Left Libertarian: A Tradition That Champions Equality and Social Justice

Left Libertarian

Can libertarians be of the Left?

Many would laugh at such a question. After all, libertarianism tends to be a fervently pro-free market ideology. But all ideologies have their shades of grey. With libertarianism being no exception to the trend.

The left libertarian tradition is one that champions equality and social justice under the framework of a free-market economy. The leftist libertarian political economy stresses a separation of economy and state while championing mutual ownership of resources in a voluntary manner.

Left Libertarians’ Unique Views

A strong skepticism of the prevailing mixed economy defines what is a left libertarian.

Their beliefs on ownership are particularly nuanced. Natural resources such as land, oil, and trees can be subject to collective ownership. While left libertarians respect private property more than most of the prominent forces on the left, they do not fully eschew collective forms of property ownership.

Voluntary co-operatives, communes, and other worker-driven arrangements can be used to empower workers and allow them to enjoy material benefits without having to face capitalist exploitation.

Going back to natural resources, individuals in a leftist libertrian order can still use the aforementioned commonly-owned goods. But there’s a catch: The use of such resources can only occur after society grants these individuals permission. In order to gain permission, individuals must make a payment to society at large.

The Intellectual Basis for Left Libertarian Economic Thought

Such logic is inspired by the thought of 19th century economist Henry George, who pushed for a land tax. George’s views on property rights were somewhat unique by United States standards, which tended to be more rooted in classical liberalism or free-market conservatism. In contrast, George saw land as a commonly-held resource and could not be held exclusively by an individual.

This conception of land ownership stood in contrast to the views of John Locke, who believed that land could be privately owned and homesteaded by individuals. Lockean views of private property tend to be more prevalent among Republicans, right-wing libertarians, and other classical liberal adjacent movements.

The Overlap and Differences Between Leftist Libertarians and Anti-Property Movements

Left-wing libertarians have a lot in common with collectivist and Marxist views on private property, at least in a conceptual sense. Although the similarities have limits. Advocates of collectivism on the authoritarian left are more likely to use state power to achieve their ends at the expense of individual freedom.

At the end of the day, left libertarians come in all shapes. They don’t generally dismiss the insights of Marxism and incorporate some of the anti-property beliefs of the renowned left anarchist thinker Pierre-Joseph Proudhon.

Proudhon is widely viewed as the father of the political philosophy of anarchism and is famous for his quip “property is theft.”

Like libertarian socialists, the libertarians of the left go beyond concepts of self-ownership and stress the need for voluntary institutions that close inequality gaps. Left-wing libertarians sympathize with economic redistribution of resources, albeit in a voluntary manner to correct disparities in inequality.

American philosopher Gary Chartier is a prominent anarchist who blends certain facets of libertarian thought with an anarchist agenda to create a stateless society. Chartier’s brand of anarchism doesn’t take a statist approach to addressing the question of allocating resources, but his vision for a stateless society remains rather unique.

How Left Libertarians Differ From Other Libertarians

Overall, left-libertarians are not fans of corporate power.

This is in line with long-standing traditions of left anarchism and libertarian socialism that do not automatically praise big business and see corporations as extensions of state oppression.

This lies in contrast to more right-leaning libertarians, who tend to be influenced by economists such as Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek. This more conventional pro-business sect doesn’t have problems with big business per se.

Pro-capitalist strains of anarchism such as anarcho-capitalism also tend to favor capitalist institutions and don’t view corporations as negatively. Non-aggression and self-ownership are put on a pedestal by right libertarians.

The Right Libertarian Focus on Markets and Private Property

General libertarian theory tends to focus heavily on free markets, individual rights, freedom of association, and limiting state involvement in the economy. Some of the libertarians more influenced by philosopher Ayn Rand and economist Murray Rothbard tend to be stauncher defenders of capitalism.

In light of these basic principles, the typical libertarian doesn’t spend much time talking about social justice. They don’t hold egalitarian beliefs and emphasize natural rights like right wing libertarians and anarchists.

The Leftist Libertarian View of Inequality

Proponents of left libertarianism believe that there are structural forms of inequality and injustice that certain disadvantaged groups have faced in society. For the sake of maintaining a dignified society, they believe that these social problems must be addressed.

By contrast, right-libertarians do not have problems with natural hierarchies or social traditions per se. In fact, they see them as a natural part of life that should not merit state activism to supposedly “correct.”

Leftist libertarian views on hierarchies are rather nuanced. Some argue that certain leadership structures in society are rooted in backwards, authoritarian institutions that inhibit certain personal and political freedoms.

Left-wing libertarians don’t categorically reject egalitarianism. They believe that a non-state approach of activating communal activism can reach this goal. Many right-wing critics of left libertarianism, who tend to be more individualist and receptive of private ownership of resources, take issue with certain premises of the libertarian left.

For proponents of right-libertarianism, left libertarians come off as bleeding hearts who fail to acknowledge that certain forms of inequality are natural and inevitable aspects of the human condition. Right libertarians believe that holding pro-egalitarian premises lends credence to state-promoted efforts to socially reconstruct society.

How Left Libertarians Differ From Contemporary Liberals

A left wing libertarian may at first appear to have similarities with proponents of left wing liberalism, given their affinities to addressing issues of racial and social inequities that they perceive to be enduring features of contemporary society.

A libertarian leftist, however, would be much more hesitant towards using the administrative state to solve these perceived problems.

Similarly, advocates of left-libertarianism would also be uneasy about “woke” corporations taking up the mantle of fighting “systemic racism.” For them, these gestures are PR stunts that obscure some of the more egregious acts of corporate malfeasance that big business is involved in.

To the libertarians of the left, big business works in tandem with the state, as evidenced by the granting of subsidies and other forms of state privilege that benefit well-established corporations.

Unlike social democrats, modern liberals, and other left-leaning proponents of mixed economies, left libertarians want to rethink the current political economic paradigm altogether.

The Consensus on Foreign Policy Restraint

Those of the libertarian left persuasion are staunch non-interventionists. On this issue, they are in line with the overwhelming majority of libertarians. The only time war is justified is when a political community suffers a direct attack.

However, libertarian leftists view wars as imperialist ventures that transfer wealth from the poor to politically-connected defense enterprises.

The libertarian left agreed with the New Left on the opposition to conflicts such as the Vietnam war and would form transpartisan alliances to rise against the warfare state. One of the most well-known figures from the New Left that served as an inspiration to the libertarian left was the American linguist Noam Chomsky,

Chomsky would later become one of the leading voices of leftist anarchist thought in the U.S. His firm critiques of the U.S. government’s expansive foreign policy have made him an icon in anti-war circles.

Left-libertarianism sees the perpetual wars of the past century as tools to not only bring destruction abroad, but also curtail civil liberties at home.

Political Strategy of the Libertarian Left

Libertarian leftists are not necessarily political in the sense that they involve themselves in partisan politics. The Libertarian Party does have some left-libertarian factions in its ranks, but these sects tend to be more involved in more grassroots political efforts, academia, or influencing general culture. The more liberal libertarians who hold conventional beliefs about limited government are more likely to partake in Libertarian Party politics.

Undoubtedly, libertarians of the left would eschew activism within the Republican Party. Leftists libertarians do not see eye-to-eye with movement conservatism on a host of economic and social issues. In the later case, the libertarian left would argue that traditional conservative beliefs generate massive polarization.

Leftist libertarians tend to be pro-choice and pro-gay marriage, arguing that efforts to regulate these activities impedes on people’s ability to exercise their individual freedoms

Concluding Thoughts

It would be misleading to suggest that left libertarians are directly descended from the likes of thinkers such as Karl Marx. Indeed, they do share beliefs that align with marxist and anarcho-syndicalist thinkers.

However, libertarians of the left do offer a unique take on building a more just society without having to use a heavy-handed state to realize this vision. In addition, the leftist libertarian tradition provides thoughtful critiques on excessive corporate power.

Libertarian leftists do not promise utopia, but they do offer an alternative path that appeals to a wide spectrum of people disaffected by the current state of American politics. Like most unorthodox political philosophies, leftist libertarian ideas are worthy of vigorous debate.

In a time dominated by outrage politics and sensationalism, the left libertarian vision for society is perhaps a reasonable approach in finding a unique way to solve society’s current problems.

Left Libertarian: A Tradition That Champions Equality and Social Justice originally appeared at Libertas Bella

Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise

Author: Libertas Bella

Libertas Bella. It’s Latin for “beautiful liberty." We chose the name for a few reasons, one of them being that we cherish liberty whether it’s our own or anyone else’s. Libertas Bella has been featured on FEE.org, LewRockwell.com, Activist Post, PJ Media, and ZeroHedge.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
15 Comments
hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
June 22, 2022 6:58 am

leadership structures in society are rooted in backwards, authoritarian institutions

I had to read that several times to make any sense of it. The adjective backwards throws it off a bit because it isn’t a proper descriptor- traditional? existing? but backwards? I don’t know what that means in this context.

Bottom line is that if there is leadership- in any sense of the word- then there must be some form of authority, particularly if we are talking about institutions and structures.

Seems to me that left or right, libertarians- in general- incline towards the same kind of Utopian ideals as the standard progressive. They want something that has never existed, based on human behavior found only on the fringes of society. In general most of the libertarians I have met are pretty nice people, inoffensive and genial, but not very rooted in reality.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  hardscrabble farmer
June 22, 2022 10:37 am

…..says the flat earther.

Arcayer
Arcayer
  hardscrabble farmer
June 22, 2022 1:03 pm

As an anarchist, I propose treating government like a disease.

That is-
A: Government is always bad.
B: Government is not always easy to eradicate.
C: Some governments are worse than others.

If you just press the [kill all governments] button, you’ll have new governments tomorrow, because you haven’t done anything about the underlying causes of government. Real government control requires a healthy ideology, a healthy culture and a healthy environment. And even if you do a really good job, small annoying governments which aren’t worth the effort of stamping out will still spring up.

This cedes the statist point that actually eliminating government is unrealistic. I think there’s even a wrong form of anarchism that goes after government like modern society hunting covid, and that would be bad. I also hold that the overton window is nowhere near that ideology, and we could get huge gains with a more eliminationist less tolerant outlook.

Fleabaggs
Fleabaggs
June 22, 2022 7:14 am

All the descriptions of Libertarianism taken together in this article sounds like the product of an unemployed linguistical contortionist.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Fleabaggs
June 22, 2022 2:43 pm

Flea, you nailed it. Way too much hairsplitting to be healthy. Its part of what I call White man syndrome. Western Europeans are genetically inclined to create divisions wherever possible. Nations, religions, tribes etc. We might have a chance if we’d learn to focus on our common ground. Not to be.

Anonymous
Anonymous
June 22, 2022 7:28 am

If not for the bad rap National Socialism makes the most sense to me. Relatively small, high trust nations of high intelligence people lead by strong but humble monarchs of some kind who were committed only to the welfare of their nations. Democratic principles would flow from and to the monarch. High intelligence people are capable of self government without a lot of oversight. A military and police force would be only large enough for national defense and social order. The people would be well-armed. There would be free trade among nations without the regulatory/predatory restrictions we have today. In a high trust nation, social services and utilities would be socialized because citizens would be willing to share resources among people with whom they share kinship and culture. Shame would return as a way to manage behavior.

It might be possible to create autonomous states in the US who outsource military protection services to Washington.

Fleabaggs
Fleabaggs
  Anonymous
June 22, 2022 7:38 am

You were doing good til that final sentence. Outsource military protection to the tranny corps?

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  Anonymous
June 22, 2022 7:50 am

The District of Corruption would place unbearable strings on any “protection” they provided.

Fleabaggs
Fleabaggs
June 22, 2022 7:46 am

Libertarania.
A fictional Shangri La whose capitol is Galt. Nestled somewhere in a hidden valley in the Southern Andes and inhabited by hedonistic cheapskates called Libertarians.

Anonymous
Anonymous
June 22, 2022 8:51 am

Their “Championing of Equality and Justice” only happens with jack boots and guns. So, No.

Shotgun Trooper
Shotgun Trooper
June 22, 2022 9:50 am

Anything to the left of center requires coercion, ultimately at gunpoint.

flash
flash
June 22, 2022 10:31 am

LOLbertz = pot, butt and stupid. That’s it . I’m ashamed to say I once called myself a Libertarian. Ir was a massive waste of time. Only low intellect idiots believe Capitalism is anything but another debt slave trap, just like it’s big sister , Marxism. It’s all bullshit.

comment image

comment image

beau
beau
June 22, 2022 11:48 am

there is nothing wrong with the dictum ‘hurt no person, or their property’, the basic principle of libertarianism, from which all law should arise.

Mustang
Mustang
June 22, 2022 12:03 pm

A Libertarian is a Conservative who cannot defend his positions.

Arcayer
Arcayer
  Mustang
June 22, 2022 1:18 pm

Libertarianism is not in itself, a complete ideology. It’s a stance on one issue. There’s just so many statists, that it feels like libertarianism is an ideology, because almost every group is proposing some sort of [let’s make a law], and our response is always the same.

Once you’ve disavowed the state, you realize that there’s a lot of things that still need to happen, and there’s still an open debate about what those things are.

If asked whether I’m more a right libertarian or left, mostly right, though I actually do side with left libertarians on a lot of issues, particularly neo-georgism. (I don’t like rule by ghosts, and am particularly worried that if you just parcel out the earth, or the light cone, IE the, everything should have an owner philosophy, you’ll get government again in a few generations, because a few elites will own everything and only ever rent it out, and the people around them never agreed to this because they didn’t exist when the property was being distributed (or homesteaded).)

On the other hand, I think evil people, as well the stupid and weak, should just die. This is definitely a right wing position. I support drug freedom, not so much because I sympathize with people who take drugs, but because I think selling them drugs is a good way to kill them.

In sum, the point is, there’s a lot of work to be done after the “kill the statists” phase, and plenty of disagreements over just what work should be done and how. There’s also issues of why, which sometimes matters at even later stages, though it has no bearing on present action.