Guest Post Eric Peters
This is a Christmas Diaper Report. Or – rather – a report about Diapering activity while Christmas shopping the other day. It seems Diapering is more prevalent in some stores while slim-to-nonexistent at others.
But which – and why?
At Home Depot and Lowes, things looked pretty normal in that there were almost no abnormal people in evidence. But at Goodwill and the local hipster organic food supermarket (Earth Fare) in my area, it appears one can always count on seeing at least a few mentally ill people adamantly clinging to the look that was popular a couple of years back. It’s almost like seeing someone still wearing bell bottom cord and platform shoes in the ’80s.
At Earth Fare, for instance, we saw the sad sight of a cashier who was wearing her garment as if it were 2021 and she had to wear it. She appeared to be in her 20s and so she wasn’t wearing that thing over her face because she was “at risk.” And even if she were, wearing that thing reduced her “risk” to the same extent that wrapping a string around an anvil tossed overboard will reduce the anvil’s risk of sinking to the bottom of the ocean.
It is possible, come to think of it, that she was “at risk” – having allowed herself to be injected with drugs that destroyed her immune system.
It is probably generally true that everyone you see who is still wearing what amounts to an amulet was injected with the drugs that did just that.
Even if so, wearing that thing over her face would serve a psychological purpose only. A powerful one. One so powerful it overrides her eyes as well as her mind in that – surely – she can see almost everyone else is not wearing a face amulet and isn’t doubling over in death, right before her eyes. It is obvious there is nothing to worry about – especially for a girl in her 20s, who is as likely to die from catching a cold as the tide not coming in tomorrow.
And yet she wears the amulet.
Other wearers could be seen at Goodwill, including a young guy behind the counter. He is also as likely to die from catching a cold as a midget is likely to be a first-round draft pick for the Lakers.
Don’t they know the all-clear has been sounded? Can’t they see it’s safe to show their faces again?
Yes, of course. They do know it. And – obviously – they can see it.
So what accounts for it?
It has to be politics.
The same kind of politics that had people wearing devices in other times and places – to show where they stood, politically. In revolutionary France, it was the cockade of the Jacobins; even the king wore it (though it didn’t keep him safe, either). In revolutionary Germany, it was the armband – and it stood for essentially the same politics. The French Revolution being fundamentally a socialist (and nationalist) revolution, too. Both revolutions, it is interesting to observe, had tripartite slogans. And they both amounted to the same thing, too.
There was a second American Revolution that began about three years ago. Its outcome has yet to be determined. Its revolutionaries are the ones you can still see wearing the symbol of their movement. It shows us the movement hasn’t yet been defeated; it is merely temporarily, sullenly quiescent.
It bides its time.
And time is running out. For them – or for us.
The events of the next 11 months will determine which of us has run out of time. Will there be another 1789 (or 1933)? It seems a fait accompli. The currently quiescent and biding their time revolutionaries will not abide what they see as a counter-revolution (one with an orange nimbus) and will become most non-quiescent if the glow waxes rather than wanes. On the other hand, what will occur if the revolution that began in 2020 is cemented in 2024?
It seems either way there will be a revolution of one kind or another.
Reason and forbearance (on both sides) might have prevented it. But – as in 1789 (and 1932) that seems as antiquary and quaint, almost, as knee britches and Gemütlichkeit.G
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
It’s politics and religion.
Those two things we shouldn’t discuss.
The third off limits topic is soiled diapers of geriatric stayed-too-long politicians.
/s
Religion IS politics IS religion IS politics…
Repeat ad nauseum.
As many have noted, statism is the religion of the “irreligious”: all must obey their conscience, or (if male) be cast into a low-status job in FlyOver country, or (if female) be condemned to the indignity of child-bearing.
As much as Auntie loves the amulet descriptor for the muzzle it shall always be an instrument of submission and humilitation. The people still wearing it appear brain damaged from the wildly successful experiment. And they, as Eric rightly points out, were probably the most injected bunch of all, poor bastards.
I think they were brain damaged before. Like the heavily tattooed young people who did seem to wear them in a superstitious fashion.
There is probably overlap on the submission/humiliation front. Lots of piercings and jewelry evolved from symbols of being owned.
Excellent point. Include scarification and branding in those rituals and visible signage.
I still see mask-wearers, nearly all of whom in my town are quite elderly. One in a hundred may have a real medical reason (immunosuppression, or unusual allergen sensitivity); the other 99% were spooked by the talking heads on TeeVee, who would never deceive them, anyway.
Just sayin’.
Let’s NOT overlook the fact that these people were mentally fucked long before they ever heard the word, “covid”. The masks are nothing more than a visible symptom of an invisible mental illness.
“It shows us the movement hasn’t yet been defeated; it is merely temporarily, sullenly quiescent.
It bides its time.”
It bidens its time.
There … FIFY …
PLEASE, give us a new picture.
That ONE sucks!
Damn, Koreans,
Taking all our diapers!
Apparently a cockade doesn’t in any way aid your cock. Learn something new every day.
Isn’t it all about the attaching? Auntie wouldn’t know but ouch. (Those Frenchies.)
And why put a codpiece on your trouser trout? That seems counterintuitive.
and redundant.
Mostly kneegros and senile old fucks I se wearing them still. Last wknd was a kniglet wearing one cause shaniqua made him I guess…..
Saw a guy out wearing a mask on a golf course.