Air Bag Omelettes . . . and Eggs

Guest Post by Eric Peters

Air bags – those government-mandated “safety” devices force-built into every new car made since the late 1990s – have killed again.

ARC Automotive – “pioneering safety since 1948” – says it “can’t say for sure” whether the inflators (as the explosive devices built into air bags are styled) won’t “cause future incidents.”

Those “incidents” being deaths and maimings. But what are a few deaths and maimings when so many lives have been saved? This is the Usual Argument presented by advocates of forcing people to assume the risk of having an explosive device built into the steering wheel (and dashboard and door panels) of the car they buy. It is in its basic reasoning the same argument – the same justification – presented by Stalin about having to break some eggs to make an omelette.

The eggs, of course, get no say.

They certainly are not allowed to say no – which is the crux of the moral problem here. Not the mechanical problem of the explosive devices built into the car. They are no more the problem, as such, than high-fructose-corn-syrup and canola-oil-laden “food” at the supermarket is a problem, as such. No one is forced to buy liquid diabetes – sodas infused with HFC – or to eat their way to metabolic disorders via a steady diet of canola-oil-laden processed foods.

You are free to assume the risk, if you like the taste.

Put more finely, no one else is forced to assume the risk. It is this latter that is the real problem with the explosive devices built into the steering wheel, dashboard and door panels of every new car, truck and SUV.

If there is a risk associated with something, it ought to be up to the individual assuming it to decide whether it is worth assuming it.

Skydiving, for instance. People who choose to do this understand that they are assuming a certain risk. It is not high – assuming the parachute is properly packed and everyone involved exercises precautions. Almost always, the skydiver does not die – and does have a good time.

But there is a risk that does not apply if you do not get into that airplane – and do not jump out of it. Those who choose to get in the airplane – and then jump out of it – do so because they accept the risk in return for what, to them, is the reward. The value the thrill of skydiving sufficiently to be willing to accept the risk that the airplane might crash or the parachute might not open.

If it does not, then it’s a tragedy.

But what would it be if the person had been forced into the airplane – and then pushed out of it?

Then it would be murder, would it not?

How is it meaningfully different to force people to sit in front of an explosive device that might explode in their face? That has done exactly that? That will always have the potential to do just that? How do the odds that it probably won’t justify that?

Just ask Stalin.

People like Stalin infest what is styled “the government,” a term used to banalize what is in fact a gang of office-holders who have acquired the legal power to impose risks – and costs – on other people. That is the essence of the problem – not the fact that air bags can kill. Nor that they can also “save lives.

Both of those being entirely beside the point.

Maybe having an air bag in your vehicle will save your life one day. This is certainly possible. It is also possible the air bag will end your life. Both possibilities are inarguably real. The question is – or ought to be – who gets to decide whether the potential benefit is worth the potential risk?

This is a question many Americans no longer ask – which helps explain why America is no longer the country it once was. It was – once – a country – that respected the right of free people to decide for themselves whether a cost was worth the benefit. That objected to the obnoxious notion that other people ought to be endowed with the legal power to countermand those decisions and impose their decisions on everyone. It is why – when air bags were first developed, back in the early 1970s – they were available.

As opposed to mandated.

You could chose to order your car (from GM and Chrysler, which both offered air bags in some of their cars) with them or choose to skip them. It was up to you.

Then along came Stalin, with an urge to make some omelettes. Not exactly Stalin, of course – but the same type. People who think it is their business to order other people’s affairs and if there’s a problem, that’s their problem.

This problem has been institutionalized.

Too many Americans now accept that they are eggs – and that if they get broken, then it’s a kind of natural calamity for which no one is to blame. Worse, many of them seem to revere these who are to blame. Whom they see – having been taught to see them – as “keeping them safe.”

They are like Stalin’s chicken.

It etiolates everywhere. Most recently during what was styled the “pandemic.” And it was, of course. Just not in the sense generally meant – by the idiot-innocents who blithely use the term in just the way those who taught them to use it intended.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
16 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
June 30, 2023 8:09 am

Internet airbags coming soon.

Big Brother keeping you safe from wrongthink

Daddy Joe
Daddy Joe
June 30, 2023 8:23 am

PCR, Thank you and well put. Most humans now are incapable of analyzing risk/reward–they just want someone/anyone to tell them what to do.

Gary G
Gary G
June 30, 2023 12:13 pm

You still have a choice. Disable the airbags. Pull the fuses or change the program. Problem solved.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Gary G
June 30, 2023 1:45 pm

I think you miss the overarching point.

fujigm
fujigm
  Anonymous
June 30, 2023 4:06 pm

Gary elucidates an (obvious) extension of the point.
Mr. Peters tries to claim you are “forced” by government.
You are not.
You (always) have options.
People have been trying to force others to behave certain ways since the dawn of man.
But those who just wish to be left alone continue to thwart them.
It is no different today.
Don’t like the bomb in the steering wheel?
Disable it.
Anything the government tries to force on you HELPS you.
It ‘forces’ you to think creatively.
This in turn increases your cognitive powers.
(Thinking makes you smarter, really).
If you don’t want to be forced to think creatively, you have chosen your lot.
Those unable to adapt will eventually be unable to survive.
(Re: the vaxcipients)
Complaining when some midwit (or worse) tries to force something on you is counterproductive.
Fortunately, government employment tends to attract these midwits (and worse).
They are generally easy to outwit.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  fujigm
June 30, 2023 4:18 pm

Mr. Peters tries to claim you are “forced” by government.
You are not.

You are. You cannot buy a modern vehicle without it.

Don’t like the bomb in the steering wheel?
Disable it.

Sure. But that still misses the ‘force’ point. You have already been forced to pay for it. Just like all the rest of the “help incompetent morons who really shouldn’t be driving, drive” tech. Even if you buy second hand, it is baked into the price. Also, in may jurisdictions, you are forced to keep all these systems functional, even if you want none.

fujigm
fujigm
  Anonymous
June 30, 2023 7:55 pm

You are. You cannot buy a modern vehicle without it.
Try again.
One can buy a vehicle configured in any way he chooses.
It just won’t be legal for road use.

Nobody “forced” you to buy the car.
I don’t buy products that contain things I don’t want or like.
Or I remove them if I need the product.
As for ‘forced’ to keep these systems functional, you sound like one of those individuals that believes they can ‘force’ you to obey the laws.
Anyone with a modicum of intelligence can look around and see that is patently false.
Thank you, but I still disagree with your proposition of “force”.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  fujigm
June 30, 2023 8:10 pm

I appreciate your pedantry. 🙂

Of course you are correct, nobody has to do or buy anything.

But if you wish to operate in modern society, you are certainly compelled with the threat of penalty. Coerced? Compelled? Forced? Extorted?

As for ‘forced’ to keep these systems functional, you sound like one of those individuals that believes they can ‘force’ you to obey the laws.

If you live where yearly inspections happen, they have to pass. No pass, not allowed to use. You can defeat whatever after, but flirting with the law.

Of course you can just ignore everything, have no insurance, etc. You are free to be an outlaw. I often am. But the state might use force against you.

fujigm
fujigm
  Anonymous
July 1, 2023 11:09 pm

Not an outlaw.
A scofflaw.

Visayas Outpost
Visayas Outpost
  fujigm
June 30, 2023 7:13 pm

Yes and no. I am probably one of the few who has actually removed and disabled their airbags, voluntarily. This is considered a criminal act, since you then have to ‘get around’ the malfunction signals in order to pass vehicle inspection. Then of course you’d be criminally liable for injuries sustained in an accident where you removed the ‘safety’ device.

The only legal workaround I’m aware of is to have a car that is too old for the airbag. This is a shotty choice, but at least it is a choice. It’s yet another reason why 3rd world countries aren’t so bad when you get right down to it.

fujigm
fujigm
  Visayas Outpost
June 30, 2023 8:05 pm

If the vehicle was ‘modified prior to it’s purchase’, you are not liable.
If the vehicle is registered to a corporation (it’s not ‘your’ vehicle), you are not liable for failure of safety devices, for whatever reason.
You may still maintain liability for injuries as the driver.
As for “of course you’d be criminally liable”, there’s a legal citation I’d be interested in seeing.
Nothing is “of course” in the law.
Even when there is statute.
Criminal liability requires the highest burden of proof, and the number of elements to be proven here can be made considerable.

Oilman2
Oilman2
June 30, 2023 2:32 pm

Not for my family…we are out, O-U-T, out of the automobile game. My sons, son-in-laws and even daughters have better things to do than finance giant woke companies playing the EV game.

We have gone to buying old (1980 or earlier) cars and trucks. Even buying a non-running wreck, it costs around $ 15,000 to get it running and mechanically strong, and outfitted with brand new interior.In return for that work, we get no airbags and much improved gas mileage. We don’t repaint to look spiffy, we just paint blah to lessen attention.

The trucks are not painted – instead sprayed with bedliner under and outside – rust problems nil. My first one, a 1983 Honda Accord, now has 356K on the rebuild and gets an easy 48 MPG with carbureted 4 banger. Our Ford F250 is rolling up on 250K miles, and still going strong on rebuilt engine, tranny and front/rear pumpkins.

We can remanufacture THREE vehicles for the price of a Jeep Truck or fresh Ford 4WD truck.

We are O-U-T of the new car scam, and doing less environmental damage than the building of ONE new vehicle. Bonus is no new SAFETY crap like lane/curb alerts, seatbelt/door alerts, airbags and many other things that break easily and must be replaced due to the idiotic sensor junk in new cars…

You guys might want to tr6 this – everything you need to know is on Youtube, every how-to and DIY for remanufacturing cars from the frame up.

fujigm
fujigm
  Oilman2
June 30, 2023 4:08 pm

Shhhh.
Don’t spread this around.
If other people start doing this, it’ll push up the price of old POS vehicles.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  fujigm
June 30, 2023 4:13 pm

Too late. I am starting to see 2015 vehicles with ask prices lower than the same 2000 year model with similar mileage/condition.

Biggest factor to me ATM is direct injection vs. port injection. Stay away from DI unless you plan on selling it before it becomes a problem. Variable cams are problem waiting to happen too.

fujigm
fujigm
  Anonymous
June 30, 2023 8:10 pm

I generally avoid injection all together (except for K-Jetronic).
Both it and carbueration have no electronics to fail.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  fujigm
June 30, 2023 8:16 pm

Depends how simple you want to go and why.

EMP proof, nearly indestructible, reliable and efficient? Get a 1986-1999 1.6 or 1.9 idi VW diesel.

My favorite is TBI sbc for normal use, but not for SHTF. That would be the VW.