Guest Post by Martin Armstrong
Michael Sussmann has been acquitted of lying to the FBI. The verdict comes as no surprise as the jury was personally selected to favor Sussmann, while the judge had been bought and paid for by the Clintons. Sussmann said: “I told the truth to the FBI and the jury record clearly recognize that with their unanimous verdict today, I’m grateful to the members of the jury for their careful and thoughtful service. Despite being falsely accused. I’m relieved that Justice ultimately prevailed in my case.”
Hillary Clinton’s own campaign manager Robby Mook admitted that the collusion hoax was a deliberate attempt to manipulate the presidential election and distract the public from Hillary’s email scandal. The prosecutor presented the jury with clear evidence of Sussmann billing the Clinton campaign for collecting information to link Russia’s Alfa Bank to Donald Trump. In one clear text, Sussmann said that he wanted to help the FBI by providing them with information independently. There is a possibility that Clinton misled Sussmann and allowed him to take the fall. She has not responded publicly on the trial.
“Opposition research is not illegal. If it were, the jails of Washington, D.C. would be teeming over,” the defense attorney said during the beginning of the trial. Unfortunately, this was more than research. Hillary Clinton and her crew ran with the story and blatantly claimed Donald Trump stole the election with the help of Russia. This trial paints a bleak picture of the FBI, the media, and America’s entire legal system.
The Michael Sussmann trial is completely corrupt and biased to favor the Clintons. Sussmann is charged with lying to the FBI under 18 U.S.C. 1001 for claiming there were ties between the Trump campaign and Russian bank Alfa. Other Clinton advisors have admitted that Hillary Clinton herself signed off on the lie that Trump was colluding with the Russians to hack the 2016 US Presidential Election. Federal Judge Christopher Cooper who is overseeing the trial has been bought and paid for by the Clintons.
To begin, one of the jurors donated to the Clintons and simply said he would “strive for impartiality as best I can.” Judge Cooper overruled prosecutors’ objections to having him on the jury after he clearly said he could not guarantee he’d judged unbiasedly. Another woman on the jury is a far-left AOC supporter and donor, and a third said she simply cannot recall if she donated to the Clintons in the past. Worse, another woman admitted her husband worked for the failed Clinton campaign in 2008. As if all of this weren’t evidence enough of an unfair jury, one woman revealed that her daughter attends high school and plays sports with the defendant’s own daughter.
Corrupt Judge Cooper insists the trial cannot revolve around the actual Clinton campaign and has banned special counsel John Durham from suggesting any “joint venture.” The same permissions were not provided to Trump’s former staff when they faced their day in court. This entire trial appears to be for show as the jury likely reached a verdict before the trial began.
