Guns Confiscated after Man Seeks Insomnia Treatment

 

In the old Soviet and East German police states of the Cold War, police kept secret files on scores of common people.  Information was fed to the police by thousands of clandestine sources – and a seemingly banal or routine interaction with nearly anyone could lead to a surprise “knock on the door” by authorities.  During the late Soviet era, communist leadership moved away from the executions and purges of the Stalin years and began to increasingly rely upon medical professionals to diagnose “enemies of the state” as insane – thus, a routine trip to your doctor could lead to a visit from police.

Although the Cold War ended over two decades ago, a lawsuit filed December 17 in U.S. District Court in Rochester, NY alleges that such heavy-handed police-state tactics are presently being employed in Andrew Cuomo’s New York.  The suit, filed by attorney Paloma Capanna on behalf of plaintiff Donald Montgomery, alleges that the New York State Police ordered the permanent confiscation of Mr. Montgomery’s registered handguns after he sought treatment for insomnia.  The confiscation was ordered under Cuomo’s “SAFE Act” gun-control law.

The allegations in the case are downright scary.  The complaint contends that Montgomery, a Navy veteran and retired police officer who rose to the rank of detective sergeant during his 30-year career, voluntarily sought treatment for insomnia at a hospital on Long Island in May of 2014 after relocating to a new home several hundred miles from his previous residence.

According to the suit, the hospital diagnosed the plaintiff as “mildly depressed,” and his clinical evaluation stated, “Patient has no thoughts of hurting himself. Patient has no thoughts of hurting others. Patient is not having suicidal thoughts. Patient is not having homicidal thoughts…” and “there is no evidence of any psychotic processes, mania, or OCD symptoms. Insight, judgment, and impulse control are good.”  The suit further alleges that a psychiatrist told the plaintiff, “I don’t know why you were referred here. You don’t belong here.”Nonetheless, the suit contends that five days after being discharged from the hospital, the local sheriff’s department showed up at Montgomery’s door and seized his four registered handguns, including his former duty sidearm, after the sheriff had been subjected to “repeated pressure” by the New York State Police, who claimed that Montgomery had been declared mentally defective and had been involuntarily committed to a mental institution.

Montgomery alleges that the hospital violated his privacy by transmitting his medical information to the State Police without his consent or knowledge.  Montgomery subsequently requested a hearing to have his handgun ownership permit reinstated, but the sheriff’s department allegedly terminated his permit without a hearing.  The suit alleges that police denied Montgomery’s Freedom of Information requests to see what information has been placed in his secret file, and that both police and the hospital refused to allow him to correct the falsehoods in his record.

The suit names Gov. Cuomo, Eastern Long Island Hospital, and several state officials, including the superintendent of state police and the local sheriff, as defendants, and alleges that they violated Montgomery’s Second-, Fourth-, Fifth-, and Fourteenth-Amendment rights.  It seeks injunctive and declaratory relief for Montgomery and all similarly situated persons.

Last year, Cuomo publicly stated that “extreme conservatives” – namely, gun owners and opponents of abortion and gay marriage – “have no place in the State of New York.”  In other words, they are enemies of the state.  Cuomo’s use of medical records against gun owners under his “SAFE Act” is clearly an effort to confiscate firearms from people who “have no place” in his police state.

Residents of other states should be wary that progressives will make similar efforts to use the federally mandated electronic medical database required by Obamacare against gun owners and/or political dissidents in the future.

You can read the full text of the lawsuit here.


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
18 Comments
harry p.
harry p.
January 3, 2015 9:25 am

Yeah, but they are just enforcing the law, want to go home to their families, have extremely dangerous jobs, etc…
Stucky can have his resolution, mine is to pick up the slack and not be so laxed in my disgust. Fuck these costumed donut devouring mongoloid road pirates and the copsuckers who lick their boots, fuck them all to hell.

Stucky
Stucky
January 3, 2015 9:31 am

I tried. God knows I tried.

Fuck my resolution.

Fuck cops.

Copfuks eat shit.

The universe is back in synchronicity!!

ragman
ragman
January 3, 2015 10:47 am

These new agents of the state(Drs) can’t axe these questions in Fl. harry p: please tell us how you really feel. Stucky: that didn’t last long! Happy(armed) New Year to all!

Stucky
Stucky
January 3, 2015 11:08 am

ragman

The spirit was willing, but the flesh is weak. I am a man with a weak will, easily overcome by the Tempter, a slave to the Dark Side of my emotions, a Creature whose habits rule my soul

In other words …. a spineless pussy.

Besides … “copluv” just sounded stupid as shit.

Mdtoaz
Mdtoaz
January 3, 2015 11:09 am

Sorry officer, those guns were all stolen last night. I don’t have any guns

ottomatik
ottomatik
January 3, 2015 1:15 pm

Are we required by law to report stolen guns?

Steve Hogan
Steve Hogan
January 3, 2015 2:11 pm

Sorry, officer, but my guns and my gold were tragically lost in a boating accident….

ASIG
ASIG
January 3, 2015 2:43 pm

California Gun Confiscation bill goes into effect 2015- provides $24 Million to expedite illegal Gun Seizure.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/19/california-gun-confiscation-bill_n_3117238.html

So if you own a gun in California that was legal at the time you bought it, and that has subsequently been banned from sale in California, the state intends to confiscate those guns.

I can remember back when the assault weapons ban was first being debated in the California legislature, gun owners were expressing concerns that the assault weapons ban would result in their guns being taken away. I distinctly remember the state legislators flat out stating that anyone that legally purchased their assault weapons prior to the coming ban could continue to possess those guns they just would be required to REGISTER them with the state. They stated at that time they only wanted to take the guns out of the hands of the “criminals”.

So now just having an “assault rifle” makes you a “criminal” and the state intends to “remove the assault weapons from the hands of the criminals”.

And So It Goes

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
January 3, 2015 3:08 pm

ottomatik says:
“Are we required by law to report stolen guns?”

Not if you aren’t aware of the theft until they ask you for them. “Oh shit! I was robbed! I’m glad your were here officer. I’m glad we discovered this theft together so you can help me file a report.”

ottomatik
ottomatik
January 3, 2015 3:58 pm

IS- Thanks for the clarification, I assume that if you “know” they have been stolen you are required to report.

ASIG- Im sure the California model will be coming to a State near you soon and if not the Fed’s will adopt and implement, add it to the list; War on Poverty, War on Drugs, War on Terror,….. War on Guns.
A dream come true for totalitarian statist, add the War on Hate and complete unhindered Central Planning will finally be able to provide us the Utopia they have fallen short of.
I can’t wait.

harry p.
harry p.
January 3, 2015 4:19 pm

ragman,
i say cop i don’t mean every single person who identifies themselves as a police officer. many are what i refer to as peace officers, actually act as public servants and stalwarts and view their role as de-escalating situations instead of tyring to dominate a situation.
i think some of them are genuinely good people but the ones that fall into that crowd are small town rural cops for the most part. a portion of them are genuine sociopaths and the rest just want a job that they can retire from but have their principles and morals continuously degraded over a period of time until they become a shell of their former selves and should not be employed anymore.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
January 3, 2015 4:31 pm

ottomatik said:
“IS- Thanks for the clarification, I assume that if you “know” they have been stolen you are required to report.”

I don’t know the legal answer. I know that if a gun that can be traced to me gets lost or stolen I will report it for my own protection. I don’t need some idiot to steal my guns and then commit a crime or kill someone with them.

Anonymous
Anonymous
January 3, 2015 4:39 pm

This goes back to Holder saying Americans need to be brainwashed.Notice public schools targeting of white little boys for poptart guns(poptarts bitten off in the shape of a gun)finger guns or saying the word gun.Now include home inspection by police,psychiatrist evaluation,expulsion.Not to mention calling them a weapon-So far no black little boys or Mexicans targeted all white children

Llpoh
Llpoh
January 3, 2015 6:55 pm

Stuck has more spine than anyone I know. He is 6’8″, after all.

Stucky
Stucky
January 3, 2015 8:51 pm

“Stuck has more spine than anyone I know. He is 6’8″, after all.” ———- Llpoh

Thank You.

And don’t forget … the same is true for all other body parts. heh heh

TE
TE
January 4, 2015 7:48 pm

Judas. This country sucks.

But on a good note, do you all know that the UN Small Arms Treaty has been passed with the US leading the way?

It is all but over for gun owners. We are all criminals now.

No wonder I start to feel rage and wish for blood pouring from the nose of those that continue to berate me with, “USA! USA! USA!”

We suck. At least it is now official.

AKAnon
AKAnon
January 5, 2015 7:12 pm

This doesn’t surprise anyone, does it? He should have ducked.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
January 5, 2015 9:00 pm

This is why we can’t have “universal background checks”. The gov’t will keep the data from the background checks. It’s a gun owner database. At least with a few gun show loopholes, etc, they know they don’t have ALL guns registered.