Taking Vitamin D Daily May Reduce Cancer Mortality by 12%

Via Mercola

Story at-a-glance

  • A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis found daily vitamin D supplementation reduced cancer mortality by a significant 12%
  • Daily vitamin D supplementation was particularly beneficial for people aged 70 and over, as well as those who took vitamin D daily and were later diagnosed with cancer
  • Among people who took daily vitamin D doses of 5,000 IU to 50,000 IU daily, no adverse effects were found
  • Past research has found women with a vitamin D level at or above 60 ng/mL (150 nmol/L) had an 82% lower risk of breast cancer compared to those with levels below 20 ng/mL
  • To optimize your vitamin D levels, regular sun exposure is the best option; however, if you’re unable to get adequate sun exposure each day, supplementation may be necessary

On a typical sunny day, your body may produce up to 25,000 international units (IU) of vitamin D.1 Yet, in the U.S., the average daily recommended intake is only 600 IU for people between the ages of 1 and 70, and 800 IU for those over 70.2

These amounts are likely far too low for most people to optimize their vitamin D levels and take advantage of all the related health benefits — like a reduced risk of dying from cancer.3 The fact is, adequate daily sun exposure over a large portion of your skin is the best way to increase and maintain your vitamin D levels.

But many people either don’t get outdoors enough to achieve this, or live in areas where it’s too cold to comfortably do so for much of the year. While you should strive to get sensible sun exposure as much as possible, since it offers important benefits beyond vitamin D, research also shows that daily vitamin D supplementation is safe4 and significantly advantageous for your health.

Daily Vitamin D Lowers Cancer Mortality by 12%

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the U.S., after heart disease.5 Yet, despite the fact that so many people are dying of this condition — and vitamin D could help — health officials rarely recommend vitamin D for cancer prevention or treatment.

A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis published in Ageing Research Reviews found vitamin D3 supplementation reduced cancer mortality by 6%. This wasn’t considered statistically significant, but when only studies involving daily vitamin D intake were analyzed, cancer mortality dropped by a significant 12%.6 According to the researchers:7

“From a biological perspective, it is plausible that a sufficient vitamin D status has an impact on cancer prognosis: by binding to the vitamin D receptor (VDR), the active hormone 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) influences signaling pathways that regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and cell survival, and thus acts as an anti-proliferative agent in many tissues and can slow the growth of malignant cells.”

Meanwhile, risks of lung cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, bladder cancer and lymphoma are higher in people with low vitamin D levels, while having higher levels is associated with a better prognosis in cases of breast and colorectal cancers.8

The Ageing Research Reviews study further revealed that daily vitamin D supplementation was particularly beneficial for people aged 70 and over, as well as those who took vitamin D daily and were later diagnosed with cancer. Study author Ben Schöttker, Ph.D., with the German Cancer Research Center in Heidelberg, explained:9

“This does imply that basically everyone aged 50 and older, including people who have never had cancer, might profit from vitamin D supplementation if they are vitamin D insufficient … Doctors cannot know who might develop cancer at a later time.

However, in Germany, the risk [of developing] cancer once in life is very high — 43% for women and 51% for men — and thus, the chance to treat someone who might profit from that in the future is quite high … the lifetime risk to develop cancer is comparable in most other industrialized countries.”

Many Studies Show Vitamin D Lowers Risk of Cancer Death

Other research also supports vitamin D’s role in protecting against cancer death. In one study of 25,871 patients, vitamin D supplementation was found to reduce the risk for metastatic cancer and death by 17%. The risk was reduced by as much as 38% among those who also maintained a healthy weight.10,11

What’s particularly noteworthy is this study only gave participants 2,000 IU of vitamin D daily and didn’t measure their blood levels. Despite these research flaws, a significant benefit was still found. However, other research has found even more striking benefits.

Take, for example, a GrassrootsHealth analysis published in June 2018 in PLOS ONE. It showed women with a vitamin D level at or above 60 ng/mL (150 nmol/L) had an 82% lower risk of breast cancer compared to those with levels below 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L).12

An earlier U.K. study found that having a vitamin D level above 60 ng/mL resulted in an 83% lower breast cancer risk,13,14 which is nearly identical to GrassrootsHealth’s 2018 analysis. Another meta-analysis looking at breast cancer reviewed 70 observational studies, finding that for each 2 ng/mL (5 nmol/L) increase in vitamin D level there was a corresponding 6% decrease in breast cancer incidence.15

Overall, this translates into a 71% reduced risk when you increase your vitamin D level from 20 ng/mL to 60 ng/mL (50 to 150 nmol/L).16 Similarly, a Canadian study showed that women who reported having the most sun exposure from ages 10 to 19 had a significantly reduced risk of developing breast cancer.17

Download this Article Before it Disappears

Download PDF

Did High-Dose Vitamin D Cure Pancreatic Cancer?

Vitamin D may even help in cases of pancreatic cancer, one of the deadliest forms of cancer with a five-year survival rate of just 7.2%.18 Researchers published the case of an 83-year-old woman with pancreatic cancer “who errantly took supratherapeutic doses of vitamin D 50,000 U daily, achieving a serum 25(OH)D level of more than 150 ng/mL, with no appreciable side effects.”

Personally, I strongly disagree with high dose therapy as it is unnecessary and non-biological and if you are supplementing I would recommend taking it once a day.

Eight months after diagnosis — and consistent daily intake of high-dose vitamin D — scans revealed “no evidence of disease progression.” Further, the researchers noted, “Currently she describes as feeling quite well with no difficulty accomplishing her activities of daily living.” They called for further research to investigate:19

“One cannot conclude that her vitamin D dose was in any way related to this outcome. There is only one CT scan before the initiation of vitamin D, and there is no way to know what her pace of disease would have been in the absence of vitamin D supplementation. In addition, she was taking several other supplements such as shitake mushrooms, although inconsistently and for a shorter duration, which were also intended to treat her malignancy.

Nonetheless, given the poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer and the limited treatment options for patients, this case should stimulate further investigation. The daily dose of 50,000 U of vitamin D3 was well tolerated in our patient for over 10 months at the time of writing. Consideration should be given to a clinical trial that evaluates a similar dose.”

High-Dose Vitamin D Deemed ‘Safe,’ Beneficial

There’s a lot of controversy over taking higher doses of vitamin D, in part because excessive vitamin D, particularly in combination with lack of vitamin K2 and magnesium, may cause overabsorption of calcium, which in turn may result in calcium deposits in your heart and kidneys.

A team of researchers conducted routine vitamin D screenings on more than 4,700 hospital patients upon admission.20 Most were then given vitamin D supplements in the amount of 5,000 or 10,000 IUs a day to correct deficiencies. In some cases, patients took 20,000 to 50,000 IUs daily to target certain diseases.

“Deficiency is strongly linked to increased risk for a multitude of diseases, several of which have historically been shown to improve dramatically with either adequate UVB exposure to the skin, or to oral or topical supplementation with vitamin D. These diseases include asthma, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, rickets and tuberculosis,” the researchers explained.

While three patients with psoriasis had “marked clinical improvement” upon taking higher vitamin D doses daily, none of the patients experienced hypercalcemia due to vitamin D — nor did they experience any other adverse event from vitamin D supplementation.

In the video above, John Campbell, a retired nurse educator based in England, details the study, noting, “There’s no question at all in my mind that authorities around the world … should increase the recommended amount of vitamin D. The current recommended amounts … are way too low.”21

There’s a Good Chance You’re Vitamin-D Deficient

The global prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (defined as a level of less than 20 ng/mL) and insufficiency (defined as a level of 20 to less than 30 ng/mL) is 40% to 100%.22

Further, 20 ng/mL has repeatedly been shown to be grossly insufficient for good health and disease prevention and, to maintain your health, your level should be between 60 ng/mL (150 nmol/L) and 80 ng/ml (200 nmol/l). A level of 100 ng/mL (250 nmol/l) appears safe and beneficial for certain conditions, especially cancer.

Research has shown that once you reach a minimum serum vitamin D level of 40 ng/mL, your risk for cancer diminishes by 67%, compared to having a level of 20 ng/mL or less.23

Among older adults in the U.S., vitamin D deficiency may affect up to 100% of the population,24 not only because they tend to spend a lot of time indoors but also because they produce less vitamin D in response to sun exposure than a younger person with the same sun exposure.

The Best Way to Raise Your Vitamin D Level

The best way to get your vitamin D is from sun exposure. While many are unable to do this, it is possible. As I am writing this at the end of May, my vitamin D level was 99 with no supplementation. When you aren’t taking a vitamin D supplement, your D level is a strong marker for sun exposure and confirmation you are getting enough near infrared (IR) in addition to UVB radiation.

There’s a good reason to ensure your vitamin D levels are within the optimal range. Aside from combating cancer, giving vitamin D to people with COVID-19 cut risk of death from SARS-CoV-2 by 51% and reduced risk of admission to the intensive care unit by 72%.25

I launched an information campaign to raise awareness about the use of vitamin D for COVID-19 back in June 2020 and published my own vitamin D review October 31, 2020, in the peer-reviewed journal Nutrients.26 It shows that 14 observational studies suggest vitamin D levels are inversely linked with the incidence or severity of COVID-19 and recommends vitamin D supplements for prevention or treatment.27

To optimize your vitamin D levels, regular sun exposure is the best option, as not only will it naturally raise your vitamin D levels, but it will provide numerous other benefits, such as enhanced production of melatonin — another potent anticancer agent.28 However, if you’re unable to get adequate sun exposure each day, supplementation may be necessary.

To determine how much sun exposure is enough and/or how much vitamin D3 you need to take, you’ll need to measure your vitamin D level, ideally twice a year. When supplementing, also remember vitamins D and K2, calcium and magnesium all work together and must be properly balanced for optimal health.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
~L
~L
June 16, 2023 7:43 am

If looking, seek:
Biotics Research
Bio D Mulsion Forte.
Oil to water liquid, to aid absorption.
1 drop = 50 mcg (2000 IU)
Take 4-5, in your juice.

Used as 1 part of immune system boosting, especially for northern hemisphere occupants in Fall & Winter months, when the sun is less frequently a reliable source of D.

You’re welcome.

Anthony Aaron
Anthony Aaron
  ~L
June 16, 2023 1:19 pm
Anonymous
Anonymous
June 16, 2023 8:08 am

Without sufficient magnesium for bioavailability, D3 is just expensive piss.

~L
~L
  Anonymous
June 16, 2023 9:01 am

Duly noted. Thx for the input.
We see the same effect with lab created synthetic, garbage vitamins.
Natural occurring vita & minerals in foods are best.
That said our soul that food grows in has only a small fraction of those now, as compared to the 40’s.
So, quality supplements can help.
In some ‘s opinions & experience.

Dr. Royal Lee researched well, and launched his Standard Process line of supplements way back then, & is still available thru naturopathic healthcare advisors.

Might be worthy of a look-see to some.
Others, as with Dr. Mercola, will claim to dismiss him as an anti- main-stream-medicine quack.

In the end, to each their own.

Aunt Acid
Aunt Acid
  Administrator
June 16, 2023 11:27 pm

You forgot exercise, supplements, and sleep, Dr Jarrouge ; if one wishes and works to be “truly healthy.”

And also might Auntie add fulfilling social and faith life. Without The Lord it don’t matter.

B_MC
B_MC
June 16, 2023 10:26 am

the measurement has been used for “racist exclusion” and has caused “historical harm.”

American Medical Association asks doctors to de-emphasize body mass index

The American Medical Association is clarifying the role of a person’s body mass index, also known as BMI.

The group is urging doctors to de-emphasize its use when assessing health and obesity of patients and acknowledge that the measurement has been used for “racist exclusion” and has caused “historical harm.”

The main concerns the AMA said it’s found with the BMI system is that it does not account for body composition, muscle mass, racial differences and genetics.

The recommendation comes after an AMA report recognized issues of racist exclusion because BMI is based primarily on data collected from previous generations of non-Hispanic, white populations…

“That leads to poor quality care and specifically to Black women, who typically have higher levels of BMI compared to the average population,” said Sutton.

https://abc7.com/american-medical-association-body-mass-index-bmi-report-doctors/13383826/

B_MC
B_MC
  B_MC
June 16, 2023 10:59 am

The AMA is covering for fast food industry….

Fast food suppliers contribute to increases in BMI and decreases in IQ

Around the world, obesity during childhood and adolescence is on the rise. Its causes are complex and multifaceted but environmental factors are often named as a major culprit, with the increased supply of fast food garnering particular press and policy attention in recent decades. Using Norwegian registry data, this column documents that the increased supply of fast food restaurants could be responsible for as much as 35% of the increase in BMI and 27% of the decline in cognitive ability observed across cohorts born during the 1980s.

https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/fast-food-suppliers-contribute-increases-bmi-and-decreases-iq

mark
mark
June 16, 2023 10:31 am

AN OVERVIEW OF: CANCER AS A METABOLIC DISEASE BY DR. THOMAS SEYFRIED on the Origin, Management, and Prevention of Cancer: Including texts by Dominic … Christofferson & the Press Pulse Strategy Paperback – April 23, 2023

CANCER IS A METABOLIC DISEASE – Dr. Thomas Seyfried reveals stunning non-toxic cancer therapies.

There is much evidence that the Keto diet, coupled with interment Fasting & water Fasting, plus taking Ivermectin is a protocol to research and consider.

The other MIC (the Medical Industrial Complex) wants nothing to do with the above…no $$$$$$$$$$$$$ to be made.

Ivermectin converts cold tumors hot and synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade for treatment of breast cancer
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41523-021-00229-5

Antitumor effects of ivermectin at clinically feasible concentrations support its clinical development as a repositioned cancer drug
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32474842/

B_MC
B_MC
June 16, 2023 10:36 am

From Net Zero to Glyphosate: Agritech’s Greenwashed Corporate Power Grab

Today, in the mainstream narrative, there is much talk of a ‘food transition’. Big agribusiness and ‘philanthropic’ foundations position themselves as the saviours of humanity due to their much- promoted plans to ‘feed the world’ with ‘precision’ farming’, ‘data-driven’ agriculture and ‘sustainable’ production.

These are the very institutions responsible for the social, ecological and environmental degradation associated with the current food system. The same bodies responsible for spiralling rates of illness due to the toxic food they produce or promote…

CORPORATE FOOD TRANSITION

The food transition is couched in the language of climate emergency and sustainability. It envisages a particular future for farming. It is not organic and relatively few farmers have a place in it…

Now, the likes of Bayer, Corteva and Syngenta are working with Microsoft, Google and the big-tech giants to facilitate farmerless farms driven by cloud and AI technology. A cartel of data owners and proprietary input suppliers are reinforcing their grip on the global food system while expanding their industrial model of crop cultivation.

One way they are doing this is by driving the ‘climate emergency’ narrative, a contested commentary that has been carefully promoted (see the work of investigative journalist Cory Morningstar), and net-zero ideology and tying this to carbon offsetting and carbon credits.

In countries where industrial agriculture dominates, ‘carbon farming’ involves modifying existing practices to claim that carbon is being sequestered in the soil and to then sell carbon credits…

To be part of Bayer’s Carbon Program, farmers have to be enrolled in Bayer’s FieldView digital agriculture platform. Bayer then uses the FieldView app to instruct farmers on the implementation of just two practices that are said to sequester carbon in the soils: reduced tillage or no-till farming and the planting of cover crops…

Net-zero Ponzi scheme

In its article From land grab to soil grab: the new business of carbon farming, GRAIN says control rather than sequestering carbon is at the heart of the matter. More than half of the soil organic matter in the world’s agricultural soils has already been lost. Yet, the main culprits behind this soil catastrophe are now recasting themselves as soil saviours.

From Net Zero to Glyphosate: Agritech’s Greenwashed Corporate Power Grab 

Long Time Lurker
Long Time Lurker
June 16, 2023 1:42 pm

“vitamin D” is a hormone, not a vitamin. Taking any hormones triggers the body to create less of said hormone.

Get out in the sun!!!

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Long Time Lurker
June 16, 2023 8:58 pm

The sun is only sufficient a bit of the year, depending on latitude.

Anonymous
Anonymous
June 16, 2023 4:02 pm

Bullshit studies to sell a product. Big Pharma owns all major vitamin companies. Most supplements are a money making scam and can be downright dangerous to your health and well being.

Harry Taynt
Harry Taynt
  Anonymous
June 16, 2023 6:51 pm

^^^ Literal retard.