KEYNESIAN SOLUTIONS – AFTER TOTAL FAILURE – TRY, TRY AGAIN

“Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some. The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches strikes not only at security, but at confidence in the equity of the existing distribution of wealth.” – John Maynard Keynes – The Economic Consequences of the Peace

  

While Barack Obama vacations on Martha’s Vineyard this week he’ll be thinking about his grand vision to save America – again. There is one thing you can say about Obama – he’s predictable. He promises to unveil his “new” plan for America in early September. The White House said Obama will give a speech after the September 5 Labor Day holiday to outline measures to boost hiring and find budget savings that surpass the $1.5 trillion goal of a new congressional deficit-cutting committee. It is heartening to see that Barack has turned into a cost cutter extraordinaire. He should be an inspiration to the Tea Party, except for one little problem. The plan he unveils in a few weeks will increase spending now and fret about spending cuts at some future unspecified date.

I can reveal his plan today because the White House has already leaked the major aspects of his plan. He will call for an extension of the Social Security payroll tax cut of 2% for all working Americans. This was supposed to give a dramatic boost to GDP in 2011. Maybe it will work next time. He will demand that extended unemployment benefits be renewed. Somehow providing 99 weeks of unemployment benefits is supposed to create jobs. It’s done wonders thus far. He will propose some semblance of an infrastructure bank or tax cuts to spur infrastructure spending. It will include a proposal for training and education to help unemployed people switch careers. He will attempt to steal the thunder from the SUPER COMMITTEE of 12 by coming up with $2 trillion of budget savings by insisting the Lear jet flying rich fork over an extra $500 billion.

You may have noticed that followers of Keynesian dogma like Paul Krugman, Larry Summers, Brad Delong, Richard Koo, John Galbraith, every Democrat in Congress, and every liberal pundit and columnist have been shrieking about the Tea Party terrorists and their ghastly budget cuts that are destroying our economy. They contend the stock market is tanking and the economy is heading into recession due to the brutal austerity measures being imposed by the extremists in the Republican Party. There is just one small issue with their argument. It is completely false. It is a bold faced lie. This is 2011. The economy has been in freefall since January 1. No spending cuts have occurred. Nada!!! As the CBO chart below reveals, the horrendous slashing of government will amount to $21 billion in 2012 and $42 billion in 2013. Of course, those aren’t even cuts in spending. They are reductions in the projected increases in spending. Politicians must be very secure in the knowledge that Americans are completely ignorant when it comes to anything other than the details of Kim Kardashian’s wedding and who Snooki is banging on Jersey Shore.

 

I’d like to remind the Harvard educated Keynesian economists that Federal government spending is currently chiming in at $3.8 trillion per year. Federal spending was $2.7 trillion in 2007 and $3.0 trillion in 2008. Keynesians believe government spending fills the gap when private companies are contracting. Obama has taken Keynesianism to a new level. Federal spending will total $10.8 trillion in Obama’s 1st three years, versus $8.4 trillion in the previous three years. Even a Harvard economist can figure out this is a 29% increase in Federal spending. What has it accomplished? We are back in recession, unemployment is rising, forty six million Americans are on food stamps, food and energy prices are soaring, and the middle class is being annihilated. The standard Keynesian response is we would have lost 3 million more jobs, we were saved from a 2nd Great Depression and the stimulus was too little. It would have worked if it had just been twice as large.

The 2nd Great Depression was not avoided, it was delayed. Our two decade long delusional credit boom could have been voluntarily abandoned in 2008. The banks at fault could have been liquidated in an orderly bankruptcy with stockholders and bondholders accepting the consequences of their foolishness. Unemployment would have soared to 12%, GDP would have collapsed, and the stock market would have fallen to 5,000. The bad debt would have been flushed from the system. Instead our Wall Street beholden leaders chose to save their banker friends, cover-up the bad debt, shift private debt to taxpayer debt, print trillions of new dollars in an effort to inflate away the debt, and implemented every wacky Keynesian stimulus idea Larry Summers could dream up.  These strokes of genius have failed miserably. Bernanke, Paulson, Geithner and Obama have set in motion a series of events that will ultimately lead to a catastrophic currency collapse. We have entered the 2nd phase of the Greater Depression and there are no monetary or fiscal bullets left in the gun. Further expansion of debt will lead to a hyperinflationary collapse as the remaining confidence in the U.S. dollar is exhausted. We are one failed Treasury auction away from a currency crisis.

John Maynard Keynes argued the solution to the Great Depression was to stimulate the economy through some combination of two approaches: a reduction in interest rates and government investment in infrastructure. Investment by government injects income, which results in more spending in the general economy, which in turn stimulates more production and investment involving still more income and spending and so forth. The initial stimulation starts a cascade of events, whose total increase in economic activity is a multiple of the original investment.

It sounds so good in theory, but it didn’t work in the Depression and it hasn’t worked today. It is a doctrine taught in every business school in America with no actual results to support it. Who needs facts and actual results when a good story believed and perpetuated by non-thinking pundits will do? Every Keynesian play in the playbook has been used since 2008. The American people were told by Obama and his Keynesian trained advisors that if we implemented his $862 billion shovel ready stimulus package, unemployment would peak at 7.9% and would decline to 6.5% by today. The cascade of recovery was going to be jump started by a stimulus package that equaled 27% of the previous year’s entire spending. Obama’s complete package was implemented. The outcome was an eye opener. If you show a Keynesian this chart, their response would be: “Imagine how bad it would have been if we didn’t spend the $862 billion.”

 

John Maynard Obama got everything he asked for in January 2009. He had both houses in Congress and did not need to consult Republicans to pass his Keynesian $862 billion porkulus bill. It seems that $252 billion, or 29% of the package was nothing more than transfer payments. Of course, according to Keynesians, the $252 billion should have had a multiplier effect when it was handed out. I think they were right. Obama was able to multiply the number of people on food stamps in January 2009 from 32 million to the current tally of 45.8 million. The monthly food stamp transfer payment has gone from $3.6 billion to $6.1 billion. Keynesians should be thrilled by this success story.

 [Review & Outlook]

Obama’s Keynesian dream bill included:

  • $1 billion for Amtrak, the federal railroad that hasn’t turned a profit in 40 years.
  • $2 billion for child-care subsidies.
  • $50 million for that great engine of job creation, the National Endowment for the Arts.
  • $400 million for global-warming research.
  • $2.4 billion for carbon-capture demonstration projects.
  • $650 million on top of the billions already doled out to pay for digital TV conversion coupons.
  • $8 billion for renewable energy funding.
  • $6 billion for mass transit that had a low or negative return on investment.
  • $600 million more for the federal government to buy new cars. Uncle Sam already spends $3 billion a year on its fleet of 600,000 vehicles.
  • Congress earmarked $7 billion for modernizing federal buildings and facilities.
  • The Smithsonian received $150 million.
  • The Department of Education got $66 billion, more than the entire Education Department spent a just 10 years ago. $6 billion of this subsidized university building projects.

Obama declared in December 2008 there were shovel ready projects across the land that would create immediate jobs. Too bad he didn’t tell the American public only $30 billion of the $862 billion mountain of pork was earmarked for highways and bridges. Obama declared his stimulus would create 3.5 million jobs, later changed to “create or save”. There were 144 million Americans employed in January 2009. Today, there are 139 million Americans employed. Obama gives the term “success story” a new meaning. The Keynesians had their chance and now they want a do-over. Sorry, that isn’t how it works in the real world. As Speaker Nancy Pelosi put it, “We won the election. We wrote the bill.” No truer words have ever been spoken.

As we know, that was only the beginning of our Keynesian debt nightmare. Let’s do some critical thinking and assess the results of Obama’s other Keynesian solutions:

  • The Homebuyer Tax Credit cost taxpayers $27 billion or $43,000 per additional house sold. The Keynesians handed 3.9 million people $7,000 to do something they were going to do anyway. They lured first time home buyers into the market. Since the credit expired, median home prices have fallen $15,000 and continue to fall. This wonderful government program has created more underwater homeowners and did nothing to stabilize the housing market or home prices.
  • Cash for Clunkers cost taxpayers $3 billion. An incremental 125,000 cars were sold at a cost of $24,000 per car. This Keynesian dream program lured more people into debt and warped the used car market by destroying used cars and driving up prices for poor people who couldn’t afford a new car. There were no carryover benefits except for government controlled union car makers.
  • Obama’s HAMP program allocated $11 billion to supposedly allow 4 million homeowners to modify their mortgages, reduce their monthly mortgage payments and avoid foreclosure. HAMP has proven a colossal failure that has done more to harm than help debt-laden homeowners. It has achieved slightly more than 500,000 permanent modifications, 40% of which the Treasury expects to default. Far more borrowers have dropped out of the program than successfully achieved permanent loan modification. These borrowers, along with those who later default, will often be left with larger outstanding debt, worse credit scores, and less home equity.
  • Obama even handed $30 billion to the largest homebuilder corporations in the country, run by billionaires like Bob Toll, by allowing them to carry back their losses and wipe out tax liabilities in prior years. This did wonders for the housing market. It did stimulate bonus payments for the CEOs of these companies.
  • Billions of tax revenue was lost by handing out $1,500 tax credits for people to buy new windows, doors, and appliances they were going to buy anyway. We are still waiting for that multiplier effect.

The usual suspects are now declaring that we can’t make the same mistakes FDR made in 1937 resulting in a dramatic downturn in 1938. As usual, the Keynesian storyline about the Great Depression is false.

Depression Keynesian Fallacy

One thing to remember is that while the depression that started in 1929 may have come to a bottom in 1933, it took a long time to recover. There was a cyclical recovery in 1937, and why was that? Roosevelt had the good luck to have been elected dead flat at the bottom. So it wasn’t his policies that cured the last depression, it was luck and good timing, combined with the fact that they were creating a lot of money after Roosevelt took the dollar off the gold standard. That resulted in a false recovery, from 1933 to 1937, and it went downhill again. – Doug Casey   

 

Keynes′ theory suggested that active government policy could be effective in managing the economy. Rather than seeing unbalanced government budgets as wrong, Keynes advocated what has been called countercyclical fiscal policies, that is, policies that acted against the tide of the business cycle: deficit spending when a nation’s economy suffers from recession or when recovery is long-delayed and unemployment is persistently high—and the suppression of inflation in boom times by either increasing taxes or cutting back on government outlays. He argued that governments should solve problems in the short run rather than waiting for market forces to do it in the long run. Keynes had too much faith in the wisdom of politicians and Federal Reserve bankers. They mastered the art of deficit spending, but fell a little short on paying off the debts during boom times. About $14.6 trillion short so far.

The Great Depression had the same origins as our current Greater Depression. The three Republican administrations of the 1920s practiced laissez-faire economics, starting by cutting top tax rates from 77% to 25% by 1925. Non-intervention into business and banking became government policy. These policies led to overconfidence on the part of investors and a classic credit-induced speculative boom. Gambling in the markets by the wealthy increased. While the haves got richer, millions of have-nots lived below the household poverty line of $2,000 per year. The rip roaring party came to an abrupt end in October 1929, with the Great Stock Market Crash.

Between 1929 and 1932, the market fell 89% from its high. The Keynesian storyline is that Herbert Hoover’s administration did nothing to try and revive the economy. It took Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his New Deal Keynesian policies to save the country. It’s a nice story, but entirely phony. Between 1929 and 1933 the Hoover administration increased real per-capita federal expenditures by 88%, not exactly the austerity measures described in fantasy stories concocted by the mainstream media.  

Bureau of Economic Analysis National Income and Product Accounts Table

Table 1.1.6A. Real Gross Domestic Product, Chained (1937) Dollars [Billions of chained (1937) dollars]
 
 1929 
 1930 
 1931 
 1932 
 1933 
 1934 
 1935 
 1936 
 1937 
 1938 
 1939 
Gross domestic product
87.3
79.8
74.6
64.9
64.0
71.0
77.3
87.4
91.9
88.7
95.9
Personal consumption expenditures
63.1
59.7
57.8
52.6
51.5
55.1
58.5
64.5
66.8
65.8
69.4
Gross private domestic investment
12.2
8.1
5.1
1.5
2.3
4.1
7.6
9.7
12.2
8.0
10.3
Net exports of goods and services
0.8
0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.1
0.2
-0.5
-0.3
0.1
0.9
1.0
Government consumption expenditures and gross investment
9.2
10.2
10.6
10.2
9.9
11.1
11.5
13.4
12.8
13.8
15.0

 

The Great Depression officially lasted from 1929 until 1940. What is not well known is that real GDP was at the same level in 1936 as it had been in 1929. In no small part because real GDP soared by 37% between 1933 and 1936. The unemployment rate in 1929 was 5%. In 1936, even after real GDP had recovered to pre-depression levels, the unemployment rate was still 15%. It spiked back to 18% in 1938 and stayed above 15% until World War II. Tellingly, in 1936, private domestic investment was 21% below the level of 1929. 

By contrast, government expenditures surged by 46% between 1929 and 1936. With the government creating new agencies and employing people in make-work projects, private industry was crowded out. The extensive governmental economic planning and intervention that began during the Hoover administration swelled drastically under Roosevelt. The bolstering of wage rates and prices, expansion of credit, propping up of weak firms, and increased government spending on public works prolonged the Great Depression.

The facts powerfully contradict the notion endorsed by Krugman and other Keynesian devotees that the supposed 1937-38 Depression within the Great Depression was caused by Roosevelt slashing spending. In fact, real GDP only dropped by 3.5% in 1938 and rebounded by 8.1% in 1939. What actually collapsed in 1938 was private investment, which fell 34%. By contrast, government spending declined by only 4.5% in 1938, proving that Roosevelt did not drastically cut spending. To the extent that he eased up on the accelerator, it was by cutting back on useless jobs programs like those provided by the Works Progress Administration and the Public Works Administration. Austerity did not derail the recovery.

The reason private investment collapsed in 1938 was Roosevelt’s anti-business crusade. He denounced big business as the cause of the Depression. In March 1938, FDR appointed Yale University law professor Thurman Arnold to head the antitrust division of the Justice Department. Arnold soon hired some 300 lawyers to file antitrust lawsuits against businesses. Arnold launched cases against entire industries, with lawsuits against the milk, oil, tobacco, shoe machinery, tires, fertilizer, railroad, pharmaceuticals, school supplies, billboards, fire insurance, liquor, typewriter, and movie industries.

Paul Krugman’s recent veiled yearning for a war or staged crisis to revive the economy through spending to fight the war is another Keynesian fallacy perpetuated by the mainstream media. These mindless non-critical thinking talking heads actually believe World War II ended the Great Depression. Doug Casey obliterates their fantasy:

“People say that World War II cured the Depression, but in fact, it made it worse. As bad as things were in the ‘30s, they were worse during the war in the ‘40s. You couldn’t get shoes. You couldn’t get gasoline. You couldn’t get tires. You couldn’t get just about anything that was being used for the war. The war prolonged and deepened the Depression. The thing that ended the Depression was not the war but the fact that since people could not consume, they were forced to save. That delayed consumption resulted in a huge amount of savings, and that’s what caused the recovery in the late 1940s.

 

The fact that the entire world was left in smoldering ruins after World War II, except for the United States, may have contributed slightly to our recovery from the Great Depression.

According to Murray Rothbard, in his book America’s Great Depression, the artificial meddling in the economy was a disaster prior to the Great Depression, and government efforts to prop up the economy after the crash of 1929 only made things far worse. Government intrusion delayed the market’s correction and made the road to complete recovery more difficult. Today’s myopic politicians, captured monetary authorities and Harvard trained Keynesian economists have learned the wrong lessons from the Great Depression. The upshot will be a second Greater Depression and further impoverishment of the dwindling middle class. The implications of more wasteful government stimulus programs, more quantitative easing and more debt are: further debasement of the currency and ultimately a hyperinflationary collapse. The great economist John Maynard Keynes understood currency debasement:

“There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose.”

How to Cut Spending While Actually Increasing Spending

“Those to whom the system brings windfalls, beyond their deserts and even beyond their expectations or desires, become ‘profiteers,’ who are the object of the hatred of the bourgeoisie, whom the inflationism has impoverished, not less than of the proletariat. As the inflation proceeds and the real value of the currency fluctuates wildly from month to month, all permanent relations between debtors and creditors, which form the ultimate foundation of capitalism, become so utterly disordered as to be almost meaningless; and the process of wealth-getting degenerates into a gamble and a lottery.” – John Maynard Keynes – The Economic Consequences of the Peace

Obama’s plan to revive America will be announced with great fanfare in two weeks. We know for sure he will propose these two brilliant ideas:

  • Extending unemployment compensation again at a total 2012 cost of $65 billion. Because we know that paying people to not work creates millions of jobs. The multiplier effect is off the charts. Why work when you can watch The View and chow down on cheese doodles purchased with your SNAP card for 99 weeks?
  • Extending the payroll tax cut at a total 2012 cost of $100 billion. This was supposed to give a dramatic boost to the economy in FY11. Have you noticed any boost? A Keynesian will argue, “Imagine if we hadn’t done it.” A critical thinker might ask: Is it prudent to increase the unfunded Social Security liability by another $100 billion and hand the bill to future unborn generations, so we can buy a new IPod 2 today?

It is a certainty that Obama will announce an infrastructure bank or some variation to spur investment in our national infrastructure that is crumbling by the day. Top Keynesian, and architect of the Obama stimulus plan, Larry Summers has been blathering about this for months. Even though the first stimulus plan was sold as an infrastructure plan, they mean it this time. As usual, the storyline is false. You can’t drive anywhere in this country and not be inconvenienced by road widening, bridge building, and repaving projects. The Keynesians act like infrastructure projects are highly unusual and need new Federal dollars to jump start the engine. The fact is that every Federal, State and municipal government has a capital fund that is budgeted every year. Most of the projects have multiple year lead times. They require planning and coordination. The reason we have 160,000 structurally deficient or obsolete bridges and thousands of miles of crumbling underground pipes is because politicians decided to spend their budgets on something more useful like train museums, murals, turtle crossings, and studies on the mating habits of ferrets.

The country has lost approximately seven million jobs since 2007. Five million of the jobs were lost in sales industries and manufacturing industries. There are 139 million jobs in America today and only seven million, or 5% of all jobs, in the construction industry. How do Keynesians expect to revive the job market with an infrastructure bank that will benefit, at most, 5% of the U.S. workforce? Let me guess. They will propose billions of new spending on education so they can retrain sales clerks from Wal-Mart into architects for designing 160,000 new bridges.

Barack Obama will stand in front of the American people and lie. He is a born again cost cutter, who will propose new spending. As anyone with a calculator can figure out, the two guaranteed proposals from his upcoming speech will increase spending by $165 billion in 2012. If you go back to the handy dandy chart from the CBO showing the “horrific spending cuts” from the recent debt ceiling deal you will see  these “cuts” total $122 billion between 2012 and 2014. Barack will wipe out all of the supposed savings through mid 2015 with his new Keynesian plan. But don’t worry. His plan will have huge spending cuts in 2017 after his hoped for 2nd term is finished. Keynesians always promise to cut spending once their current emergency ends.     

The Keynesians had their chance. They controlled the Presidency and both houses of Congress. A Keynesian runs the Federal Reserve. They implemented everything they proposed. The $862 billion porkulus program, the $700 billion TARP program, home buyer tax credits, energy efficiency credits, loan modification programs, zero interest rates, QE1 and QE2. They increased social welfare transfers for Social Security, Unemployment Compensation, food stamps, Medicare, Medicaid, and Veterans by $600 billion since 2007, a 35% increase in four years. No one has foiled their plans. The Tea Party didn’t really exist until 2010. They didn’t lose the House until November 2010. They cannot blame the Tea Party extremists, but they do.

The Keynesians have successfully increased Federal spending by $1.1 trillion, or 41% since 2007, and are running deficits exceeding 10% of GDP, but they call the Tea Party extremists. Domestic investment is still 9% below 2008 levels as the Federal government has crowded out the small businesses that create the jobs in this country. And now the Keynesians declare we need more stimulus, more programs, more debt, more quantitative easing and lower interest rates. It just wasn’t enough the first time. You have to give the Keynesians credit. Despite the utter absolute failure of every scheme they have implemented, they will worship their models and theories until they successfully collapse our economic system. Then they’ll blame the Tea Party terrorists who foiled their plans.

None of the Keynesian solutions worked during this crisis, just as they didn’t work during the Great Depression. The solution was simple, yet painful. The banking system needed to be saved, not the banks. The bad debt needed to be purged from the system. Wall Street criminals needed to be prosecuted. Bondholders and stockholders needed bear the losses from their foolish investments. Saving and investment in the country needed to be encouraged, while borrowing and consuming needed to be discouraged. Our leaders have failed to lead. The American people have failed to accept the consequences of their actions. And now we are going to pay a heavy price as Ludwig von Mises predicted:

“There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit (debt) expansion. The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner as the result of a voluntary abandonment of further credit (debt) expansion, or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved.”

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
100 Comments
Steve Hogan
Steve Hogan
August 23, 2011 2:24 pm

Great piece. I love a good rant, especially when it’s backed by facts.

We’re being led by morons and they’re driving us into the abyss. Fasten your seatbelt, folks.

Stucky
Stucky
August 23, 2011 3:07 pm

Even Mr. Homo Keynes didn’t believe his own bullshit.

From the Introduction, “The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money”

“The theory of aggregated production, which is the point of the following book, nevertheless can be much easier adapted to the CONDITIONS OF A TOTALITARIAN STATE than the theory of production and distribution of a given production put forth under conditions of FREE COMPETITION and a large degree of laissez-faire.”
——————– J.M.KEYNES, September 7, 1936

Dave Doe
Dave Doe
August 23, 2011 3:14 pm

Jim, good piece.

For those similarly depressed after reading this
A little comic relief from Youtube.

Keynes vs Hayek Rap: Fight of the Century – Part 1

Part 2

Muck About
Muck About
August 23, 2011 4:07 pm

Really good piece. It will be picked up widely, I bet.

Now that all the bullshit goobermint actions that didn’t work are going to be tried again (with, I’m sure, equal success), when will they address the real problems and quit not “fixing it”??

Default on the mathematically impossible to pay back debt. Breakup the TBTF banks. Review every law on the books with the idea of eliminating every law or “rule” that discourages formation of small businesses _IN_ANY_WAY. Don’t cut SS withholding – that’s like putting a small slit in the throat of an already busted program. Increase the retirement age by one month per year (Terry Coxen’s idea!), do away with the FSA except for those who truly can’t take care of themselves – and check on them to make sure. Obesity is not a disability – it’s a license to eat less. Eliminate the war on drugs, regulate them sensibly, tax the living shit out of them and use all the proceeds to educate and rehabilitate (SSS forgive me for I know what I say offends you!) and jail anyone being a bad guy while under the influence (like DUI or robbery to support a habit – that’s a no-no). No DOE, No HUD, No hundreds of political appointed “committees” with members paid from the Federal weal.

A constitutional amendment to force CONgress to eat its own cooking. No more mandating the several States to do things without funding.

I could go on for a books’ worth.

Free small businesses from taxes, reporting, labor law BS, abolish the minimum wage, go to a Fair Tax on consumption, delete any Federal Agency with more than one letter in it’s name and cut DOD in half and redesign it to fight the next war, not the last two.(Keep the Boomers and Fast Attacks for doomsday).

Since none of the above will ever happen, now I’ll go buy a little gold on the dip today and finish reading Jared Diamonds “Collapse”.. Great now and then history book..

MA

Muck About
Muck About
August 23, 2011 4:15 pm

To summarize the above rant: Governments (Federal, State and local) can not create jobs except those paid for by more taxes on citizens or borrowing either of which discourages true job growth.

Catch 22.

All government (at all levels) can do to “create jobs” is to eliminate all obstacles, rules, laws, reporting requirements and everything else that makes it difficult to impossible for new business to be created. They they must get out of the way and let things get underway.

Sure, some regulation may be necessary to protect public health, squash the bad guys to try to steal and plunder the public (although they haven’t done even that _at_all_ for the past 40 years) but keep it to a minimum and start throwing miscreants in jail (fill up all that space left when the pot smokers leave).

Done now.. Feel better. Time for a toddy..

MA

cv51
cv51
August 23, 2011 4:48 pm

Beautiful work Jim!

As the Barack Obama/Larry Summers experiment tries to stimulate we see roads being ground back to gravel, flash mobs, cities and counties going bankrupt, and pension funds not writing checks.

Great job Obama!! Your a real winner. You make the Republicans look smart.

scott
scott
August 23, 2011 6:11 pm

Its well to remember that “President” Obama began his improbable journey from sophomore senator from Illinois to the White House as the ‘anti-Iraq war’ candidate. He hadn’t been around in 2003 when most of the Congress voted for the invasion and to his and most of the Congress’s mind the economy was humming along on HELOCs, CDO and MBS issuance when he began his campaign.

He saw no problems or potential for career advancement by making an issue of the economy as that was Bush’s strong suit. It was 24/7 Iraq 100% of the time on the one issue Obama THOUGHT could gain him the White House. So much for the deep thinking of Obama’s mind. It was, and is, all campaign tactics. How to consolidate the left and the black vote to deny Hillary his parties nomination while, at the same time, manoveuring John McCain into the GOP’s! There was never any real ‘plan’ for governing the nation especially when, in spring and summer of 2008 the economy began to fall apart. Obama had not studied or campaigned on economic issues so he was ill prepared to deal with the situation when he managed to win the election. His ‘stimulus’ plan as Admin brilliantly exposes in the above article was not a plan at all just a hodgepodge of various Democrat wish lists of things to fund. If Keynes was the ‘conventional wisdom’ then Keynes would have to do. No time or thought had been given to what was really taking place so like a washed up football coach trapped in a time warp he just kept calling the same plays over and over again even if they didn’t work. It was all he knew.

Kill Bill
Kill Bill
August 23, 2011 6:15 pm

“Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency. -MK

No need to do that – its self debauching but unlike modern ovens its not self-cleaning.

efarmer
efarmer
August 23, 2011 7:23 pm

The fact that Hogan got a thumbs down shows that Krugman and Obama read this site.

EF

FRED FLINTSTONE
FRED FLINTSTONE
August 23, 2011 7:25 pm

Debasing the currency is the 2nd fastest way to kill Capitalism. The fastest way is to interfere with what should be FREE MARKET FUNCTIONS! Allow the chips to fall where they may. Malinvestment will have loss of capital as consequence. Failure to deploy capital will erode purchasing power via inflationr. If left to its own devices pure capitalism performs. This bastardized Keynesian crap with a little corporate fascism and socialism thrown in does not get it.

Just pretend I posted the requisite picture of fat people on scooters to emphasize my point.

llpoh
llpoh
August 23, 2011 7:29 pm

Fucking idiot politicians. I can hardly stand to think about it. I am still steamed up over the 13 million on SS disability – with 2 million more waiting to get on – and Admin comes up with this to make my day.

For the love of all that is good – all I ask is that they stop helping me, and the rest of the population, for just a couple of years. If they do that, we will be able to help ourselves. We do not need their help – can’t they see that?

llpoh
llpoh
August 23, 2011 9:01 pm

Admin – so almost 40% of the shit for brains population believe that that fucking nitwit is doing a good job? That is absolutely un-fucking-believable. The country is flushing itself down the shitter and 40% think that chief flusher is doing a good job. Just what would he have to do to get them to change their minds? Maybe if he just walked outside the whitehouse and started pissing on passers-by that would get their attention. After all, he is symbolically pissing all over the country by what he is doing anyway, so he might as well go out and have an actual go at it.

You keep making my day. You must be a real chuckle around the house.

Kill Bill
Kill Bill
August 23, 2011 9:29 pm

If one Arizona resort has its way, vacationers will soon be skiing over snow made of reclaimed sewage water.

The Hopi Tribe filed a lawsuit Friday in Arizona Superior Court against the city of Flagstaff over their plans to sell 1.5 million gallons of reclaimed wastewater to Snowbowl Ski Resort.

Resort owners say that in light snow years, attendance drops from 150,000 skiers to less than 3,000 skiers. To make up for the shortfall, the resort has plans to pipe sewage water 15 miles uphill to a reservoir until it is needed for making fake snow.
~~

Yeh, shit on those who do attend your ski slope in off peak times. Morons.

llpoh
llpoh
August 23, 2011 9:37 pm

KB – people use, even drink, reclaimed sewer water all over the world. Hell, for that matter, all water is reclaimed. As fresh water becomes increasingly scarce this will happen more and more.

llpoh
llpoh
August 23, 2011 10:25 pm

Once again the people are getting FUCKED. Bank of America wants their fraud case swept under the rug.

http://news.yahoo.com/bank-americas-no-good-very-bad-enablers-170931303.html

llpoh
llpoh
August 23, 2011 10:38 pm

doppelgang llpoh alert. But nice post anyway.

ron
ron
August 23, 2011 10:40 pm

Bill you think that water out of the tap is some prestine glacier water?the whole area needs water,im sure itll be filtered and you wont be walking on turds in off peak times.I think Trump called it right when he said theyre all stupid.

Kill Bill
Kill Bill
August 23, 2011 10:56 pm

As fresh water becomes increasingly scarce this will happen more and more. -llpoh

I agree.

I still dont care for it.

Kill Bill
Kill Bill
August 23, 2011 11:02 pm

Bill you think that water out of the tap is some prestine glacier water?

Even a boomerist is smart enough to not believe that.

Colma Rising
Colma Rising
August 23, 2011 11:09 pm

Republicans, Democrats and in between just love to shovel government cash into their business and hence Keynes is their man. Wasn’t it Nixon who said “We’re all Keynesians now”? Do the markets not hang on the words of their central planners?

The results speak for themselves. The flushing you hear is the echoes of the toilet bowl we’re so joyously enjoying.

Mr. “In the long run we’ll be dead” Keynes was quite right. He’s long dead and his monster-baby of a theory isn’t working here in the future.

But the professors kneel at the foot of his bust and await their very own money shot.

Benjamin
Benjamin
August 24, 2011 5:20 am

The fundamental problem is that jobs are being eliminated by technology faster than they are being created. This has nothing to do with the government – it’s purely free-market.

Capitalists replace workers with machines, and then are surprised when the machines don’t buy their products. The only way to solve this is artificial demand creation by the government.

If you disagree, please name the emerging industry which will create enough jobs to increase employment rates. If you can’t, you agree.

Novista
Novista
August 24, 2011 6:49 am

Mighty fine work, Jim.

I will add this, not exactly off-topic: What made the Roaring 20s roar was the EZ credit from the FedRes. That was a concerted effort to assist Great Britain in restoring the gold standard they’d dropped to finance their way through WW1 (along with lots of funding from ‘allied war bonds’.

GB insisted on restoring the pound at $4.86, the pre-war value. To do that needed planned monetary inflation in many places, but particularly U.S. involvement.

Funny thing happened on the way to the forum, GB initiated the gold-exchange standard to support their mercantilist strategy. Other countries were roped into the inflationary bias too, call it early globalization. It all fell apart in a few years anyway.

Oh, and let’s hear it for Hoover’s Smoot-Hawley Interventions have consequences.

Rob in Nova Scotia
Rob in Nova Scotia
August 24, 2011 8:08 am

Benjamin

You have constructed your argument like a five year during his first trip to school yard.

If a person has 50,000 dollars laying around what do they invest it in.

Thanks to ZIRP, inflation and all the user fees the banks pile on, putting money in the bank is just giving permission to them and government to steal your money. You could buy gold but that just gets put in safe place to be taken out once and a while to admire.

None of the these things create jobs.

You could put it in the stock market to prop up Zombie banks, car companies or any number of ridiculously overpriced companies. Mutual funds are the same thing, just a turd wrapped in a statement mailed to you quarterly.

These things might create jobs.

What used to happen was people of ambition with an idea would start a business. This is where most of the good jobs have and will in future come from.

I feel this is the only way to create jobs.

Right now in my community the paper mill which employs 600 direct and 400 indirect workers is shutting down indefinitely. The knee-jerk response from government the last few days is to offer them incentives to reopen (newsspeak for more tax breaks). Governments everywhere have to quit deciding the winners and losers in the economy and let the market decide. I will say the market as in true market not the abomination that we have right now.

Welshman
Welshman
August 24, 2011 8:59 am

Admin.,

Great Rant, really enjoyed the Dragnet Approach, “Just the Facts”.

Petey
Petey
August 24, 2011 9:39 am

Benjamin, people shouted the same thing hundreds of years ago. Technology allows more people to be involved in a process. Are you saying the invention of the computer is a bad thing? That is a machine.
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Innovation.html

“Henry Hazlitt provides the example of cotton-spinning machinery introduced in England in the 1760s. At the time, the English textile industry employed some 7,900 people, and many workers protested the introduction of machinery out of fear for their livelihoods. But in 1787 there were 320,000 workers in the English textile industry. Although the introduction of machinery caused temporary discomfort to some workers, the machinery increased the aggregate wealth of society by decreasing the cost of production. Amazingly, concerns over technology and job loss in the textile industry continue today. One report notes that the introduction of new machinery in American textile mills between 1972 and 1992 coincided with a greater than 30 percent decrease in the number of textile jobs. However, that decrease was offset by the creation of new jobs. The authors conclude that “there is substantial entry into the industries, job creation rates are high, and productivity dynamics suggest surviving plants have emerged all the stronger while it has been the less productive plants that have exited.”

Petey
Petey
August 24, 2011 9:42 am

Admin you need to get better trolls and dolts to come by here. Lately, most have been low hanging fruit.

Maureen
Maureen
August 24, 2011 11:29 am

Gee Guys, I think this will work! UNTIL WE RUN OUT OF OTHER PEOPLES MONEY TO PAY FOR IT.

WHAT THEN?

I think we need more Margaret Thatcher types as leaders.

Colma Rising
Colma Rising
August 24, 2011 1:22 pm

We do indeed need more Margaret Thatchers, minus the menopause.

Gordon
Gordon
August 24, 2011 1:59 pm

Solutions: Maximum number of employees in any single company 500 or less.
Eliminate elections and have selections, like lottery, allowing for anyone with the correct qualifications to get any of the selected (elected) political positions.

Remember, 500 employees maximum, this includes government. In this manner,
all companies will have to learn to work together with standardizations, and the problem we
have now will never occur. If a failure occurs in one company, there are thousands ready
to take over. Today,if a large company fails, they are the to big to fails, and they push their
own agenda, and they go down because people want their own agenda, not theirs.
Thanks

Michael
Michael
August 24, 2011 3:22 pm

Should Israel Embrace Glenn Beck?
Tuesday, 23 Aug 2011 11:08 AM
By Alan Dershowitz

Share: More . . . A A | Email Us | Print | Forward Article

All decent people, whether on the left or the right, should support Israel’s right to exist as the democratic nation state of the Jewish people.

All decent people should support Israel’s right to defend its civilians from terrorist attacks. All reasonable people should favor a just peace that assures Israel’s ability to thrive in a dangerous neighborhood and to defend its borders.

These issues should not divide decent people along ideological or political lines. Israel’s existence and right to defend itself should be bipartisan issues, not only in the United States, but in all democratic countries of the world.

The reality, however, is very different. The Jewish state is demonized by the hard left in America, by virtually the entire left in much of Europe, and by most of the left and right in Ireland, Norway, and Sweden. Its right to exist is denied by a high proportion of Arabs and Muslims, and most of the Arab and Muslim nations do not have diplomatic relations with Israel.

In many circles, anti-Zionism easily morphs into anti-Semitism, and in some countries Jews are afraid to walk the streets wearing any clothing or symbols that identify them as Jewish.

The general assembly of the United Nations has become the world’s new Der Sturmer, whose podium hosts, and many of whose audience members cheer, virulent anti-Semites such as Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Defenders of Israel, even those critical of some of Israel’s policies, are banned from speaking at universities, are attacked personally by the hard-left media and are treated as pariahs by their academic colleagues.

It is against this sad and increasingly dangerous background that one must evaluate Glenn Beck’s visit to Israel. I disagree with much of Beck’s politics and with virtually all of his conspiracy theorizing. Yet I admire his courage in putting his body in the line of fire. I believe him when he says:

If the world goes down the road of dehumanizing Jews again, “then count me a Jew and come for me first.”

At a time when old friends and allies who should be supporting the Jewish state are abandoning it in droves, Beck’s willingness to stand up for Israel must be accepted with gratitude. I, for one, do not question his motives. I believe they are genuine.

One need not accept all of Beck’s positions on Israel — and I certainly do not — in order to agree with him that support of Israel is one of the great moral issues of the 21st century.

Those who thoughtlessly attack Israel no matter what it does and thoughtlessly defend Israel’s enemies regardless of what they do, are making peace far more difficult. They incentivize terrorism by Israel’s enemies and disincentivize compromise on all sides.

I will wait to hear precisely what Glenn Beck says during his visit to Israel before I evaluate it. Just as I feel free to criticize the Israeli government when I think it is wrong, I certainly feel free to criticize defenders of Israel when I think they are wrong. But I will not prejudge Beck until he is given a full opportunity to express his views.

I certainly admire Beck’s decision to go to Israel far more than the decision of so many so-called artists and intellectuals who call for a boycott against the Jewish state without even bothering to go there and see for themselves.

I welcome the support of religious Christians who love Israel for religious reasons. I abhor the ignorant and misguided efforts of other Christians, such as Jimmy Carter and Desmond Tutu, who misuse their faith against the Jewish state.

I hope that more Christians will follow in Beck’s footsteps and take the time to visit Israel. They will see Christianity thriving in Israel while at the same time being dismantled and destroyed in Lebanon, in Gaza, in Egypt, and in other areas in which Islamic fundamentalists have taken over.

Christian religious sites are preserved in Jerusalem and other areas under Israeli control. When the Jordanian government controlled parts of Jerusalem, it destroyed many historic religious sites sacred to both Jews and Christians.

Nation states are entitled to engage in Realpolitik so long as they do so within the limits of acceptable morality. Realpolitik requires accepting support from, and sometimes giving support to, nations and people who are not in complete agreement over policies.

Consider Nelson Mandela’s alliances with some of most brutal dictatorships (Libya, Cuba, Syria) and supporters of terrorism (P.L.O., Iran) while he was engaged in his just struggle against the evils of apartheid.

I do not recall the left condemning Mandela for doing what he had to do. But the same left was unforgiving in Israel when it was forced to make some strategic military deals with South Africa, while strongly opposing its apartheid policies.

I do not mean to compare dictatorial, terrorist, or apartheid regimes with Glenn Beck, only to make the point that the Jewish state is often subjected to a double standard when it comes to the support it receives or gives.

Many Israelis will welcome Glenn Beck’s support. Some will oppose it. Others will wish his views were more consistent with their own. This is as it should be in a democracy.

The fact is that Israel is the only country in the Middle East that would allow Glenn Beck to express his views, without censoring them or even knowing in advance what he was going to say. This too is as it should be in a democracy.

Read more on Newsmax.com: Should Israel Embrace Glenn Beck?
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama’s Re-Election? Vote Here Now!——————————————————————————–

“Ben Bernanke belongs in an orange jumpsuit”

Welcome to The Michael Savage Newsletter, your weekly insider report on all things “Savage.”

In this issue, find out how to download a FREE chapter of Michael Savage’s next book, the thriller “Abuse of Power”.

——————————————————————————–
On Monday night, while so many talk radio hosts were on vacation, Savage told listeners:

“I am the last man standing in broadcasting. …

“Obama says ‘we’ were inspired by the ‘peaceful protests’ that broke out in Libya. Who’s ‘we’? Him and his mother in law? What’s with that imperial ‘we’?

“So why isn’t O-bummer inspired by the peaceful protests here at home, the tea party? Instead he castigates everyone they represent: the American taxpayer.

“Did you know if you took every dollar from everyone earning a million dollars, it would only take away 2 percent of the national debt? Without reducing spending, we’re finished as a nation.

“But Obama needs a 20-car motorcade to visit the CEO of Comcast, which owns NBC and MSNBC. Is that appropriate? Can you name any other president who has visited another big media company? I don’t think so.

“Anyway, the only other person excited about the overthrow of the Gadhafi regime is Anderson Cooper. He’s celebrating because the men in Libya have tight dungarees and they look like they visited Berkeley once.

“For the vermin in the media today, ‘rebel’ means ‘good’ — unless you mean the rebels in the Tea Party. Then they’re no good. But you and I know the tea party members are the real rebels of today, not the liberal media.

“Like I always say: Liberalism is a mental disorder. Someone should put it in the Diagnostic Manual psychiatrists use, then all Obama’s followers could claim disability and never have to work again

Colma Rising
Colma Rising
August 24, 2011 3:51 pm

Michael Savage is awesome… my favorite Talk Radio by miles, even if I don’t agree with the dude 15% on a good year, 50% in election years, the guy rips new asses on the deserving, notably the Marin County Libtards. I would shit a brick if “Michael” was him… I’m pissed he’s off air in SF.

That being said, Beck, for the most part is a dunce in my opinion. Bailout Beck, says I. An admittedly ADD rittled doofus.

Nonetheless, prepare for a blogosphere battle as TBP is war weary and stuffed to the brim with vets and shitbags alike who can’t stomach the continuous drums of war. Ron Paul all the way.

Good luck.

AWD
AWD
August 24, 2011 4:19 pm

Dr. Coburn wrote this peice on where some of the Obama porculus went:

Some projects funded by the President Obama’s Stimulus Package:

Midwestern Region: An Illinois county spent $173,824 from a weatherization grant on eight pickup trucks. A Wisconsin nursing home received $2.8 million in stimulus money it didn’t need or request. Road signs costing $300 each are being placed at construction sites to alert motorists that the project is being paid for by stimulus money. In Illinois alone, the signs are expected to cost $150,000, according to the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT). IDOT spent millions of stimulus money in Harrisburg, Illinois for a two lane highway around the town that nobody will use and directs traffic away from an already decimated downtown. In Macomb, Illinois, $643, 945 was spent on a Prairie view public housing parking lot that no one wants. Illinois will spend $350,000 to build a four-person bunkhouse at Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge. The median price for a home in Marion, Illinois, the site of the park, is currently $71,000.
Akron, Ohio used up to $1.5 million to erect a suicide-prevention fence to keep people from jumping off the All-American Bridge despite concerns such a project would be wasteful, ineffective and ugly. Rather than help welfare recipients obtain jobs and escape poverty, $1 million will be used to study whether 300 people in Chicago are healthier when living in “green” public housing facilities. The National Institute of Health gave an Indiana University professor $356,000 to study how kids perceive foreign accents.
T
he Tallgrass Prairie National Preserve’s new visitor’s center and a pedestrian and bike project over U.S. Highway 75 in Kansas were some of the first projects approved for stimulus funds in the state. Failing to cite an economic benefit from the projects, officials noted that they chose “projects that strengthen the cultural, aesthetic or environmental value of our transportation system.” A National Forest in Missouri will receive $462,000 to replace toilets.

The Southern Region: Memphis, Tennessee spent $1.5 million to redevelop fairgrounds and $250,000 to rehabilitate a dilapidated laundromat. Stimulus money paid for housing used by Soyono the Sumatran tiger and Luke the Lion at the National Zoo in Washington, D.C. Despite federal law that prohibits spending federal funds on local zoos, money will go to the National Zoo. The Smithsonian, which runs the zoo, is spending $11.4 of its $25 million in stimulus funds on the National Zoo and its Zoo research center in Virginia. Washington, North Carolina is using stimulus funds to pay for a “project-funding manager” whose job it is to secure even more stimulus funds. Lexington, Kentucky, spent $4.7 million on a trail connecting downtown with a horse farm. Virginia spent $340,000 on a rural bridge that carries only 20 cars a day. The South Carolina Department of Natural Resources spent $1.7 million to grow oysters.

Western Region: Washington State University (Vancouver) is receiving $148, 438 to analyze the use of marijuana in conjunction with medications like morphine. According to local reports, this is the first ARRA funding received by WSU. The project is uniquely qualified to receive these funds because of its potential to stimulate the economy and create or retain jobs within the community. “Microsoft Bridge” in Seattle received $11 million in stimulus funds. Despite having nearly $20 billion in cash reserves, Microsoft will be the prime beneficiary of $11 million for construction of a bridge to connect the two campuses of its headquarters. Oregon spent $4.2 million to raise railroad track 18 inches. In Scappoose, Oregon (pop. 6,200), drivers are tired of taking a detour to get past railroad tracks that are not level with the main road. Portland, Oregon, spent $1 million in stimulus funds for bike lockers. TuaLatin, Oregon, plans to spend $2.5 million on a “train-horn-free” zone. A Utah sheriff’s office has plans to purchase a Harley-Davidson motorcycle. Montana’s state-run liquor warehouse will receive $2.2 million in stimulus cash to install skylights. A California skate park will get a $620,000 “facelift.” The Bureau of Land Management is using stimulus funds to study the impact wind farms have on the sage grouse population in Oregon.

Northeastern Region: Pawtucket, Rhode Island is spending $550,000 on a skateboard park. Yale and the University of Connecticut are receiving $850,000 in stimulus for research “to study how paying attention improves performance of difficult tasks.” Maine to spend over $1.3 million on “government arts jobs,” including $30,000 for basket makers, $20,000 for story telling, and $12,500 for a music festival. The National Institutes of Health is giving Yale University $680,100 in stimulus funds to study the effectiveness of diet and exercise at reducing obesity. Altoona, Pennsylvania is getting $819,000 for a homelessness prevention program despite local reports that the town may not have enough of a homeless problem to use it. Nantucket, Massachusetts, will spend $5.6 million in stimulus cash to resurface 6.4 miles of road and bike path, or roughly $875,000 a mile.

(Source: 100 Stimulus Projects: A Second Opinion, Sen. Tom Coburn, 111th Congress, June 2009, Coburn.senate.gov. Used with permission)

db
db
August 24, 2011 4:22 pm

“Being angry is like drinking poison and expecting the other person to die.” – Buddhist saying

Colma Rising
Colma Rising
August 24, 2011 6:06 pm

JMKES

RHenson194
RHenson194
August 24, 2011 6:55 pm

@Gordon
You would make a great addition to BHO’s think tank Gordon. Maybe if you forced everyone to make the exact same amount of money, we could live in a utopia…just one more idea for you to submit when you’re at your think tank interview!!!!

Colma Rising
Colma Rising
August 24, 2011 7:08 pm

Ooh baby – Margaret Thatcher is so hot. I would do her. Ooh ooh ooh. Yes yes yes.

[imgcomment image[/img]

Kill Bill
Kill Bill
August 24, 2011 8:30 pm

All decent people, whether on the left or the right, should support Israel’s right to exist as the democratic nation state of the Jewish people.

I have no problems with Israels existence. Or the countries that surround them. Or Americas.

Get along already.

llpoh
llpoh
August 24, 2011 8:35 pm

The only place for women in politics is in the waiting room, serving the men drinks and Hors d’oeuvres, Colma, menopause or not.

Kill Bill
Kill Bill
August 24, 2011 8:37 pm

The only place for women in politics is in the waiting room, -llpoh

I have a hard time telling them apart what with the Ronald McDonald costumes they wear.

Kill Bill
Kill Bill
August 24, 2011 8:44 pm

Based on Federal estimates, the State of Oklahoma was awarded an “estimated” $2.6 Billion in recovery funds. from arra.ok.gov

Kill Bill
Kill Bill
August 24, 2011 8:49 pm

Broadband Technology Opportunities Program
(National Appropriation: $4,700,000,000)

Oklahoma spent these stimulus funds

and then more

Job Corps Centers
(National Appropriation: $250,000,000)

Description: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act allocates funds for the construction, rehabilitation and acquisition of these centers. Up to 15 percent of these funds may be allocated for Jobs Corps Centers for operation, which may include training for careers in energy efficiency, renewable energy and for environmental protection agencies.

http://www.ok.gov/recovery/Funding_Categories/Business_&_Employment/

Kill Bill
Kill Bill
August 24, 2011 9:01 pm

What Coburn didnt specify in his finger pointing rant is that Oklahoma took home 2.6 billion from the recovery act.

Coburn is hoping that you will look, over there, stimulus waste, while ignoring his stimulus spending.

You cant polish a turd but you can spray it with BS.

angryspittle
angryspittle
August 25, 2011 2:05 am

“Useless jobs programs” like the WPA and the PWA. I wonder how useless those were to the millions of people who benefited from them.

Novista
Novista
August 25, 2011 7:41 am

angryspittle

Did you happen to notice FDR’s stimulus methodology? It was based on the voting record. Swing states got the lion’s share; sure states got enough to keep them from whining, and enemy states got little or nothing.

What’s your take on the New Deal practice of maintaining high prices? Five million hogs slaughter, and two million cattle; cotton fields burned.

Sure, give a man a government job, a paycheck, and he is better off. Who pays his wages? The taxpayers. Where is the productivity, you know, the P in GDP.

Benign
Benign
August 25, 2011 10:39 am

Quinn –

You are allegedly a servant of the ruling class in your position with an Ivy League college, and your (updated, what we used to call) white liberal guilt overflows.

Would you not provide food stamps to families without food? Would you not provide subsistence level income to those without jobs? As Cain remarked sarcastically when asked where Abel was, “Am I my brother’s keeper?”

It’s time to recognize the fault is with capitalism–a system that, once a social contract is abandoned, aids and abets the excessive concentration of income and wealth to those that already have. You subscribe to Strauss and Howe’s thesis, as do I; but you need to take the next step and admit that the problem arises with misplaced beliefs in markets and capitalism. Both Keynesianism and Monetarism are failures, and have provided cover for the kleptocrats. When the circular flow of income and product becomes unbalanced, aggregate demand collapses. The failure of Keynesianism is that it doesn’t address the distributional underpinnings of the collapse of effective demand. Marx got that one right, and Keynes almost did in the quote you begin with (which alludes only to currency depreciation).

What we need is government that has the balls to address distributional issues in a real way, instead of piling guilt trips on the already downtrodden.