Guest Post by Pat Buchanan
Neocons and war hawks are taking the position that the visible defeat of the Russian army and its expulsion from Ukraine, and Putin’s humiliation and ouster, must be America’s goals. And these goals should be nonnegotiable.
Asked if the U.S. should send troops to fight beside the Ukrainians, Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., said Sunday the time may have come.
Russian President Vladimir Putin “will only stop when we stop him,” said Coons.
“We are in a very dangerous moment where it is important that … we in Congress and the administration come to a common position about when we are willing to go the next step and to send not just arms but troops to the aid in defense of Ukraine.”
“If the answer is never, then we are inviting another level of escalation in brutality by Putin.”
In response, the White House affirmed President Joe Biden’s declaration that U.S. troops are not going to be sent to fight Russians in Ukraine, as this would open the door to World War III.
Said Biden last month: “The idea that we’re going to send in offensive equipment and have planes and tanks and trains going in with American pilots and American crews, just understand … that’s called World War III, OK? Let’s get it straight here, guys.”
Biden added, “We will not fight the third world war in Ukraine.”
Since Biden made these remarks, however, the red line against direct U.S. aid to the Ukrainian military has shifted, though the prohibition against the introduction of U.S. troops and air power has remained.
The present U.S. position might be summarized thus:
As U.S. forces fighting and killing Russians in Ukraine would ignite a U.S.-Russia war, which could escalate to nuclear war, we are not going to take that first step and risk the security and survival of our country, even if our staying out of this two-month war means the defeat of Ukraine.
Call it the Eisenhower position.
In 1956, President Dwight Eisenhower refused to use U.S. forces to intervene to halt Russian tanks from crushing the Hungarian Revolution that had risen up against Soviet occupation and rule.
Ike was unwilling to cross the Yalta line dividing Europe and chose to let the Hungarian Revolution fail rather than potentially ignite a war in which our own soldiers and nation would be at risk.
Ike literally put America first, ahead of the Hungarians.
Where does Biden’s refusal to follow Coon’s urgings leave the rival belligerents in this Ukraine-Russia war?
Putin has suffered a series of setbacks since his invasion began.
He has failed to capture any of the three largest cities in Ukraine: Kyiv, the capital, or Kharkiv, the second largest city, or Odessa, the third largest city and principal port on the Black Sea.
Putin suffered a humiliating defeat and retreat in the battle of Kyiv and has lost a fourth of the forces with which he started the war.
The flagship of Russia’s Black Sea fleet, the cruiser Moskva, has been sunk, reportedly by Ukrainian anti-ship missiles.
Yet Putin has had his successes as well.
If Mariupol, Ukraine’s major port on the Sea of Azov falls, as is expected, Putin will have his “land bridge” from Russia to Crimea. North of Crimea and in the west of Luhansk and Donetsk, Putin has also added to the lands he has held since 2014.
Russia’s capture and annexation of the Donbas could be called a victory by Putin. Capture of Kharkiv or Odessa, the latter of which would give Putin control of the entire Black Sea coast of Ukraine, making Kyiv the capital of a land-locked country, would constitute a triumph.
Which brings us to the debate now shaping up in the USA.
Neocons and war hawks are taking the position that the visible defeat of the Russian army and its expulsion from Ukraine, and Putin’s humiliation and ouster, must be America’s goals. And these goals should be nonnegotiable. Failure to achieve these ends, it is said, would amount to a defeat for NATO and the United States.
The problem with this victory scenario?
Putin has sent many signals that before he accepts the defeat of his army and country and his own removal and trial as a “war criminal” who engaged in “genocide,” he will use battlefield nuclear weapons from his arsenal of 6,000 such weapons to win the war.
Wednesday Putin announced Russia’s test of a giant new intercontinental ballistic missile.
Dissenters believe that Putin may not be bluffing, that an early and negotiated end to this war may be necessary to avoid a wider conflict that could escalate into World War III.
But, as ever, they are being charged with timidity and cowardice and letting pass a historic opportunity to administer to authoritarian Russia the defeat it invited with this invasion and that it richly deserves.
Yet, recall: To avoid war with Russia, President Harry Truman refused to breach Joseph Stalin’s Berlin Blockade. Eisenhower let the Hungarian revolution be drowned in blood and told the Brits, French and Israelis to get out of Egypt. President John F. Kennedy let the Berlin Wall go up. President Lyndon B. Johnson let the Prague Spring be crushed by the Warsaw Pact.
The sooner this war ends, the better for all.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
First Priority:
Distract from the fact that the US is already at war with Russia. And losing badly.
Pat: FIFY!
I see Putin not going along with the NWO. For that, he must pay. He is bringing Russia in alignment with a return to White centric Christianity. He’s keeping Russia as a sovereign nation that won’t accept the domination of the globalist cabal.
He wants no part of the new Bolsheviks, knowing where that leads. He is aware of history.
You will never hear both sides of the story in the main stream media. Because if you did, the media, politician’s, war hawks, RINO’s and the Biden Administration would be exposed as the hypocrites that they are.
Listen to this and pass it on. Maybe we could avoid WW3 if enough Americans understood the truth and did not lend their support to these aggressive actions against Russia. We pushed them into this corner over the last three decades and I’ve studied and watched it all… Chip
If we’re sending guns and money and we have military officers in Ukraine calling the shots, then we are already at war, aren’t we?
HSF… the U.S. has been sending military “advisors” to both start and support conflicts since the founding of the O.S.S. Having military officers in the Ukraine means we have a role in the conflict. The question of whether we have crossed the large line of having a battalion of troops on the ground is still in the air… I don’t think we have done that yet. We are sending money, guns, and advisors and I’m sure Putin expected this somewhat. At what point does Putin/Russia see our backdoor logistics as too much and start to see Americans as a target.
I do think this conflict could easily be pointed to later as the beginning of WWIII. With the massive world disruption in the supply chain and world leaders allowing it to pervade and worsen, people with nothing to lose will start to lose it.
Protect US borders first Coon! Dumbass! Chip
Putin has suffered a series of setbacks since his invasion began.
He has failed to capture any of the three largest cities in Ukraine: Kyiv, the capital, or Kharkiv, the second largest city, or Odessa, the third largest city and principal port on the Black Sea.
BULLSHIT! Putin is not interested in the capture of cities outside that which he will eventually annex. Russia is executing this military action with a surgeons blade and not the shock and awe tactics that the US used in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya. The US is the evil empire in the world today… Chip
You are correct! Anyone who spouts the MSM version of events in Ukraine is not worth listening to.
We have a group of very dangerous fools in Washington.
I think we also have some in Mariupol.
There is also one in Chicago.
Senator Coons, go to Ukraine and enlist in .the Azov Battalion .Yeah, I didn’t think so.
Contrast Ike with Johnson. One was a former warrior, 5-star general and was pro America. The other served two months as a facilities inspector and was pro General Dynamics, Colt Arms, and Bell Helicopter.