About a year ago, Georgia copfuk Michael Vickers shot and seriously wounded a 10 year old boy. Copfuk Vickers was in pursuit of a suspect. He did NOT shoot at the suspect … he shot at the boy’s family dog, missed, and almost killed the boy. No charges were filed against the copfuk. The copfuk never even offered an apology …. He was too busy enjoying his paid vacation during the “investigation”. You can read about it here;
Copfuks kill family pets virtually every day in Amerika. In many cases this egregious behavior is further fucked up by charging the human victims!
It doesn’t work the other way around. A person who kills, wounds, or even taunts a K-9 “officer” faces criminal charges ……….. even if the act was committed in demonstrable self-defense!!!
Under a bill approved by the Georgia state senate last week, a peon citizen who “assaults” (you don’t even have to kill the dog) a police dog could face up to ten years in prison and a $10,000 fine. You can read that here;
http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/local/story/2015/mar/04/scaled-down-tanjas-law-may-pass/291411/
“Tanja’s Law,” is dedicated to the memory of a police dog that was shot and killed during a SWAT raid in Georgia that took place just a few weeks after copfuk Vickers nearly killed the 10 year old kid. The man who shot Tanja accepted a plea agreement imposing a 20-50 year prison sentence!
But that wasn’t enough for copfuks and polfuks!! The original draft would have treated the killing of a canine “officer” as an act of SECOND DEGREE MURDER.
Never in the history of Western Civilization has the destruction of an animal been viewed as murder.
Welcome to the USA!USA!USA! … where copfuks get away with murdering humans …. and humans go to prison for killing a dog, even if in self-defense.
Australia is looking better and better and better …..
Simple mathematics:
Canine copfuk life > human mundane life
Why?
Because ‘murka
Everyone involved in the attempt to pass this law should be killed immediately.
Also the piece of shit cop in the original story. I would love to piss on his corpse.
Michael vicks dogs get more justice than a black murder by cop victim. Now this. And I like dogs. But this is beyond absurd.
I have long predicted to acquaintances the coming age of police retaliation. I don’t mean the police against the citizenry, but the retaliation of the citizenry against the police.
As the police become more brutal in their suppression of historic rights, they face the wrath of a citizenry, push too far. The police must choose which side to support. They are the buffer between the elite and the people.
The escalation of ambushes and killing of police are only going to get worse. There will be a time when the police will hole up in their stations, fearful to venture into the community.
When I was a kid, the police were looked up to, the people believed that they were on their side. When an officer was gunned down and people read about it in the newspaper, everyone reading it was saddened. I fear, not so today. The police have brought this upon themselves. Police work can be dangerous and deserve the support of the people, however, the police have developed a ‘them or us’ attitude. It is all us in the long run, tho. So the police must choose, they have much to change to garner the support of the people once again. Laws like the above just drive a wedge between themselves and the people they purport to serve.
The police can’t do their job without the support of the community.
“When an officer was gunned down and people read about it in the newspaper, everyone reading it was saddened. I fear, not so today.” —— Homer
I rejoice. Pretty much every time.
kill a copfuk dog, go directly to jail, if not murdered beforehand..cop kills your dog?…so solly.
Oklahoma Cop Shoots, Kills Family’s Dog, Says it Was ‘Awesome’
http://www.infowars.com/oklahoma-cop-shoots-kills-family-dog-says-it-was-awesome/
[img
?oh=08bed0d74ec20e5515f0dfec04f83e39&oe=5573B644&__gda__=1438060706_5d40c8133cafe7d8ef013b7c41cbb5c6[/img]
Stucky–How times have changed. The Feds corrupt everything they touch. The militarization of the police has changed the culture of police work. It has pitted the police against the citizenry.
I guarantee you that the way a person in Watts sees the police is going to be different than the way a person in Beverly Hills sees them. One is based on experience and one is based on re-runs of Dragnet.
The people in this country are not as moral as they once were and the police reflect that in their composition. There are a lot of good cops, trying to do a good job, but they are being compromised by those believing in the ‘them or us’ rhetoric. They are a fraternity protecting there own even to the point of falsifying records and lying on the stand.
Police work is a personality changing job which promotes ‘them or us’ The police need to meld with the communities ideals to become balanced in their outlook. I don’t see that happening any time soon especially in big cities.
I’m not so much a rejoice r. The specter of violence is a conflagration that’s difficult to contain. Watts and Ferguson, Mo are a case in point.
Stucky– why is this, you might ask? Well, I’ll tell you. It goes back to my days in Psychology.
Eric Berne, a psychiatrist, wrote a book called, “Games People Play”. Berne describes a process that people engage in called ‘stamp collecting’.
You remember, years ago, Green Stamps and Blue Chip Stamps that you would receive at the store for a purchase, which you would paste in a booklet and you could redeem the booklets for merchandise. Steph S. It was way, way before your time.
Along that same line, Berne says that people collect (mental) stamps and when the opportunity arises, cash them in. There are different colored stamps. Blue stamps, when cashed in allow you a drunk or a really good drunk depending on how many booklet you cash in. The brown stamps (the shitty kind) when cash in allow you a riot, a beating or even a murder.
Of course there are good colored stamps, too, that allow you a love affair, etc.
The people of Ferguson, MO have been collecting these blue and brown stamp (injustices at the hands of the police) for a long time and with the fatal shooting of young Michael Brown cashed in their booklets of stamps.
Of course, you can only cash in your stamps once, however, there are individuals who cash in counterfeit stamps. They keep trying to cash in the same stamps over and over again.
Good Book! The best thing in psychology since then, I believe, is the ‘Enneagram of Personality’ and ‘Personality Typing’.
For those interested, I’m a basic type 5 – Enneagram Wikipedia only gives a cursory explanation.
Where is an innocent citizen left to cower, secure in the knowledge that being alive hasn’t given some power-crazed, morality/revenue officer, to kill us dead?
There is NOWHERE folks. We have NOWHERE we are allowed to live free of their “protection.”
If you aren’t guilty, you have nothing to fear!
Destroy the Constitution, implement fear and allow Drug Laws, implement more fear and allow Terrorism Laws.
Success.
I fear for my big black dog. The night the drunk took out my swingset and garden boxes, my hub laughed at me when I took my dog upstairs and locked her in. I didn’t laugh.
It is open season on our families, including our animals. We asked them to protect us, and now when they are saving us to death we sit ensconced in delusion and ask for more.
There is no “fixing” this country. Way past the point of no return. My prayer is that something good rises from the ashes.
Love the stamp analogy. (My mom was a faithful S&H saver … we got several kitchen items that way including, of course, a toaster … which lasted over 10 years.)
All the copfuk stories that get posted here …. that’s a LOT of brown stamps …. and of of (several) reasons I have zero sorrow when a copfuk is gunned down.
Underdogs and Overlords
We’re not worthy: Georgia police dog “Tanja” is buried with full honors.
http://www.freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2015/03/underdogs-and-overlords.html
A little less than a year ago, Michael Vickers shot and seriously wounded a 10-year-old boy in Broxton, Georgia under circumstances that remain unclear. The victim, Dakota Corbitt, suffered serious and potentially permanent injury to his leg.
Despite the fact that this was an act of firearms-related violence involving a child, no charges were filed against Vickers. Although the public record is barren of a comment from Coffee County Sheriff Doyle Wooten expressing sympathy for Dakota and his mother, Amy, the sheriff pointedly commiserated with the shooter, telling a local NBC affiliate that Vickers is the father of three young children and that the shooting “is really preying on his mind.”
Many people bearing such burdens would make a point of meeting with the injured child and expressing contrition in person. Vickers didn’t have time for such a gesture, however, because immediately after the shooting he went on what was described as a “pre-approved vacation” from his job as a drug investigator with the Broxton Police Department.
At the time of the shooting, Vickers was in pursuit of a man suspected of shooting a police officer from nearby Douglas, Georgia. However, Vickers didn’t fire the shot at a human suspect; he was attempting to shoot the Corbitt family’s dog. Owing to his good-enough-for-government-“work” marksmanship, Vickers nearly murdered the 10-year-old boy.
Every day in this country, police officers, acting on the basis of vague and usually implausible fears, shoot and kill dogs. This isn’t true of service personnel whose occupations actually benefit the public — such as postal carriers and private couriers – and involve frequent contact with unfamiliar canines. In some cases, the shooting or destruction of a family pet by a privileged aggressor has been compounded by the threat – or imposition – of charges against the grieving human victims.
The memory of man runs not to an occasion on which an armed emissary of the wealth-devouring class has been prosecuted for killing or injuring a privately owned canine. A member of the productive class who kills, wounds, taunts, or even barks at a K-9 “officer,” on the other hand, will face criminal charges, even if the act was committed in demonstrable self-defense. Under a bill approved by the Georgia state senate last week, a Mundane who “assaults” a police dog could face up to ten years in prison and a $10,000 fine.
…unless he was a fellow LEO, of course.
Senate Bill 72, “Tanja’s Law,” is dedicated to the memory of a police dog that was shot and killed during a SWAT raid in Georgia that took place just a few weeks after Vickers nearly killed Dakota Corbitt. Tanja was buried with the Brezhnevite pageantry and state-dictated solemnity that accompany every police funeral.
Late last year, the man who shot Tanja, a genuinely unpleasant specimen named Steven Lee Waldemer, accepted a plea agreement imposing a 20-50 year prison sentence. This was seen as inadequate by Tanja’s human comrades, who insisted that any Mundane who lifts an unhallowed hand to injure one of his canine overlords must suffer more severely than the present law dictates.
In its original draft, “Tanja’s law” would have treated the killing of a police dog as an act of second-degree murder – the charge that would have been filed against Vickers if he had killed Dakota Corbitt and had done so as a common citizen, rather than a state-licensed purveyor of violence.
If enacted in its original form, “Tanja’s Law” would have been the first statute in U.S. history – perhaps in the history of the Western World – to recognize the deliberate destruction of a non-human creature as “murder.”
Of course, this would have applied only to specially designated members of that species, whose codified status in law would have been superior to that of human beings who are not part of the exalted fraternity of official coercion. A dog killed by a police officer wouldn’t be regarded as a murder victim, or autopsied by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, as “Tanja’s Law” specifies. Nor would a human Mundane be allowed to use defensive violence to protect himself against an unwarranted K-9 attack.
Herein lies the unarticulated, but undeniable, evil of this bill: In its original form, it would have expanded the circumstances in which police would employ “justifiable” lethal force. Under the Graham v. Connor standard, the individual police officer is trained that lethal force is “reasonable” in response to a perceived threat to his life or that of a fellow officer. If killing a police dog is “murder,” a human officer on the scene would be legally justified in killing a Mundane who is “perceived” as posing such a threat.
Currently, it is common to see police officers gun down dogs that simply approach them. Indeed, that’s how Dakota Corbitt was shot: The family dog raced into the family’s front yard in response to the presence of an armed intruder. One entirely plausible scenario growing out of “Tanja’s Law” version 1.0 would see a police officer gunning down a human being who verbally “threatens” or “takes an aggressive stance” when approached by a police dog.
The legislative purpose of the original bill was “to provide a measure of equivalency in the punishment of crimes committed against police dogs in the performance of their official duties as to that of peace officers [and to] provide that the offense of murder in the second degree shall include causing the death of a police dog while such police dog is engaged in its official duties….”
Although the revised legislation discarded the language designating destruction of a police dog (or horse) second-degree murder, it unambiguously elevates such animals above the rank of Mundane humanity.
It has been pointed out that any bill bearing an individual’s name is likely pregnant with trouble. This is certainly true of “Tanja’s Law,” as it is of most such legislation. As it happens, the current session of the Georgia State Legislature is considering two specimens of that type, the second of which –– House Bill 56, also known as “Bou-Bou’s Law” – would actually legalize the use of no-knock SWAT raids in Georgia, where such raids are both quite common and entirely illegal.
“The current law already makes these kinds of raids illegal in Georgia,” observes criminal defense attorney Catherina Bernard, who contends that the bill would do “the opposite of what it says it’s going to do.”
Bou-Bou Phonesvanh, for whom the bill was named, is the toddler who was burned, maimed, and nearly murdered during a 2:00 no-knock raid carried out in Cornelia, Georgia last May 28 by Sturmabteilung in the employ of the Habserham County Sheriff’s Office.
Bou-Bou and his parents were staying with relatives after their home in Wisconsin had burned down. Neither the mother nor the father was a suspect, or had a criminal record. The presence of toys and other indicia of children residing at the address should have been obvious even to the marginally sapient personages who find employment as police officers.
Heedless to any consideration apart from the degenerate urge to kick in doors and throw people to the ground, the Berserkers beat down the front door and hurled a flash-bang grenade into the crib in which the 19-month-old was sleeping.
The warrant authorizing the raid in which Bou-Bou’s chest was ripped open and his nose was blown off was issued on the unsupported word of a police informant that a $50 drug transaction had occurred at the premises a few hours earlier.
An “official investigation” of the incident “justified” the use of force while Bou-Bou was still in intensive care. A prosecutor-dominated grand jury ratified that finding, while expressing highly qualified reservations about the use of no-knock warrants.
The panel described the investigation that led to the raid as “hurried, sloppy, and unfortunately not in accordance with the best practice and procedures.” However, it described the officers involved as “well-intentioned people … in too big a hurry.” The grand jury was actually more critical of “the parents and extended family” of the nearly-murdered child, who supposedly “had some degree of knowledge concerning family members involved in criminal activity that came in and out of the residence” – a claim that the state didn’t prove, but was sufficient to absolve the officers of all responsibility.
State Rep. Kevin Tanner has sponsored a separate bill that would supposedly place the most modest imaginable restrictions on the use of no-knock warrants – most significantly, by forbidding the use of such tactics between 10:00 PM and 6:00 a.m. That impediment could be overcome by an earnest declaration from police that a post-midnight paramilitary assault is necessary in order to preserve vulnerable evidence. Rep. Tanner, perhaps not surprisingly, was a sheriff’s deputy in Dawson County, Georgia for 18 years, and has personally participated in no-knock raids.
Nothing in any of the proposed bills would actually prevent police from carrying out 3:00 no-knock raids. However, police unions will not countenance any criticism of such tactics.
“I don’t think any changes are needed because it is not easy now [to get a no-knock warrant],” lied Carrie Mills, a representative of the International Brotherhood of Police Officers. Yes, she conceded, people – including permanently disfigured children – have been abused in post-midnight SWAT raids, but that’s just how things are done in the Soyuz: “You have to draw the line between your right as a citizen to privacy and a community’s right to live in a crime-free environment. You can’t have them both.”
Although “Bou-Bou’s” law has made it out of committee, legislative analysts describe the bill as “troubled” and unlikely to pass. This reflects the intense opposition from police unions and their allies, who prefer that such raids continue without legal authorization rather than seeing even the most trivial potential restrictions inscribed into law.
Such people believe it to be entirely appropriate to imprison a human being for wounding a police dog, while offering a paid vacation to a cop who shoots a ten-year-old boy, or blows open the chest of a sleeping infant with a flash-bang grenade.
Homer – I was not familiar with enneagram, but took the test to see where I fell. I am a type 8 with heavy type 1 characteristics:
Type Eight
The Challenger
The powerful, aggressive type. Eights are self-confident, strong, and assertive. Protective, resourceful, straight-talking, and decisive, but can also be ego-centric and domineering. Eights feel they must control their environment, especially people, sometimes becoming confrontational and intimidating. Eights typically have problems with their tempers and with allowing themselves to be vulnerable. At their Best: self-mastering, they use their strength to improve others’ lives, becoming heroic, magnanimous, and inspiring.
Type One
The Reformer
The principled, idealistic type. Ones are conscientious and ethical, with a strong sense of right and wrong. They are teachers, crusaders, and advocates for change: always striving to improve things, but afraid of making a mistake. Well-organized, orderly, and fastidious, they try to maintain high standards, but can slip into being critical and perfectionistic. They typically have problems with resentment and impatience. At their Best: wise, discerning, realistic, and noble. Can be morally heroic.
I was stunned, I tell you, simply stunned, by how I was characterized.
Here is type five:
Type Five
The Investigator
The perceptive, cerebral type. Fives are alert, insightful, and curious. They are able to concentrate and focus on developing complex ideas and skills. Independent, innovative, and inventive, they can also become preoccupied with their thoughts and imaginary constructs. They become detached, yet high-strung and intense. They typically have problems with eccentricity, nihilism, and isolation. At their Best: visionary pioneers, often ahead of their time, and able to see the world in an entirely new way.
Interestingly, what I am NOT is the following:
Type Two
The Helper
The caring, interpersonal type. Twos are empathetic, sincere, and warm-hearted. They are friendly, generous, and self-sacrificing, but can also be sentimental, flattering, and people-pleasing. They are well-meaning and driven to be close to others, but can slip into doing things for others in order to be needed. They typically have problems with possessiveness and with acknowledging their own needs. At their Best: unselfish and altruistic, they have unconditional love for others.
Or this:
Type Nine
The Peacemaker
The easy-going, self-effacing type. Nines are accepting, trusting, and stable. They are usually grounded, supportive, and often creative, but can also be too willing to go along with others to keep the peace. They want everything to go smoothly and be without conflict, but they can also tend to be complacent and emotionally distant, simplifying problems and ignoring anything upsetting. They typically have problems with inertia and stubbornness. At their Best: indomitable and all- embracing, they are able to bring people together and heal conflicts.
I got zero points in either of those categories. I am simply stunned. And here I thought I was easy-going, caring, empathic, warm-hearted, accepting and trusting.
Instead I am aggressive, assertive, and controlling.
Bullshit. Those fucks that created that system can kiss my ass. I am too warm-hearted. Fuckers.
Flash–Written by a knowledgeable lawyer, I suspect. Good factual write.
I’ll tell you something that you dear readers don’t know. In the training of K-9 dogs, is is understood that when the dog makes a capture the the dog is rewarded. What is the reward, you ask? I tell you this from a knowing on good authority. The dog is allowed to bite the suspect-victim while the poor bloke is handcuffed on the ground. TRUE! Also, if the police know that the suspect has a gun, the K-9 unit is never sent in to flush out the villain.
The illusion that these dogs are bona fide member of the PD, drawing a salary and a pension, boarders on the insane.
Poor Smokey, dispatched in the line of duty, a K-9, in Massachusetts, was eulogized by the DA in the newspapers, in Bean Town, I believe. Smokey’s death will not go unavenged, and all the other personification dribble.
Police need to be held accountable, personally, for their unlawful actions. The same for the DA’s that disregard the law. DAs and judges should only have the protection of sovereign immunity when acting lawfully and constitutionally. These jerks always hold something back from the defense and they do it with impunity. I bet you could count on one big toe how many DAs have been disbarred for criminal malfeasance in this country. O.K. Maybe two.
“Australia is looking better and better and better …..”
Hope you’re not planning on buying a house there
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-15/mortgage-regulation-australian-style
Llpoh, Just busting out of Dodge would lead me to suspect as much. One type isn’t any better than another, just different.
Being a business man as you are, I would think that this would give you an edge on your employees.
Help you make the right selection for employment and projects, also, provide insight into your own personality.
Hate to say it, I’m a rock solid type 5.
@Llpoh, I just had to go see what I was.
I, too, am primarily an “8” with a big old zero on the “9”, which is funny because I have always been the family peacemaker. This might explain a lot.
But, my secondary numbers are equal in 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7.
I blame it on being a Gemini. I am multiple people, and usually the one you are meeting is pretty cool. Really.
Oleaginous Outrager – what is this thing “mortgage”?
Not buying a house – building a doomstead from scratch to my specs – fully autonomous and independent of all govt infrastructure. When it is done, I will have property tax to pay, but nothing else.
I sure as hell am not saying Australia is perfect, or in perfect condition. It sure as hell is not.
But it is very sparsely populated once you get outside of the metropolises. And the people outside said metropolises are very fine indeed.
TE – why am I not surprised you are an 8 – assertive!
I think this might be you organizing your employees:
[img]http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTi3UAh6RklGwVhR0y525hTwJXokOmr3iSKdXxz7lcsCaCVKhXW[/img]
Llpoh–You mean you were stunned at the accuracy of the characterization or stunned at the inaccuracy described by the test?.
@Llpoh, that’s funny.
One day my ex hub called me at work and started the conversation the conversation with, “Do you know what YOUR bastard son did?!”
I tried to be calm, I counted to ten, I muted the phone and cussed at him, I practiced my focused Square Breathing. And he would not stop yelling at.
I closed my office door, unmuted the phone, and let fly with ten years of pent up anger and frustration (son was four days away from 18, the end was near). I screamed at him like it was 1985, we were still married, and I hadn’t spent a decade learning to control my upbringing.
When I came out of my office to apologize to my staff, a couple of my girls were pale faced.
They had NO idea I had that in me. None. Both of them upped their game from that day forward.
I’m not a yeller, anymore. If I get angry enough to yell at you, my son would tell you that you better be moving outside the blast zone.
It took years and years to get here. I was raised a yeller, by yellers, married a yeller, then divorced him and my upbringing…lol
Llpoh–I noticed in your comment to Oleaginous Outrager that you mentioned ‘hell’ twice in the same sentence. hmmm!
I know that Australia isn’t hell, but I’ve been assured that there are parts in Australia, where you can see it from there.
Homer – I fit my profile to a T, and then some. Some folks are all bark no bite. I tend to be all bite.
TE – I can yell, but I usually do it for effect, and not because I have lost my temper. You sound like my partner – he only goes off every few years, but whoa, when he does you do not want to be the subject of his attention.
When I am well and truly pissed off, I am able to go into very lengthy tirades. I can abuse someone for very long periods without raising my voice nor using foul language (foul language gives the abused reason to huff off, throw you out, call senior management, whatever). I enter some kind of zone, and become quite creative with abusing the object of my ire. The more angry I get, the more calmly I tend to speak.
It is a gift. What can I say.
Homer – next to the two poles, I suspect Australia can make a case for being the most inhospitable place on earth. It is dry and hot, and even where it is not dry and hot, there are things everywhere that can kill you.
Something like 8 of the 10 most poisonous snakes on earth are in Australia. The most poisonous spiders on earth. Sea shells that can kill you. Miniature octopuses that can kill you. Jellyfish. Crocodiles. Sharks. Sea snakes. Poisonous spiny fish.
Man – sea shells that can kill you? Fuck that. This little fucker can kill you dead as a dodo:
[img
?v=0[/img]
Friend of mine sent me an article re a telephone worker stomping through some underbrush with a couple of workmates repairing lines. He was only ten yards from them. Suddenly they did not hear him anymore – not a peep. A taipan got him, and he was not even able to give a yell – dead as yesterdays news in no time at all.
In the news, a young mans’ body was just found. His car stuck in some sand, and he got bit while digging it out – left a note saying “bit by snake”. Hasta la vista, baby. My guess is it was a death adder (the “death” part of it kinda describes the little bastard), as they are not prone to running away as most others are.
Oh, well. Can’t help bad luck.
Where are you guys taking that enneagram test. Link please.
@Llpoh, it can be trained.
I worked hard to stop my first instinct – yelling.
Now it is a whisper. Those that know me best will tell you that if we are disagreeing, and my voice drops to a controlled whisper, you are in deep, deep, trouble. One step up from my yelling, which would indicate a total loss of control.
When I’m reaming your ass in a whisper, you’ll have to grow closer to me, which might be what I want.
I once got in a dispute with a store manager, and he resorted to yelling and calling me names. I dropped my voice to a whisper and before I left, I had a coupon in my hand for $20 of free groceries and an apology.
I also had the people behind me – all with the same issue – applauding.
Yelling, or swearing, indicates you are losing the fight. I don’t lose, often.
@Stuck, here ya’ go:
http://www.enneagraminstitute.com/Tests_Battery.asp#FreeShortTests
The test is the RHETI sampler, I took the short sampler because I’m not paying a bunch of paid-for academics and scientists to be a guinea pig
I took the army aptitude test in high school, it gave me only one career possibility; sheriff. I saw the same test on a click box a couple of years ago, same result after 40 years. Llpoh brings up a very interesting nugget most people are unaware of. Yelling on a high level is generally theatre. I always loved it when traffic cops and traffic judges laid into me. I knew I was going to walk. In their mind, the screaming was my punishment. Hard for me to keep a straight face.
Got the max points (8) as a Type 3 …… and 5 points on Type 8
Type Three —– The Achiever
The adaptable, success-oriented type. Threes are self-assured, attractive, and charming. Ambitious, competent, and energetic, they can also be status-conscious and highly driven for advancement. They are diplomatic and poised, but can also be overly concerned with their image and what others think of them. They typically have problems with workaholism and competitiveness. At their Best:: self-accepting, authentic, everything they seem to be—role models who inspire others.
There ya go you assholes … my moobs are ATTRACTIVE!!!
starfcker–One takes his comeuppance, humbly.
That might make a fun thread of its own …. to see how everyone else stacks up.
Stucky–attractive and charming are you? [img
[/img]
My top two both say I am heroic! Ha! Who needs to be attractive when you are Herculean!
This is me off to slay dragons and rescue fair big-bosomed damsels! (Small bosomed damsels can fend for themselves!)
[img
[/img]
Just took that little test . Solid 8, with 3 and 7 right behind. 0 on 4. Homer, I always did my best. got a ticket on the GW parkway for 105. That road is some sort of national park, so I ended up in federal court. Everyone else in court that day were marines blowing each other at the rest stops. The judge screamed at me for at least a full minute, told me he was going to make an example of me, and then fined me 175. From the sound of him, I thought it was going to be expensive. I almost grinned in his face. Good self control.
And llpoh, I wouldn’t worry so much about that seashell. It’s the fucking salties.
I am about to go rescue these two:
[img
[/img]
I am leaving this one for Stuck:
[img
[/img]
Star – re yelling, I only ever yell at an employee if I am trying to save them from being fired. It is a last ditch effort to get their attention. Otherwise, I never do it. It is degrading to both parties, and I simply do not do it.
I occasionally thump tables and carry on in group meetings. It is pure theatrics.
No, I get it completely. Run the same game myself.
The future for police headquarters .