Guest Post by
The annual meeting of the World Economic Forum wrapped up this week with calls for digital IDs, rapid development of new vaccines, more partnerships with corporate media outlets like The New York Times, and widespread acceptance and proliferation of artificial intelligence in all areas of society, including healthcare and education.
The threat of a new pandemic and so-called “misinformation.” The future of democracy. The future impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in society. The “green agenda.”
These were just some of the topics on the agenda at the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, which concluded today.
Some of the highlights of this year’s meeting included warnings of how a yet-unknown “Disease X” may cause the next pandemic, discussions on how AI could lead to the rapid development of new vaccines, and talk about how AI could either fall victim to — or filter out — so-called “misinformation” and “disinformation.”
‘We don’t want to wait a year before we get the vaccine’
Warnings were accompanied by more optimistic — from the perspective of the meeting’s participants — outlooks about the role AI could play in tackling future pandemics, such as through the rapid development of new vaccines.
Jeremy Hunt, the U.K.’s chancellor of the Exchequer, said during a Thursday panel discussion — in which Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla participated — that “when we have the next pandemic, we don’t want to have to wait a year before we get the vaccine.”
“If AI can shrink the time it takes to get that vaccine to a month, then that is a massive step forward for humanity,” Hunt said.
Digital ID ‘very necessary’ for tracking the unvaccinated
During another Thursday panel discussion, Queen Máxima of the Netherlands said that digital ID is “very necessary” for the provision of a range of public services — and suggested that it can be used to track the unvaccinated.
Digital ID “is very necessary for financial services, but not only. It is also good for school enrollment, it is also good for health — who actually got a vaccination or not,” she said.
Bourla elaborated on the possibilities he sees for AI in the realm of healthcare.
Answering a question from CNN journalist Fareed Zakaria, Bourla said, “Our job is to make breakthroughs that change patients’ lives. With AI, I can do it faster and I can do it better.”
One example identified by Bourla was the role AI played in developing Paxlovid, a prescription oral medication marketed as a treatment for COVID-19.
“It was developed in four months,” Bourla said, whereas development of such a drug “usually takes four years.” He said AI helped significantly reduce the amount of time needed for the “drug discovery” process, where “You really synthesize millions of molecules and then you try to discover within them, which one works.”
He credited this breakthrough with saving “millions of lives.”
“I truly believe that we are about to enter a scientific renaissance in life sciences because of this coexistence of advancements in technology and biology,” Bourla said. “AI is a very powerful tool. In the hands of bad people [it] can do bad things for the world, but in the hands of good people [it] can do great things for the world.”
World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus warned on Wednesday during the “Preparing for Disease X” panel discussion that the world must prepare for a future pandemic, which may be caused by a yet-unknown “Disease X.”
Panelists warned that “Disease X” — which is included in the WHO’s list of “priority diseases” — could “result in 20 times more fatalities than the coronavirus pandemic.”
Aside from “Disease X,” Tedros and other participants on the panel also discussed the need for a “pandemic agreement” and the urgency of having it approved at this year’s World Health Assembly, to be held between May 27 and June 1 in Geneva.
‘We’re going to have digital doctors, digital people’
During the “Technology in a Turbulent World” panel, panelists offered predictions as to other ways in which AI is likely to become integrated into people’s lives.
Marc Benioff, chair and CEO of Salesforce, said that while “AI is really not at a point where we’re replacing human beings, it’s really at a point where we’re augmenting them.”
He cited, as hypothetical examples, the possibility that WEF participants could ask an AI application such as ChatGPT “what’s some good questions I could ask” during their panel, or that radiologists could use AI “to help read my CT scan into my MRI.”
“We’re just about to get to that breakthrough where we’re going to go, ‘Wow, it’s almost like it’s a digital person,” Benioff said. However, reflecting the theme of this year’s WEF meeting — “Rebuilding Trust” — he added, “When we get to that point, we’re going to ask ourselves, ‘Do we trust it?’”
“We’re going to have digital doctors, digital people, these digital people are going to merge and there’s going to have to be a level of trust,” Benioff said.
Similarly, Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI — which maintains a partnership with Microsoft — said that AI will help “everyone’s job … operate at a little bit higher of a level of abstraction.”
“We will all have access to a lot more capability and we’ll still make decisions. They may trend more towards curation over time, but we’ll make decisions about what should happen in the world,” he said.
Julie Sweet, chair and CEO of Accenture, also expressed optimism over AI’s future role, saying that AI is “massively going to improve social services.”
To build “trust,” Benioff called for more regulation, alluding to the social media ecosystem and “misinformation” on such platforms.
“We have to also turn to those regulators and say, ‘Hey, if you look at social media over the last decade, it’s been kind of a f***ing s**t show.’ It’s pretty bad. We don’t want that in our AI industry. We want to have a good healthy partnership with these moderators and with these regulators.”
Altman suggested that one way to develop such “partnerships” is to train AI to locate and identify information from certain preferred sources.
He said:
“What we want to do with the content owners, like The New York Times and deals that we have done with many other publishers, and we’ll do more over time, is when a user says, ‘Hey, ChatGPT, what happened at Davos today?,’ we would like to display content, link out, show brands of places like The New York Times or the Wall Street Journal or any other great publication and say, ‘Here’s what happened today. Here’s this real-time information.’”
Bourla also called for more regulation of AI, saying that while he was “certain right now that the benefits clearly outweigh the risks,” he feels “we need regulation right now.”
Hunt, however, said that minimal regulation is the best approach at this time.
“I think we need to be light touch because … it’s such an emerging stage. You can kill the golden goose before it has a chance to grow,” he said.
AI could be used to educate students about ‘misinformation’
WEF leaders also addressed the future role of AI in education, in particular during the WEF’s “Education Meets AI” panel on Thursday.
According to Forbes, panelists, including government officials from Slovenia and the United Arab Emirates, suggested that AI will provide “novel opportunities for deeply personalized learning and tutoring.”
Ahmad bin Abdullah Humaid Belhoul Al Falasi, minister of education of the United Arab Emirates, called this “democratic tutoring,” suggesting that AI would provide “scalable” tutoring “available to all” outside the classroom, which will supplement classroom teaching and which “leaves the hardest part — the soft skills — to teachers.”
Nzinga Qunta, an anchor with the South African Broadcasting Corporation, suggested that such tutoring would not be restricted in terms of age or physical space.
Panelists also provided reassurances that AI would not lead to the elimination of human jobs — but suggested that people won’t lose their jobs due to AI “but by people who know how to use AI,” Forbes reported.
The “risk of mis- and disinformation” was also highlighted during the discussion, with panelists suggesting that “critical thinking” can enable students to identify the “hazardous” risks of “misinformation” and “disinformation.”
‘Misinformation’ can lead to ‘civil unrest’
“Misinformation” was indeed highly prominent on the agenda of this year’s WEF meeting. The WEF’s Global Risks Report, released Jan. 10, named “misinformation” and “disinformation” derived from AI as the top risk facing the world over the next two years, and the fifth-highest risk over the next decade.
According to the report, “Foreign and domestic actors alike will leverage misinformation and disinformation to widen societal and political divides” in the next two years, posing a risk to elections in countries such as the U.S., U.K. and India and a risk of “civil unrest” across the world.
“What’s more, false information and societal polarization are inherently intertwined, with potential to amplify each other,” according to Saadia Zahidi, the WEF’s managing director, for which “innovation and trustworthy decision-making” are required. However, she said this “is only possible in a world with alignment on the facts.”
‘There is a risk the wrong leaders are elected’
The WEF’s warnings about the “threat” of “misinformation” and “disinformation” is closely aligned with fears expressed by WEF meeting participants regarding how AI could impact democracy and the electoral process.
In recent days, a video went viral on social media showing WEF co-founder and chairman Klaus Schwab in a discussion with Sergey Brin, co-founder and former president of Google. Schwab suggested a hypothetical scenario where “you do not even have to have elections anymore” because AI “can already predict the winner” — a scenario Brin did not explicitly dismiss.
Even though that video was frequently presented in social media posts as originating from this year’s WEF meeting, it is actually from a discussion at the WEF’s annual meeting in 2017. Yet, other statements at this year’s meeting also referenced elections and governance.
During a panel discussion today on “Global Risks: What’s in the Mail?” Haslinda Amin, Bloomberg News’ chief international correspondent for Southeast Asia, suggested “there is a risk the wrong leaders are elected” in this year’s elections in key countries.
Responding to Amin, Douglas L. Peterson, president and CEO of S&P Global, said this “is one of the top risks for this year” and added, “We also need to make sure we stay engaged through global institutions, like the UN, like NATO.”
And during his special address at the WEF meeting, António Guterres, the United Nation’s secretary-general, called for “effective mechanisms of global governance” as part of “a new multipolar global order.”
Building ‘international economic order’ required to tackle ‘climate crisis’
Numerous WEF meeting participants also warned about the risks posed by climate change — and used the opportunity to call for more money and investments for “green” initiatives.
Speaking earlier this week at the WEF meeting, John Kerry, U.S. special presidential envoy for climate, said 2023 “was literally the most disruptive, climate-disrupted, most climate consequential, negative year in human history,” and that as a result, there is no more “space for debate or, frankly, procrastination any longer.”
To respond to this, WEF meeting participants said more money is needed. For instance, Tharman Shanmugaratnam, president of Singapore, said “governments are going to have to invest significantly more than they’ve invested before.”
And according to Chrystia Freeland, deputy prime minister of Canada, government intervention is needed as part of the transition away from carbon — a process which she said will create “more jobs, more growth, more manufacturing.”
The price tag for such interventions, according to Christine Lagarde, president of the European Central Bank, is “no less than 620 billion per year to actually move the green transition further.”
When confronted on the streets of Davos Thursday by True North Media journalist Andrew Lawton, Lagarde dodged questions about whether central bank digital currencies, such as the digital euro introduced by Lagarde, could be used to control people.
“I’m not speaking because I’m in a quiet period,” was Lagarde’s response.
In another confrontation on Davos’ streets, Rebel News reporters targeted Philipp Hildebrand, vice chairman of BlackRock, one of the world’s largest investment firms, asking him a series of questions about BlackRock’s support for “ESG” — environmental, social and corporate governance.
Hildebrand did not respond to any of the reporters’ questions.
And Jake Sullivan, national security adviser of the U.S., tied several threads together, suggesting on Tuesday during a special address that “the international economic order” could be built or updated “in ways that … address the climate crisis.”
More than 60 heads of state and 1,600 business leaders were among this year’s 2,800 participants from 120 countries.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
These people are on some bad stuff, frying their brains. I wonder how many people will die because of their plans.
Will die? More like — how many have already died and will continue to die ad infinitum …
If Conservative, Constitution Loving, Bitter Clinging, Deplorable, Patriotic Americans were the problem/danger that we are portrayed as, no one would be leaving Davos alive.
Ebola Vaccine That ‘Sheds’ Onto/Infects Others 31% of the Time Given to Colorado Healthcare Workers Just Down the Road from New Ebola Bat Lab
Pending pandemic?
https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/ebola-vaccine-that-sheds-onto-infects
The “Ebola Vaccine” was targeting BLACK people of Africa…Remember???
And just as the “Covid-19” scam actually was designed to the SAME people…It actually has “Back-fired” on Them “Big-Pharma”.
No wonder THEY are attempting to start WW3…TO HIDED THEIR EVIL WAYS!
Buy a copy of “In Lies We Trust” video DVD format for all the “Evidence”!
US .gov holds ebola patent:
https://www.google.com/search?q=US+.gov+holds+ebola+patent%3A&sca_esv=600112330&source=hp&ei=xiysZbLTIuqtptQPprmbiAU&iflsig=ANes7DEAAAAAZaw61h4oGQSUIC0O6KaDIbR13C-qr7h5&ved=0ahUKEwiyzuPx5uyDAxXqlokEHabcBlEQ4dUDCBM&oq=US+.gov+holds+ebola+patent%3A&gs_lp=Egdnd3Mtd2l6IhtVUyAuZ292IGhvbGRzIGVib2xhIHBhdGVudDpIAFAAWABwAHgAkAEAmAEAoAEAqgEAuAEMyAEA&sclient=gws-wiz
I have a theory on this.
I’ve extensively read Todd Callendar’s works on Ebola/Marburg back in 2021.
I believe this Colorado bat lab crap is more “look over here, a squirrel”.
It is these ebola jabs that have been given to these healthcare workers which will then shed the ebola virus onto others who are already sick and in contact with these people.
I listened to that one doctor who joined Jon on that Infowars segment and he said that this ebola virus would certainly affect the immuno-compromised.
Who is already has severely compromised immune systems? Many of the people who took the covid jabs, a lot of whom now happen to be some of the most sick and are the ones in hospitals with turbo cancers, auto-immune diseases, etc. They’re also the ones who will be most likely exposed to these healthcare workers who have been given these new shedding jabs.
They’ll claim it’ll be another “lab leak” again, but that’s BS. It will come from being spread to those who are already crippled by the covid jabs instead. This will then trigger all of the existing CDC regulations/procedures on Ebola/hemorraghic fevers and will trigger what was passed as part of Congressional bills in 2021 and last year.
They’ve had these ebola/marburg vaccines already set up and ready to go for some time. However, as Todd pointed out, these vaccines are loaded with ricin instead, which will simply kill people off, and much faster than the covid jabs ever did.
If people take a look at symptoms of ricin poisoning, much of them directly align with the symptoms of ebola as well…
This is also the perfect vehicle for them to ram through that WHO treaty in May of this year, and then to also eliminate paper currency under the guise of “public health/safety” given how ebola happens to spread through “bodily fluid contaminations”.
Can’t have paper money anymore as it isn’t safe given people cough, sneeze, etc on it…
To me, it’s a plain roadmap, especially since the elitists always use repeating scripts.
It’s no different than with covid.
1. Make statements at WEF about a “new pandemic”
2. Run “health simulation”
3. Release/trigger actual disease
4. Lockdown
5. Commence toxic jabbing of sheep
For Covid:
1. WEF/Gavi talked about an upcoming pandemic in 2019
2. Health simulation run was Event 201 held in October 2019 and a simulation was run by Johns Hopkins
3. Covid “materializes” in China in early 2020 (was about 3 months after simulation)
4. 2020 and 2021 lockdowns
5. All the drug companies magically release covid jabs in 2021
Now for Ebola/Marburg/Diesase X:
1. Make statements at WEF about disease x (already done)
2. Simulation was just completed by Johns Hopkins earlier this week now
3. Triggering actual release has already started now with these ebola jabs for healthcare workers
4. They’ll probably do lockdowns in spring here for this
5. Toxic ricin jabs are already set to go along with all the CDC procedures as they were already created in 2021
Not hard to see at all…
Big Pharmers “All our vaccine products come with protection from liability.”
Time pass.
Big Pharmers “Let’s start calling all of our products ‘vaccines’ “
In order to get rid of all financial liability, those ‘vaccines’ also need to be on the list of vaccines required for children …
In the “Universe” SPACE is BLACK…White is DEATH…ALL LIFE exist inside this blackness and will FOREVER!
Even the so-called “White Race” came from a BLACK Female!
For those poor white people who BE-LIE-VE “Believe” in “White Supremacy” They are being “Trapped” by our “Creators”…Melanin Beings.
They fail to “Remember” RE-MEM-BER WHERE THEY CAME FROM…THUS ARE ACTUALLY TRAPPING THEMSELVES.
FOR PROOF SEE: http://www.supremedesignonline.com
What?
Are you Ed?
It’s just effin amazing to see how arrogant and self important these insane psychopaths are. They use selective logic to convince themselves that the reason people don’t universally sign up for technocratic totalitarianism is because they saw mis/dis information. That’s also why they vote for the ‘wrong’ people.. and AI can help stupid ol us with that, so elections won’t even be necessary anymore. BTW, who programs the ‘correct’ info into AI?
This crazy idea that truth is universally and immutably aligned by the laws of the universe with their views.. from COVID they sure were wrong for being universally and unquestionably right all the time.. enough to boldly say we will tell you what truth is and crush the mis/dis with our AI.. Sounds like a sales pitch for a moron..
It all sounds so civilized doesn’t it? The WEF is nothing but a forum to make neofuedal technocratic totalitarianism sound like fluffy wonderful civilized life with no worries. They all know what they’re really after, this is just the marketing arm.. it’s the sales pitch in room 101 without the painful torture part..
“Our job is to make breakthroughs that change patients’ lives. With AI, I can do it faster and I can do it better.”
Cancer certainly changes people’s lives and it requires a butt load of medicine to fight it. Is that what Bourla was referencing?
Bourla used the expression ‘change patients’ lives’ … he’s not talking about ‘fighting’ anything or ‘curing’ anyone …
Fighting the disease is what Pharma is interested in doing. Getting the opportunity to give you the disease is just a bonus. The only cure you will find is death, after they have drained your bank accounts.