This downturn should be greater than the last one in the 1700s according to our models. Volatility rises so the swings in climate become much more dramatic with the turn of these cycles. It is similar to a stock market crash. Once it breaks, the volatility rises and market prices appears very choppy. So there will be a burst to the upside, followed by new lows on the downside. I am in Paris. Nowhere near as warn as the States. People are wearing jackets on the street. Northern Europe never really warmed up this year. When I was here in the Spring, I had to go buy sweaters for it was much colder than I expected.These cycles in climate were originally discovered from ice core samples from the North Pole which revealed a 300 year cycle in climate defined as the energy output of the sun. When I saw the presentation presented by Harvard scientists back in the 1980s, I immediate saw their chart was close to the 309.6 year cycle in the ECM. The sun has been documented now that it is a thermodynamic system which beats like your heart. The cycle defines maximum and minimum over a 300 year period and explains migrations and the rise and fall of civilization.
The last downturn was pretty bad. They also seem to line up with the revolution cycle. It probably aggravates society and they move toward civil unrest. Some 2500 men died at Valley Forge from exposure during the winter encampment. Clearly, this is the cycle that has driven war by conquest and is linked stimulated by a change in climate that has marked a reduction in food supply.
It will be this turn down in global cooling which will spark a rise in food prices on the horizon. The Global Warming/Climate Change crowd as always try to reduce all blame to a single factor. This type of thinking process has seriously retarded our evolutionary process. They are incapable of dynamic thinking and are incompetent insofar as just observing the world around them. They destroy our future in every possible way for their ignorance condemns us to repeat history in every field they use this primitive means of thinking – always reducing whatever the issue if to single cause and effect.
I am reviewing new research by another scientist who has linked changes in the magnetic field to earthquakes. They seem to pinpoint the area. We are running it through our system to see the correlations historically to verify the work. Very promising. The solar polar fields (SPF) data which flip with the sunspot activity in an 11 year cycle, as measured by the Wilcox Solar Observatory (WSO), has been studied and compared with the large magnitude earthquake record from the United States Geological Survey. The time period covers the 38 years (+13,600 days) that the WSO has collected the SPF data. This study reveals a dependence of M8.0+ seismic activity on the oscillations of the SPF. We are also starting to see an increase in earthquake activity with this cycle. Yellowstone has the worst quake in 34 year last June.
This 309.6 year ECM cycle was discovered from economics. But the sun cycle fits in. It appears that there is also waves of volcanic activity which also correlates. The explosion of Thera (Santorini) which was about the time of Moses and his confrontation with the Pharaoh, also market the collapse of the Minoan civilization and this is when the barbarian Greeks conquered Crete after the eruption and their economy was devastated, and then they took Troy. So the established empires fell, the barbarians were at the gates, and then Greece too collapses into a Dark Age. The Greeks became the dreaded “Sea People” who invaded Northern Africa. It now appears that the Philistines were of Greek Mycenaean origin.
So these downturns and volatility in climate the Global Warming fraudsters (who then changed it to Climate Change when it wasn’t getting warmer), attribute everything to man. Even today, the current level of volcano activity shows that globally, volcanoes on land and under the sea release a total of about 200 million tonnes of CO2 annually. It’s a fact that Kilauea in Hawaii which erupts continuously has been releasing more than twice the amount of noxious sulfur dioxide gas (SO2) as the single dirtiest power plant on the U.S. mainland on a daily basis. So even if we shut down power plants and ride bicycles, you will by no means eliminate the claimed greenhouse gases.
When Mount St Helens erupted, President Ronald Reagan made this comment:
“I have flown twice over Mount St. Helens out on our West Coast. I’m not a scientist and I don’t know the figures, but I have a suspicion that that one little mountain has probably released more sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere of the world than has been released in the last ten years of automobile driving or things of that kind that people are so concerned about.”
President Ronald Reagan, 1980
Mount Saint Helens Eruption 1980
Reagan was right because automobiles principally emit carbon compounds, such as carbon monoxide, and nitrous oxides. Sulfur dioxide is not a problem with auto emissions. According to the US Geological Society untainted by the Global Warming/Climate Change Crowd, said:
“An estimated 1.5 million metric tons of sulfur dioxide gas was discharged by Mount St. Helens during the explosive eruption of 18 May 1980. Thus, approximately 2 million metric tons of sulfur dioxide was released during the whole eruption sequence.”
Consequently, there are two problems with the data. Even the EPA admits it cannot accurately attribute how much greenhouse gas is naturally created v man. If we add together the massive release of sulfur dioxide that occurred from Mount St. Helens when it erupted, along with the likely gas eruption before and after for five years on either side of the eruption, Reagan’s claim that he had “a suspicion that that one little mountain has probably released more sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere of the world than has been released in the last ten years of automobile driving” appears to be fairly close to accurate, and this was just his guess.
It appears that we would enter a White Earth Effect and die as a planet if the volcanic activity ceased. That is the source of warming up the planet again when the sun turns down. Sure, man may add to volatility, but we by no means possess the power to change the climate cycle. There is ABSOLUTELY ZERO proof the the long-term 300 years cycle has changed. People who believe this nonsense should not read this blog for you you must also be a deep-rooted Marxist and believe all the BS of governments. If you buy into that, you might as well buy into everything they say. Only an idiot can possibly think we have the capacity to alter the universe or how it functions. We are incapable of even grasping all the variables at play.
If you have a basement, you can grow your own food without land and this may be the next hot trend.
Tried but failed to get a Gubbermint job, as I passed the Lie Detector exam.
Martin Armstrong is a great guy and a statistician, no doubt ab out that. But he has no clue regarding climate change and global warming,unfortunately.
A “prediction” about global cooling is beyondredicilous in time when we are to “enjoy” global warming speed up.
Why don’t people stick with their expertise? I never understood this.
Where it for natural factors only (Sun, volcanoes, orbital changes, etc. ) we would have a slight cooling. Now we have WARMING.
Here is the latest graph of global temperatures according to NOAA (till july 2015):
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/time-series/global/globe/land/ytd/7/1880-2015
We have strong El Nino, and are switching to a positive PDO phase, both os which enhance warming.
Next year has a good chance to be RECORD hot again (which whould be third in a row).
That one person has a good reputation in one research field does not make him an excellent climatologist automatically.
Best,
Alex
“Experts” in 1977
Stupid, I don’t read your column for accuracy but for a laugh. Keep cherry picking and I keep laughing.
It wasn’t until last April that the brutal cold left the part of CT where I live. Now we are gearing up for another severely cold winter. However, this is New England, where snowy and very cold winters are the norm. The last time I remember when winters were as bad as last year was back in the 70’s.
I’ve heard all the arguments about ‘global warming’ for about twenty years now. I must say that the people who study this are the world’s worst forecasters. According to their predictions less then 10 years ago, New England would have the climate of North Carolina. We’re still waiting on that happy time.
Plus the ice will be gone from arctic regions; open water around the North Pole year round; the people of Europe’s children will grow up never knowing what snow is; the poor polar bears and yada-yada-yada.
All bullshit. If the brains behind this con could figure out how to make money off of an impending ice age, they would be screaming that to the heavens. Meanwhile, the useful idiots buy into this crap and get all high and mighty about it, like it was a religion.
In the 70’s there were many studies arguing the case for an encroaching ice age. Maybe that’s happening, maybe not, or it just takes a long time to get the ice age going. Either way, I’m not losing any sleep over it. I just don’t want asshole con-artist like Al Gore forcing me to pay some stupid fucking tax so he can buy a couple more mansions.
Good article from MA. I guess the fuknuts above think “The Little Ice Age” that ended in the late 1800’s did not happen or could never happen again………..think again maroons.
Nice come back T4C.
What some people see as “global warming” others see as the final end of the last ice age, a return to normal conditions for Earth.
In any event, it has nothing to do with the presence or lack thereof throughout the Earths history, it has cycled before us and will continue to do so after us.
Unfortunatelly, “solar shut-down” is not enough to trigger an Ice Age:
`Research has shown that a grand solar minimum would offset no more than 0.3°C of global warming
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/aug/14/global-warming-solar-minimum-barely-dent
best,
Alex
At one time the straights of Mackinaw were nothing more than a waterfall just East of Mackinaw Island where Lake Michigan dumped into Lake Huron in what is called Mackinaw Falls. This low water period was in between two periods of lake water levels higher than what they are today.
How could lake levels change so drastically without it being man caused? Government paid climate “scientists” know this is a fact, they just don’t know the why.
I know this is one small example but the “man caused” crowd has no answers to facts.
Facts are seldom even mentioned by the man caused crowd. Somehow they just know that man is causing today’s “normal weather” to change, no matter how many studies show that the earths climate has always been changing and will always be changing, whether man exists, or not.
How do they know? Because other like-minded people say so, and they say so repeatedly and loudly.
The answer is more restriction, more taxes, more government to save us all.
Horse hockey, there is no such thing as normal weather or normal climate or man caused climate change.
The fact free left is full of fucknuts.
AGW sets off my bullshit detector in a big way. The earth has been here 4 billion years, and has been hotter and colder than now repeatedly. People have survived centuries of droughts, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes / hurricanes / typhoons, and every other weather-related misery ever noticed. Why are we to panic now about AGW? Puny little us are now going to shut down the climate / weather / natural cycles for CO2, H2O and NOx / SOx?
Someone thinks (or maybe knows) the majority of us are stupid. They have quit making predictions because they can’t make true predictions : more storms / more violent storms, sea ice disappearance, polar bear extinction, none came true. The only way you get higher temperatures more recently is to doctor the data: ignore certain weather stations, extrapolate vast areas (Siberia) from a tiny data set (few stations), “correct” the readings until they fit the theory, and so forth. This is academic fraud, perpetuated on a whole planet by educated fools.
Since my government believes in AGW, someone wants to make money and / or gain power and control from this. Obama has already decimated the coal industry in America, without proposing any real replacement for the baseload generation for the power grid (NO, solar, wind and renewables aren’t feasible as yet; solar is unavailable 12/24, wind is intermittent and geothermal too small to be significant). Natural gas works, but do you want the grid reliant on ONE real energy source (yes, nuclear, but it takes forever to build a plant and the installed base is aging past safety / reliability at a quick pace). It takes time to push natural gas down pipelines as well; a bad guess or two on the part of pipeline companies, electric utilities or oil field production supervision could lead to a cold winter without natural gas in place to feed the boilers.
When you are shivering in the dark, remember who pushed AGW without proof as a reason to shut down coal-fired power plants without viable replacements in place.
Some major problems with official climate change story:
1) The NOAA figures are based on bullshit data. Looking at their methodology, they take actual measurements, then apply “adjustment factors” to give a false appearance of gradual warming. The raw measurements show a gradual cooling, but have been altered so that past measurements are adjusted to be colder, and more recent measurements adjusted to be warmer.
2) Data is created in areas where no measurements exist within hundreds or thousands of miles by extrapolating the closest “measurements”. This introduces huge errors in their models.
3) Long term modeling is riddled with errors, as the measurement methodologies and measurement sites have changed greatly over long periods of time. We have gone from limited measurements on land, to measurements on the ocean, to satellite measurements, all while increasing the number of measurement sites and degrees of precision. Any trend of small changes of temperature would fall within the margin of error of these vast changes in measurement methodologies.
4) The climate models have been grossly inaccurate in recent years, and show an inability to predict future temperatures even as close as decade away. As a matter of fact, meteorology has been shown to be more inaccurate at predicting future temperatures than simply averaging historical temperatures for any given day that is further than 9 days in the future.
5) Satellite data actually shows there has been a slight cooling in recent years. Since the 1980s, there has been a breakdown in the correlation between atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperature. There is also a closer correlation between solar activity and global temperature than carbon dioxide.
6) In the long run, atmospheric carbon dioxide is removed from the atmosphere through weathering, forming a negative feedback loop called the carbonate-silicate cycle.
7) The geologic record suggests that there have been much hotter periods in our past, and the fossil record shows that hotter periods are more conducive to animal life. Assuming global warming hysteria were true, it appears that there isn’t much cause for alarm.
in the marxist drive to utopia maybe they will tell me what the ideal climate looks like
Admin,
so ” TIME” magazine is for you a good scientific reference? Majority of SCIENTIFIC literature at that time was saying the Earth would eventually warm.
So please, dont spread myths. It is not your style.
I like you economic analyses, but regarding climate… do your homework.
Best,
Alex
Please, if you refer to scientific topics, cite scientific literature:
A review of the literature suggests that, on the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists’ thinking as being one of the most important forces shaping Earth’s climate on human time scales. More importantly than showing the falsehood of the myth, this review describes how scientists of the time built the foundation on which the cohesive enterprise of modern climate science now rests.
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1
best,
Alex
It doesn’t matter one bit, Alexander Ac, HOW MANY scientists believe ANYTHING. PROOF is what is needed, and AGW “theory” fails to provide any.
(how can you have a theory if it doesn’t allow accurate prediction? What use is a theory that is repeatedly wrong? How can a “scientist” declare anything is “settled”, when it only takes one counterexample to invalidate any theory? What kind of “scientist” keeps datasets concealed, and writes Emails with phrases like “we have to keep XXX from publishing in peer-reviewed journals”, “hide the decline” and “The Medieval Warming period is a problem”. Isn’t the whole point of SCIENCE to have open discussion and debate on topics to achieve understanding? How many “scientists” were on Galileo’s side?)
THERE IS NO COHESIVE ENTERPRISE OF CLIMATE SCIENCE. There is a loud group of activists who declare the same thing repeatedly without proof, and THOUSANDS of scientists who disagree with them. THAT’S the way it should be – open discussion and debate with proof provided. But those who want to make money by controlling the behavior of others aren’t providing proof, just noise and doctored datasets (whose originals they “decline” to provide for examination when possible – Hansen being one prime example).
You are a true believer, fine. Be a believer. But to believe without proof is FAITH – and I’m not a member of the Environmental Religious Movement. I am, however, a scientist – and I question everything, every day, when I can (I take reliable electric power without questions, every time I turn on a light switch – but one counterexample {power failure} will make me question that, and turn on my generator if I need to).
Go worship with High Priest Al Gore, associate priest James Hansen and friends all you want – but avoid calling it science. It isn’t, and as long as you insist on articles of faith (AGW in general, faulty temperature data treatments to fit the theories, need for immediate sacrifices to satisfy YOUR religious beliefs of sea level rise) then count me out.
James,
sorry but can you first think and then write?
Scientis “believe” something, because it is based on objective evidence, NOT because other scientist believe the same.
Your claim that there is no proof of AGW is total horseshit, so sorry, I dont continue arguing with you.
Alex
Alexander Ac says: “Martin Armstrong is a great guy and a statistician, no doubt ab out that. But he has no clue regarding climate change and global warming,unfortunately.
A “prediction” about global cooling is beyond redicilous in time when we are to “enjoy” global warming speed up.
Why don’t people stick with their expertise? I never understood this.
Where it for natural factors only (Sun, volcanoes, orbital changes, etc. ) we would have a slight cooling. Now we have WARMING.
Here is the latest graph of global temperatures according to NOAA (till july 2015):…”
==============
Alex, it is YOU that has no clue.
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/07/27/mind-blowing-temperature-fraud-at-noaa/
Mind-Blowing Temperature Fraud At NOAA
Posted on July 27, 2015 by stevengoddard
The measured US temperature data from USHCN shows that the US is on a long-term cooling trend. But the reported temperatures from NOAA show a strong warming trend.
The biggest component of this fraud is making up data. Almost half of all reported US temperature data is now fake. They fill in missing rural data with urban data to create the appearance of non-existent US warming.
[img
?zoom=2[/img]
@jamesthewanderer – +1000!
Rise – You forgot to add that NOAA is owned by the Rothschilds so the trickery is bound to happen. Alexander ac just needs to do a little bit of real study to find that he has been lied to all along.
Globull Warming is to set up another fleece the sheep program which Alexander ac will find himself drowning in if he and others don’t wake up.
crickets from Alex
too funny.
The problem with these global warning types is the fall back position is that you are not a scientist so you can’t comment. I may not be a scientist but I have lived in Nova Scotia for 50 years. I talked with many people. Farmers fisherman, people like me. The consensus here is that we are about one month behind in our summer season. But Alex is going to tell us that we can’t have an opinion. Anyways I don’t see it and that is all that matters to me. I’m not paying a carbon tax. I won’t vote for anyone who proposes one and talking to people I know most feel the same way. The scare tactics used the warmers hasn’t worked. Too bad so sad Alex.
Hope people have figured out g warming is a distraction for the little people.-Bill Clinton just gave a “cough” speech in Congo, and N Korea.Same as Hillary in Bengahzi,except she had to cover her tracks.
Glen Beck on his blackboard segment of his show a few years back,did a follow the money of those that profit under “global warming”-Michael Obama,her mother,,Goldman,that I do remember.Maybe still on youtube
Guys,
do you like conspiracies more than an actuall science? Think about that. Steven Goddard is a fucking retard, not scientist.
But apart from global warming being a problem or not, how about COUNTLESS of other fucking examples how humans are FUCKING UP with our collective environment, from overfishing, through deforestation, to soil erozion, to species extermination and air pollution.
How is this consistent with a broader topic of this whole blog, that majority of human race is just clueless greedy corrupted assholite?
Best,
Alex
@Alex, does your trusted science tell you what is going to happen if our magnetic poles change dramatically? They are ALREADY moving, changing our angle to the sun.
Yes, “we” are polluting our environment. What you neglect to realize is that “we” have ALREADY done nearly as much as we can without dramatically changing our lifestyles, including starvation and mass suffering. We already shipped the production to China, so praytell what will MORE taxes and regulations on the very few remaining American, non-exempted mass corporations do for our environment?
Our very water and “health” care is poisoning us at a cellular level and you want millions of Americans to be cold, hungry and sick as hell to feel good about “doing something.”
Science is not God. Man is not God. He cannot control nature, as everytime he thinks he does worse monsters appear to devour us.
Anyway, no matter, once our fiat Ponzi scheme goes tits up, and the rest of the world decides us egotistical, fat, drugged, ‘murkins are not worth the (kinda) food we consume, it ain’t going to matter one way or the other.
Government, corporations and academia have the vast majority convinced that they can control the land, the sea, the air, and the very cells of natures illnesses and parasites.
As billions of dead could attest, they aren’t God, yet for so many, they will die painful drawn out deaths at their hands while praising and worshiping them with their actions and lips.
Good luck with that. And good luck in the upcoming shitstorm, with your ability to seek unbiased “truth,” I get the feeling you will need all the luck and prayers you can get.
You , AGW deniers should go and visit aftermath of this wildfire in California:
best,
Ale
@Alex –
1. Pause in global temperature rise since 1998. Then we have a one year uptick, and its cause for panic?
2. The #1 suspect in the AGW field is Carbon Dioxide. There is little to no link between CO2 and global temperature, except for a 40 (1958-1998) year timespan where they happened to grow side-by-side. Lengthen the chart out and it falls apart pretty damned fast.
3. Fires in CA have been going on for generations. Thats what happens when you move a bunch of morans out into the desert and then they pump all of the moisture out of the soil. CA is naturally rough and scrubby countryside (don’t believe me, go camp in Camp Pendleton, essentially unspoiled old-school Southern CA).
4. Here is my favorite: The temperature guesses for pre-1900 have error bars substantially larger than the supposed increase we are supposedly going through. Seriously, when your data has a +-1˚C, it doesn’t bode well when you say “a rise of 0.1˚C will kill millions”.
5. Antarctica has been piling on ice at an astounding rate. It doesn’t even begin to dip back into the 20 year normal between ’88 and ’08, its substantially higher. Not that that is cause for news, we only have decent ice records of sea ice going back to the late 80s, everything before that is borderline anecdotal.
I guess my point is this: Climate acts on a scale we can scarcely comprehend. There are a lot of overlooked variables, and a lot of cherry picked data to make both sides of the argument come to a head.
We have to know where we came from to know where we are going, and the current politicization of climate science is doing more harm than good. Science can’t even get funded unless its designed from the get-go to push the agenda paying for the study, and any good scientist can design a trial that will 100% net the desired results.
TCD,
3. Fires in CA have been going on for generations. Oh no, t ell me someting I dony know. Holly shit, I KNOW wildfires are fuckingly normal thing in wild wild west!
But if there is RISING trend in the wildfires, you need to explain it. Warming climate and other fucked up behaviour of our all too ignorant Homo sapiens explains it very well.
You are another of countless examples that our species has no future.
Best,
Alex
No, Alex Ac, you need to explain
– how hiding original datasets and only providing “corrected” data is science –
– how hiding the Medieval Warming Period is science –
– how trying to suppress publications in peer-reviewed journals by competing viewpoints is science –
– how ANY data fed into that model produces a “hockey stick” graph is science –
– how refusing to debate is science –
I’m not buying your religious ideas. Try using objective evidence and rational thought instead of FAITH.
“TCD,
”
——————————————————————-
You misspelled 2 out of 3 letters. Off to a great start.
A better man would chalk it up to a simple typo, but I’m not that nice, and I’m pretty sure you’re a fucking retard.
—————————————————————————
3. Fires in CA have been going on for generations. Oh no, t ell me someting I dony know. Holly shit, I KNOW wildfires are fuckingly normal thing in wild wild west!
But if there is RISING trend in the wildfires, you need to explain it. Warming climate and other fucked up behaviour of our all too ignorant Homo sapiens explains it very well.
You are another of countless examples that our species has no future.
Best,
Alex
”
————————————————————–
What I find cute is your connection between California wild fires, and anthropegenic climate change.
Things this connection conveniently ignores:
1. Human prevention of “natural” small scale fires that eat up the dry scrub in small doses. This build up of material resulting in the “end of days” style blazes we are becoming used to seeing.
2. Humans pumping all of the water out of the ground in pretty much the entire damned state. Completely destroying the water supplies in an area noted for its arid conditions. Good call there guys.
3. As population grows the chance that a moran will flick a cigarette butt out into the bush grows substantially.
So, to recap. We have an area well past its natural carrying capacity with people causing rapacious damage to the natural hydrology of the system, while they simultaneously suppress all fires, and bring in more idiots to cause said fires……
holy fuck you’re right, I should buy a Prius. That will save the Californians from their own hubris.
GUYS! HE DID IT! HE SOLVED ALL GLOBAL ISSUES! IF WE ALL JUST SPEND ALL OF OUR MONEY ON PROPPING UP STUPIDITY THERE WON’T BE ANY PROBLEMS LEFT TO SOLVE!
Fucking retard.
Dear TPD,
well, You know, I am NOT denying all the retarded human behaviour that is messing up with natural wildfires and making them worse.
It is YOU who is just denying another stupid and self-defeating behaviour against nature.
Prius will not solve anything. Lets try NO CAR AT ALL. Good start. Will also help the global financial shit we are in and this website is mostly about.
Here, if I say AGW is the left-wing conspiracy against freedom, I would be genius beyond any imagination.
Grow up guys . And move on.
Best,
Alex
Or, alternatively, tell to me, to a fucking retard with PhD in environmental science, this.
Are humans entitled to fuck-up our collective environment beyond recognition without any serious effort to (try to) survive in the long-term and (try to) prevent the irreversible damage?
Thats what you think?
Best,
Alex
You’re a Ph.D. with a degree in Environmental Science? I had no idea!
Perhaps because you dismiss reason, debate and actual data for religious ideology, character attack and “corrected” data. Getting an advanced degree without actually understanding the basics of science is sort of like buying an appearance (painting) instead of an actual building: it may look pretty on your wall, but you can’t live in it. You can’t do anything else with it, especially not anything useful. And no one will gain anything from listening to you spout nonsense dressed up as “environmental science”.
I have no idea where you got your Ph.D. from, but you might want to go back and demand a refund: it didn’t accomplish what you (or they) think it did, and taking money under false pretenses is fraud. I’m sure your alma mater will be embarrassed for you and negotiate a settlement, rather than go to court and prove you didn’t learn anything in 4-7 years of study. At least, nothing about basic science: you’ve proven that here already.
Here’s a clue: when you use a mercury-filled glass thermometer in a laboratory, it might pass through a rubber stopper on a three-necked glass flask. Inside the flask is a reaction mixture at a given temperature, say about 150 C; outside is the laboratory, usually around 25 C. In order to get the actual temperature inside the flask, you apply a “stem correction factor”; that is, a correction for the fact that the mercury in the stem is seeing a colder temperature than the inside of the flask, radiates heat to the laboratory, and shrinks slightly. This is a known fact, determinable by experiment, and repeatable for a given thermometer. “Correcting” the temperature reading of the thermometer is reasonable, expected and valid, appears in older literature all the time (back when they used mercury thermometers ordinarily; nowadays, broken mercury thermometers call for a HAZMAT team response, so most labs have phased them out for thermocouples and infrared devices). The point here is I can tell you why, how and how much correction is applied to a given thermometer, and for what reason.
Can you tell me why the AGW crowd corrects a given dataset? By how much? From what original reading? I doubt it, because THEY DON’T PUBLISH THAT INFORMATION. They hide the original data sets when they can, give no justification why they “correct” a given reading by a given amount, or how they can justify correcting it at all! Did your Ph.D. in Environmental Science tell you how to determine how much to “correct” a data point in Greenland versus one in Siberia and why? How much do you “correct” a temperature reading in Greenland versus one taken in the tropics, and why? Does it matter if the reading is taken in the ocean or on land? How do you calculate a “global average temperature”, and WHAT DOES IT MEAN when you do so?
You may have an advanced degree, but you are incredibly gullible and credulous: you buy predictions from models that are unverifiable, datasets provided without authentication of methods and prescriptions for solutions for indeterminable problems. You have my sympathy, but not my agreement.
“Or, alternatively, tell to me, to a fucking retard with PhD in environmental science, this.
Are humans entitled to fuck-up our collective environment beyond recognition without any serious effort to (try to) survive in the long-term and (try to) prevent the irreversible damage?
Thats what you think?
Best,
Alex”
Guys. This special snowflake is special. I think I hurt his fee-fees.
Because you’re new, I’ll give you the rundown.
1. I’ve a MS-Chemistry. I run a lab that covers multiple types of analyses, internal/external customers, and do a helluvalot more for my company aside from that.
2. My dad specialized in environmental law, and did a lot of work in California.
3. Due to my own education, and my father’s affiliation, you can imagine that we have quite a bit of discussion about these various topics, never mind the huge number of his personal friends who also fall under the category of “PhD”. All of this has influenced my stance. For the record, most of his friends and himself are firmly in my camp with regard to this matter.
I work for a living fuckwad, I can’t afford to base decisions off what the popular theories are, because if I did that my company would make much less money. So, I read primary research articles, and pull the data myself. Things that I guarantee you haven’t done since you did your dissertation (coincidentally, the last time you had an original thought.)
I believed in global warming in 1998. Then the great pause happened. Then theory after theory (or hypothesis, if you are pedantic and/or autistic) got put forward trying to find the “missing” heat. Rather than making the assumption that their models were flawed, they actually spent all of their time creating models that fit the narrative. Deplorable.
15 years later, the same thing was going on, except now people preach it as gospel, and anyone who doesn’t believe is a creationist nutjob.
The Global Warming narrative as it currently stands is indefensible. The data shows differently, the research is flawed, and the proponents on both sides are bought and paid for talking heads with zero credibility.
Actual picture of Alex defending his thesis:
[img
[/img]
EDIT:
Please note, the helmet was borrowed. The fucking retard is literally too stupid to keep track of his own helmet.
10000000+
TPC
Fucking Awesome!
Alex ac
You say “No Cars At All”, what if we all drove cars and trucks that only had water vapor as the emission? Could that make a GW fuknut like you want to go on living?
@Bea – “You say “No Cars At All”, what if we all drove cars and trucks that only had water vapor as the emission? Could that make a GW fuknut like you want to go on living?”
Go on living? Shit, you already got both inches of his clit rock hard.
Alex ac- If you should come back into this thread I would like for you to take a look at these two cars:
Toyota Marai
Hyundai Tucson
Both are available for purchase in limited areas right now, both are hydrogen fuel cell powered and run on H2. Both have only water vapor emissions.
Dear Bea Lever,
hydrogenis OK, but its not an energy source, just an energy carrier. You have to produce somehow and THAT bring emissions, depending on the way how you produce it.
Elecrit car are better than hydrogen powered, but they are still a tiny fraction of conventional cars (cca 0.075 %).
Dear TPC, thank explaining me that humans ARE entitled to destroy biosphere without actually to give a shit about it.
Best,
Alex
Alex
You’re a big stinky douche with your passive aggressive grade seven girls school debating style. You are all butt hurt because TPC can go toe to toe with you in debate so you come back with that. Fuck man I am picturing you right now sitting in corner of the room holding your breath. Pathetic.
Anyways I’m back to destroying the biosphere I have to be paying my bills. I will say I love this planet as much as you claim to.
You sir can stop holding your breath it’s okay. And if you come back to thread how about addressing what TPC said. You ended your last statement with a big shit. Literally. Certainly not, I hope, the debating style of someone who supposedly has a PHD.
Yo! SSS!!!
Alexander The Great Douchebag just SHATTERED your thumbs down record!!!! 144 downs, and three measly ups!
When you get back you better quick post something about how great the CIA is.
Alexander Ac (a cocksucker?), you are a complete fraud. Fuckoff and die.
“hydrogenis OK, but its not an energy source, just an energy carrier. You have to produce somehow and THAT bring emissions, depending on the way how you produce it.”
I don’t think you understand how manufacturing works. Those batteries? They require a shit ton of very, very non-green chemicals and metals to make happen. See, they make look prettier on the road in America, but whoever is stuck making those batteries gets toxic rivers and higher cancer rates.
Energy always comes at a cost.
People want to cut all emissions to zero and completely destroy manufacturing all to prevent CARBON DIOXIDE……perhaps the SAFEST of the fucking gases we can output…..from “polluting” our atmosphere.
We wouldn’t have these problems if high schoolers actually got taught useful things instead of how to hold hands and sing kumbaya.
“Dear TPC, thank explaining me that humans ARE entitled to destroy biosphere without actually to give a shit about it.”
You come in here claiming some moral high ground, AND a PhD in a relevant field, and yet sport zero technical writing skills, absolutely no ability to defend your position, and a complete lack of supported facts.
You are so ignorant of the subject matter that at this point I’m beating a dead horse. A better man would exit the conversation….but, well we’ve covered this up above. Even you should be able to find the post.
I’m not that nice.
[/img]
[img
You fucking retard.
Alex ac
Unless you only eat raw food , walk or use non-motorized bicycle to get everywhere, live off the power grid in your home with solar etc , and make vast majority of what you need by hand……you are a fraud. I’m betting you drive a 11MPG SUV and use coal powered electric to cook the shit out of your food. Preach it Alex, nobody here is buying it.
Al Gore and Alex, two fukwits of the first order jerking each other off.
Dear Bea,
sure, I have SUV , because studying environmental science in Slovakia is lucrative and guarantees that you can buy one 🙂
and I also have a private jet, since Al Gore is my good friend :))
So to answer without irony – I have no car, and no house, I am renting since I dont want mortgage. See? I take Burning Platform seriously. No debt, no problem 🙂
Best,
Alex
Wow
Crickets for what TPC has to say but you just couldn’t help yourself with another drive by shooting.
Alex you continue to astound me with your intellect. You must find it hard to breathe with your head stuck in your arse.
Best
Rob