Guest Post by Igor Chudov
Is “Vaccinated Blood” Safe?
A new study was just published by Castruita et al.
The scientists, while studying “something else” related to hepatitis, decided to test blood samples of their patients who got vaccinated for COVID-19 with mRNA vaccines for the presence of vaccine mRNA.
Their approach was comprehensive:
- They looked at vaccinated and unvaccinated persons to have a control group.
- They distinguished between vaccine mRNA and viral RNA of Sars-Cov-2
- They were careful to avoid contaminants showing up as positive reads for vaccine mRNA
- They distinguished, in their analyses, between Moderna and Pfizer mRNA genetic codes. These two vaccines encode the same spike proteins but contain different nucleotides (this is called codon optimization)
I am proud of Castruita et al. for being meticulous with their analyses. I wish all “COVID research” was done with such in-depth safeguards against mistakes.
This is what they found:
We surprisingly found fragments of COVID-19 vaccine mRNA up to 28 days postvaccination in blood from chronic HCV patients vaccinated with mRNA vaccines from both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.
…
of the 108 patient samples, 10 samples (9.3%) had partial or up to full sequences of the vaccine mRNA sequence (Fig. 1), identified from one to 28 days postvaccination. There was ~100% identity between the detected mRNA nucleotide sequences found in plasma and the specific mRNA vaccine given. The 10 samples had a median of 5.5 million raw read pairs available (see Table S1). Breadth and depth of coverage of the vaccine mRNA sequences ranged from completeness and >20 000, respectively, to short fragments with a depth of coverage of 100 (Fig. 1). None of the negative or the HCV-positive controls had SARS-CoV-2 matching reads.
They identified blood samples containing vaccine mRNA as late as 28 days after administering vaccine doses.
I am not sure how the 108 samples were spaced temporally. Therefore, we do not know with certainty whether much fewer patients have mRNA in their blood by Day 28, compared to, for example, Day 14. Various samples (compare the day 14 sample from one patient with Day 15 Pfizer sample from another patient) contain wildly inconsistent amounts of mRNA. If I were to guess, if more samples were analyzed, the authors would find greatly varying amounts of mRNA, even for the same sampling days post-vaccine, in different persons.
Is Vaccinated Blood Free of COVID Vaccine?
The question is rhetorical, and the above study proved that the answer is no.
mRNA Covid vaccine is present in some vaccinated blood for at least 28 days (this is the maximum that the study authors tested for).
Is such blood safe or unsafe? It is not a question that I can answer based on just the above study. However, there was a sad story of a baby who developed a blood clot and died after getting a vaccinated blood transfusion.
According to the study results, 9.3% of vaccinated blood samples could be contaminated with Covid vaccine mRNA.
It is possible that “baby Alex” was one of the unlucky recipients of blood having a large amount of Covid vaccine mRNA.
Good News for Vaccinated People
Despite debunking the myth of “vaccine staying at the injection site” and another myth of “vaccinated blood does not contain vaccine mRNA,” the study also shows that 98 samples out of 108 did NOT have vaccine mRNA detected. This means that while we should be upset about being lied to, most people who received Covid vaccines did not have their blood contaminated with the vaccine. Only a minority (a sizable one) did.
Vaccinated Blood Health Concerns
People’s concerns about accepting Covid-vaccinated blood transfusions are not baseless, as we know. The study shows 9.3% of blood samples contain mRNA nanoparticles from Covid vaccines. However, as time passes after the last dose, the amount of contamination likely declines in quantity and frequency of occurrence.
The problem is that we never know what blood we are receiving!
Rejecting a much-needed blood transfusion is also very risky. Transfusions are given when the recipient is at risk of dying, after all. All this explains strong demand for unvaccinated blood.
What do you think we should do about this?
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
The test went to 28 days, What about 2 years. 5 years after multiple boosters? Not adequate.
How is the decline encouraged?
How old is the blood that is from another body?
Does the decline continue after being removed and stored?
I have no idea what this means.
You take a drug and it shows up in your system? Isn’t that the object of taking the drug?
I take it to mean “If you don’t want the drug, don’t accept tainted blood”.
Most people getting transfusions aren’t really in the position to say no, are they?
Well, yes they are.
I had a procedure done a few months ago. They asked if I consented to have a blood transfusion if it became necessary (highly unlikely).
Me: Not unless it is from my wife or you can guarantee that it is from a pureblood.
Nurse: What if your wife is not readily available ?
Me: So be it, I know where I’m going in the end of this earthly realm.
Hope all is well up at the farm!
Great to see your name up again.
We’re solid as can be expected. Still watching these morons with a mix of trepidation and awe.
Glad you were clear about the blood thing, didn’t know that was even an option once you’re under their control. I’d have thought they’d have made it next to impossible to stay clean once they started down the path of everyone must take the shot, by hook or by crook.
Yeah, you can’t trust these people once you’re sedated. The was a couple in WA state that lined up un-“vacccinated” blood for their baby who needed a transfusion; when it came time, the evil doctors/nurses said they couldn’t locate it and then used the “normal” supply.
It depends..If it’s from.a.sudden emergency, then there’s not much you can do. But if it’s from a planned procedure you have a couple of options. You can bank your own blood, or get an unvaccinated donor to make a directed blood donation for you, or a combination of the two.
No, most people have very little choice unless death is a option. Most people don’t really plan their emergency surgeries.
The mRNA jab was supposed to STAY PUT, not go merrily circulating throughout the body….another LIE from our overlords. (crimes against humanity). They are injected into muscle tissue specifically for this purpose (versus IV or taken orally, etc. and absorbed into the blood stream). Bigger issue is that the unjabbed getting the blood will now suddenly become jabbed.
My neighbor who took all the shots, including the latest booster recently admitted to me that he contracted Covid , but because he was vaccinated, he survived…ha ha ha… a retired government employee…they’re all dumb as shit. .
Just had a friend (3 shots) who was talking about family who took an Alaskan cruise (also three shots). The entire boat got Covid. His family member got EXTREMELY ill. His response: I can’t imagine how bad it would have been without the shots. My response: or maybe they just don’t work.
A real head scratcher for sure….
They always say that it would have been worse if they hadn’t had the jab. Apparently it’s a mantra of their religion to do so.
When from all appearances it appears that the jab makes it worse.
So, how much is a pint of pureblood going for these days?
At The Dracula Pub,
Pureblood pints are £70.
..most people who received Covid vaccines did not have their blood contaminated with the vaccine.
So the stuff’s not just Safe and Effective™, but magic, too.
Isn’t The Science® just WOW!?
That would lend credence to the idea that many lots were either straight up saline, or contained no mRNA (or perhaps degraded to nothing due to expiry, bad storage, etc.).
Who didn’t know this from day one? Whatever you inject in your body circulates in the blood….duh.
Nope, not the way typical intramuscular vaccines are supposed to work. They specifically said that this mRNA would STAY PUT – just another lie of course. Not everything makes its way into the bloodstream.
The key phrase is “supposed to work”. We know that many people got Spanish Flu from vaccines and lots of people got Polio from vaccines so it appears that staying put is just a theory.
Vaccinated Blood is Contaminated with COVID Vaccine mRNA, Study Finds
That someone was paid to check the vaccinated for traces of vaccine speaks volumes.
Interesting since several independent labs found no mnra at all. They had to get them ‘illegally’- so bizarre. Even good drs were somewhat unbelieving. But there you are.
They found a lot of other stuff and it seems like they (the vaxxx) were filthy.
I have a transplant condition from a genetic kidney disorder and immune compromised and cannot even receive a tetanus shot or booster among many other restrictions like a mRNA genetic altering vaccine .
Screen the blood donors and what the hell offer a bonus gift card for pure blood take it out of the Suicide arms shipment of cash to Ukrainian CIA PUPPETS and BONUSES FOR NAZIS