More than 1,600 scientists, including two Nobel laureates, declare climate ’emergency’ a myth

Via Just the News

The global coalition of scientists say that politics and a journalistic frenzy has propelled a doomsday climate change hysteria. The signatories also ask other scientists to “address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming.”

A coalition of 1,609 scientists from around the world have signed a declaration stating “there is no climate emergency” and that they “strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy” being pushed across the globe. The declaration does not deny the harmful effect of greenhouse gasses, but instead challenges the hysteria brought about by the narrative of imminent doom.

The declaration, put together by the Global Climate Intelligence Group (CLINTEL), was made public this month and urges that “Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific.”

CLINTEL is an independent foundation that operates in the fields of climate change and climate policy. CLINTEL was founded in 2019 by emeritus professor of geophysics Guus Berkhout and science journalist Marcel Crok.

“Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures,” the declaration says.

Of the 1,609 scientists who have signed the declaration, two signatories are Nobel Prize laureates. The most recent to sign is Nobel Prize winner Dr. John F. Clauser, winner of the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics. In an announcement from CLINTEL, Clauser is quoted as saying “Misguided climate science has metastasized into massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience. In turn, the pseudoscience has become a scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills. It has been promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agents, politicians, journalists, government agencies, and environmentalists.”

The underlying report that engendered the declaration lays out a series of statements challenging many of the common climate claims. For example, one of the most common claims – and repeated without question by many – is that the earth will soon pass “tipping points that will lead to catastrophic environmental damage, including dangerous sea level rise, entire species going extinct, and even greater suffering in many nations, especially the poorest.”

The sense of immediate crisis has been repeated constantly by mainstream media, including The New York Times, which said flatly, “Earth is likely to cross a critical threshold for global warming within the next decade.”

In 2009, former vice president Al Gore famously predicted that “the Arctic would be ice-free by 2013.” He later backtracked, according to Reuters, who said Gore was merely quoting other scientific reports. Gore had three years earlier published “An Inconvenient Truth” the subtitle of which was “The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and What We Can Do About It.” A documentary film based on the book earned $24,146,161 in gross receipts that year.

Celebrity activist Greta Thunberg tweeted in 2018 – five years after Gore’s doomsday prediction – that “climate change will wipe out all of humanity unless we stop using fossil fuels over the next five years.” The Highland County Press reported that she deleted the tweet.

Last week, John Kerry, President Biden’s “Special Presidential Envoy for Climate” spoke at a conference in Edinburgh, Scotland, saying that “scientists who have spent a lifetime tracking this human-made crisis described themselves as ‘alarmed’ and ‘terrified.’ As one said unequivocally, “we are now in uncharted territory.”

“So now, humanity is inexorably threatened by humanity itself—by those seducing people into buying into a completely fictitious alternative reality where we don’t need to act and we don’t even need to care,” Kerry added.

The signatories to the CLINTEL declaration say that global warming is “far slower than predicted,” and that “inadequate models” often guide climate policy.

The CLINTEL declaration comes at a time when recent claims abound that natural disasters such as the wildfires in Maui and Canada, the heatwaves across the globe and other events are driven by climate change. The declaration goes on to challenge the ever-ready blame on climate change, stating “There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent.”

As President Biden and countless world leaders push heavily for net-zero carbon emissions by 2050 the scientists assert that this is not only “unrealistic,” but harmful to world economies.

“There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050,” the paper reads, proposing “adaptation instead of mitigation.”

As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
August 30, 2023 5:18 pm

It’s all to get people to buy electric cars, and then . . . .

comment image

Copacop
Copacop
August 30, 2023 6:13 pm

The sheep only watch the MSM… The media is the true enemy…

Aunt Acid
Aunt Acid
  Copacop
August 30, 2023 6:44 pm

and a deadly virus.

Warren
Warren
  Aunt Acid
August 30, 2023 7:15 pm

Liberalism is the virus

Hugo Igo
Hugo Igo
  Warren
August 31, 2023 2:59 am

A proven neurological defect, to be precise.

k31
k31
  Copacop
August 30, 2023 10:14 pm

Nobody is watching MSM. Except boomers. They never listened to their grandparents about what TV and rock and roll would do.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  k31
August 31, 2023 6:27 am

I upvoted you, but really it’s the majority of Gen X, too.

k31
k31
  Anonymous
August 31, 2023 4:44 pm

It could be. My problem is all the people I know are either younger or older than me.

Anonymous
Anonymous
August 30, 2023 6:29 pm

Why Are Democrats Deserting Their Blessed Sanctuary Cities?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
August 30, 2023 6:33 pm

Associated Press Coverage of Courts, Climate Bankrolled by Dozens of Left-Wing Foundations

Warren
Warren
  Anonymous
August 30, 2023 7:19 pm

They move to places that actually work for the benefit of their residents and voot in the same style of leftist assists that screwed up where they left because “This time it will be different”. They’re like the plague.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Warren
August 31, 2023 6:29 am

Locusts

Steve Z.
Steve Z.
August 30, 2023 6:30 pm

One of the big aspects of this charade is the carbon credit offsets. The value of which is in the $trillions. Under this proposal you would be allowed a carbon usage and anything above some arbitrary level you’d have to buy carbon offset credits. Al Gore is big into this seeing a $trillion dollar payday for whoever controls the carbon offset purchases market.
Admittedly, my knowledge isn’t strong on this subject but that’s the big picture.

Cricket
Cricket
  Steve Z.
August 30, 2023 7:39 pm

I recall the Catholic Church sold indulgences since the Middle Ages, where one could sin, pay the church an indulgence and be forgiven for said sin. I believe this system remains in place today and has allowed many rich and famous Catholics including Kennedys to get marriage annulments even after children were born.

Carbon credits are no different. You fly on a private jet, own a huge diesel guzzling yacht or live in a huge mansion that consumes more power than your average steel mill. If you buy carbon credits, you don’t have to change your behaviour in the slightest, while the plebs suffer with paper straws, freeze in the dark and suffer ULEZ fines if they drive their cars due to ever increasing environmental restrictions and energy costs.

If you look into Tesla’s business model in any detail you’ll soon find Elon Musk’s true profit center is selling carbon credits.

Hugo Igo
Hugo Igo
  Cricket
August 31, 2023 3:00 am

Thank you for reminding me. Screencapped.

august
august
  Cricket
August 31, 2023 12:02 pm

>>>Catholic Church sold indulgences since the Middle Ages, where one could sin, pay the church an indulgence and be forgiven for said sin.

From my position as a ‘lapsed Catholic’, I’ll say that your statement is not quite correct. The idea behind an indulgence was, and is, that the performance of certain virtuous acts is rewarded by a reduction of the time one must experience in Purgatory (or the time a third party, such as a naughty loved one) must spend in Purgatory.

Indulgences do not, as far as I have ever heard, play a role in whether or not any individual is ‘saved’ (i.e. bound for Heaven); since for most human souls, the road to Heaven is said to run through Purgatory, indulgences merely make the upward journey faster/easier.

FWIW, indulgences at some time and places were sold with a specific time frame attached, that is they bore units of time (months, years); the popular interpretation of the time factor was simply that this was the time you escaped serving in Purgatory. From what I read, this has NOT been the case for many years.

bigfoot
bigfoot
  august
August 31, 2023 5:48 pm

Tell us about excommunication and the threat of it. (Not my downvote)

Hugo Igo
Hugo Igo
August 31, 2023 2:57 am

In the future, scientists who were corrupted and peddled climate hysteria will be labeled “clowns” and tossed into the dustbin of history. Anyone recall who challenged Galileo? Not likely. We only remember Galileo.

Same with covid-19. The doctors who promoted the globalist’s scam will be stripped of their credentials post present.

Get on the right side of history… now.

Jackie Puppet
Jackie Puppet
August 31, 2023 6:37 pm

Libtards ( & comments section moderators) didn’t like this when I posted this stuff on MSM sites.

Debunking The “97%” Consensus Claims – Part I

Debunking The “97%” Consensus Claims – Part I

Cook’s 97% Scam Debunked

Cook’s 97% Scam Debunked