Property Rights and Property Taxes—and Countries That Don’t Have Them

Property Rights and Property Taxes—and Countries That Don’t Have Them

By Nick Giambruno, Senior Editor, InternationalMan.com

Do you really own something that you are forced to perpetually make payments on and which can be seized from you if you don’t pay?

I would say that you don’t.

You would possess such an item, but you wouldn’t own it—an important distinction

A ridiculous perversion of the concept of ownership and property rights has infected most of the world like a virus: something that most people unquestioningly accept as a normal part of life—like it’s a part of the eternal fabric of the cosmos.

I am talking about property taxes, of course.

You know, the annual tax you pay that is based not on whether any income was generated, but rather on the underlying value of real estate you supposedly “own.” There is no way to pay off this obligation in one fell swoop; it stays with you for as long as you “own” the property.

In actuality, you don’t own anything which you must pay property taxes on—you are merely renting it from the government.

Suppose you bought a sofa set and coffee table for your living room for $5,000 cash, and then had the obligation to pay $100—or a percentage of the furniture’s value—in tax each year for as long as you “owned” it. Then suppose that for whatever reason you’re unable or unwilling to pay your furniture’s property tax. It won’t take long for the government to swoop in and confiscate it to pay off your delinquent taxes. You get to “own” it as long as you pay the never-ending annual fee—stop paying and you’ll find out who really owns it.

While many people would correctly find a furniture property tax absurd, they also illogically find it acceptable for the government to levy an insatiable tax on different assets—namely their homes, offices, and raw land.

But to me at least, the type of asset being taxed is not what makes it absurd, it’s the concept of property taxes that is absurd.

Respect for property rights and property taxes are mutually exclusive concepts. What’s yours is yours, and you shouldn’t need to pay the government for permission to keep it.

It’s not uncommon for people in North America and Europe to pay tens of thousands of dollars per year in property taxes… just to live in their own homes. And this burden will almost certainly continue to rise. Property taxes are constantly being raised in most places, especially in places with poor fiscal health.

It’s very possible that over a lifetime, the total amount of property taxes extracted will exceed what was paid for the underlying property in the first place.

And, just like the furniture example above, if you don’t pay your property tax (AKA government rent) on the home you thought you owned, it will be confiscated. This is not as uncommon as some would believe. It was estimated that 10,000 people in Pennsylvania alone lose their homes annually because they aren’t able to keep up with the property taxes.

Using the word “own” and “ownership” in these contexts is the sloppy use of the word—which always leads to sloppy thinking.

Speaking of sloppy thinking, expect Boobus Americanus to say things like “how would we pay for local services like public schools if it weren’t for property taxes?” Of course, these services could be funded in many different ways—or better, they could be provided for in the free market. But don’t expect that to happen. In fact, given the social, political, and economic dynamics in the US and most of the rest of the West, expect the opposite—property taxes have nowhere to go but north.

It doesn’t have to be this way. You can own real estate in certain countries and can skip the annual property-tax harvest.

I have previously written that I view real estate in foreign countries—along with physical gold held abroad—as superior vehicles for long-term savings.

However, foreign real estate has its drawbacks. It’s illiquid and has carrying costs like maintenance expenses and, of course, property taxes. To diminish these costs that eat away at your real estate investment, it is essential to minimize or eliminate them.

Here’s a list of countries that do not levy any property taxes:

That’s it. If you want to escape the rapacious and ridiculous property tax, these are your options.

Ireland would have been on this list, but it recently adopted a property tax. This does not bode well for other EU countries that conceivably could face fiscal troubles and turn to property taxes as a solution—like Malta and Croatia.

Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Nicaragua have property taxes, but the obligations are generally negligible.

The risk, of course, is that since a property tax is already in place in these countries it can easily be increased whenever the government decides it needs more revenue. Case in point: the bankrupt government of Greece. Consider the excerpt below from an article in The Guardian.

“The joke now doing the rounds is: if you want to punish your child, you threaten to pass on property to them… Greeks traditionally have always regarded property as a secure investment. But now it has become a huge millstone, given that the tax burden has increased sevenfold in the past two years alone.”

The country on the list above that most interests me is the Cayman Islands, but to each his own. This is because most Caymanians are vehemently opposed to all forms of direct taxation and have never had it in their history. That attitude and history is a good guarantor that it will be very unlikely for a property tax to be imposed sometime in the future.

In any case, buying foreign real estate is a very individualized and often complex decision—but one that provides huge diversification benefits. Property taxes are but one consideration.

You should look at foreign real estate less as a vehicle for a quick return and more as a diversified long-term store of wealth. Wherever you decide to buy, it should also be in a place that you would actually want to spend some significant time in. That way, the property has value to you, regardless of whether it proves to be a good investment.

One expert on foreign real estate whom I’d highly recommend is none other than Doug Casey, the original International Man and my mentor. Doug’s been to over 175 countries and invested in real estate in a number them. He wrote a thick and detailed chapter on foreign real estate, including his favorite markets, for our Going Global publication, which is a must-read for those interested in this extremely important topic.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Fred Hayek
Fred Hayek
September 15, 2014 5:56 pm

There was a state wide referendum question on the ballot in 2012(?) in, I think, North Dakota, but it was, unfortunately, defeated.

Any state with a large number of illegal aliens, that’s most of ’em these days, might be well advised to switch to financing via sales taxes instead of with property taxes and income taxes. Sales taxes hit everyone even if they’re working under the table.

Fred Hayek
Fred Hayek
September 15, 2014 5:57 pm

Oops, forgot to say that it was a ballot question asking voters to eliminate property taxes in ND.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
September 15, 2014 6:24 pm

Nick Giambruno is a globe trotting financial analyst who has lived in Europe, the middle east and the US. How can someone who has zero stake in a physical community rooted in place have any concept of what it means to “own property”?

His analysis may seem cutting edge to finance types, but I find it extremely shallow and one dimensional. Property is far more than an asset. Productive land earns far more than it costs. People who neither own land, nor work it cannot possibly understand it as anything other than a financial instrument and a losing one at that.

Note to Nick- you never really own anything. Things that you think you own can be stolen, burn to ash, exist after you have shuffled off this mortal coil. Your possession of things is not ownership simply because there is no longer a tax obligation on it. It is yours based on a multitude of considerations and actions. My property taxes go to support my community, people I know and have relationships with. If Nick finds it preferable to live with a nation filled with indigenous natives on the Turks and Caicos who share nothing in common with him because of advantageous tax position, he sacrifices a multitude of benefits that cannot be purchased with any amount of money.

There are costs to everything and value that cannot be numerated in dollars.

Anonymous
Anonymous
September 15, 2014 7:39 pm

This reeks of neo-mercantilism

Not a Slave in Your Collective
Not a Slave in Your Collective
September 16, 2014 1:55 am

No kids in school, then no more school tax.

Why is school tax forever? Pay for 12 years, and then you are done.

I have no kids and never attended public schools, so get your school taxes off my house.

American’s do not own their house, they rent it from the school board. That makes us a nation of serfs to the school board.

TE
TE
September 16, 2014 12:41 pm

@hardscrabble, I suppose your view is true for someone that is well connected and well like by the community. You feel a part of “them,” they treat you that way too.

From the viewpoint of someone currently fighting a government bureaucracy over their “own” land/home/building, it feels more like theft.

From the cops, to the inspectors, the connected, and the politicians, there are teams of roving bureaucrats going door to door and extorting – or outright destroying – numerous taxpayers. I have the feeling that anyone that has felt the bad side of the outright power trip and control of the government would be likely suspects for your down votes.

Feeling valued and connected would lead me to feel warmer and fuzzier about helping my community. Sadly, for me and many other of the businesses and property owners around here, we feel like we have targets on our back.

Our taxes, fines, inspections, regulations, forms, are theft and extortion of both our time, and our money. Driving through half-empty industrial parks and with further reflection it becomes obvious that our community doesn’t want us around.

They are going to miss our money. So will every other property tax paying business/citizen left.

The Tea Party was over a 3% tax. How freakin’ quaint.