FREE SPEECH IN AMERICA WILL EITHER LIVE OR DIE BY THE END OF THESE COLLEGE PROTESTS
Editor’s Note: There’s something very BIG going on across the USA yet very few folks get it. Not only that, but all of officialdom appears to be on the wrong side of history.
Now, put all political positions and personal differences aside for just a moment and consider these two indisputable facts:
First, that the apartheid Zionist State of Israel has been perpetrating a full-blown genocide in Gaza since October 8, 2023.
Secondly, that every single US citizen has the First Amendment right to vigorously protest that genocide, especially when their tax dollars are directly funding it and it’s being carried out in the name of the American people. (Once President Joe Biden (illegitimate POTUS, of course) and Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer all threw their full support to Israel’s war in Gaza and genocide of the Palestinian people, We the People have every right to protest such reprehensible and immoral support.)
With this correct understanding, what is now taking place on campuses across America is an unparalleled attempt by officialdom to shut down all expressions of Free Speech about the ongoing Gaza Genocide to the point of gutting the First Amendment. Similarly, all justifiable criticism of Israel is now being banned from universities in many states where these peaceful protests have been going on. See: Rep. Thomas Massie Warns Congress is Trying to Pass Hate Speech Laws to Outlaw Criticism of Israel
KEY POINT: What’s most alarming about these perfectly legal protests is the manner in which they are being broken up by the authorities via so many unlawful arrests. In some cases, police brutality tactics are being deliberately used for no other reason but to intimidate the protesting college students and peaceful demonstrations (those few that have recently become violent have been infiltrated by the FBI’s COINTELPRO agents provocateur, MOSSAD agents and CIA operatives).
This quite intentional cancelling of Free Speech is being carried out in a variety of ways that are well explained in the excellent analysis below. Every Patriot is highly encouraged to read every single word of this detailed breakdown of the stealthy plot to effectively repeal the all-important First Amendment in 2024.
“Have You No Sense of Decency?”
RE: The Congressional Hearings concerning University Presidents on Student Uprisings
By Prof Michael Hudson
The Unz review
The recent Congressional hearings leading to a bloodbath of university presidents brings back memories from my teen-age years in the 1950s when everyone’s eyes were glued to the TV broadcast of the McCarthy hearings.
And the student revolts incited by vicious college presidents trying to stifle academic freedom when it opposes foreign unjust wars awakens memories of the 1960s protests against the Vietnam War and the campus clampdowns confronting police violence. I was the junior member of the “Columbia three” alongside Seymour Melman and my mentor Terence McCarthy (both of whom taught at Columbia’s Seeley Mudd School of Industrial Engineering; my job was mainly to handle publicity and publication). At the end of that decade, students occupied my office and all others at the New School’s graduate faculty in New York City – very peacefully, without disturbing any of my books and papers.
Only the epithets have changed. The invective “Communist” has been replaced by “anti-Semite,” and the renewal of police violence on campus has not yet led to a Kent State-style rifle barrage against protesters.
But the common denominators are all here once again. A concerted effort has been organized to condemn and even to punish today’s nationwide student uprisings against the genocide occurring in Gaza and the West Bank. Just as the House Unamerican Activities Committee (HUAC) aimed to end the careers of progressive actors, directors, professors and State Department officials unsympathetic to Chiang Kai-Shek or sympathetic to the Soviet Union from 1947 to 1975, today’s version aims at ending what remains of academic freedom in the United States.
The epithet of “communism” from 75 years ago has been updated to “anti-Semitism.” Senator Joe McCarthy of Wisconsin has been replaced by Elise Stefanik, House Republican from upstate New York, and Senator “Scoop” Jackson upgraded to President Joe Biden. Harvard University President Claudine Gay (now forced to resign), former University of Pennsylvania President Elizabeth Magill (also given the boot), and Massachusetts Institute of Technology President Sally Kornbluth were called upon to abase themselves by promising to accuse peace advocates critical of U.S. foreign policy of anti-Semitism.
Image: Nemat ‘Minouche’ Shafik (Licensed under CC BY 2.0)
The most recent victim was Columbia’s president Nemat “Minouche” Shafik, a cosmopolitan opportunist with trilateral citizenship who enforced neoliberal economic policy as a high-ranking official at the IMF (where she was no stranger to the violence of “IMF riots”) and the World Bank, and who brought her lawyers along to help her acquiesce in the Congressional Committee’s demands.
She did that and more, all on her own. Despite being told not to by the faculty and student affairs committees, she called in the police to arrest peaceful demonstrators. This radical trespass of police violence against peaceful demonstrators (the police themselves attested to their peacefulness) triggered sympathetic revolts throughout the United States, met with even more violent police responses at Emory College in Atlanta and California State Polytechnic, where cell phone videos were quickly posted on various media platforms.
Just as intellectual freedom and free speech were attacked by HUAC 75 years ago, academic freedom is now under attack at these universities. The police have trespassed onto school grounds to accuse students themselves of trespassing, with violence reminiscent of the demonstrations that peaked in May 1970 when the Ohio National Guard shot Kent State students singing and speaking out against America’s war in Vietnam.
Today’s demonstrations are in opposition to the Biden-Netanyahu genocide in Gaza and the West Bank. The more underlying crisis can be boiled down to the insistence by Benjamin Netanyahu that to criticize Israel is anti-Semitic. That is the “enabling slur” of today’s assault on academic freedom.
By “Israel,” Biden and Netanyahu mean specifically the right-wing Likud Party and its theocratic supporters aiming to create “a land without a [non-Jewish] people.” They assert that Jews owe their loyalty not to their current nationality (or humanity) but to Israel and its policy of driving the Gaza Strip’s millions of Palestinians into the sea by bombing them out of their homes, hospitals and refugee camps.
The implication is that to support the International Court of Justice’s accusations that Israel is plausibly committing genocide is an anti-Semitic act. Supporting the UN resolutions vetoed by the United States is anti-Semitic.
The claim is that Israel is defending itself and that protesting the genocide of the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank frightens Jewish students. But research by students at Columbia’s School of Journalism found that the complaints cited by the New York Times and other pro-Israeli media were made by non-students trying to spread the story that Israel’s violence was in self-defense.
The student violence has been by Israeli nationals. Columbia has a student-exchange program with Israel for students who finish their compulsory training with the Israeli Defense Forces. It was some of these exchange students who attacked pro-Gaza demonstrators, spraying them with Skunk, a foul-smelling indelible Israeli army chemical weapon that marks demonstrators for subsequent arrest, torture or assassination. The only students endangered were the victims of this attack. Columbia under Shafik did nothing to protect or help the victims.
The hearings to which she submitted speak for themselves. Columbia’s president Shafik was able to avoid the first attack on universities not sufficiently pro-Likud by having meetings outside of the country. Yet she showed herself willing to submit to the same brow-beating that had led her two fellow presidents to be fired, hoping that her lawyers had prompted her to submit in a way that would be acceptable to the committee.
I found the most demagogic attack to be that of Republican Congressman Rick Allen from Georgia, asking Dr. Shafik whether she was familiar with the passage in Genesis 12.3. As he explained
“It was a covenant that God made with Abraham. And that covenant was real clear. … ‘If you bless Israel, I will bless you. If you curse Israel, I will curse you.’ … Do you consider that to be a serious issue? I mean, do you want Columbia University to be cursed by God of the Bible?”[1]
Shafik smiled and was friendly all the way through this bible thumping, and replied meekly, “Definitely not.”
She might have warded off this browbeating question by saying, “Your question is bizarre. This is 2024, and America is not a theocracy. And the Israel of the early 1st century BC was not Netanyahu’s Israel of today.” She accepted all the accusations that Allen and his fellow Congressional inquisitors threw at her.
Her main nemesis was Elise Stefanik, Chair of the House Republican Conference, who is on the House Armed Services Committee, and the Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Congresswoman Stefanik: You were asked were there any anti-Jewish protests and you said ‘No’.
President Shafik: So the protest was not labeled as an anti-Jewish protest. It was labeled as an anti-Israeli government. But antisemitic incidents happened or antisemitic things were said. So I just wanted to finish.
Congresswoman Stefanik: And you are aware that in that bill, that got 377 Members out of 435 Members of Congress, condemns ‘from the river to the sea’ as antisemitic?
Dr. Shafik: Yes, I am aware of that.
Congresswoman Stefanik: But you don’t believe ‘from the river to the sea’ is antisemitic?
Dr. Shafik: We have already issued a statement to our community saying that language is hurtful and we would prefer not to hear it on our campus.[2]
What an appropriate response to Stefanik’s browbeating might have been?
Shafik could have said,
“The reason why students are protesting is against the Israeli genocide against the Palestinians, as the International Court of Justice has ruled, and most of the United Nations agree. I’m proud of them for taking a moral stand that most of the world supports but is under attack here in this room.”
Instead, Shafik seemed more willing than the leaders of Harvard or Penn to condemn and potentially discipline students and faculty for using the term “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.” She could have said that it is absurd to say that this is a call to eliminate Israel’s Jewish population, but is a call to give Palestinians freedom instead of being treated as Untermenschen.
Asked explicitly whether calls for genocide violate Columbia’s code of conduct, Dr. Shafik answered in the affirmative — “Yes, it does.” So did the other Columbia leaders who accompanied her at the hearing. They did not say that this is not at all what the protests are about. Neither Shafik nor any other of the university officials say,
“Our university is proud of our students taking an active political and social role in protesting the idea of ethnic cleansing and outright murder of families simply to grab the land that they live on. Standing up for that moral principle is what education is all about, and what civilization’s all about.”
The one highlight that I remember from the McCarthy hearings was the reply by Joseph Welch, the U.S. Army’s Special Council, on June 9, 1954 to Republican Senator Joe McCarthy’s charge that one of Welch’s attorneys had ties to a Communist front organization.
“Until this moment, senator,” Welsh replied, “I think I never gauged your cruelty or your recklessness. … Have you no sense of decency, sir? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?”
The audience broke into wild applause. Welch’s put-down has echoed for the past 70 years in the minds of those who were watching television then (as I was, at age 15). A similar answer by any of the three other college presidents would have shown Stefanik to be the vulgarian that she is. But none ventured to stand up against the abasement.
The Congressional attack accusing opponents of genocide in Gaza as anti-Semites supporting genocide against the Jews is bipartisan. Already in December, Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (D-Ore.) helped cause Harvard and Penn’s presidents to be fired for their stumbling over her red-baiting. She repeated her question to Shafik on April 17: “Does calling for the genocide of Jews violate Columbia’s code of conduct?” Bonamici asked the four new Columbia witnesses. All responded: “Yes.”
That was the moment when they should have said that the students were not calling for genocide of the Jews, but seeking to mobilize opposition to genocide being committed by the Likud government against the Palestinians with President Biden’s full support.
During a break in the proceedings Rep. Stefanik told the press that “the witnesses were overheard discussing how well they thought their testimony was going for Columbia.” This arrogance is eerily reminiscent to the previous three university presidents who believed when walking out of the hearing that their testimony was acceptable.
“Columbia is in for a reckoning of accountability. If it takes a member of Congress to force a university president to fire a pro-terrorist, antisemitic faculty chair, then Columbia University leadership is failing Jewish students and its academic mission,” added Stefanik. “No amount of overlawyered, overprepped, and over-consulted testimony is going to cover up for failure to act.”[3]
Shafik could have pointedly corrected the implications by the House inquisitors that it was Jewish students who needed protection. The reality was just the opposite: The danger was from the Israeli IDF students who attacked the demonstrators with military Skunk, with no punishment by Columbia.
Despite being told not to by the faculty and student groups (which Shafik was officially bound to consult), she called in the police, who arrested 107 students, tied their hands behind their backs and kept them that way for many hours as punishment while charging them for trespassing on Columbia’s property. Shafik then suspended them from classes.
The Clash Between Two Kinds of Judaism: Zionist vs. Assimilationist
A good number of these protestors being criticized were Jewish. Netanyahu and AIPAC have claimed – correctly, it seems – that the greatest danger to their current genocidal policies comes from the traditionally liberal Jewish middle-class population. Progressive Jewish groups have joined the uprisings at Columbia and other universities.
Early Zionism arose in late 19th-century Europe as a response to the violent pogroms killing Jews in Ukrainian cities such as Odessa and other Central European cities that were the center of anti-Semitism. Zionism promised to create a safe refuge. It made sense at a time when Jews were fleeing their countries to save their lives in countries that accepted them. They were the “Gazans” of their day.
After World War II and the horrors of the Holocaust anti-Semitism became passé. Most Jews in the United States and other countries were being assimilated and becoming prosperous, most successfully in the United States. The past century has seen this success enable them to assimilate, while retaining the moral standard that ethnic and religious discrimination such as that which their forbears had suffered is wrong in principle. Jewish activists were in the forefront of fighting for civil liberties, most visibly against anti-Black prejudice and violence in the 1960s and ‘70s, and against the Vietnam War. Many of my Jewish school friends in the 1950s bought Israel bonds, but thought of Israel as a socialist country and thought of volunteering to work on a kibbutz in the summer. There was no thought of antagonism, and I heard no mention of the Palestinian population when the phrase “a people without a land in a land without a people” was spoken.
But Zionism’s leaders have remained obsessed with the old antagonisms in the wake of Nazism’s murders of so many Jews. In many ways they have turned Nazism inside out, fearing a renewed attack from non-Jews. Driving the Arabs out of Israel and making it an apartheid state was just the opposite of what assimilationist Jews aimed at.
The moral stance of progressive Jews, and the ideal that Jews, blacks and members of all other religions and races should be treated equally, is the opposite of Israeli Zionism. In the hands of Netanyahu’s Likud Party and the influx of right-wing supporters, Zionism asserts a claim to set Jewish people apart from the rest of their national population, and even from the rest of the world, as we are seeing today.
Claiming to speak for all Jews, living and dead, Netanyahu asserts that to criticize his genocide and the Palestinian holocaust, the nakba, is anti-Semitic. This is the position of Stefanik and her fellow committee members. It is an assertion that Jews owe their first allegiance to Israel, and hence to its ethnic cleansing and mass murder since last October. President Biden also has labeled the student demonstrations “antisemitic protests.”
This claim in the circumstances of Israel’s ongoing genocide is causing more anti-Semitism than anyone since Hitler. If people throughout the world come to adopt Netanyahu’s and his cabinet’s definition of anti-Semitism, how many, being repulsed by Israel’s actions, will say, “If that is the case, then indeed I guess I’m anti-Semitic.”
Netanyahu’s Slander Against Judaism and What Civilization Should Stand For
Image: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a message on Israel’s war with Hamas, January 10, 2024. (Video screenshot)
Netanyahu characterized the U.S. protests in an extremist speech on April 24 attacking American academic freedom.
What’s happening in America’s college campuses is horrific. Antisemitic mobs have taken over leading universities. They call for the annihilation of Israel, they attack Jewish students, they attack Jewish faculty. This is reminiscent of what happened in German universities in the 1930s. We see this exponential rise of antisemitism throughout America and throughout Western societies as Israel tries to defend itself against genocidal terrorists, genocidal terrorists who hide behind civilians.
It’s unconscionable, it has to be stopped, it has to be condemned and condemned unequivocally. But that’s not what happened. The response of several university presidents was shameful. Now, fortunately, state, local, federal officials, many of them have responded differently but there has to be more. More has to be done.[4]
This is a call to make American universities into arms of a police state, imposing policies dictated by Israel’s settler state. That call is being funded by a circular flow: Congress gives enormous subsidies to Israel, which recycles some of this money back into the election campaigns of politicians willing to serve their donors. It is the same policy that Ukraine uses when it employs U.S. “aid” by setting up well-funded lobbying organizations to back client politicians.
What kind of student and academic protest expressions could oppose the Gaza and West Bank genocide without explicitly threatening Jewish students? How about “Palestinians are human being too!” That is not aggressive. To make it more ecumenical, one could add “And so are the Russians, despite what Ukrainian neo-Nazis say.”
I can understand why Israelis feel threatened by Palestinians. They know how many they have killed and brutalized to grab their land, killing just to “free” the land for themselves. They must think “If the Palestinians are like us, they must want to kill us, because of what we have done to them and there can never be a two-state solution and we can never live together, because this land was given to us by God.”
Netanyahu fanned the flames after his April 24 speech by raising today’s conflict to the level of a fight for civilization:
“What is important now is for all of us, all of us who are interested and cherish our values and our civilization, to stand up together and to say enough is enough.”
Is what Israel is doing, and what the United Nations, the International Court of Justice and most of the Global Majority oppose, really “our civilization”? Ethnic cleansing, genocide and treating the Palestinian population as conquered and to be expelled as subhumans is an assault on the most basic principles of civilization.
Peaceful students defending that universal concept of civilization are called terrorists and anti-Semites – by the terrorist Israeli Prime Minister. He is following the tactics of Joseph Goebbels: The way to mobilize a population to fight the enemy is to depict yourself as under attack. That was the Nazi public relations strategy, and it is the PR strategy of Israel today – and of many in the American Congress, in AIPAC and many related institutions that proclaim a morally offensive idea of civilization as the ethnic supremacy of a group sanctioned by God.
The real focus of the protests is the U.S. policy that is backing Israel’s ethnic cleansing and genocide supported by last week’s foreign “aid.” It is also a protest against the corruption of Congressional politicians raising money from lobbyists representing foreign interests over those of the United States. Last week’s “aid” bill also backed Ukraine, that other country presently engaged in ethnic cleansing, with House members waved Ukrainian flags, not those of the United States. Shortly before that, one Congressman wore his Israeli army uniform into Congress to advertise his priorities.
Zionism has gone far beyond Judaism. I’ve read that there are nine Christian Zionists for every Jewish Zionists. It is as if both groups are calling for the End Time to arrive, while insisting that support for the United Nations and the International Court of Justice condemning Israel for genocide is anti-Semitic.
What Can the Students at Columbia Ask For
Students at Columbia and other universities have called for universities to disinvest in Israeli stocks, and also those of U.S. arms makers exporting to Israel. Given the fact that universities have become business organizations, I don’t think that this is the most practical demand at present. Most important, it doesn’t go to the heart of the principles at work.
What really is the big public relations issue is the unconditional U.S. backing for Israel come what may, with “anti-Semitism” the current propaganda epithet to characterize those who oppose genocide and brutal land grabbing.
They should insist on a public announcement by Columbia (and also Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania, who were equally obsequious to Rep. Stefanik) that they recognize that it is not anti-Semitic to condemn genocide, support the United Nations and denounce the U.S. veto.
They should insist that Columbia and the other universities making a sacrosanct promise not to call police onto academic grounds over issues of free speech.
They should insist that the president be fired for her one-sided support of Israeli violence against her students. In that demand they are in agreement with Rep. Stefanik’s principle of protecting students, and that Dr. Shafik must go.
But there is one class of major offenders that should be held up for contempt: the donors who try to attack academic freedom by using their money to influence university policy and turn universities away from the role in supporting academic freedom and free speech. The students should insist that university administrators – the unpleasant opportunists standing above the faculty and students – must not only refuse such pressure but should join in publicly expressing shock over such covert political influence.
The problem is that American universities have become like Congress in basing their policy on attracting contributions from their donors. That is the academic equivalent of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling. Numerous Zionist funders have threatened to withdraw their contributions to Harvard, Columbia and other schools not following Netanyahu’s demands to clamp down on opponents of genocide and defenders of the United Nations. These funders are the enemies of the students at such universities, and both students and faculty should insist on their removal. Just as Dr. Shafik’s International Monetary Fund fell subject to its economists’ protest that there must be “No more Argentinas,” perhaps the Columbia students could chant “No More Shafiks.”
*
Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Michael Hudson is President of The Institute for the Study of Long-Term Economic Trends (ISLET), a Wall Street Financial Analyst, Distinguished Research Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri, Kansas City. He is the author of Killing the Host (published in e-format by CounterPunch Books and in print by Islet). His new book is J is For Junk Economics.
Notes
[1] https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=syPELLKpABI
[3] Nicholas Fandos, Stephanie Saul and Sharon Otterman, “Columbia’s President Tells Congress That Action Is Needed Against Antisemitism,” The New York Times, April 17, 2024., and “Columbia President Grilled During Congressional Hearing on Campus Antisemitism,” Jewish Journal, April 18, 2024. https://jewishjournal.com/news/united-states/370521/columbia-president-grilled-during-congressional-hearing-on-campus-antisemitism/#:~:text=Columbia%20President%20Grilled%20During%20Congressional%20Hearing%20on%20Campus%20Antisemitism
[4] Miranda Nazzaro. “Netanyahu condemns ‘antisemitic mobs’ on US college campuses,” The Hill, April 24, 2024.
Featured image is from Shutterstock
___
https://www.unz.com/mhudson/have-you-no-sense-of-decency/
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Free speech for everyone, but those ” terrorists” protesting mass murder…stop dey’ heads….reeeee
No boots stomping on “terrorist” heads. Just Bolshevik/Zionist pwnd popos standing by letting the actors exercise their First Amendment …suck it EvangiboomerTards. You’re the enemy of America , too.
Wassa matta wit you, boi? Can’t afford a tent and a bus ticket?
Yes, but I’m saving up to buy you a years supply of maxipads, bleeding ass Fed fagbot.
And they say devil worshiper’s have no sense of charity!
Bless yer little heart!
Using the power of logic and being able to recognize patterns, what are we to discern about the events unfolding?
In order to fully grasp what is occurring you must first establish the progress of an idea or policy.
We didn’t get to free speech restrictions by happenstance or accident, it was planned.
Criticism of a specific group of people in the US was growing according to groups that track that kind of thing. They dislike the criticism yet cannot legally stop people beyond bullying, censoring, alienating, slander and similar tactics.
What to do?
Create an atmosphere wherein it can be demonstrated that there exists a real need to legally prohibit free speech. How does one do that? Create a movement that can be pushed to criticize that group of people. Now place operatives within that movement that will either directly or through incitement turn those peaceful protests into violent ones and suddenly it’s shouting fire in a movie theater.
The purpose of the protests is two-fold; to create an atmosphere of anger that is believable enough to account for violent acts carried out by agent provocateurs, thereby calling for restrictions on both speech and protest and to acclimate the sympathetic portion of the population to willingly accept the massive importation of millions of Palestinians for humanitarian purposes, further diluting the American fabric..
Mission accomplished.
Never listen to narratives.
Always pay attention to what occurs.
Use your good sense and reasoning, arrive at a conclusion.
Once you apply this formula you will almost never be congratulated or rewarded, but you will rarely be surprised with the outcomes because you can see them coming for miles.
Prepare accordingly.
+1000 …great comment. Too bad asshole EvangiBoomerTwoGospelThirdTempleRedHeiferZionistChristianRaptureTards are too stupid to understand how they’re being played.
America might be able to shuck off these Zionist shackles if the Synagogue of Satan worshippers actually came to comprehend what a large bloc of useful voting idiots they are. A pox on them all.
Same as it always was…
“Before some audiences not even the possession of the exactest knowledge will make it easy for what we say to produce conviction. For argument based on knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one cannot instruct.” Aristotle
Yes, this is all theater. No college campus is the root of the problem, so why should it be the locus of protest? Heavy disruption needs to be taking place in the streets of DC, the place that creates all the mayhem in the first place.
College kids are, at least, learning a bit about how the Real World operates.
One young woman at Princeton was shocked when she was taken into police custody, and then forcibly excluded from the campus (the cops took her dorm keys). She appealed for help to at least one faculty member who she knew for a fact was very sympathetic to the demonstrators. “Sorry,’ was the faculty guy’s response, “I’m coming up for tenure soon”.
Fuckin-A, man.
Soooo
Government wants to control and censor people
Government creates the ’emergency’ needed to bring in the solution
Solution accepted and governments real face emerges.
” Problem, reaction ,solution or thesis, antithesis ,synthesis , Hegel must be just so darn proud of himself right about now . Eh Hoser ?
So fucking true! I was telling that same to my dear wife last night, and then I read your comment this morning. Of course, you were much more eloquent in your prose.
Create your own narrative.
AntiGentilism is a crime. Further AntiGentilism will be met by sanctions in the marketplace.
Let My People Go !!!!!!!!
I always thought we should join in with Antifa. Afterall who’s not anti fascist and that would end that.
Not one mention of ‘Dr.’ Shafik’s ties to the IMF
Nor any mention of Soros money fueling the “protests”
All aboard the Jew haters’ train!
All pre-planned to accommodate:
annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum
muh holohoax, and from an unz article no less
Weren’t the universities requiring clotshots not that long ago? Does all this seem contrived to anyone else? Like all the ‘activism’ that Hudson’s jew friends engaged in back in the day.
It’s only contrived if you actually think about it.
Don’t think about it, emote.
I haven’t watched enough news lately to know how I’m supposed to feel.
Is there a Ken Burns documentary to get me up to speed?
If you condone this free speech, free the j6 protestors.
plus hookers and blow plus sex change operations for soldiers and a myriad of other expensive useless but sometimes fun stuff…
Human sacrifice ,dogs living with cats , shrimp running on treadmills ….Gay frogs …. oh the humanity !!! Somebody really did get a government grant to study shrimp running on treadmills !!!!
Funny how the chews are quieter than church mice everytime a white kid is stomped to death by a nigger.
But protest the chews conducting yet another genocide in the levant?
And those little piggies go “REEEEE!”
Hmm, I wasn’t aware the first Amendment covered for – Trespassing, Property Damage, Physical Violence, Occupation of Private Property, Disrupting Traffic and Public Right to Free Movement, Violence Towards Police Officers, Etc…. I guess I should go back and re-read the constitution.
Only for those working to destroy America. If you want to protest genocidal maniacs…doesn’t cover that.
Those things you listed? Those are existing civil or criminal violations already on the books.
This is about something else.
But then you knew that.
Oh Contraire, My Dear Farmer.
Meaning, he didn’t know that, of course.
Traitor son of a bitch.
Hey fucktard. Either you stand for the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, or you are a traitor bastard that needs to be stripped of citizenship and deported.
Okay tuff guy.
Booger is correct , the constitution doesn’t grant anyone the right to infringe upon anyone else’s civil rights , that is were your rights neccasarilly must stop . Maybe it’s ya’ll that are trying to “make it about something else” . I personally think there are paid agitators in both camps and we are just warming up for the summer Bolshevik political theater season ( the mostly peaceful summer of love red guard uprising of 2020 , the sequel , and I think a long hot commie summer its gonna be if you live in any of the big blue commie hell holes . Saint Floyd of the holy fentynol overdose has risen .
And oh yeah the Safeway here in Belfair has seen fit to hire a big black security guard .
They gassed 1,000 Jews per hour.
Then they used the 1,500 crematory ovens [I have seen these ovens at Auschwitz, they go on for 10 miles] operated 24/7, to get rid of the bodies.
The Ovens were just meat smokers.
Cherry, apple, or hickory?
Wormwood
Absinthe makes the heart grow fonder.
shortly before you pass out. yes.
Fig or Olive
If only that were true! Queue in the “What a Wonderful World” song.
I hope you were being sarcastic Epy, because no one could be that gullible to believe such codswallop.
Well, just go to Auschwitz and see for yourself the endless miles of crematory ovens.
If they’re endless then why would I have to go the whole way to Auschwitz in order to see them?
the joke is that miles of ovens is absurd
Sounds like bullshit to me. Where’s the proof?
Crematoriums must run at ~1600 degrees F. It takes on average 2.5 hours to burn off organic matter (still leaving behind the bones, bone fragments and teeth that then must be crushed in a separate process).
Heat Energy (calories) = m * c * ?T m = mass of human ( average: 80.7 kg )
c = specific heat of human body ( 3470 J. kg-1 . K-1 )
?T = Change in temperature. ( cremation temp – room temp )
Room Temperature = 26 °C
1600 °F = 871°C
So: H.E. = 80.7kg * 3470 J/kg*k * (871-26)
H.E. = 236624.5 kcal
The energy in a kg of coke(coal) is 8000 kcal/kg. So one body would (under IDEAL conditions) take 236625kcal/8000kcal/kg = 29.57 or about 30kg (66 pounds!) of fuel to burn.
To cremate, say, 3 to 6 million jews, therefore, it would take around 100,000-200,000 metric tons (220,462,280-440,924,560 pounds!) of coal.
That is an awful lot of coal (i.e. impossible) for a country that couldn’t heat its homes, operate its tanks or fly it’s aircraft etc. because of beyond-critical fuel shortages.
Also when coal is burnt, it generates around 5-10% of its weight in ash. So, I’ll be generous and say 5%. So 9 million kg of ash from the fuel. The average adult leaves ~2.5kg of bone fragments, teeth and ash from cremation. So we have 9 million + 2.5x6million = 24 million kg of ash.
That is a lot of remains to just disappear and leave no trace. Makes one think.
H.E. = 80.7kg * 3470 J/kg*k * (871-26)
H.E. = 236,624.5 kcal per body
236,624.5 kcal * 6,500,000 = 1,538,059,250,000,000 kcal total
999569974676.29 kcal per megaton
That’s 1.53 Megatons of TNT
That’s 1000x all the explosives used in WWI.
That’s 1/2 of all the explosives used during all of WWII.
That’s 100x the nuclear bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
All from a non-nuclear, resource-starved, Texas sized blockaded nation fighting for its life on multiple fronts during a world war. Truly amazing technology indeed. It really makes one think.
• In fact, Germany was desperately short on fuel for their war vehicles, tanks and planes.
• Cremation requires temperatures >1800F (1400C) for over two hours to render the body organics to ashes then 30 minutes to cool. Next the bone fragments and teeth have to be crushed into powder. Only one body can be cremated at a time or the burning organics will plug the oven exhaust vents.
• Lets do the math: 6,000,000 x 2hrs x 1day/24 hours x 1month/30days / 6 detainment camps = 2778 months total cremation time assuming 24/7 operation of the single oven at each of the 6 camps simultaneously. Yet the Event is claimed to have occurred over the last 6 months of the war.
Bonus question: Since a 100 lb body generates ~100 cubic inches of ash weighing an avg 6 lbs for a man and 4 for a woman, lets do the math:.
6,000,000 x 5 = 30,000,000 lbs of ash 6,000,000 x 100 in3 x .0005787 ft3/in3 = 1,036,806,635,562 cubic feet of ash.
Where are the 6 mountains of 5,000,000 lbs and 17,280,110 cubic feet of ash located within reasonable proximity to each camp?
“The six million Holocaust victims were reincarnations of the souls of sinners, people who transgressed and did all sorts of things that should not be done. They had been reincarnated in order to atone.” — Ovadia Yosef, Israel’s Chief Sephardi Rabbi, 2000
From 1938 to 1948, the European Jewish population grew by 20%.
The only European ethnic group to have increased instead of
declining.
The 6 million number came from Simon Wiesenthal who said in an
interview in the mid 50’s where that number came from.
His direct quote was that we had to come up with an number big
enough to get attention, but not too big as to be not believed.
German war production peaked in the summer and fall of 1944 when
must German men were dying on the Eastern Front.
They were slave labor camps, not extermination camps.
According to German records, there were 20 ovens in total the
Auschwitz complex which in fact was six different camps.
They made everything from Mauser k98 rifles to SS uniforms.
Math seems a bit off…6,000,000÷1,000/hr=6,000 hrs to kill the entire claimed Holocaust body count. 24×365=8,760 hrs/yr. What the hell did the Germans do during the remaining 3+ years Auschwitz was open for business?
I am for free speech/protest but when students are attacked for merely wanting to go to a class at the college they attend,well,we are way beyond free speech/protest.
Again, crimes that occur at a protest are not synonymous with protest.
Arrest anyone who commits a crime, but do not ask for additional laws meant to strip away rights from law abiding citizens.
Never did ask for that.
Not you, James, them. The ones calling for new speech laws. Those people.
“Congress shall make no law … abridging … the right of the people …
to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Redress of grievances: At what point does redress of grievances become insurrection? The political prisoners from J6 were exercising they’re right of redress. What we’re looking at here is insurrection (IMHO).
Paid profession agitators will destroy any meaningful protest, it’s up to those who are righteously protesting for a cause to police the infiltrators, less the original cause be abridged.
You left out one very important condition of that 1st Amendment Right –
‘To peaceably assemble’ to make known their grievances.
Trespassing, destruction of property, threatening others is not ‘peaceably’. Once you cross that rule of law, you lose your right.
Precisely!
Hey shit for brains. The protesters were peacefully protesting, when the fucktard Gestapo attacked them. Now there are no rules. It is violence in response to violence.
No, that is not how that works.
If there are a group of 100 people, and 3 decided to start breaking laws that does not make the other 97 people criminals.
You lose that right?
Rights aren’t something that can be taken back. They weren’t granted by men.
more to the point if the government doesn’t want a protest all it would need to do is send in one person to break one of those laws and there’d be no protest ever again.
and how many people, even in a place like TBP, will understand that the ‘protests’ are being staged deliberately to provoke exactly this kind of ‘reaction’ and precipitate the censorship measures.. none of this is just by accident.
Indeed.
Condemn genocide or be a supporter of it. There is no middle ground regarding it. Simple.
Yep. That’s what many kids were saying about Vietnam.
Good thing the FUSA doesn’t have a draft, or the Jews would really have to come down hard.
I’ll try again…
There is indifference to sides. I’m for neither side, I refuse to play.
simple
The only sides in history are the INSIDE and the OUTSIDE.
Color me outside…the range of all the fucking lies.
Stupid and Stupider are your pronouns.
Did Mommy leave the basement door unlocked again? Bwahaha! Careful on those stairs, young tardling!
Color you shitstain Zionist sumbag.
Somebody got their little ass triggered! HAH HA !
Ethnic cleansing, scorched earth policy, and the mass slaughter of civilians is ALWAYS THE DEVIL’S BUSINESS.
Q: Who the hell edited this article?? A: No one.