On the hard days ahead, and the trap we are (eagerly, so eagerly) setting for ourselves

Guest Post by Alex Berenson

Drugs and gambling eat people. And we keep making them more accessible and powerful. Meantime, “ethical non-monogamy” is just another way to spell “key party.” It’s 1972 all over, with stronger drugs.

Last week, New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg warned of the self-centered ennui marching across the United States:

I keep thinking of the early 1970s, another period when broad-based, idealistic social movements had recently fragmented, with some turning toward a militant sectarianism while others withdrew from politics, seeking self-realization in lifestyle experimentation.

Fair warning: Goldberg is a progressive, though an open-minded one.

In December 2018, she interviewed me about Tell Your Children, my book on the mental health risks of cannabis. She believed cannabis should be legalized, but she treated my arguments respectfully. (This was before my reporting on lockdowns and the mRNAs made me the one who must not be named at the Times; before the elite media turned so polarized and hard-left it stopped engaging with inconvenient facts.)

So Goldberg made her comment in the context of a potential win for Donald Trump in November, which she thinks would be a disaster. Obviously, a lot of you disagree.

But I believe the specter she raises is broader even than the 2024 election, and will haunt us no matter who wins.

America is not well.

This warning isn’t just a feeling, or false nostalgia. (When I was a kid, we had Oldsmobiles! And Three’s Company.) Our decline is visible in the data.

(The good old days! Hard to believe Olds got shut down.)

We are the wealthiest society in human history.

Yet our life expectancy now badly trails most other developed countries – despite (despite?) our massive medical spending. Preventable deaths have shown terrible trends in the last few years. Not just overdoses, but murders, car accidents, even fires. Fewer Americans are marrying or having children.

Many of the young seem paralyzed, too, maybe because of the media’s endless whinging over climate change, with accompanying efforts to turn every blizzard or heat wave into a harbinger of the apocalypse. One would hardly know that weather-related deaths have plunged for generations.

But that’s only half the story. Maybe less.

I almost can’t believe I have to say this out loud, but in the United States in 2024 I do:

Drug use is not a moral neutral. (By drug use I mean the consumption of recreational, mind-altering drugs, legal or not, prescribed or not. Including alcohol, for alcohol is indeed a drug.)

Gambling is not a moral neutral.

I write this as someone who drinks and gambles regularly. Playing poker is in fact gambling, despite what some poker players like to think.

Sex and adultery are more complex issues. If one partner has completely given up on sex, for example, the other may be justified in trying to sexual satisfaction outside marriage, with or without the approval of the celibate partner.

But I do think – at a minimum – efforts to bring third (or fourth!) parties into established monogamous relationships are rarely a moral neutral. Especially when children are involved.

I am not using the phrase “moral neutral” in a religious sense – or even, necessarily, to mean “absolute right and wrong.” What I mean is something more like: these actions can easily – very easily – be taken to excess. When they do they are likely to produce despair, not happiness. And not just for the user.

I thought about these dangers again after reading the Philip K Dick novel A Scanner Darkly. Dick mostly wrote science fiction, and A Scanner Darkly is sometimes miscategorized as a sci-fi novel.

It’s not.

From first page to last, A Scanner Darkly about drugs and drug use – an invented drug called Substance D, which Dick never fully defines but which looks like a powerful stimulant. The novel opens with a Substance D user in the late stages of formication, the “bug paranoia” which occurs in particularly unlucky cocaine and methamphetamine addicts:

Once a guy stood all day shaking bugs from his hair. The doctor told him there were no bugs in his hair. After he had taken a shower for eight hours, standing under hot water hour after hour suffering the pain of the bugs, he got out and dried himself, and he still had bugs in his hair; in fact, he had bugs all over him.

Imagine, if you can, being so totally addicted to a drug that even the feeling of imaginary bugs crawling all over your skin cannot convince you to stop taking it.

The story doesn’t get any happier after that.

A Scanner Darkly offers among the darkest depictions of drug use ever presented. Most drug novels make at least a nod toward capturing the highs early on before careening into addiction and horror. Dick never bothers. He begins his story in the mid- to late-stages of addiction, when users are mainly worried about withdrawal: I only got a week’s supply, he thought. What then when I’m out? Shit.

(From the 2006 film adaption of A Scanner Darkly, which was shot as live action and then traced over by animators. True story: Keanu Reeves was supposed to play John Wells in the movie version of The Faithful Spy. Too bad it never got made, he would have been great.)

But the hardest gut punch in A Scanner Darkly comes after it ends, in a short author’s note where Dick makes clear it is hardly fiction at all:

This has been a novel about some people who were punished entirely too much for what they did. They wanted to have a good time, but they were like children playing in the street; they could see one after another of them being killed – run over, maimed, destroyed – but they continued to play anyhow.

We really all were very happy for a while, sitting around not toiling but just bullshitting and playing, but it was for such a terrible brief time, and then the punishment was beyond belief…

For a while I myself was one of these children playing in the street; I was, like the rest of them, playing instead of being grown up, and I was punished.

In fact, Dick had always used amphetamines heavily. But after his fourth marriage broke up in 1970, he fell into full-blown addiction. His house in California became a crash pad for a rotating gang of users (and dealers) in their teens and twenties. Dick survived, but many of his new friends did not. His author’s note lists seven dead, and six more with permanent psychosis or brain damage.

Here’s what I mean in the simplest way when I say drug use is not a moral neutral.

I mean: Drugs eat people. To the bone, until nothing is left. (And gambling. And sex, certain kinds of sex.)

No one can know when he starts if he’s going to be eaten. The consequences of use often fall more heavily on the poor, but that’s not because the rich are exempt. It’s only because they have more runway, more time to get clean, more chances to change their minds. If they play too long and too hard, they get eaten too.

By the end of the 1970s, after a sodden, lost decade of casual drug use and sex, Americans had learned this lesson. In her Times piece, Goldberg quotes a 1979 book called “The Culture of Narcissism”:

…people have convinced themselves that what matters is psychic self-improvement: getting in touch with their feelings, eating health food, taking lessons in ballet or belly-dancing, immersing themselves in the wisdom of the East, jogging, learning how to ‘relate,’ overcoming the ‘fear of pleasure.’

But being afraid of pleasure is not the world’s worst idea.

Now, as we were in 1972, we’re angry and cynical on left and right, stuck with leaders many of us despise, encouraging our own retreat from the world following misadventures overseas.

Only this time the drugs are so much stronger: instead of hash and black-tar heroin, we have 90 percent THC vapes – legal almost everywhere – and fentanyl. Psychedelics are on the way back too, and we’re so addicted to stimulants that we are constantly running out.

(You can’t spell addict without ADD. Or maybe you can? I’d better check my phone.)

Gambling, which barely existed legally in 1970, is everywhere too.

Casino gambling, lotteries, scratch-offs, and now – worst of all – on phones, which are addictive enough as it is. Time will tell, but I am increasingly worried we are only beginning to see the harm allowing people to bet this way can cause.

Finally, the media elite seems to have decided that this is a good time to push “ethical non-monogamy,” (yeah, right), or even polygamy and polycules. Most studies suggest the real problem with sex these days is that teenagers and twenty-somethings aren’t having enough of it, not that middle-aged Brooklynites need an excuse for wipe-swapping.

Stick around long enough and every bad idea comes back.

This time, though, the bad ideas are supercharged.

We’re already at 100,000 overdose deaths a year.

How many will it take for us to realize that “self-realization in lifestyle experimentation” is not the answer?

As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
Ouirphuqd
Ouirphuqd
February 1, 2024 8:12 am

We’re feeding the beast, all the good intentions of “if it feels good, do it” are seldom scrutinized. The dishonesty of not holding individuals responsible for their questionable behavior never pay dividends, consumption leads to a soulless poverty. When everyone is equally poor, Satan will have completed the task!

Anonymous
Anonymous
February 1, 2024 8:52 am

Drinking beer and playing poker with the guys is immoral; but cheating on your spouse is justifiable.

Okay, Berenclown.

Kennyboy
Kennyboy
February 1, 2024 8:58 am

ONLY WHEN “WHITE PEOPLE” REMEMBER THAT SONG CALLED “IMAGINE”, WILL IT EVER BECOME A GREAT NATION…GET THAT???

Timmy
Timmy
  Kennyboy
February 1, 2024 10:03 am

‘Imagine’ John Lennon staged his death and lived on as Mark Staycer…a ‘John Lennon’ impersonator

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
February 1, 2024 8:59 am

Here’s the thing he leaves out; purpose.

A human being with something to do, something that gives their life meaning, something that brings them into the orbit of others doing the same things, sharing the same experiences and having similar goals will not feel the same desire that drug abusers do. Drugs, or sex or alcohol are substitutes for purpose, not impediments.

The problem is never the outside influence, it’s the inner purpose.

When we lose meaning, we seek something else to fill the hole it leaves behind.

countryboy
countryboy
February 1, 2024 9:00 am

Sin eats people.

TrubyDoobie
TrubyDoobie
February 1, 2024 9:02 am

We’re already at 100,000 overdose deaths a year.

We are at 30,000 od deaths a year.
The other 70,000 died with vaccine injury co-morbidities.

DecimalPoint
DecimalPoint
February 1, 2024 9:05 am

We’re already at 100,000 overdose deaths a year.

Or 10,000 overdose deaths and a bunch of vaxxed to fill out the hundred thousand.

Anonymous
Anonymous
February 1, 2024 10:02 am

Huh? What was the point of this article again?

Aunt Acid
Aunt Acid
  Anonymous
February 1, 2024 10:59 am

To display superior morals of the writer.

m
m
February 1, 2024 11:24 am

“If they play too long and too hard, they get eaten too.
By the end of the 1970s, after a sodden, lost decade of casual drug use and sex, Americans had learned this lesson.”

Sorry, but that’s entirely wishful thinking.

cz
cz
February 1, 2024 12:19 pm

you can have opinions and feelz about morals, and/or notice outcomes based on behaviors, but you cannot divorce morals from “religion” (as alex wants to do) because moral standards, actual benchmarks of right and wrong, only come from God.

Walter
Walter
February 1, 2024 9:33 pm

What an odd article. True in many ways but very odd. In the 60s and 70s people had a little bit of an excuse in ignorance. Not as much of an excuse as I thought at the time but some of an excuse. Reading a while back about the meth running through Hollywood made me realize the word isn’t getting passed or something. The opioids as well, in the sixties and even seventies most of the hard dope was in the lowest part of society and welled up into the -mostly- ignorant middle. Hallucinogens were just way out there.

After those experiences you’d think every mamma and daddy’d be preaching revealed truth to the kiddos, I know I did, but apparently lots of people let it slide.

It’s all and always individual. There’s all kinds of ways to jack yourself up, as adults most people catch on and don’t… with the GLARING exception of alcohol… but kids gotta be looked after, personally and up close, not by schools, ‘organizations’, taxpayer funded bullshit therapy programs or that sort of unbelievable collectivist crap. It’s personal, individual, takes time and attention.

Certainly, at this point, any and all large media, educational and government organizations pitching ‘information’ have to be tossed on the shit heap in detail as malicious self interested actors bent on shadowy and nefarious purposes you can’t know. You’re on your own, just like you’ve always been, even if you didn’t know it.

It’s all very odd, this vast demoralization. Yuri Bezmenov explains, perhaps?

Lou
Lou
  Walter
February 1, 2024 11:04 pm

As far as raising you kids goes, getting them into good sports programs is the least expensive, most rewarding thing parents can do. Not always easy and a lot more effective if the kid becomes passionate about the sport he/she chooses. Best part time job a school kid can have, plus it teaches them invaluable time management skills. Sure, some programs are “expensive”-so budget for it and if need be give up some other discretionary expenses for the few years you have your kids at home.

ILuvCO2
ILuvCO2
  Lou
February 1, 2024 11:09 pm

Ha, don’t do hockey, been there, done that.

splurge
splurge
  ILuvCO2
February 2, 2024 12:43 am

Oh, man c’mon hockey be damn near magic, great stuff that.

Dagobaz
Dagobaz
February 2, 2024 5:16 am

When you lose faith in everything, you will fall for anything.

Anonymous
Anonymous
February 2, 2024 11:25 am

Cannabis is handy…but Mushrooms are dandy…I hear it makes the bugs more palatable…

Anonymous
Anonymous
February 3, 2024 7:24 am

Humble opinions from a 26 male, of the race color that reflects all visible light.

Too many d-bags in society. It is all the reward and punishment system of our current west. If you only take it away, then people will naturally reorganize themselves, but if you invert it to something anti-moral, then everyone will either go all out OR become part of the exodus to get the fuck out of town.

If something does not make sense, then people can only endure it so long. But in the case of bread and entertainment, especially for propaganda, things like communism and the roman coliseum can go on much longer than a normal rejection point. The sad truth is: It doesn’t matter how brutal or inhumane the regimes are, they will only collapse once people lose interest in them (as an old talking point or fad, gone stale), because they are no longer entertained.

I tend to think in terms of (Old) German ideals, not of the Nazis or Weimar era, but of the people who innovated, created a civilization and farmed the land (hey, sounds like old America, recently deceased, RIP 1913 or 1861, take your pick).

The one thing western civilization has proven: it isn’t entertaining to watch crop harvests grow. It requires a hint of patience and some self-accountability to your own conditions, as well as the ultimate motivator of not going hungry the following winter.

I think people would be really surprised from all the peace and prosperity they would create by leaving everyone else the fuck alone.

The biggest mistake our nation made was the endorsement of listening to the few, while ignoring the many. If people know they do not have an equal voice or representation within debate, then they LEAVE the debate. That has destroyed our republic several times over.

And once you mentally leave the debate, but are not allowed to leave in reality, the reward and punishment system becomes both the tether and the noose. People cannot leave, so they plow forward, not knowing their destination. Then the herd gets too close to the cliff. So it goes…

My solution:
Legalize gun duels again, and may the merit of a quicker draw determine society’s attention span.

Then if it goes into war, because a bankster doesn’t want the hard slug up his ass, let famine come back to make the war parties pay. After all, societal cooperation is just setting aside differences so my (and yours) children have a better, well fed future. Those who do not learn: destroy, both externally and internally, leading to a shifting of allegiances towards more cooperative allies, and a draining of the war party’s $$$.

We may not believe it, but parasitism is a short lived phenomenon, as its weakened host is usually snapped up by a carnivore predator looking for a easy meal, killing the parasite in the process.

So return the predator and end the parasites.