Guest Post by Martin Armstrong
Let’s get real. The entire nonsense of climate change is camouflage for the real agenda of reducing the population. Bill Gates has been funding this and reducing the people, for you are the carbon he wants to eliminate. This entire idea that was stuffed into his head by his father dates back to Malthus.
They will create plagues that fulfill our disease models, and you have Kerry running around to reduce the food supply, claiming agriculture is a major source of climate change, so to reduce the food supply that will inevitably cause starvation and kill as many people as possible.
These people will make Hitler look like just an amateur. Malthus did not understand cycles. In his 1798 book An Essay on the Principle of Population, Malthus argued that an increase in a nation’s food production had improved the well-being of the population; however, that improvement was temporary because it led to population growth. So the population would exceed the food supply and that was the doom of society. He never understood cycles and certainly failed to comprehend that innovation is part of the cycle.
The invention of gunpowder that led to cannons was how the Turks conquered Byzantium when its wall had been impenetrable for centuries. The development of oil as an energy source saved the whales, but it gave birth to the automobile, which expanded civilization into the suburbs.
The discovery of fossil fuels enabled the combustion engine, which was then applied to farming. That increased the food production. Fertilizers were developed, and now Kerry and Gates realize that they have to kill food production to bring about Malthus’s prediction of 1798.
Kerry is a flat, outright propagandist for this entire climate change agenda. He states that scientists are correct for 30 years. That is just total BS. They were predicting an ice age in the 1970s. What happened to the hole in the ozone layer? Remember we were all going to die from acid rain?
Strangely, Bill Gates is now the largest farmland/landowner in the United States, which is a paradox, just like his vaccines to save people while pushing to reduce the population. Gates began buying up farmland in 2013 and now owns about 270,000 acres spread across 18 different states. He has a little more than one-third of the state of Rhode Island, a stunning amount for one person. So why does Bill Gates keep buying up so much farmland if this is a significant factor in climate change? Some find it a sinister paradox when Gates isn’t changing the practices of the farmers renting the land. Does this put him in the position to stop food production when he feels the time is right?
This attack on farming ironically has come exactly 224 years from Malthus trying to reduce agriculture production now, and with the climate turning colder, throw in a couple of volcanoes, and we have a major agricultural crisis on our hands. None of this makes any sense.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
If they break the Farm to Table supply chain there is no quick fix. It takes time to replant, re-grow, harvest and process food stuffs. There is no rushing it and nothing you can do can speed it up. Nothing. If the cycle is stopped once, briefly, untold numbers of people starve before the food supply is reestablished.
Orders of magnitude more people starve if agriculture is restarted without mechanization.
People have spoken of being thrown into a 19th century world if there was an EMP, Solar Flare etc. There were millions of horses and other draft animals then, harness makers, black smiths, people who built steam engines, loggers, and all manner of other skills and infrastructure. we have NONE OF THAT. The result is unimaginably grim.
We have to take what those who wish to starve us have but think we shouldn’t.
VOWG
Eat the rich.
Exactly. A new dark age is more like it.
makes perfect sense if the goal is to cull us
Point of order:
In the reverse of the way most people think of it the combustion engine was not made possible by the discovery of fossil fuel. The combustion engine was actually invented to improve the production of fossil fuel, which had already been in use for millennia, but did not require fossil fuel to run. Most of them ended up running on wood until the use of combustion engines had increased the production of fossil fuel to such a degree that it became viable to switch to fossil fuel to run the engines that facilitated the production of fossil fuel. Can you say “feedback loop” boys and girls? I knew you could.
The first free running combustion engine vehicle capable of carrying a person was built in 1769 and the modern expansion of the suburbs was facilitated by combustion engine rail long before most people had even seen an automobile. Electrification of urban and suburban serving rail began only 10 years after Daimler and Benz had been able to putt-putt the length of their driveways, and so rail continued to dominate suburban growth for some further decades. Millions of people still rely on rail to support their suburban living. That’s why Grand Central Terminal exists.
It’s abiogenic, not fossil.
Are you being rayssiss?
I’m trying to be. Where am I failing in this endeavor?
Whenever possible I stick to one argument at a time. Opening a second provides an opportunity to drive my primary argument off the rail.
Sometimes it isn’t possible. In sex vs. gender, for instance, correcting the language almost always has to come first, but in this case the origin of the fuel is an irrelevancy to the argument I was making.
Also a common psyop trick is to derail accurate comments in any way possible. To distract and get folks off topic instead of
directly over the target
…and when crops fail? By actual ‘nature’ or man destroyed.
WHO chief demands ‘plant-based’ food systems to ‘save planet’
All Western nations and Western-styled (S.Korea, Japan, etc.) nations have below replacement reproduction. That’s why their respective traitor ‘leaders’ have embraced immigration. These nations will shrink on their own over time if left alone.
So…if population is the problem, then the ‘elites’ should focus on where the populations are highest and/or are growing the fastest (China, India, Africa).
They ( club of rome ) have chosen to cull the west and keep the asians due to the culture ingrained over centuries. Chinese / Japanese are used to rigid society & conformity. Easier to manage.
That seems a silly argument to me. Why must a population adhere perpetually to positive growth rather than go through cycles? What is the unstated assumption or goal?
Only politicians understand the why of your question. Until you understand that growth-which they love-provides nearly unlimited license for corruption, graft, and theft of a societies’ wealth.
As smart as we think we all are, we are meerly clothed animals. Like all other animals, we will reproduce until we reach the carrying capacity of our ecosystem. And then, as always happens when you exceed the carrying capacity, great numbers will die off.
We are using up natural resources at an alarming rate yet the so called “elites” imagine that they exempt from the laws of nature because they are so rich, believing that this makes them so smart. They will end up eaten by their servants and die ignoble deaths with the rest of the “useless eaters”.
The survivors are the true elites. Those that live in harmony with the land and understand natures cycles. Those, like HSF, that engender strong, self sufficient community are the meek that shall inherit this earth.
God bless them.
That’s a pretty good explanation of how the meek will inherit the earth.
Bill Gates seems to be up to more legal skullduggary just like he used in the early days of his software company. His farmland purchase in North Dakota went through to the dismay of many local farming and other interests-including Judy Vogel, who did not stop asking embarrassing questions that well after the fact shed some light on the tricks being played by Farmer Bill with help from North Dakota bureacrats. It appears he sets up a new shell company or trust name-often reflective of the new area where he spends millions upon millions buying farmland. Red River Trust-as finally divulged on documents Vogel was able to obtain-is fitting for prime ag land in the Red River Valley of North Dakota. The link provides interesting reading regarding the slimy deal that would have been totally covered up had she not been passionate about her cause.