The Coming Revaluation of Gold

Guest Post by Hugo Salinas Price

The current melt-down of the world’s debt bubble is likely to continue in the course of the next months. The secular trend to expansion of credit has morphed into contraction and liquidation. It is my opinion that the new trend is now established and no action by any of the Central Banks (CB) that issue reserve currencies will do anything at all to reverse that trend.

Sandeep Jaitly thinks that the desperate reserve-issuing CBs – the US Fed, the ECB, the Bank of England and the Japanese CB – may resort to programs of QEP, by which he means “Quantitative Easing for the People”. This quantitative easing will mean putting money into the hands of the populations by rebates on taxes, invented make-work schemes or any other excuse to furnish the people with the famous “helicopter money”, to get them to spend.

As the present crisis deepens and given our experience with the way our so-called “economists” think, we can reasonably expect such programs to be launched. Nevertheless, the present trend of world economic contraction will not be reversed by any ad hoc program. The world’s expectations – positive for growth since WW II – have turned negative. This is an event of such magnitude that no “QE” will have any effect upon the final outcome: debt collapse.

The growing fear in the world’s markets arises from the recognition on the part of indebted corporations and individuals that their debt burdens are increasing due to devaluations of their national currencies. International investors are attempting to reduce their exposure. “Hot money”, invested in countries which offered higher interest rates, now wants to go home. In recent years of bonanza, foreigners borrowed some $11 trillion dollars, in various Reserve Currencies, to invest in their own countries. Of this total, it is calculated that about $7 trillion of those dollars are denominated in dollars. The debtors are now attempting to pay-off their dollar loans, and this has the effect of lowering the value of their own currencies with respect to the US Dollar, thus aggravating the situation. There is a loss of confidence in national currencies, producing Capital flight to the rising Dollar, because the countries that issue those currencies are no longer able to maintain export surpluses against the reserve-issuing countries, and are thus unable to increase reserves and are actually losing these reserves. The export-surpluses are disappearing in the “rest of the world” because the reserve-currency countries, plus China, are in an economic slump (essentially attributable to excessive debt) and are reducing their consumption of imports, thus reducing the exports of the export-surplus countries.

The loss of Reserves on the part of the countries which depend on export-surpluses for economic health makes the accumulated debt burden in the world increasingly unsustainable; investors around the world are worried that some of their assets (which are actually debt instruments, that is to say various sorts of promises to pay) may turn out to be duds, and they are trying to find ways to protect themselves – and Devil take the hindmost!

Whatever expedients are implemented, the final outcome of the unprecedented economic contraction in the world will have to be the revaluation of gold reserves, as desperate governments of the world resort to gold to preserve indispensable international trade. The revaluation of gold reserves held by Central Banks will be the only alternative for countries seeking to retain a minimum of international trade to supply their economies, whether they are based on agriculture, on manufacturing or on mining.

The amount of gold held by any particular country will not be the important factor in maintaining operating economies, because even a small amount of gold will be sufficient for that purpose; the reason being, that gold coming into newly rediscovered importance, no country will be able to maintain either trade surpluses or trade deficits. The first case would imply that other countries are sending their precious gold to the surplus export countries, but the scarcity of gold and its vital importance will not permit other countries to lose their gold to the (would-be) surplus-producing countries. In the second case, the trade-deficit countries would immediately correct their activity by devaluing their currencies ipso facto, rather than continue to lose their precious gold to cover their trade-deficits: devaluation would put an immediate stop to the excess of imports over exports. Governments resorting to credit-creation to fund their deficits would find themselves limited to balanced budgets; otherwise, their budget deficits funded by credit-creation would spill over into excessive imports and the consequent necessity for immediate devaluation of their currency.

Only gold-producing countries will be able to run trade deficits, limited to the amount of gold they produce to pay for such deficits.

Thus, the revaluation of gold will have the beneficent effect of restoring the world to a healthy condition, lost a century ago, of balanced trade and balanced national budgets.

The discipline of gold as Reserves backing currency at a revalued price will restore order to a world that has refused to adopt the necessary discipline until forced to do so in the desperate situation now evolving, where there will be no other alternative but to accept the detested fiscal and financial discipline imposed by gold.

We do not know the true amount of gold held by the world’s central banks, because it is a closely held secret. However, we need not know that figure. Whatever gold there is in CB vaults will be sufficient, for the reasons we have given.

Nor do we know at what price, in dollars, the price will be set, or how it will be set. However, given the truly astronomic amounts of debt in existence, a very high price will be necessary to “liquefy” i.e. make payable remaining debt, whatever the amount remaining after the purge which is now in process. The very high price of gold will mean that all debt instruments will be subject to large losses in terms of gold value. The revaluation of gold will reduce the weight of the present debt overhang upon the world.

The revaluation of gold does not mean that prices of goods and services will rise in tandem with the higher price of gold. Established prices will by and large remain the same prices that existed before the revaluation. However, prices will have to re-adjust to reflect the new economic realities. Many goods that we have taken for granted will disappear, as their artificial cheapness vanishes.

Another characteristic of a world that has begun to trade with gold-backed currencies as money, will be that one-way flows of gold from one region to another, or from groups of countries to a single country, will be impossible; such a flow would become a permanent drain on gold for some region or some country, and a permanent increase in gold for some region or some country. Eventually the gold would tend to pile up in some region or country, leaving the rest of the world with a lack of gold.

The oil-producing countries will have to adjust the gold price of their oil exports to balance with the gold price of their imports, plus the gold value of their investments abroad.

For a visual appreciation of the coming conditions, we have provided a few graphs. The first column illustrates the present condition, with present CB Reserves at $11.025 Trillion dollars, plus an estimate of CB Reserves of 31,110 tons of gold at $1,100 Dollars an ounce (according to an authoritative calculation of 183.000 tons of gold in existence at present, of which 17% are calculated to be held as Reserves by Central Banks around the world). The second column presents the present CB Dollar Reserves, below CB reserve gold revalued at $22,000 Dollars an ounce. The third column presents the present CB Dollar Reserves, below 50,000 tons of reserve gold revalued at $50,000 Dollars an ounce. We use the larger figure for CB gold, because some analysts think that China, and also Russia, have far larger gold reserves than they disclose publicly.

Why do we use $22,000 and $50,000 Dollars an ounce? Because other thinkers have estimated a necessary revaluation of gold, with various figures between a low price of $10,000 Dollars and ounce and a high price of $50,000 Dollars an ounce. So we arbitrarily selected $22,000 Dollars an ounce and $50,000 Dollars an ounce. Take your pick. The price and the quantity of gold in Central Bank vaults are really immaterial; the facts will be known eventually, and the result will be what we have pointed out above: the restoration of balanced trade and balanced budgets in our present highly disorderly world.

Once the world’s currencies are “gold-backed”, then the gold held by individuals, trusts or corporations will cease to lie lifeless in stocks of gold. All gold will have become money and will spring to life in furthering economic activity: the revaluation of gold by Central Banks will also revalue, simultaneously, the 151,890 tons of gold which are thought to be in private hands at present – 183,000 tons total, minus 31,110 tons held by Central Banks = 151,890 tons in private hands.

For China, the revaluation of gold means an end to the great export trade of Chinese manufactures, with the consequent inevitable, and surely very wrenching re-ordering of its economy. Perhaps this explains why the Chinese government has been urging the population of China to purchase gold.

China, which is rumored to have far more gold in its Reserves than it says it does, might have the opportunity to lend say, 50 tons of the yellow metal to each of 50 hard-hit countries, for a total of an insignificant 2,500 tons out of its large stash. In return, the recipient countries would place Chinese on the Boards of their Central Banks and as supervisors in their National Treasuries; in addition, China might obtain privileges to invest in the extraction of scarce natural resources or in agriculture – China has a huge population that will require establishing sources of food. Nothing comes without a price, and “he who has the gold makes the rules”. The Chinese are well-known as consummate merchants and as people who know how to live unobtrusively in foreign countries. China’s influence may extend around the world, with the world’s return to gold-backed currencies.

For the US, the revaluation of gold means an end to its ability to obtain any goods it desires, in any quantity, in any place, at any price by simply tendering today’s mighty fiat Dollar in mock-payment, in exchange for those goods. The US economy will have to suffer a huge and also painful, wrenching adjustment to its new situation in a different world, where balanced trade and balanced budgets are relentlessly imposed by the new status of gold as international money. On the positive side, US manufacturing will immediately spring to life to supply the US market; employment and incomes will surge with the rebirth of US manufactures.

Once all currencies are “gold-backed” by revalued gold reserves, then gold is once again the international money, and the Dollar becomes nothing more than the national currency of the US, as quantities of gold become the international means of settling trade. We need not worry ourselves about how this will take place, because that it will happen is a certainty. All prices of goods and services around the world will really be gold prices, since all currencies will be redeemable at sight, in gold.

Such is the significance of the coming revaluation of gold.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
28 Comments
Fiatman60
Fiatman60
February 3, 2016 1:59 pm

Good “pie in the sky” article. – Not going to happen……

Until after WW3 and trillions lie in ruin……..

Thaisleeze
Thaisleeze
February 3, 2016 3:09 pm

Even as a lifelong goldbug I have to reluctantly agree with you Fiatman

SpecOpsAlpha
SpecOpsAlpha
February 3, 2016 3:35 pm

Control freaks can’t stand the thought of a monetary system that is outside their control. They’d rather just become dictators.

jamesthewanderer
jamesthewanderer
February 3, 2016 3:50 pm

Fiatman60, so you agree with Hugo Salinas Price?

“Upon Caesar’s bringing forth a law for the division of the lands in Campania amongst his soldiers, many in the Senate opposed it; amongst the rest, Lucius Gellius, one of the eldest in the house, said it should never pass whilst he lived. “Let us postpone it,” said Cicero, “Gellius does not ask us to wait long”.

Specie
Specie
February 3, 2016 4:00 pm

I’m sure Hugo is a lot smarter than me but i don’t know about $20,000/oz

but i think gold has bottomed.

gold bear markets average -45%

this one has been -44%

gold bull markets average +400%

that gets it to $4,184

sounds reasonable to me

kokoda
kokoda
February 3, 2016 4:01 pm

Whatever happens…..you can be sure the gov’t will take measures against the people that hold gold. I don’t know why people can’t see this coming. Gov’t will do anything to ensure the operation continues in their favor and the citizens will bear the financial suffering.

bb
bb
February 3, 2016 4:39 pm

Well this was the article over at Silver Doctors I read a few days ago . I thought if Hugo Salinas is only half right I’ll come out ok.I bought a few more pieces of gold that day .With tax they were a little over 1200 dollars per gold eagle.

card802
card802
February 3, 2016 4:50 pm

I can imagine if a country had $200 Trillion in debt obligations it might come down to two choices, default on the debt, or inflate it away.

$20k an ounce would be some real good inflation eh?

My ice cream cones will be $250 each please, or some gold.

Anonymous
Anonymous
February 3, 2016 5:05 pm

An ounce of gold always weighs an ounce.

Other things may become worth more gold or less gold as times change but the ounce of gold is still steady at weighing an ounce, it never weight more and it never weighs less.

Credit
Credit
February 3, 2016 5:41 pm

they’d better revalue it – it’s not worth half a damn right now.

javelin
javelin
February 3, 2016 5:56 pm

bb said,”Well this was the article over at Silver Doctors I read a few days ago . I thought if Hugo Salinas is only half right I’ll come out ok.I bought a few more pieces of gold that day .With tax they were a little over 1200 dollars per gold eagle.”

Agreed, I’m not a huge player in PM’s but do have a bit for diversification. Last week Apmex ran a straight up $1486 for a 100 oz Ag bar–free shipping included..couldn’t pass up nabbing a few even though the larger bars are not as liquid or tradeable. I’ve almost covered the spot overhead in just the past week’s surge.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
February 3, 2016 6:02 pm

Gold has been on a tear recently. Up $13 currently. Still, it’s hard to say no at these prices.

rhs jr
rhs jr
February 3, 2016 6:11 pm

The Pig Slop Theory says that when slop runs to one end of the trough, all the pigs run squealing to that end. When something like gold starts up, it’s like slop to the NYC Pigs who will run squealing with billions of crooked counterfeit money to buy it all and send the price to the stars. Smart Goy like to anticipate what commodity the Pig Exploiters (they call themselves Investors) are going to wreck next.

On Point
On Point
February 3, 2016 6:20 pm

Gold and silver is money and has been since the dawn of time. Fiat always fails. I know some look at the metals as more of an “asset preservation” vehicle as opposed to obtaining significant financial “returns”, and I agree. However, given the current, and erroneously deflated pricing due to the current manipulation in the paper markets, as well as the inevitable forthcoming parabolic spike in physical metals when the U.S. Petro-dollar crashes, I believe there will be very significant returns in gold and even more in silver; beyond mere asset preservation.

For those who are Christians, the Book of Revelation speaks to seven churches which previously existed. Some experts believe it also expands to the different churches that have existed throughout all of history. If that is the case, the Church in Laodicea is the final and could represent the wealthy churches currently existing in the Northern Hemisphere today who care not about Planned Parenthood’s selling of baby bits or even the Islamic invasion within their own nations.

Revelation 3:15-18 says:

“I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other! So, because you are lukewarm—neither hot nor cold—I am about to spit you out of my mouth. You say, ‘I am rich; I have acquired wealth and do not need a thing.’ But you do not realize that you are wretched, pitiful, poor, blind and naked. I counsel you to buy from me gold refined in the fire, so you can become rich; and white clothes to wear, so you can cover your shameful nakedness; and salve to put on your eyes, so you can see.”

Some spiritualize this advice from the God of Abraham, Isaac & Jacob who says to buy “gold refined in the fire” as merely trusting in His Word . Others believe this verse should be interpreted literally.

Why not be safe in any case? Buy some physical gold and silver as an insurance policy. Hold on to it and be patient. You might see and be glad one day very soon.

Archie
Archie
February 3, 2016 6:39 pm

I have been reading about the so-called reevaluation of gold for many years now, notably on FOFOA’s blog. It doesn’t mean it will not happen. I think it will. But I have been waiting. And, think of what turmoil it will bring.

Incidentally, FOFOA argues that gold will be revalued in isolation, from up on high, so that a loaf of bread will not cost 40 dollars or whatever, though this is indeed possible for a time. The price of gold will be hiked to whatever amount so as to balance the bloated balance sheets of worldwide governments. It could be $20,000 or $200,000 an ounce. It wouldn’t matter to industry since gold is virtually useless.

The only reservation I have about FOFOA, as brilliant as he is, is the political, even eschatological angle, element. Logic loses at this point and all is possible.

Credit
Credit
February 3, 2016 6:57 pm

elemental metals, from an earth mine or a nearby asteroid, have intrinsic value.

On Point
On Point
February 3, 2016 7:21 pm

History, and current events, both prove you wrong Archie. Take an ounce of gold to Argentina, Venezuela, Japan, Zimbabwe, America or any nation on earth and you will eat well for some time in hospitable dwellings. Gold & Silver have an intrinsic, worldwide value that defies the lie of paper money. Physical gold and silver coins are also portable concealable and very accessible. This makes them the opposite of useless.

Archie
Archie
February 3, 2016 7:49 pm

On point, read for comprehension. I mentioned that gold is useless in the context of industrial use, so that if the price is revalued much much higher it would not affect our lives. Unlike oil, or silver, or copper, any one of which, if the price went to the moon, it would be catastrophic.

The readership here is getting dumber and dumber.

On Point
On Point
February 3, 2016 8:41 pm

No offense Archie, but you’re fucking imbecilic stupidity makes me puke in my mouth a little. Keep posting here here, and given the number of hits on this website each month, I think I will sell my metals and invest in Scope mouthwash.

http://www.usfunds.com/slideshows/the-many-uses-of-gold/

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
February 4, 2016 3:54 am

If gold is to become money again then revaluations in the $22k-$50k range are possible due the extreme levels of debt that exist. However, I think that much of the debt will simply be discharged or written off meaning revaluations significantly less that the $22k number.

If my math is right and the official US gold holdings are correct, US gold is only worth less that $300 billion dollars. That’s official US govt holdings. The physical gold held by citizens is a fraction of that and would only account for a few hours or maybe a day of govt spending. (current cost of govt is about $10billion per day) Despite revaluation, any confiscation of gold in the US would be purely punitive and the costs of rounding it up, processing into good delivery bars, transporting, storage, etc would negate any gain. I’m not saying confiscation won’t happen but it’s rather unrealistic from an economic standpoint.

The govt could also make it illegal to sell gold for dollars or certain other transactions while still allowing ownership.

Still, keeping your ear to the ground and trying to convert some portion of your holdings to real estate before any confiscation would likely be a good idea. Real estate will soon be much cheaper than it is today.

If they insist on confiscation I suggest cutting it up into 1/4″ sized chunks and delivering it to them via 12 gauge shotgun.

SpecOpsAlpha
SpecOpsAlpha
February 4, 2016 5:34 am

Hmmm…trust gold or trust Hillary Clinton and those like her…

Bob
Bob
February 4, 2016 2:01 pm

History so far has been that gold winds up being priced in terms of the current accepted currency — coin, fiat, whatever. The disruption the author contemplates would probably include the end of the dollar as we know it, replaced by some other new accepted currency. So the $22,00 — $50,000 discussion seems meaningless.

Archie make an excellent point. People who own gold can watch the world turn, relatively unaffected day-to-day by the fluctuating price of gold. How likely is it that those who now own gold will end up owning and/or running any good-sized piece of the world, based on their gold holdings alone? As I see it, the probability of that outcome hovers microscopically right above 0%

Archie
Archie
February 4, 2016 6:11 pm

On point, it’s difficult to wade past the shitstain of a post you made yesterday without commenting. So here I try again. And I will write very simply, slowly, so even retards like yourself can get it.

Look at the yearly output of gold mines. Do you know how much of it is used in industry? A paltry ~12%. Can you think of another commodity where this obtains? Bueller? The rest ends up primarily as jewelry and investment coins and bars. And here’s the point dickface–this last bit is not used. It is hoarded. Not used for industry. Not used, as in not useful, fucko. Your comic book link on the industrial uses of gold is irrelevant to my point. Since the quantity consumed in each dental operation or whatever is so small, a substantial hike in price would not effect anything, let alone our modern world. Do you think a similar spike in oil would? Or lumber? Starting to get the picture?

Now, here’s the larger point. Paying attention? Think of all the above ground gold accumulated over the last several decades. It is sitting in vaults, under floorboards, and hanging around necks all over the world. It is not being used as in it is useless, except as an ornament or investment vehicle. Now, lastly, can you think of a stockpile in the commodities market that mirrors the above? No because they are consumed, used, as in they are useful to industry, and life in general. Do you see my point now you blithering buffoon?

Fuck off now.

Unfortunate
Unfortunate
February 4, 2016 7:47 pm

Arch-idiot, it seems to me that if you choose to not buy, and hold, gold because of its perceived lack of value (in your evaluation) in the manufacturing sector, then maybe consider silver? Or, keep investing in mutual funds, stocks, bonds and other dollar backed investments and see what happens.

If you were my financial advisor, I would tell you: “You’re fuckin’ fired!”. Good luck in the future, douchbag.

Archie
Archie
February 4, 2016 7:58 pm

Un-derwear, undone, underdone, unpleasant, undressed, unmasked, do fuck yourself. Your troll routine is getting stale. Besides, you have not digested one word of my posts here. Nor anywhere else for that matter. Not surprising.

Please fuck off to tel aviv and tell your boss cass sunstein to buck up. What ever happened to sticks and stones will break my bones but words will not hurt me? My god you are a pansy.

Unfortunate
Unfortunate
February 4, 2016 8:00 pm

Also, stockpiles “in the commodities market” won’t matter if its based upon the petro dollar. If you don’t have it in your possession, it’s not yours and never was. Better to possess precious metals and own land (especially farmland), then to own shares in paper commodities that financial experts consider to be “useful in industry”. Times are different. My opinion.

Unfortunate
Unfortunate
February 4, 2016 8:01 pm

What’s your last name Archie, you brave soul, you…

Unfortunate
Unfortunate
February 4, 2016 8:11 pm

It’s about ideas here over identity. Anything else you want me to explain to you? You whose moniker derives from a comic book, but with comments more laughable?