Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) – What do they have to say about Tulsi Gabbard?

Citation: https://www.cfr.org/election2020/candidate-tracker/tulsi-gabbard

Note*: Tulsi Gabbard was a participant in World Economic Forum Young Global Leaders program,[7][8][9]  (2015) and former 5-year Term member of the Council on Foreign Relations ending July 2019.

Note**: This article on the CFR website was written when Tulsi Gabbard was a candidate for the 2020 POTUS election.

******************************************************

Tulsi Gabbard is a four-term member of the House of Representatives from Hawaii and a veteran. First elected in 2012, she serves on the Foreign Affairs and Armed Services Committees. She positions herself as an environmentalist and a critic of “regime change wars.”

A major in the Hawaii National Guard, she deployed to Iraq from 2004 to 2005. Born in American Samoa and raised in Hawaii, she is a graduate of Hawaii Pacific University.

China

Gabbard criticizes President Donald J. Trump’s confrontational stance toward Beijing and warns about the downsides of escalating tensions with China. She says a cooperative relationship is needed instead to confront global challenges.

  • Gabbard opposes Trump’s trade war with China, arguing that his approach has been “extremely volatile,” with “ravaging and devastating effects” on both manufacturers and farmers.
  • She believes the trade war with China has not only hurt the U.S. economy, but has also made it more difficult to get Chinese support for any nuclear deal with North Korea. She has said she would work with China to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula.
  • She says the United States must maintain a cooperative relationship with China in order to address climate change and other areas of mutual concern.
  • She also warns of the possibility that the trade war could escalate into a “hot war” with a nuclear-armed China.

Climate and Energy

Gabbard highlights her record as a lifelong environmentalist and campaigner for action on climate change, including proposals for sweeping legislation on clean energy. She has spoken in favor of many aspects of the Green New Deal framework.

  • Gabbard supports the Paris Agreement, calling Trump’s decision to withdraw the United States from the climate deal “short-sighted and irresponsible.”
  • She has introduced legislation, known as the Off Fossil Fuels for a Better Future Act, that would require all U.S. electricity to come from clean energy sources by 2035.
  • She calls for “significant investments” in clean energy technology. She says she would end all fossil fuel subsidies, ban fracking, and stop all offshore oil and gas drilling. She opposed the Dakota Access Pipeline that was proposed on indigenous lands in South Dakota.
  • She opposes nuclear power and has distanced herself from the parts of the Green New Deal proposal that seek to expand it. She says there is not yet any permanent solution to the problem of long-term nuclear waste.

Counterterrorism

Gabbard identifies as a “hawk” on Islamist terrorism, supporting U.S. military missions against al-Qaeda and the self-proclaimed Islamic State, while opposing regime-change policies that she says create openings for terrorist groups.

  • Gabbard has harshly criticized U.S. support for militants who are seeking to overthrow the government of Bashar al-Assad in Syria, arguing that these groups have close ties to al-Qaeda and the Islamic State. She says Washington should work with Russia and Assad to fight terrorist groups instead.
  • She sponsored the 2017 Stop Arming Terrorists Act, which would have prohibited any federal funds from being directed to these groups.
  • She opposes overthrowing the Assad regime, arguing that it would result in the victory of Islamist terrorist groups. She visited Syria in 2017 and controversially met with Assad and other Syrian leaders.
  • She criticized President Barack Obama for not taking more steps to fight terrorists in Syria, arguing that Russian President Vladimir Putin was doing so. She also criticized Obama for failing to use the phrase “radical Islam” to describe the source of terrorist attacks.
  • She says Saudi Arabia is spending hundreds of billions of dollars to export its brand of extremism and support Sunni terrorist groups around the world, including the Islamic State. She has called on Washington to end aid to Riyadh.
  • She has previously opposed the release of suspected terrorist leaders from the U.S. detention camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, arguing that they would return to the battlefield.
  • She has opposed the expansion of federal surveillance powers, which she says are a violation of basic civil liberties, and she backs legislation to end warrantless surveillance of Americans’ communications.

Cybersecurity and Digital Policy

Gabbard has proposed legislation to make U.S. election systems more robust against hacking. She has also harshly criticized the market power of Silicon Valley giants, which she says gives them undue influence over the political system.

  • She says that, after Russia’s interference in the 2016 elections, U.S. voting systems are still vulnerable to such attacks. She has introduced legislation to mandate the use of paper ballots in every state.
  • She has warned against escalating tensions with Moscow over election interference because of concerns that a confrontation could lead to nuclear war.
  • She calls the market dominance of large tech companies such as Google and Facebook, which she calls monopolies, “a direct threat to our democracy,” arguing that they censor dissenting views. She proposes breaking up such firms.
  • She accuses Google of censorship for briefly suspending her Google Ads account following the June 2019 Democratic primary debates, and she has filed a federal lawsuit against the company seeking $50 million in damages.

Defense

Gabbard, who saw active-duty military service in Iraq, has based her campaign platform around ending major U.S. troop commitments abroad, reorienting military policy toward more targeted counterterrorism goals, and improving veterans’ care.

  • Gabbard says she will end “wasteful regime change wars” that she says have cost the United States trillions of dollars that should have instead been directed toward health care, infrastructure, and other domestic priorities.
  • She has warned against U.S. military interventions aimed at changing local governments in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and elsewhere, though she backs targeted counterterrorism missions.
  • She argues that a lack of congressional oversight has led to increased deployments of U.S. soldiers around the world, leading to a “seriously overextended” military. She has introduced legislation to reassert congressional war powers, making it an impeachable offense for a president to authorize military action without congressional approval.
  • She says she would withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan before the end of her first term.
  • She has been vocal on veterans’ issues. She has introduced legislation seeking to grant veterans priority when applying to jobs, give them easier access to physical and mental health care, and reform the Department of Veterans Affairs system.
  • She has also pushed legislation to address the effects of exposure to burn pits, which are waste sites in combat zones that can expose soldiers to toxic chemicals, leading to neurological disorders, high rates of cancers, and other health effects.

Diplomacy and Foreign Aid

Gabbard is broadly noninterventionist, arguing that the United States should not use its military power to reshape other countries’ political systems, but rather should use diplomacy to find common ground and avoid war even with the most intransigent adversaries.

  • Gabbard says it is the United States’ responsibility as the world’s most powerful country to give up “gunboat diplomacy” and seek to influence the world through “communication, negotiation, and goodwill.”
  • She advocates for reducing tensions with nuclear-armed powers, especially Russia, in order to avoid “sleepwalking” into nuclear war. She says she would call for summits with the leaders of both China and Russia in her first week in office.
  • She argues that the U.S. president must “have the courage” to meet with adversaries. She has praised Trump’s direct talks with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, and she controversially met with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in 2017, which she claims is evidence of her commitment to diplomacy.
  • She criticizes Trump’s withdrawals from major global agreements, including the Paris climate deal, the Iran nuclear agreement, and the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty with Russia, which limited both countries’ nuclear missile stockpiles.

Economic Policy

Gabbard’s economic policies center on more strongly regulating Wall Street, protecting consumers, rejecting tax cuts for the wealthy, and other policies that she says would create a more equitable society.

  • Gabbard opposed the 2017 tax reform championed by Trump, which she says provided “giveaways to corporations and special interests” while adding trillions of dollars to the “already-reckless deficit.”
  • She advocates for stricter financial regulation and she pushed for criminal investigations of Wall Street executives in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.
  • She says she would break up “too big to fail” banks and pursue a new Glass-Steagall Act, referencing a twentieth-century law that mandated the separation of commercial and investment banking.
  • She has cosponsored legislation to strengthen the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, created after the 2008 crisis, and raise the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour.
  • She has introduced legislation to eliminate in-state college tuition for lower- and middle-class students and to make it easier to discharge student loans through bankruptcy.

Immigration

Gabbard has criticized many of Trump’s immigration policies, including family separations and child detention, while calling for comprehensive immigration reform. She has split with many other Democratic candidates in calling for stronger border security measures.

  • Gabbard calls for a comprehensive reform of the immigration system that would provide the estimated eleven million undocumented residents living in the United States with a path to citizenship, find “compassionate” ways to secure the border, and increase funding and other support for the U.S. asylum system.
  • She calls on Congress to pass legislation making the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy permanent. DACA was an Obama-era executive action shielding undocumented residents brought to the country as children from deportation.
  • She says the United States must secure its borders, arguing that without borders “we don’t really have a country.” She criticizes several other Democratic candidates for advocating what she calls “open borders” by proposing the decriminalization of illegal border crossings.
  • She has called the housing of migrant children in for-profit detention centers “absolutely despicable” and promises to end Trump’s family separation policies.
  • She opposes calls from other candidates to “abolish ICE” (Immigration and Customs Enforcement), saying that doing so “doesn’t actually deal with the problem” of abusive detention practices.
  • She has been ambivalent about the need for the construction of a physical wall on the U.S. southern border, saying that increased electronic surveillance would be more effective.

Middle East

Gabbard’s campaign has been centered on the need to avoid “regime change wars” in the Middle East, while also advocating further steps to fight Islamist radicalism.

  • Gabbard, an Iraq War veteran, says regime-change efforts in places such as Iraq and Libya have given haven to terrorists, cost trillions of dollars, and helped create millions of refugees in the region.
  • Though she calls Syrian President Bashar al-Assad a “brutal dictator,” she opposes his overthrow. She is a harsh critic of U.S. support for Syrian rebels, who she says have close ties to al-Qaeda and the Islamic State.
  • She is a skeptic of the U.S. troop presence in Syria, but criticized Trump’s handling of the withdrawal of U.S. forces from northern Syria, which she says exposed Kurds in the region to “slaughter” at the hands of invading Turkish forces. She calls Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan a “radical Islamist” who has long supported the Islamic State.
  • She controversially met with Assad during a 2017 visit to Syria, and she opposed Trump’s 2017 and 2018 air strikes on Syrian regime targets, arguing that the U.S. president had no constitutional authority for military action. She has argued for working with Russia, which backs Assad, to fight Islamist militants in Syria.
  • She wants to distance the United States from Saudi Arabia, which she says exports its brand of extremism around the world, pushes for war with Iran, and carries out “genocidal” war in Yemen.
  • She has supported congressional resolutions to end U.S. support for the Saudi campaign in Yemen. She calls for an end to all U.S. aid to the kingdom as well as for the release of the results of a federal investigation into Saudi Arabia’s role in the 9/11 attacks.
  • She was a “cautious” supporter of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, which she called “imperfect,” but she says Trump’s withdrawal from the agreement undermines U.S. credibility and will make it more likely that Iran acquires nuclear weapons.
  • She calls the killing of Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani, targeted by a U.S. air strike in January 2020, an act of war, and charges that Trump’s decision to launch the attack without congressional authorization is a violation of the Constitution.
  • She warns against what she sees as the administration’s eagerness for war with Iran, which she says would be “devastating.” She argues that the tensions with Iran have distracted the United States from its efforts to fight al-Qaeda and the Islamic State.
  • She considers Israel to be the United States’ “strongest ally.” She has “reservations” about Israeli settlements in the occupied territories and supports a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

North Korea

Gabbard has favored direct talks with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un to try to end Pyongyang’s nuclear program, and she blames a militaristic U.S. foreign policy for making it harder to reach a deal.

  • Gabbard says Trump’s negotiations with Kim to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula have been “steps in the right direction.”
  • She said a 2018 false alert of an imminent ballistic missile attack on her home state of Hawaii underscored the need for immediate direct talks with Kim.
  • She has said that Kim sees nuclear weapons as his only deterrent against regime change because of U.S. interventions in Iraq, Libya, and Syria, which she calls counterproductive.
  • She argues that U.S. reversals elsewhere in the world, including Trump’s withdrawals from the Iran nuclear deal and the INF Treaty, have made Kim less likely to compromise.
  • She blames Trump’s trade war for making it more difficult to get Chinese support for any nuclear deal with North Korea. She has said she would work more closely with China to influence Pyongyang.

Russia

Gabbard calls for reducing tensions between the United States and Russia to lessen the chance of nuclear war and to enable cooperation on arms control, terrorism, and other areas of mutual concern. She has also supported sanctions on Russia for its intervention in Ukraine.

  • Gabbard has called for a reduction of tensions with Moscow in places including Syria and Venezuela, arguing that “we are in a better place in the world when we’re not on the brink of nuclear war.” She says she would call for a summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin during her first week in office.
  • She says that Moscow’s interference in U.S. elections should be addressed through diplomacy. She says U.S. voting systems are still vulnerable to such attacks, and she has introduced legislation to mandate the use of paper ballots in every state.
  • Her stances have won applause from within the Russian government, including state-backed television networks and Russian diplomats, leading her campaign to issue denials of soliciting any foreign support.
  • As a member of Congress, she strongly supported sanctions on Russia for its 2014 invasion of Ukraine, arguing that Obama’s sanctions did not go far enough. She also backed sending military aid to Ukraine, a policy rejected by Obama but implemented by Trump.
  • She opposed the Trump administration’s decision to leave the INF Treaty with Russia, which limited both countries’ nuclear missile stockpiles. She warns the withdrawal will set off a “new arms race.”

Trade

Gabbard is a skeptic of multinational trade deals, which she argues have led to large U.S. job losses, lower wages, and a loss of U.S. sovereignty. She also opposes Trump’s trade war with China.

  • Gabbard is against Trump’s trade war with China, arguing that his approach has been “extremely volatile,” with “ravaging and devastating effects” on both manufacturers and farmers.
  • She believes the trade war has not only hurt the U.S. economy, but has also made it more difficult to get Chinese support for any nuclear deal with North Korea. She warns the trade war could escalate into a “hot war” with a nuclear-armed China.
  • She opposed Obama’s signature Asia-Pacific trade deal, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, arguing that it would cost Americans jobs, harm the environment, and undermine U.S. sovereignty.
  • She has been a fierce critic of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which she says cost hundreds of thousands of American jobs and lowered wages. She voted for Trump’s revamped NAFTA, the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, after congressional Democrats negotiated for stronger labor and environmental provisions.

Venezuela and Latin America

Gabbard says the United States should not get involved in Venezuela, where the Trump administration has joined most countries in the region in backing opposition leader Juan Guaido as interim president.

  • She says Washington should “stay out” of Venezuela, arguing that the United States has no right to choose other countries’ leaders.
  • She accused Trump of “saber-rattling” by stating that the United States may consider using force to intervene in favor of Guaido. She says such a conflict would put the United States on a collision course with Russia, which supports the current government of Nicolas Maduro.

This project was made possible in part by a grant from Carnegie Corporation of New York.

As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
51 Comments
Chick Lyttle
Chick Lyttle
May 7, 2024 11:20 am

Gabbard highlights her record as a lifelong environmentalist and campaigner for action on climate change, including proposals for sweeping legislation on clean energy. She has spoken in favor of many aspects of the Green New Deal framework.

Not qualified for the job if she believes anthropological climate change.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Chick Lyttle
May 7, 2024 12:18 pm

anthropogenic

The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer
  Anonymous
May 7, 2024 2:03 pm

anthropomorphic.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  The Central Scrutinizer
May 7, 2024 2:21 pm

philanthropathic

Backstopper
Backstopper
  Anonymous
May 7, 2024 5:35 pm

Pathetic

Anonymous
Anonymous
  The Central Scrutinizer
May 7, 2024 9:02 pm

assigning human traits to animals

Tr4head
Tr4head
  Chick Lyttle
May 7, 2024 5:35 pm

Sociopathic.

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 7, 2024 11:49 am

Whoever ends up in, .gov will remain unchanged.

Abolish the state.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
May 7, 2024 11:52 am

Like virtually every politician in BOTH major parties, she lacks sound economic understanding, has NO fundamental principles upon which stands on political power, government intervention, government theft, etc are based, and so unsurprisingly is all over the map philosophically. Not that Trump is any different…just different on other things.

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 7, 2024 12:49 pm

Once again if not Trump and Gabbard as VP what then ???
More DC typical shenanigans
Civil War likely racially motivated thanks to the indigent black populations clustered in decaying cities and 50 million illegals of mixed backgrounds all primarily dependent on leftist government hand out policies and criminal activity creating murder and mayhem !
Recent majority black youth attacking cars in traffic in Philadelphia, turning them into dead nigger speed bumps is what is needed but we know a driver in fear of obvious attack weaponizing their car defensively is what a CORRUPT LEFTIST DOJ will call a crime
They want civil war , it’s the only way out for the entire treasonous leftist democrats.
They will again play victim as they did regarding J6

Tr4head
Tr4head
  Anonymous
May 7, 2024 5:38 pm

RFK is the only answer that avoids civil war, no Warp Speed healthocracy that wants YOU and yours dead and stops weaponization of Govt against “political dissidents” like his Father and Uncle.

kiwi
kiwi
  Tr4head
May 7, 2024 11:18 pm

Dr Shiva

unredacted
unredacted
  kiwi
May 8, 2024 5:27 am

here’s one to ponder-
Dr Shiva for prez?!

ok.realistically, Inthink that’s a great idea kiwi.

i wonder how much of HIS truth maga can take.
i doubt much at all.

i also find it telling when suitable, willing, winners that are native born, are in extreme short supply.

Sam Fox
Sam Fox
  Tr4head
May 8, 2024 1:51 am

RFK is also an enviro extremest like Gabbard. Ending the use of oil would be disastrous! There is NO WAY wind turbines & solar panels can produce enough electricity to run the country.
Then there is the HUGE problem of how big a carbon footprint it takes to manufacture wind turbines & panels. We are better off driving cars & trucks. Turbines are killing a LOT of whales & birds. Where are the enviros?
SamFox

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 7, 2024 12:58 pm

This place has lots of C.F.R. backstory.

” Harvard economist and Kennedy supporter, John K. Galbraith, confirmed the Council’s influence: “Those of us who had worked for the Kennedy election were tolerated in the government for that reason and had a say, but foreign policy was still with the Council on Foreign Relations people.”

Who is it that moves ” The Overton Window ” all the time ? ( Media Control )

 Stephen F. Cohen described the Council as “America’s single most important non-govern­mental foreign-policy organization”, whose primary role is to “define the accepted, legitimate, orthodox parameters of discussion.”

And no less than John J. McCloy, the longtime chairman of the Council and advisor to several U.S. presidents, recalled about his time in Washington: “Whenever we needed a man we thumbed through the roll of the Council members and put through a call to New York [i.e., the CFR headquarters].”

[1] In general, elite journalists do not have to be told what to write. In a 1997 essay, media researcher Noam Chomsky explained this aspect as follows: “The point is that they wouldn’t be there unless they had already demonstrated that nobody has to tell them what to write because they are going to say the right thing anyway. () They have been through the socialization system.”

[2] In 1996, it was none other than the CFR which recommended a closer cooperation between the CIA and the media, i.e. a restart of the famous CIA Operation Mockingbird.

( Sean Hannity will spout the words ‘ Mockingbird Media ‘ followed by a completely false definition to confuse his sheeple. )

Link

The CFR and the Media – The Council on Foreign Relations and the Media

comment image?w=1152

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
May 7, 2024 4:49 pm

I believe Sean Hannity has moved to Florida. Too bad, no snow there in order to toss a snowball with rock during November’s Selection like should have been done in NH 2008. Fair warning, don’t let this guy brainwash you. He’s all CFR and more.

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 7, 2024 1:04 pm
Askimet
Askimet
  Anonymous
May 7, 2024 2:12 pm

Nice link share Anon!

Sam Fox
Sam Fox
  Anonymous
May 8, 2024 2:16 am

Condi Rice is CFR. Her name is on the membership list.

SamFox

Obbledy
Obbledy
May 7, 2024 1:11 pm

NO WALL KISSERS!……

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Obbledy
May 7, 2024 5:09 pm

Too late. Prepare appropriately.

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 7, 2024 1:15 pm

CFR not only manipulates media ( From PSYOPS To Mind War ) they cherry pick far left disinformation ” experts ” to further their aims.

Disinformation and Faith Communities | Council on Foreign Relations

Joan Donovan is one example. At a CFR talk she basically said that ‘ Truth ” is decided by society , collectively.

WHAT ????

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 7, 2024 1:31 pm

Everything the Council On Foreign Relations does not like will be called a ‘ trope ‘ , misinformation or Konspiracy theory.

The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer
May 7, 2024 2:01 pm

I WOULD say that nothing good ever came out of Hawaii, but then I remembered Maui Wowie. Mmmm. Tasty.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  The Central Scrutinizer
May 7, 2024 4:54 pm

Lucky person

Askimet
Askimet
May 7, 2024 2:11 pm

She’s a swamp creature what lost her forehead mounted off button

Working Man's Chest Surgeon
Working Man's Chest Surgeon
May 7, 2024 2:40 pm

Disclosure: I love Tulsi and have voted for her.

That said, she made a huge strategic error in turning down RFKs offer to be VP. She aligns much better with him, and Trump would really just be using her if he picks her, as she appears to hope.

She and RFK could have won and she would be able to transform the country. As it is, RFK is a dark horse who merits a real close look – specifically, people (Admin?) should take a look at the Zogby poll he spoke about. He definitely could win in an environment where Biden has to be replaced, and Trump is in jail.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/26000-voters-say-rfk-jr-can-win-it-all/ar-AA1o8DEU

People have had enough. “Pox on both your houses” is a powerful argument.

Tr4head
Tr4head
  Working Man's Chest Surgeon
May 7, 2024 5:43 pm

Sadly there are many brainwashed Trumpers on TBP that would vote for him if he was dead. I guess that’s what happens to your brain after Warp Speed takes its toll.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Tr4head
May 7, 2024 10:39 pm

lol

Anon
Anon
  Tr4head
May 7, 2024 11:27 pm

And what choice would be better?

Ed
Ed
  Anon
May 8, 2024 8:50 am

None of the above would be better, but that option is never offered.

Sam Fox
Sam Fox
  Tr4head
May 8, 2024 1:55 am

Tr4–And your POTUS pick would be…???

SamFox

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Tr4head
May 8, 2024 2:49 am

Sadly there are many brainwashed TDS’ers on TBP that would attack him
even if he was dead. I guess that’s what happens to your brain after Deplorables takes its toll.

Ed
Ed
  Anonymous
May 8, 2024 8:51 am

Shine his shoes while you’re down there, anonyhole.

Ed
Ed
  Working Man's Chest Surgeon
May 8, 2024 8:49 am

Go get in line for your next booster shot, sockpuppet. You former “big dogs” are so fuckin’ transparent that it doesn’t matter which one you are..

poordude
poordude
May 7, 2024 3:57 pm

There are so many problems in her positions on policy I simply do not have the energy to address them. She should never hold political office again.

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 7, 2024 5:06 pm

Tulsi? Just goes to enforce the fact Trump does not know what he is doing waking in a new world every day , sort of like changing directions with the wind. “Today I think I’ll inquire of…tomorrow, WTFK’s?”

When I first heard of Tulsi some years ago I thought, “wow, someone that “might” get it”, at least on the lunacy surrounding the MIC. I’m assuming Tulsi is still ok with abortion. Maybe this is knuckleheads strategy since he has stated he is willing to work a deal with dems on the killing fields issue. A deal? The blood is not on my hands but Trump’s.

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 7, 2024 6:35 pm

WEF & CFR…sounds like the perfect running mate for the Donald…she was probably issued a bigger knife than traitor Pence.

Known Associate
Known Associate
May 7, 2024 8:21 pm

The anonymous author (never mind the one who posted this incoherent rant) is citing predominately 4yr old or older positions as disqualifications. Many of these positions, if acted upon, would actually lead to a more peaceful and productive international cooperation and a trade renaissance. Many would not. Bear in mind that this content is lifted from highly dated CFR material, not current policy positions by the subject politician.

If one is going to attempt to characterize Tulsi Gabbard as fit or unfit for office, especially executive office, one must at least seek an interview with the candidate for current positions.

At the end of the rant, it is not possible to determine if the author is for or against, simply transcribing some corporate gobbledygook.

State your own mind, willya? That way the rest of us can see where YOU stand.

Trump is not going to win this on his own tarnished record, (fucked up on Warp Speed among other things, due to his scientific ignorance and a lack of competent and un-compromised staff),he will need someone as VP that can handle some actual policy work (unlike the current crew of fags, fairies and kneelers) to be the bulldog that we need to turn this clown show around.

Personally, I don’t think it is Tulsi. She may be a willing false flag for the hidden hand.

Over and out.

Known Associate
Known Associate
  Known Associate
May 7, 2024 9:02 pm

And then there is this, something that makes a personal stand against the deep state media assassination of RFK Jr:

It’s a personal statement by himself, so you have to honor it as first-person, if for no other reason.

He is a man that has recovered from the personal trauma of his young life and actually gives a shit about our once great country, and the only survivor of the deep state campaign against his family. He knows how to get meaningful work done. And so does Tulsi.

Trump would have a leg up if he could bring both of these soldiers against the deep state into the fold. VP and SecState, in no particular order.

The usual suspects will do him nothing but harm.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Known Associate
May 9, 2024 12:56 am

We don’t have to honor anything from traitors.

As an aside, his wife is friends with Ghislaine Maxwell (and they both flew on Epstein’s plane). Who was buddy buddy with rapey fag Spacey, of “The Usual Suspects”.

The more you know.

How much does it pay to shill for people like this, I wonder?

Sam Fox
Sam Fox
  Known Associate
May 8, 2024 2:14 am

Known–It’s the REST of her stuff that’s deadly to one degree or another.
Her & RFK’s enviro-mental positions are enough to drive USA into the ground. I have never trusted her. Something there just isn’t right.

So, what did Trump tell the vax makers to put in the poison? You have a list of the ingredients he specified?
Which members of his staff helped create the vax?
He told them to hurry = warp-speed. OK. Was that because he wanted to crap all over his legacy or perhaps he wanted to help people…
Hadn’t Fouchi & his diabolic pals been working previously to make the virus & wasn’t it them that helped get the vax made? Did Mr. T know he was being set up? Could it be he was deceived?

WHAT would you have done, now that it’s passed?

SamFox

jde
jde
  Sam Fox
May 9, 2024 1:14 am

WHAT would you have done, now that it’s passed?”

It was obvious in March of 2020 it was all hype, and I wasn’t even paying much attention.

Apologists like yourself should be treated like the traitors who locked down most of the world. I know exactly what I would do. in a similar vein,

judea delenda est

Sam Fox
Sam Fox
  jde
May 9, 2024 10:37 pm

jde–No evidence of the hype, just speculation?

Ohhh, I’m so threatened! I wasn’t for lock downs. That allegation is just a typical dimm distraction effort. Lock downs were so stupid, a game of ‘who can we control’ played by big brother. The same big brother going after Mr. T now.
I wasn’t pro vax, ever.
The Q was “what would you have done…?” and your response wasn’t there, just a childish dimm not so shiny object game.
It’s very obvious that you weren’t paying attention.

What was I an apologist of or for? Mr. T? Yes, I support him. You have some one with a better record you would like to mention? Or are you going to just do the bait & switch dimm distraction jive again?

When I first heard of the vax God strongly warned me to stay away from it. There was NO mistaking the warning or Who it was from. Play with that all you want. It it is still true.

SamFox

overthecliff
overthecliff
May 7, 2024 8:23 pm

So. Tulsi is a complete globalist. Just what we are needing.

Dindu? nay, nay
Dindu? nay, nay
May 7, 2024 8:34 pm

Hindu

Who Is Tulsi Gabbard?
Tulsi Gabbard has served in the U.S. House of Representatives on behalf of Hawaii’s 2nd congressional district since 2012. Having been deployed to Iraq (2004-2005) and Kuwait (2008-2009) as part of the Hawaii Army National Guard, Gabbard is one of the first female combat veterans and the first Hindu to be elected to Congress.

Gabbard was the Democratic National Committee’s vice chair from 2013 to 2016, but she left her post due to friction with the committee as well as her desire to endorse Senator Bernie Sanders‘ 2016 presidential bid. Known for her vehement stance against U.S. military interventionism and a champion of veterans’ rights, Gabbard announced her candidacy for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination in February 2019, before dropping out of the race in March 2020.

Tulsi Gabbard – 2020, Policies & Age – Biography

Hootin Goober
Hootin Goober
May 8, 2024 12:15 am

Goober thinks she’d be better as Secretary of Deeefense…. I’ve never seen her flustered, without an answer, or angry. She presents herself with a high level of self awareness. I bet she could get the Pentagon to pass an audit and put some people in jail. She’s also too smart to believe the climate crap, so she must be in on the plan. Too bad.

k31
k31
  Hootin Goober
May 8, 2024 12:21 am

Imagine being a man who wants to be ruled by women.

k31
k31
May 8, 2024 12:19 am

“Gabbard, who saw active-duty military service in Iraq,” This is fucking pathetic and shameful. No woman contributed anything of any importance to the Ziocon Iraq operation, Except for those in the hospitals.

Sam Fox
Sam Fox
May 8, 2024 2:29 am

The best VP choice is Sarah Palin.

Sarah is a true USA Patriot. She is proven strong & is 1000% pro USA. Sarah doesn’t have the odd positions Gabbard has, especially on the environment, one of the most important issues the US faces ATM.
If We The People are forced to give up oil & natural gas,this country will be a pushover.
I just don’t think electric tanks, choppers & jets are going to cut it for defense.
Palin is Drill! Baby Drill! Gabbard would go solar & wind. Even in peacetime solar & wind can’t make enough juice.
As a pretty well know Mamma Grizzly, Sarah would draw a lot of undecided women voters.

SamFox

Liqueda
Liqueda
May 9, 2024 5:28 pm

I connect the dots with mundane astrology as the CFR has been steering the US for over a century. People wonder why nothing changes no matter who you vote for? The CFR and the Trilateral Commision.
https://mundane-astrology-notes.blogspot.com/2024/02/saturn-neptune-slavery-and-exposure.html