US Mass Media Audience Collapsed — UN Report on International Financial Architecture — Global Governance and Climate Change — Utopian Dreams of Control – [10-29-23]

Direct from BOOM Finance and Economics at the links below

Hat Tip to my colleague at BOOM Finance and Economics Substack (Subscribe for Free) – also on LinkedIn and WordPress. Covid Medical News Network CMN News BOOM Blog and All Editorials (over 5 years) at:  BOOM Finance and Economics | Designed for Critical Thinkers — UPDATED WEEKLY (WordPress.com)

BOOM Finance and Economics seeks out the very best information from authoritative sources and strives for consistency in its quality and trustworthiness. Over 5 years, BOOM has developed a loyal readership which includes many of the world’s most senior economists, central bankers, their senior advisers, fund managers and academics.  If you want a real edge in understanding the complex world of finance and economics, subscribe to BOOM on Substack or as a Follower on LinkedIn.

BOOM EDITORIAL THIS WEEK

 

US MASS MEDIA AUDIENCE COLLAPSED.  The mainstream media audience has collapsed in America.  CNN has just announced the closure of its “World News Headquarters” in Atlanta amid reports that its audience is now less than that generated by just one man in the alternative media, Joe Rogan. Other reports list Tucker Carlson’s audience for his first show on Twitter at over 100 million views. Who needs mainstream news?

On Friday, CNN reporter Kate Bolduan said, “Before we go today, we are marking an important moment today in CNN’s history. Today’s show will be the final broadcast from the CNN Center in Atlanta”.

The people have lost faith and trust in what conventional newspapers, magazines, radio and TV stations offer as news.

Perhaps we should all now bracket the word “news” with inverted commas? Why?  Because it is now clear to most that the mass media “news” is in fact an endless diet of propaganda that ensures a twisted view of national and world events. There is no attempt at balanced reporting. No debate is tolerated. Free speech is censored. It is all fearful sensation aimed at political persuasion and intended to create endless mass anxiety.

Fear begets alpha brain wave states which boost suggestibility. So the remnant, robotic audience who continue watching and reading the mainstream western media will do just about anything suggested by the mainstream. They will even believe that the fifth, sixth or seventh Covid “vaccine” jab is necessary and “safe and effective”.

An article in AXIOS recently showed that only 16% of Americans have strong confidence in their newspapers. That is a staggeringly low number. However, for television news, the number is 11%!

The trend in confidence has been in steady decline since 1990. Thirty years of decline in confidence is a disaster, surely. It makes one wonder which of the 11% group implicitly trusts their TV news broadcasts each evening and their morning newspaper. Are they the brain dead – the idiots of the Idiocracy?

UNITED NATIONS REPORT — GLOBAL GOVERNANCE AND CLIMATE CHANGE – UTOPIAN DREAMS OF CONTROL

The Summit of the Future, to be held in 2024, is an opportunity to agree on multi-lateral solutions for a better tomorrow, strengthening global governance for both present and future generations (General Assembly resolution 76/307).

The author of the “Chapeau” introduction – the UN Secretary General – seems sublimely ignorant of the fact that the term “global governance” is offensive to many millions, if not billions, of people on planet Earth. After all, he is an unelected official, appointed and answerable to no one in particular. He does not represent any electorate.  He assumes authority over people who have not played any part in granting him such authority. This lack of real democratic process is a major problem for the United Nations and its many satellite, ‘Non- Governmental Organisations’.

However there is worse to come, much worse. The next biggest problem that BOOM has with the document as a whole is the constant references to ‘climate change’, ‘climate crisis’, and the word ‘sustainable”. This assumes that ‘climate change’ is somehow a financial problem. After all, the document is (supposedly) about reform of the global financial architecture.

Here is a typical sentence illustrating BOOM’s point – Quote: “…. international financial architecture (is) entirely unfit for purpose in a world characterized by unrelenting climate change, increasing systemic risks, extreme inequality, entrenched gender bias, ………..”

And it goes on, “The existing architecture has been unable to support the mobilization of stable and long-term financing at scale for investments needed to combat the climate crisis and achieve the Sustainable Development Goals for the 8 billion people in the world today …….. Dramatic under investment in global public goods, including pandemic preparedness and climate action”.

BOOM must ask – what the hell has climate to do with reform of the International Financial Architecture?  Is this a Report on climate, or gender bias, or pandemic preparedness, or sustainability, or is it a Report on Finance?

Then there is the tendency for over-reach. “We must craft a new set of rules and institutions that support convergence for the twenty-first century and enable all countries to achieve sustainable, inclusive and just transformations.”  Who (exactly) is “we”?  What is “convergence” for the twenty-first century? What “new institutions” will support it? And what is a “just” transformation?

The international financial architecture should be structured to proactively support the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals and the realization of human rights.

What is meant by “proactive support”? And why is “the realisation of human rights” a separate matter from “sustainable development goals”?

Then that troublesome word “only” appears again, assuming a centralised (global) authority to act. And reference to global governance appears yet again. “The only way to facilitate such a structure is through ambitious reform, starting with more inclusive, representative and, ultimately, more effective global economic governance.”

The words “inclusive” and “representative” appear as if the author felt that they should somehow be thrown into the word salad, presumably to give the appearance of democracy when the whole thrust of the document is the opposite of it.

The author (or authors — who do not reveal their names) grandly set out the “action orientated” recommendations for reforming the international financial architecture and tax architecture in six areas (somehow the reform of tax architecture has suddenly appeared).

  1. Global economic governance (yet another reference to Global Governance)
  2. Debt relief and the cost of sovereign borrowing (who can disagree with debt relief?)
  3. International Public Finance
  4. The Global Financial Safety Net
  5. Policy and regulatory frameworks and
  6. Global tax architecture for equitable and inclusive sustainable development.

There’s that word “Global” again mixed up with the words “inclusive, equitable and sustainable”.  Did an 8th grader write this document with the assistance of ChatGPT, the so-called artificial “intelligence”? BOOM wonders.

The next (rather large) Heading announces “Reform and strengthen global economic governance”. There’s that pesky reference (again) to global governance and we are only on Page 5. The document is well over 30 pages in length.

A diagram then proudly announces, “FIGURE 1 — REFORMED INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL ARCHITECTURE THAT IS FIT FOR PURPOSE FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY” An illustration under it looks like an old Greek or Roman Temple (not a 21st century structure) with three foundations:

“A REPRESENTATIVE APEX BODY TO ENHANCE COHERENCE.” An “Apex” body as a foundation and to enhance “Coherence”? Huh?

“MORE DEMOCRATIC AND REPRESENTATIVE DECISION-MAKING RULES.”  Democracy mixed in with some representation and rules?  Who can disagree with that?

“REFORMED AND STRENGTHENED GLOBAL ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE.” You can never have enough Global Governance, can you?

And at the top of each pillar in the Roman Temple lie the words:

“COHERENT – LONG TERM – RESILIENT – SUSTAINABLE – EQUITABLE – INCLUSIVE – COORDINATED” Now who could argue with that?

Then, there are two “ACTIONS” listed as necessary to reform the International Financial Architecture and make it ‘Fit for Purpose’ for the 21st century; here we have more “centralised, non-democratic global governance.”

ACTION 1: “TRANSFORM THE GOVERNANCE OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS”

ACTION 2: “CREATE A REPRESENTATIVE APEX BODY TO SYSTEMATICALLY ENHANCE COHERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM”

What (exactly) is “coherence” with regard to global finance? BOOM is mystified unless it is a synonym for central control. And do we need yet another unelected, non-representative committee which is now called an “Apex Body”?

The next major title in the document tends towards magical thinking and wish fulfilment: “Lower the cost of sovereign borrowing and create a lasting solution for countries facing debt distress.” Yes, a jolly good idea, 8th grader; why hasn’t someone already thought of that?

ACTION 3: “REDUCE DEBT RISKS AND ENHANCE SOVEREIGN DEBT MARKETS TO SUPPORT SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS”

ACTION 4: “ENHANCE DEBT CRISIS RESOLUTION THROUGH A TWO-STEP PROCESS: A DEBT WORKOUT MECHANISM TO SUPPORT THE COMMON FRAMEWORK AND, IN THE MEDIUM TERM, A SOVEREIGN DEBT AUTHORITY”

A “Sovereign Debt Authority” – another central committee – or is it to be an Apex Body?

Then, the next (predictable) section: “Massively scale up development and climate financing” With — more magical thinking:

ACTION 5: “MASSIVELY INCREASE DEVELOPMENT LENDING AND IMPROVE TERMS OF LENDING”

ACTION 6: “CHANGE THE BUSINESS MODELS OF MULTILATERAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS AND OTHER PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT BANKS TO FOCUS ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL IMPACT; AND MORE EFFECTIVELY LEVERAGE PRIVATE FINANCE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL IMPACT”

Then, it is back to climate change…what else, whilst ensuring “additionality” (whatever that is).  And what, pray tell, is climate finance?

ACTION 7: “MASSIVELY INCREASE CLIMATE FINANCE, WHILE ENSURING ADDITIONALITY”

Then a plan to become more effective follows. Who could argue with that?

ACTION 8: “MORE EFFECTIVELY USE THE SYSTEM OF DEVELOPMENT BANKS TO INCREASE LENDING AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL IMPACT”

And time to mention the poor? How did they forget to mention the poor?

ACTION 9: “ENSURE THAT THE POOREST CAN CONTINUE TO BENEFIT FROM THE MULTILATERAL DEVELOPMENT BANK SYSTEM”

Then it’s back to the “global safety net” (whatever that is). “Strengthen the global financial safety net and provide liquidity to countries in need.”

ACTION 10: STRENGTHEN LIQUIDITY PROVISION AND WIDEN THE FINANCIAL SAFETY NET

ACTION 11: ADDRESS CAPITAL MARKET VOLATILITY

Is it time to mention that magical word “sustainability” again?  “Reset the rules for the financial system to promote stability with sustainability.”

ACTION 12: STRENGTHEN REGULATION AND SUPERVISION OF BANK AND NON-BANK FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS TO BETTER MANAGE RISKS AND REIN IN EXCESSIVE LEVERAGE

ACTION 13: MAKE BUSINESSES MORE SUSTAINABLE AND REDUCE GREENWASHING

BOOM is not sure what “Greenwashing” means.

ACTION 14: “STRENGTHEN GLOBAL FINANCIAL INTEGRITY STANDARDS” – Redesign the global tax architecture for equitable and inclusive sustainable development

ACTION 15: “STRENGTHEN GLOBAL TAX NORMS TO ADDRESS DIGITALIZATION AND GLOBALIZATION THROUGH AN INCLUSIVE PROCESS, IN WAYS THAT MEET THE NEEDS AND CAPACITIES OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS” Ah – the good old “inclusive process”.  And, for good measure, mention it again in Action 16 just for added emphasis. Is this pretence of consultation?

ACTION 16: “IMPROVE PILLAR TWO OF THE PROPOSAL BY THE OECD/G20 INCLUSIVE FRAMEWORK ON BASE EROSION AND PROFIT SHIFTING TO REDUCE WASTEFUL TAX INCENTIVES, WHILE BETTER INCENTIVIZING TAXATION IN SOURCE COUNTRIES”

ACTION 17: “CREATE GLOBAL TAX TRANSPARENCY AND INFORMATION-SHARING FRAMEWORKS THAT BENEFIT ALL COUNTRIES” – To a totalitarian globalist, Action 17 sounds like a good idea — some good old surveillance and information sharing. The East German Stasi could perhaps be resurrected?

The word “climate” appears over 60 times in the document. There is no reference to “climate boiling”, thankfully.  In the Conclusion, the word “sustainable” appears 5 times in just two short paragraphs. But, again thankfully, the words “climate change” do not appear.

However, the document leaves no doubt in BOOM’s mind. The pathway to authoritarian, non-democratic, centralised global governance is paved by the words, climate, change, crisis, and sustainable.

Next week, BOOM will review a Report released by the Bank for International Settlements in June: “Blueprint for the future monetary system: improving the old, enabling the new.”  It’s another 34-page document. Readers will be pleased and relieved to know (in advance) that the words ‘climate’ and ‘sustainable’ do not appear in it. However, there are no authors identified for it either.  Reference: https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/our-common-agenda-policy-brief-international-finance-architecture-en.pdf

BOOM’s QUANTITATIVE BOOSTING FOR THE PEOPLES MONEY EXPLAINED: https://boomfinanceandeconomics.wordpress.com/2019/12/15/boom-as-at-15th-december-2019/  AND BOOM’s Perfect Economy: https://boomfinanceandeconomics.wordpress.com/2020/01/18/boom-as-at-19th-january-2020/

In economics, things work until they don’t.  Make your own conclusions, do your own research.  BOOM does not offer investment advice.

CLICK HERE FOR PODCASTS:   OUR BRAVE NEW ECONOMIC WORLD

BANKS DON’T TAKE DEPOSITS, THEY BORROW YOUR MONEY: LOANS CREATE DEPOSITS — that is how almost all new money is created in the economy (by commercial banks making loans). https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/quarterly-bulletin/2014/q1/money-creation-in-the-modern-economy.  Watch this short 15-minute video and see how Professor Richard Werner brilliantly explains how global banking systems really work.

In 2014, Richard Werner provided the first empirical evidence that banks create credit out of thin air.  They do this whenever they issue a loan or, more specifically, purchase a promissory note. This is a walk-through of exactly how they do it.

Most economists are unaware of this and even ignore the banking & finance sectors in their econometric models.

DISCLAIMER:   All content is presented for educational and/or entertainment purposes only. Under no circumstances should it be mistaken for professional investment advice, nor is it at all intended to be taken as such. The commentary and other contents simply reflect the opinion of the authors alone on the current and future status of the markets and various economies. It is subject to error and change without notice. The presence of a link to a website does not indicate approval or endorsement of that web site or any services, products, or opinions that may be offered by them.

Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation to buy or sell any neither securities nor investments. Do NOT ever purchase any security or investment without doing your own and sufficient research.  Neither BOOM Finance and Economics.com nor any of its principals or contributors are under any obligation to update or keep current the information contained herein. The principals and related parties may at times have positions in the securities or investments referred to and may make purchases or sales of these securities and investments while this site is live. The analysis contained is based on both technical and fundamental research.

Although the information contained is derived from sources which are believed to be reliable, they cannot be guaranteed.

Disclosure: We accept no advertising or compensation, and have no material connection to any products, brands, topics or companies mentioned anywhere on the site.

Fair Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of economic and social significance. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise

Author: Austrian Peter

Peter J. Underwood is a retired international accountant and qualified humanistic counsellor living in Bruton, UK, with his wife, Yvonne. He pursued a career as an entrepreneur and business consultant, having founded several successful businesses in the UK and South Africa His latest Substack blog describes the African concept of Ubuntu - a system of localised community support using a gift economy model.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
Jdog
Jdog
October 31, 2023 10:13 am

The US MSM is the enemy of the people, and when the societal collapse happens, they must be treated as enemy combatants.

k31
k31
  Jdog
October 31, 2023 5:22 pm

I think it would be better to treat them as witches.

Anonymous
Anonymous
October 31, 2023 11:32 am

As a US CITIZEN I now call for total withdrawal from the United Nations and evict all involved from US soil
Next all individuals and their dependents on US SOIL illegally are to be immediately rounded up and deported !
Recall all US MILITARY from around the world to facilitate these necessary actions to save the United States .
Severely restrict foreign nationals from entering the US without proper verifiable documentation of their purpose and intended length of stay

rhs jr
rhs jr
October 31, 2023 11:54 am

Building a permanent central sustainable autocratic financial system of the bankers and for the bankers with the false appearance of representative democracy and benevolence.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  rhs jr
October 31, 2023 2:48 pm

The problem with every system has always been the propensity for those who end up in charge, living opulent lives that inspire the physical labor class to seek to join the opulent class, or at least seek it for their children.
Eventually? Too much opulent class for the system foundation to support.

Great reset.
Inspire the opulent class to tear down the very system whivh makes their existence possible.
Job done.

Junious Ricardo Stanton
Junious Ricardo Stanton
October 31, 2023 3:57 pm

The wording the writer refers to is very similar the the “solutions” proposed and employed by the globalist overlords to deal with their bogus “COVID pandemic, they said “only vaccines and massive compliance with social engineering interventions will stop the spread, flatten the curve, create immunity “etc. etc.
These/those documents and reports were written primarily for the NWO cult acolytes, minions and followers; the papers and conferences reinforce their “talking points” for topics like COVID, the totally bogus climate crisis, societal transformation (the fourth industrial revolution, the Great Reset etc.) the all war all the time propaganda the plutocrats want seared into our psyches. They are telling each other what is on tap and going to happen in the near future, namely the “problem, reaction, solution” scenarios they are cooking up.

Fatman from Oz
Fatman from Oz
October 31, 2023 6:05 pm

I continue to watch MSM and will continue to do so. Perverted I know, yet what they spew out is usually the opposite of the truth. So when they spew ABCDEFG, I have the idea that the truth lies somewhere close to TUCWXYZ or the like. So please continue to watch MSM (as painful as that is) so they can continue to tell me the truth.

Voltara
Voltara
October 31, 2023 6:33 pm

I don’t know why anyone bothers talking about TV news and newspapers. If nobody believes them and barely anyone watches why do they matter? What psychological hold do they have on the public consciousness?

Their pitiful ratings figures are completely fabricated anyway and always have been.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Voltara
October 31, 2023 8:39 pm

Advertising. We are consumers you know.

rhs jr
rhs jr
  Anonymous
October 31, 2023 9:52 pm

I hate the silly juvenile diversity ads and am determined to avoid all the products in those advertisements. About all I watch anymore is Saturday football and that will probably end because the time seems to be about 50% (offensive) ads now.

Claude
Claude
November 1, 2023 7:48 pm

Mainstream news drying up and collapsing? Maybe if they didn’t suck so bad and would have some contact with reality instead of propaganda that is mediocre at that. They truly are the enemy of the people and ultimate spreaders of disinformation. If it weren’t for airports, CNN wouldn’t even have half of its reported ratings.