Doug Casey on the Debt Ceiling Farce and Why the US Should Declare Bankruptcy

Via International Man

Debt Ceiling Farce

International Man: The US federal government has raised the so-called debt ceiling 104 times since 1944.

Shouldn’t they call it a debt target instead of a debt ceiling?

Is this whole thing a farce?

Doug Casey: The situation is completely and irredeemably out of control. It’s a farce. Quite laughable, except for the fact it’s so deadly serious.

Can they reduce the debt ceiling or the amount of debt? Or even slow down its growth at this point? No.

The situation is beyond redemption because most US government expenditures go to pay entitlements—Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, and numerous other types of welfare.

Those things will be very hard to cut at this point; breaking the doggy dishes of millions of corrupted Americans would cause unrest. Plus, the so-called “defense” budget, which mostly supports the military/industrial complex while fomenting conflict. It’s actually much larger than disclosed because it should include $50 billion of foreign aid, the cost of running outrageously large embassies over the world, the CIA, and black budgets of all types.

Meanwhile, all US government agencies are bent on expanding themselves. The bureaucrats who run them realize that if they don’t grow the budget every year, they reduce their chances of going from one GS level to the next. Their success is based upon managing more people and spending more money. Naturally, all these agencies grow like cancers.

As a result, the “debt ceiling” is a fiction. It will stay out of control unless there is a total reorganization of the government—which itself would be risky. And that’s not going to happen until we have a financial catastrophe that leaves absolutely no alternative.

International Man: You have previously stated the US government should default on the national debt.

What are the reasons for that?

Doug Casey: I know it sounds outrageous to propose the US government default on its national debt. Of course, they don’t think it will ever be necessary because, as several high-level government officials have pointed out, they can just print money to pay off the debt.

However, I disagree. What are the reasons for doing something as seemingly catastrophic as defaulting on the debt? I’ll give you at least five. Stick with me. Let’s conduct an outrageous but not unreasonable thought experiment.

First, barring default, future generations of Americans will be turned into serfs to pay off the debt. Profligate people have run up the debt, but everybody’s children and grandchildren are stuck with having to pay it off. That’s simply immoral. If you have any care for the future at all, future generations should be saved from becoming serfs to pay it off.

Second, it would punish the enablers who lend the US government money. People who lend the US government money facilitate it by doing all the stupid and destructive things it does. They shouldn’t be rewarded; they should be punished.

Third, official default is better than the alternative. It’s like a hundred-story building that’s about to collapse. If that’s the case, should you wait until it collapses randomly and unpredictably, or should you have a controlled demolition? It’s not a pleasant alternative, but it’s the better alternative.

Fourth, default would make further borrowing on the part of the US government impossible, at least for a while. It would be exposed as an untrustworthy entity, like the Argentine government, which defaults all the time. People would still idiotically lend it more money, but a default might slow down the rate of increase in the US government’s size.

Fifth, it’s almost necessary that the debt goes away to help de-financialize the US economy. The US is tremendously over-financialized. It’s all about buying, selling, creating, and packaging financial instruments. Government debt, with the help of the Fed, is the actual engine of inflation. Defaulting on the national debt would pave the way for the reinstitution of a sound, redeemable, commodity-based money. People would have to concentrate more on real wealth than phony financial wealth, actual engineering, as opposed to financial and social engineering.

Of course, an objection reasonable people would make is: “If you default on the debt, it’s going to be a catastrophe.”

My answer is that just because all the paper debt of the US government goes away doesn’t mean the real wealth in the world will disappear. The farms, factories, technologies, and the skills of the workers, will still exist. But on a sound foundation. And with some new owners.

Furthermore, I’d point out that the US Government isn’t “we the people.” It’s become a discreet entity with its own interests, like a giant corporation. If it declares bankruptcy, it’s a problem for its employees and clients much more than for you, the taxpayer.

Those are some of the arguments I’d make for defaulting on the national debt. But it’s just a rather academic thought experiment. The powers-that-be will prefer to build the current house of cards higher, probably propping it up with FX controls, Central Bank Digital Currencies, a Social Credit System, much higher taxes, more inflation, price controls, and god knows what else in the years to come.

The default will happen, but more gradually, through the subtle fraud of inflation, which is actually the very worst and most dishonest way to default.

International Man: Paul Krugman and other mainstream economists have proposed the US government issue a trillion-dollar coin to buy up the federal debt.

That “serious” people can put forward such a clownish solution illustrates that it’s all a ridiculous charade.

What is your take?

Doug Casey: When you’re using funny money as a substitute for real money, it’s inevitable that soothsayers will come up with ridiculous solutions. Krugman isn’t an economist; he’s a political apologist. And a fool. He doesn’t describe the way the world works, but the way he’d like to make it work—using coercion and fraud, not voluntarism and the market. Every idea he has is so stupid that it’s criminal.

The solution to this problem is to go back to a commodity money. Money should be, once again, just a medium of exchange and a store of value. It could no longer be used as a political football.

And the US government should be cut in size by 50, 75%, or 95%. Who knows how deeply you can cut the size of the US government until you try doing it? But it’s necessary, at least if what’s left of the idea of America is going to survive.

Using commodity money will, itself, greatly downsize the US government. The US State has become a behemoth and a parasite. It’s a far bigger danger to the average American than the Russians, the Chinese, the Iranians, or all of them together. Returning to sound money and a tiny government would make for a more pleasant, prosperous, and safer world– although the process of doing it would be unpleasant for some people.

On the bright side, the only people who will be seriously hurt are the parasites living off the government. I say to hell with the parasites. They should be inconvenienced.

International Man: It’s hard to believe the US government was ever debt-free.

But it happened once—in 1835—thanks to President Andrew Jackson. He was the first and only president to completely pay off the national debt.

Jackson also shut down the Second Bank of the United States, the precursor to the Federal Reserve, the US’s current iteration of a central bank.

It’s unthinkable a modern US president could or would do such things.

Given the practical reality of the world today, where do you see the federal debt going, and what are the implications?

Doug Casey: It was wonderful that Andrew Jackson paid off the national debt, something that Alexander Hamilton, with his warped ideas of economics, sold to the country. But it’s now absolutely impossible to pay off $32 trillion of acknowledged debt, scores of trillions of contingent liabilities, and scores of trillions more of unacknowledged debt.

I’d like to point out that there actually have been previous defaults by the US government. For example, Abraham Lincoln, during the War between the States, defaulted by printing up so-called Greenback currency.

Roosevelt defaulted on the debt by fraudulently devaluing the dollar, raising the price of gold from $20.50 to $35, but only after confiscating it from citizens. That was a default. Then there was Nixon, in 1971, defaulting on the promise to pay foreign governments at $35 gold. Now the dollar is only worth 1/2000th of an ounce of gold.

International Man: Is there any way to turn lemons into lemonade and profit from this situation?

Doug Casey: Let’s not sugarcoat the situation. The real question is how to profit from the collapse of an overextended and corrupt empire.

It makes sense to look at the historical precedent, like the Roman Empire. Was there any way to profit from the collapse of the Roman Empire? Well, some people did, I suppose. But the standard of living collapsed for almost all its residents during the ensuing Dark Ages.

Is there any way to profit from the collapse of Western civilization? That’s so serious that it’s almost like asking whether it’s possible to profit from an asteroid hitting the Earth. The best you can hope to do is insulate yourself as much as possible.

At this point, the best way to be hurt least, or possibly even profit within a very bad scenario, is to own gold, silver, and other commodities. And to improve your skills as a speculator. Remember, most of the real wealth in the world is still going to exist; it’s just going to change ownership.

Editor’s Note: We’re on the cusp of a global economic crisis that could eclipse anything we’ve seen before. Most people won’t be prepared for what’s coming…

That’s precisely why bestselling author and legendary speculator Doug Casey and his team just released this urgent PDF report on how to survive and thrive in this chaotic environment. Click here to download it now.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
16 Comments
Stucky
Stucky
May 4, 2023 4:01 pm

As in religion … faith matters. ALL financial markets throughout the entire world would lose faith in the United States. Then what happens?

Stocks fall. The dollar weakens drastically, perhaps even bordering on worthless paper. America’s credit rating turns to shit. Interest rates skyrocket. Getting loans becomes next to impossible … the credit squeeze making it virtually impossible for American companies to operate. Overnight millions of families will lose whatever regular Federal payments that help them to make ends meet, or even keep them alive. Enormous civil unrest and violence will follow. A Depression will surely follow. That’s only the beginning of the bad shit. Well … that’s what I’ve heard.

But I ain’t no finance-economics guy, so what the fuck do I know? All I can say is it seems to be a rather stupid idea.

OTOH, it’s a very very simple idea; “Hey, let’s just fucken default!”. People like simple. Even when a caveman can understand it. Simple requires minimal to zero thinking. Yeah, so let’s just fucken do a Great Big Do-Over and see what happens … how bad can it be? Well, frankly my dear, I don’t want to find out.

Disclaimer: For all you smart asses out there just itching to type ===”Do you have any better ideas??!!!!”. No, I don’t. So, there.

GNL
GNL
  Stucky
May 4, 2023 4:33 pm

Jubilee

Stucky
Stucky
  GNL
May 4, 2023 5:01 pm

Unicorn farts.

Tom MacGyver
Tom MacGyver
  Stucky
May 4, 2023 5:36 pm

Soooo… your solution is to just let the monster keep on feeding… Uhh… NO!

Start with this: DEPORT EVERY ILLEGAL ALIEN.

Follow this with: CLOSE THE BORDER! I mean CLOSE IT! Use OUR MILITARY to defend OUR COUNTRY from invasion for a change CHANGE!!!

Then move on to : GUT WELFARE. MAKE IT A TWO YEAR MAX. ANY CHILDREN BORN TO THE WELFARE BUMS AFTER GOING ONTO WELFARE ARE NOT COVERED.

Next stop: NO MORE “POLICE ACTION” WARS!!! If war isn’t sanctioned by CONGRESS, we DON’T GO THERE!!! While on that tack, SCREW NATO!!!

Moving along: NO MORE “FOREIGN AID!” AND TELL THE UN TO POUND SAND!!!

..Lather, rinse, repeat…

“I ain’t no finance-economics guy” either, but one need not be a genius to live within one’s means, nor to know one’s being FLEECED!!!

Toujours Pret
Toujours Pret
  Tom MacGyver
May 4, 2023 8:19 pm

And take back the creation and regulation of the value thereof of the american dollar (not the frn) after cleansing the house of reps + of all treasonous cretins. If that were to happen what a worldwide “party” that would be.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Tom MacGyver
May 5, 2023 8:03 am

You forgot to include Social Security and Medicare in your call to end welfare.

mona
mona
  Anonymous
May 6, 2023 2:53 pm

How about just changing Social Security back to its intended purpose – return on a forced investment made by WORKING U.S. citizens who should be the only ones benefitting. Of course, the SS contribution fund was melded, by Lyndon Johnson, into a unified fund. Before that, Social Security was running at a surplus – coincidence?

Bauls
Bauls
  Tom MacGyver
May 6, 2023 9:23 pm

Lol, they gonna double down on not doing your recommendations

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
May 4, 2023 4:54 pm

Rothbard’s thoughts on the subject:
https://mises.org/wire/why-not-repudiate-national-debt

Anonymous
Anonymous
  MrLiberty
May 4, 2023 5:23 pm

repudiate the national government

repudiate vt (L repudium divorce) 1. to divorce or separate formally from (a woman) 2. to refuse to have anything to do with: disown 3. a: to refuse to accept: esp to reject as unauthorized or as having no binding force b: to reject as untrue or unjust 4. to refuse to acknowledge or pay

Rothbard chose definition #4. I think #2 and #3 are good for govt. Followed by definition #1 with respect to about half of our alleged “countrymen”.

Tom MacGyver
Tom MacGyver
May 4, 2023 5:19 pm

“The situation is beyond redemption because most US government expenditures go to pay entitlements—Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, and numerous other types of welfare.”

NEWSFLASH, Doug; Social Security is NOT an “entitlement,” neither is it a “(type) of welfare!” Y’see, we PAY INTO Social Security with the EXPECTATION of being able to DRAW ON IT when we retire! We have no choice in this! I hardly quantify myself as a “corrupted American” when I expect to get back what has been PROMISED TO ME my entire working life as money has been CONFISCATED from my every paycheck! You lost me right there…

That being said, I say call the Fed’s bluff. Let that drop-dead date pass. Let the chips fall where they may. If there’s enough money to finance FIVE MILLION-PLUS ILLEGAL ALIENS and the accompanying burgeoning Welfare state, there’s enough for Social Security!

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Tom MacGyver
May 5, 2023 8:11 am

Wrong.
Social security IS welfare, always was. And a Ponzi scheme to boot, from day one.
You “paid in” nothing to no one. You were robbed in order that your robbers could give your wealth to others.
You tolerated it because the robbers promised that one day they would steal from others to pay you a portion of what they had taken from you.
Thou shalt not steal.

mona
mona
  Anonymous
May 6, 2023 2:55 pm

Read your history – before Lyndon Johnson ended the specific Social Security fund and placed it into a unified fund, it was running at a surplus. It should have been left alone.

Bauls
Bauls
  mona
May 6, 2023 9:29 pm

Those of us an the40-50 range know all the bs deductions taken and not invested will never see a dime of that wasted money. But I don’t worry, the uniparty has a spectacular solution

i forget
i forget
May 4, 2023 8:42 pm

above the ceiling is the attic where all the crazy uncles are warehoused. slice that off. move it a safe distance away. raze that.

since unicorn farts are in the air …

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 5, 2023 7:07 am

That is not going to happen. Who would lend the government money after the default? The only money the government would get is what they can extract in taxes, and if they tried to maintain the current rate of spending there would actually be an armed revolution by taxpayers. Yet if they cut back, their base that benefits from all those “free” programs would revolt too. Better to kick the can down the road and hope they die of old age before most of the people figure it all out.