Does the Global Temperature Record REALLY Show a ‘Climate Emergency’?

Via Off-Guardian

Figure 1 (click to enlarge). Comparison of how global surface temperature is presented, top is anomaly data magnified to a narrow temperature range, as presented by the media, bottom is the same data, presented in absolute temperature, in the range of normal human experience.

We are choosing to re-publish this article, first published by Watts Up With That a couple of years ago, because it can teach a couple important lessons on the way the media covers “climate change”, and indeed the way to analyze data and statistics in general.

As the Great Reset progresses, both climate and data literacy are going to be indispensable tools.

*

Pro: Official Government Data Shows an Alarming Rapid Rise in Temperature Over 140 years

NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) is the original organization to raise the warning on global temperature increases, due to increasing carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere, during an address to the U.S. Senate by Dr. James Hansen in June 19881.

NASA GISS maintains a website where the data and graphs derived from that data are publicly available. They say:

The GISS Surface Temperature Analysis ver. 4 (GISTEMP v4) is an estimate of global surface temperature change. Graphs and tables are updated around the middle of every month using current data files from NOAA GHCN v4 (meteorological stations) and ERSST v5 (ocean areas), combined as described in our publications Hansen et al. (2010) and Lenssen et al. (2019). These updated files incorporate reports for the previous month and also late reports and corrections for earlier months.

They offer a graph of global temperature for each year from 1880 to the present as seen below.

This particular graph (Figure 2) is the most cited and referenced graph of its kind in the world, depicting a sharp rise in global temperature over the 140 years from 1880 to 2020. It shows that we are in a runaway warming trend that constitutes a “climate emergency”.

Media outlets understand and have adopted the term “climate emergency” and use it more frequently in headlines. In a 2019 article, seen below, they use data from NASA GISS to inform their readers.

Headline from the Guardian Newspaper, 15 Jan 2020

The average temperature in 2019 was about 1.1C above the average from 1850-1900, before large-scale fossil fuel burning began. The world’s scientists have warned that global heating beyond 1.5C will significantly worsen extreme weather and suffering for hundreds of millions of people.https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jan/15/climate-emergency-2019-was-second-hottest-year-on-record

The term “climate emergency” has seen a surge in use ever since its awareness grew after being used by the media to describe what appears to be a rapid global temperature rise.

From Wikipedia:

Oxford Dictionary chose climate emergency as the word of the year 2019 and defines the term as “a situation in which urgent action is required to reduce or halt climate change and avoid potentially irreversible environmental damage resulting from it.” Usage of the term soared more than 10,000% between September 2018 and September 2019.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_emergency_declaration#Terminology

The steep slope of the graph makes clear that Earth’s temperature is rising so quickly that it constitutes an emergency requiring immediate action.


Con: The widely cited NASA global temperature graph is highly magnified and visually misleading

Note that the Guardian article cites:

“The average temperature in 2019 was about 1.1C above the average from 1850-1900, before large-scale fossil fuel burning began.”

The entire graph and temperature data set from NASA GISS is displaying just the small change of 1.1°C of temperature, which is highly magnified to show the trend. Because this small temperature change is magnified, it gives the false impression of having a steep rising slope. For the unobservant, that steep slope looks like a dangerous trend that would constitute a “climate emergency”.

Note the two graphs below. Figure 4 shows how global warming is depicted in the media from NASA GISS data (such as seen above in the Guardian article), plotting a narrow temperature range to show a magnified graph.

Figure 5 below shows the exact same data when plotted on the scale of human temperature experience, such as the range of temperature we experience yearly from winter to summer. This is done by removing the anomaly calculation from the GISS data, using the agreed upon baseline temperature:

For the global mean, the most trusted models produce a value of roughly 14°C, i.e. 57.2°Fhttps://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/faq/abs_temp.html

Simply using an Excel Spreadsheet allows us to add that 57.2°F temperature back to the NASA GISS anomaly data value. You can download and examine the spreadsheet here for yourself:

GISSinabsolute2020.xlsxDownload

The result of that process gives you Figure 2:

Figure 5 shows a slow, and gradual temperature rise in actual absolute temperatures over the last 140 years. The difference with figure 1 is striking, and doesn’t look alarming at all.

If you were presented figure 5 as proof of an impending “climate emergency” would it be as concerning as figure 4 or the NASA GISS graph commonly cited in the media?

In the article Lessons on How to Lie with Statistics by Will Koehrsen Jul 28, 2019 he makes the following point:

How to Lie With Statistics2 is a 65-year-old book that can be read in an hour and will teach you more practical information you can use every day than any book on “big data” or “deep learning.”

Always Look at the Axes on a Chart

Adjusting the axes of a graph to make a point is a classic technique in manipulating charts. As a first principle, the y-axis on a bar chart should always start at 0. If not, it’s easy to prove an argument by manipulating the range, by for example, turning minor increases into massive changes:https://towardsdatascience.com/lessons-from-how-to-lie-with-statistics-57060c0d2f19

Just like in the GISS temperature graph that uses a non-zero starting point for the Y-axis, the first figure 6 graph on the left suggests interest rates are rising dramatically. But, when plotted in the full context of the data, on the right, the rise in interest rates does not look concerning at all.

The same misleading process is on display with NASA GISS temperature graph comparison in figures 1 and 2.

Magnified and scary looking temperature data aside, many scientists don’t believe we have a “climate emergency” at all even though high-schooler Greta Thunberg is impassioned enough to present her concerns to the United Nations3.

But some 500 scholars and scientists say there’s no “climate emergency” at all.

On the [same day] that Greta Thunberg made an impassioned speech to the United Nations about her fears of a climate emergency, a group of 500 prominent scientists and professionals, led by the CLINTEL co-founder Guus Berkhout, sent this registered letter to the United Nations Secretary-General stating that there is no climate emergency and climate policies should be designed to benefit the lives of people. Here’s the press release, here’ the list of 500 signees.https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/there-is-no-climate-emergency-say-500-experts-in-letter-to-the-united-nations/comment-page-1/

Clearly, the global temperature data does not support the idea of a “climate emergency”, because when you view it on the proper scale of normal human experience, the steep rise in temperature disappears. And clearly, 500 knowledgeable people of science say there’s no need to worry.


References:

  1. Global Warming Has Begun, Expert Tells Senate. The New York Times, June 24th, 1988. https://www.nytimes.com/1988/06/24/us/global-warming-has-begun-expert-tells-senate.html
  2. How to Lie With Statistics Darrell Huff, (1954) (illust. I. Geis), Norton, New York, ISBN 0-393-31072-8
  3. Greta Thunberg tells world leaders ‘you are failing us’, as nations announce fresh climate action, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 24 September 2019, https://www.un.org/development/desa/youth/news/2019/09/greta-thunberg/

 

As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
16 Comments
Bob
Bob
December 15, 2023 7:18 am

Get out of the “Heat Islands”, eg cities, away from the concrete and all the other heat sponges. Get out to where the sky is blue, the grass is green and the breeze is pleasant. Listen to the sounds of of the world and shut off that nattering nonsense in your mind. The world is doing just fine.

Yahsure
Yahsure
December 15, 2023 8:48 am

It’s about controlling people. warming is the least of my worries. Cooling and CO2 depletion? a cold dead planet is a real possible problem if you look at history.

The Duke of New York
The Duke of New York
December 15, 2023 8:58 am

For most of Earth’s history the mean temperature has been far higher than now. CO2 is not emergently high, but actually critically low, and has been ten times higher than now during prior ice ages. They push climate as the most dire emergency, yet nothing is said about pollution, microplastics, over-foresting, over-fishing or lack of drinkable water.

This nonsense makes covid look like a child’s white lie, yet the sheepy non-critical thinkers just gobble it up.

Anonymous
Anonymous
December 15, 2023 9:00 am

Why Did The Earth Totally Freeze For 100 Million Years?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowball_Earth

Bob
Bob
  Anonymous
December 15, 2023 10:26 am

’cause it was cold??

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
December 15, 2023 12:10 pm

It had a transinfection.
Apparently it has another one.

Anonymous
Anonymous
December 15, 2023 9:52 am

Temperatures, Pandemics and the Stock Market…I’ll take Lies & Manipulated Narratives for $100 Alex…

ICE-9
ICE-9
December 15, 2023 10:45 am

Pssssst. Water vapor is the most effective greenhouse gas. Don’t tell anyone.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  ICE-9
December 15, 2023 12:11 pm

The sun is variable output heating unit.
Shhhhh.

Anonymous
Anonymous
December 15, 2023 12:16 pm

What’s the 100,000 year graph look like?

The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer
December 15, 2023 12:36 pm

While observing the financial fucking these globalists are doling out on the masses, I find it incredible that these same fucks care one whit for ANYONE’S future. Not even their own.

Anonymous
Anonymous
December 15, 2023 1:06 pm

Author (as well as Watts) presume the validity of the temperature record.
I don’t know why it’s so hard to understand that that temperature record is make believe.
In turn, all proxy measures are calibrated to that fake temperature record.
All arguments relying inherently on the validity of that record are therefore sophistry and navel gazing.

B_MC
B_MC
December 15, 2023 1:55 pm

96% of NOAA heat measurement stations are corruptly placed to support climate change hoax

It turns out that almost every temperature station operated by the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is corruptly placed to make the country appear “warmer” than it actually is, effectively amplifying the “global warming” hoax.

An astounding 96 percent of NOAA’s temperature stations fail to the meet the agency’s own “uncorrupted placement” standards, according to research compiled by the Heartland Institute. Most of them are located near objects that trap or produce heat, corrupting their readouts.

Others are located in areas that, since the time of their placement, have become far more urbanized. This, too, is increasing the heat readouts and making it seem all across the board that “climate change” is real. (Related: The biggest heater of the planet is the sun, not cow flatulence or gas-powered vehicles.)

“With a 96 percent warm-bias in U.S. temperature measurements, it is impossible to use any statistical methods to derive an accurate climate trend for the U.S.,” says Heartland Institute Senior Fellow Anthony Watts, the study’s director.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-08-03-96percent-noaa-heat-stations-corruptly-placed-climate.html

B_MC
B_MC
December 15, 2023 2:12 pm

If you respire, you must expire…

Look out,vegans. This means you too.

Breathing contributes to global warming

Methane and nitrous oxide found in human exhalations are worse for the environment than carbon dioxide, scientists say

After measuring the gas composition in the exhaled breaths of 328 study participants, the researchers concluded human breath comprises 0.05% of the UK’s methane emissions and 0.1% of its nitrous oxide. Both of those gasses “have a much higher global warming potential than carbon dioxide,” the study notes…

A detailed analysis of test subjects’ diets failed to yield any indication that meat eaters produced more of either gas.

https://swentr.site/news/589091-human-breathing-global-warming-study/

The True Nolan
The True Nolan
December 15, 2023 2:39 pm

The deceit is even worse than the article and comments suggest.

Yes, they lie by manipulating the graphs and charts.
Yes, they lie by using known corrupted and unreliable data from bad locations.

But they also lie by actively “adjusting” past data. they use the word “adjust” but it is fraudulently changing data which in some cases is over 100 years old. They tell us that somehow they now know that the majority of thermometers 80 and 100 years ago read too high, so NOW they lower those numbers. They tell us that they now know that thermometers of a couple decades ago read too low, so now they raise those numbers. Viola! Instantly we see that there is a trend of rising temperatures that was never there before.

Increasingly, they simply THROW OUT most of the measured temperatures and replace them with estimates created by computers — and yes, as you might expect, when the estimates used in the charts are compared to the actual thermometer readings which were thrown out, the fake data ALWAYS increases the imaginary warming.

“Scientists”? No. They are con artists and have been so for decades. Go to Tony Heller’s site for a real eye opener. Tony has been documenting the fraud for years now.
https://realclimatescience.com/

Bullwinkle
Bullwinkle
December 15, 2023 4:35 pm

It is ALL about killing the Peasant Class.
Doubling of CO2 to 0.o8 percent and a modest rise in temperatures would greatly increase plant and FOOD production.
“THEY” can not have that.
“THEY” need only enough people shilled to take care of “THEM”.