The New York Times has lost its mind. And by mind, I mean principles and understanding of the First Amendment.

Guest Post by Alex Berenson

This failure may not be news to you, but take it easy on me – I worked there 10 years, I almost got killed in Iraq for them (yes, true, don’t ask details). I’m having a tough time with this betrayal.

You may have heard that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. testified yesterday at a Congressional hearing about censorship.

But unless you read the New York Times, you probably did not see how the Times – the world’s most important newspaper, the outlet that sets the agenda for ALL non-conservative media – covered the hearing:

 

I barely know how to respond to this insanity. Obviously, the answers to those two questions are:

  1. Yes, “misinformation” is protected by the First Amendment, the government doesn’t get to determine what facts are fit for Americans to know.
  2. Never (unless the “falsehoods” violate civil or criminal statutes, such as laws against securities fraud. In that case, they should be prosecuted or be subject to administrative sanction after the fact and after court or administrative hearings that include Constitutional protections for the defendants, not “tamped down,” whatever “tamped down” means.) 

    In other words, never.

Yet the New York Times is now on the verge of endorsing government censorship, or at least saying that it shouldn’t be dismissed, that its value is a “thorny question.”

Does the Times even remember what business it is in?

Its guiding principle is that governments and companies DO NOT DETERMINE WHAT IT WRITES, and that, aside from imminent national security risks (and I mean imminent, like the location of a terrorist bomb in Manhattan), it has an absolute right to publish without prior restraint.

That used to be its guiding principle, anyway.

Today the Times prefers to be a quasi-official arm of the biomedical security state.

Making matters even worse, the author of the story on the Kennedy hearing, Sheryl Gay Stolberg, is not some woke newbie who graduated from Oberlin two years ago and was a new media producer before getting a byline. She has worked at the Times since 1997. She speaks for the paper.

Does Sheryl Gay Stolberg not remember all the stories she’s written that some company or politician or press secretary called “out-of-context” or “unfair” or “inaccurate” (all old-school words for “misinformation”)? What about all the other reporters at the Times?

Do they not see that they are not merely walking into a censorship trap, they are setting it themselves?

I truly do not understand what has happened to journalism, and the Times in particular. When I was there – and I was there for a decade, not a cup of coffee – investigative reporting was the paper’s highest calling.

The unofficial Marine motto is “Every Marine a rifleman.” The Times version could have been “Every reporter an investigative reporter.”

Comfort the afflicted, afflict the comfortable. If your mother says she loves you, check it out.

We forgot those principles at our peril. The greatest shame at the Times during the decade I was there was not Jayson Blair’s fabrications but Judith Miller’s credulous reporting on Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction.

Yet now the Times will not even report on the fact – the black-and-white inarguable fact – that the Biden White House tried to force Twitter to censor one of its own former reporters.

(One really tough question)

Again, for those of you who don’t like the New York Times, who have never liked it, this hypocrisy may come as no surprise.

Bear with me, folks. It’s a surprise to me.

And it hurts.

As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
July 22, 2023 6:15 am

Wordle up.

javelin
javelin
July 22, 2023 8:09 am

StolBERG.. enough said

Coalclinker
Coalclinker
  javelin
July 22, 2023 11:51 pm

If they have a green, stein, or berg in their names I immediately read or watch an article assuming that it is Bolshevik.

Obbledy
Obbledy
July 22, 2023 9:12 am

Too close to the forest?…..my problem is “investigative journalism”has been used to go after the little guy…..tho he may be a lawbreaker and a snake and deserving of such scrutiny,it’s ONLY purpose is selling the salacious!
The “media” has long abandoned its RESPONSIBILITY to be the watchdog FOR The People….the “media”who has the power to actually hold government accountable,blatantly refuses to do so…….
THATS where you went wrong and it happened a looooooong time ago…….
No money in ACTUALLY informing people I guess……..glad you made it through your career with your life,I’m afraid you have been sold a bill of goods like the rest of us!
There was a time when you would get five “w’s” and an “h”…….now it’s drive by story,no details and lots of supposition(I’m being kind)….

RatBGone
RatBGone
  Obbledy
July 22, 2023 9:59 am

The msm now regularly editorializes instead of simply reporting news.

piearesquared
piearesquared
July 22, 2023 1:16 pm

“The greatest shame at the Times during the decade I was there was . . . Judith Miller’s credulous reporting on Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction.”

The author of this post sounds pretty naive. That might have been shameful to some of the clueless useful idiots working at the Times, but not to the owner and editors of the Times (and Judith Miller herself). They knew full well that they were lying, and why they were lying. And it was obvious at the time that they were lying, not just in hindsight.

Bullwinkle
Bullwinkle
July 22, 2023 2:53 pm

Why be concerned about an old dead piece of Parchment?
The Government did not throw the Constitution in the garbage.
It was “We the People” that turned our backs on the Constitution.
YES. It was US!!

There are only two Parties to the Constitution.
We the citizens of the “several States”, and those “several States”.
Look it up.

Those “several independent and sovereign Countries” gave up their part with the 17th Article.
(There were no True Amendments after the 12th.)
Since then, We the People of those “several States” gave up out “Birth Right” as citizens of those “several States” by checking a box on Government forms and swearing under Oath that you are now Statutory Citizens of a fictional United States.

We gave up our Birth Right just like Esau in the Bible.
Esau gave up his “Birth Right” for a bowl of Lentil soup.
We gave up our “Birth Right” for…….BENEFITS!

When you accept a Benefit, you are not entitled to any Remedy
Now We the People have NO Rights except what the Government offers.

The problem is with who you see in the mirror.
Who you see in the mirror will not do anything except whine about it.

William
William
July 22, 2023 7:59 pm

Operation Mockingbird. Look it up.