SPACE AVAILABLE

Only 150% more store closures YTD versus last year at this time. Only 225% more square feet AVAILABLE than last year. Who could have predicted this? Oh Yeah – me – Retail Death Rattle.

A "For Lease" sign hangs in a store window along Milwaukee Avenue in the Wicker Park neighborhood July 21, 2009 in Chicago, Illinois. The retail space vacancy rate in Chicago has topped 11 percent, the highest since the rate began to be tracked the first quarter of 1994.

Retail Store Closures Soar In 2014: At Highest Pace Since Lehman Collapse

0

What a better way to celebrate the rigged markets that are telegraphing a “durable” recovery, than with a Credit Suisse report showing, beyond a reasonable doubt, that when it comes to traditional bricks and mortar retailers, who have now closed more stores, or over 2,400 units, so far in 2014 and well double the total amount of storefront closures in 2013, this year has been the worst year for conventional discretionary spending since the start of the great financial crisis!

From Credit Suisse’s Michael Exstein

Since the start of 2014, retailers have announced the closure of more than 2,400 units, amounting to 22.6 million square feet, more than double the closures at this point in 2013 (940 units and 6.9 million square feet). After several years of attempting to cut overhead costs, the acceleration in store closures appears to be a response on the part of retailers to cope with the challenge of ecommerce and structural declines in foot traffic, and the need to address declining levels of in-store productivity. The year-to-date totals for store closing activities now challenges 2009 as the most recent year for the highest number of store closings announcements.

 

While distressed retailers (eg. Radio Shack) and bankruptcies, which have reached a three-year peak year-to-date, make up 63% of the unit closures in 2014, they comprise only 34% of the total square footage closed. On a square footage basis, broadline retailers contributed over 28% of closures, with M, DDS, JCP, TGT, and Sam’s Club participating in right-sizing their store bases.

 

Office supply stores have been equally significant contributors to the rationalization process as they grapple with the effects of broader distribution and deeper online penetration. We expect this trend to continue as Office Depot evaluates its real estate in the wake of its merger with OfficeMax. Even dollar stores and drug stores, which combined have consistently built out hundreds of stores per year, are beginning to reel back on expansion, with Family Dollar and Walgreens both planning to shutter underperforming stores.

 

The acceleration in retail closings follows several years of negative sales growth for many retailers. After slashing expenses and taking a more disciplined approach to spending, there appear to be few levers left to pull, as the top line growth remains difficult. Mall-based stores (both department store anchors and specialty apparel) in particular appear to have taken advantage of leases that have come up for renewal, as opportunities to close underproductive stores. Those that have not participated in the trend to close stores—such as higher end retailers (eg. JWN, Bloomingdale’s, and Saks)—have been relocating existing stores to more productive malls, or areas of existing malls. JWN for example recently announced the relocation of its Westfield Horton Plaza San Diego store to an upgraded area within the same mall, and is doing the same thing in Honolulu at the Ala Moana Center.

 

Of course, it wouldn’t be a Wall Street sellside piece if there wasn’t a bullish spin on the data:

We would view more momentum in store closures as a positive for the retail industry. Retail as a whole remains overcapacitied…. further rationalization appears to be a necessary change in trend where even during good economic times the store base is being adjusted

Yup – nothing but blue skies ahead.

In fact, here is some more good news. As bank of America notes, Consumer durable spending has had a very weak recovery by historic standards. The ratio of consumer durables to GDP shows that while the share of spending has recovered, it remains at recessionary levels.

Of course, who needs to spend on durables when one can just spend on stocks that in the new normal can never, ever go down?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
16 Comments
Big Mac
Big Mac
April 21, 2014 3:52 pm

And from NPR this morning.. 4-21-14

“The economy is rebounding from widespread inclement weather and the strengthening in the labor market is beginning to have a positive impact on growth,” said Ken Goldstein, an economist at The Conference Board. “Overall, this is an optimistic report.”

Go figure….

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
April 21, 2014 5:31 pm

With all this manure there must be a pony here somewhere!

Econman
Econman
April 21, 2014 6:49 pm

& as people drive around they notice there aren’t enough restaurants either!

Will that be the next over-expanded sector to pop?

AKAnon
AKAnon
April 21, 2014 7:10 pm

Fairbanks AK is getting, not one, but TWO Walgreen’s. In construction as we speak-Go figure. BTW, what is a Walgreen’s, and do they sell ammo?

AWD
AWD
April 21, 2014 7:18 pm

People are saving money, or so says a new poll. This would be the death knell for our financialization consumerist society. Our whole economy runs on debt, without more debt creation, the whole claptrap clown car falls apart. The decline in retail is just the beginning. Personally, I don’t buy anything anymore, unless it’s for my kids. Taxes and the ex-wife get all my money anyway, and I save whatever nickels and dimes are left over. As inflation continues to spiral, people will just stop buying crap they don’t need, especially as their incomes dwindle, obamacare premiums kill them, and taxes eat them alive.

Keynesian Knightmare: US Savers Outnumber Spenders By Record Numbers

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 04/21/2014

“Janet, we have a problem,” is the resoundingly loud message from the latest Gallup poll of Americans preference (and relative enjoyment) of “saving” vs. “spending”. It seems, despite all the hoop-la and exuberance about an ‘economic recovery’ that is pent-up due to weather but about to break out to escape velocity, the majority of Americans continue to enjoy saving money more than spending it, by 62% to 34%. The 2014 saving-spending gap is the one of the widest since Gallup began tracking Americans’ preferences in 2001. How long before a discussion of negative rates re-appears as the rich and powerful Oz-ians contemplate the latest effort to ‘change’ people’s mass psychology…

[imgcomment image[/img]

llpoh
llpoh
April 21, 2014 8:01 pm

AWD – not spending is not necessarily the same as saving. Used to be it was debt financed spending – the sheeple spent borrowed money. The sheeple do not have enough disposable income to really save much.

Westcoaster
Westcoaster
April 21, 2014 8:38 pm

“Negative sales growth”. Don’t cha just love weasel words? How ’bout “Lower sales volume”?

AKAnon
AKAnon
April 21, 2014 9:10 pm

Thanks, Admin. If Walgreen’s doesn’t sell ammo or preps, they are welcome to close my branch, as soon as they finish building it.

Chicago999444
Chicago999444
April 21, 2014 9:38 pm

I have to be wonder what Walgreen’s was thinking about to begin with, after watching that company open a store every 6 blocks here in Chicago. The Lakeview neighborhood has 5 within 6 blocks of the Belmont el station. There are so many downtown that you can’t walk 4 blocks without falling into one.

The retail contraction is just a return to sanity. There never was justification for 50 sq ft of retail space per man, woman, and child in this country. In 1964 there were 4 sq ft of retail space per customer, and no online sales, yet I don’t remember there being any shortage of places to spend money on superfluous consumer goods.

llpoh
llpoh
April 21, 2014 9:48 pm

Why would I go out to a “mall”, which requires me to interact with great numbers of assembled idiots, if I can safely order goods from the comfort of my home (please not I said “if” not when)?

The retail store model is rapidly becoming obsolete. Not to mention the middle class is a dying breed, and will be replaced by more and more free shitters, upper lower class and lower middle class, who will struggle to put food on the table, much less have disposable income. Not to mention the price of food is going to skyrocket.

Mike Moskos
Mike Moskos
April 22, 2014 1:02 am

I would imagine 0% of this space would be empty if the landlords would rent at the current market rates, not the fantasy rates they expect to get. At some point, the empty stores should become cheap enough for the (formerly) homeless to live in.

Of course Ben & Allen built too much retail space, driven I think by this: once you get in a car, you can go anywhere. So you open a new gleaming shopping center and poach customers from everywhere else. Your new center earns lots of profits, the others fail.

TeresaE
TeresaE
April 22, 2014 10:28 am

Office supply stores are NOT suffering from online and other distribution.

They are suffering because small business was their largest customer (all those too small to get “discount” rates from delivering big guys), continues to shed desks and machines in droves.

AND, for those that remain open, the costs of regulation, utilities, and employees continue to expand, meaning you have to cut back somewhere.

Once you read a completely misguided, idiotic, not a clue statement, it throws the author’s opinions and conclusions into doubt.

Anyway, the recovery continues unabated, we are losing two more 50+ year old businesses within a couple miles of my home.

Prosperity is truly a heartbeat away.

Gayle
Gayle
April 22, 2014 11:55 am

A planned doubling of the shopping center in my fair city screeched to a halt in 2007. They are now breaking ground to complete the project. I don’t get it.