This is a good one to share with your friends and family that are not paying attention. Pablum for us, an eye opener for them.
Via The Rebel
If you’ve been following this election at all, you have probably heard the wordsv”globalist” and “globalism” thrown around a lot. Some of the people using it are nationalists, or patriots. They see globalism as a threat to the sovereignty of their nation. Whichever nation that happens to be.
Others argue that the term “globalism” is just a scary catch-all word invented by Trump supporters, or the alt right. A word that means nothing at best, and is a racist code at worst.
The reality is that globalism means something very specific, and very dangerous, if you value democracy, individualism, or any of the values of Western civilization.
Yes, well. The murder of third world rebels supervised by the
United Nations is evident in many areas of the world. Hey, the
corporations want to do “business” there and no pesky aboriginals
will be standing in their way. World feudalism is the goal.
Thirty families and their 6K minions…I believe that is Globalism.
I first studied who “globalist” were in the early 70’s. That was right about the time the globalists started bringing Agenda 21 to the operational stage. Globalist have been inflicting damnation on the people of this planet for a very long time. Why act as though this is a new term?
A globalist is a westerner who believes any random person in the third world has a right to the wealth of people in the developed world. Obama for example. I used “third world” rather than the PC “developing world” because much of the third world doesn’t seem to be developing at all and probably never will. So far at least, it seems that only westerners can be globalists because only westerners are afflicted with white guilt (or, if they’re non-white, hatred of whites) for having invented 95% of the good stuff in the world and spread a common language and rule of law throughout the world. A chinaman is not a true globalist, because if China’s per capita wealth were to skyrocket and the per capita wealth of westerners were to plummet, the chinaman would never have any compulsion to spread Chinese wealth around among the poor westerners. Globalism only works one way, you see. Jews tend to be globalists because they prefer heterogenous societies so that they can blend in amongst the white people.
It’s quite obvious what the term “globalist” means, you moroons. It means anyone that doesn’t believe in the ‘flat earth theory’. Sheeeh! Do I have to explain everything?
At what point does cooperation become integration? When does integration become assimilation? When does discernment become prejudice? Who decides?
[img
[/img]
Looks like the gal in the video has a nice rack.
Same here.
Mario Vargas Llosa described nationalists as a backwards fascist effort to close borders and prevent foreigners from contaminating their culture. He says that nationalism is anti-freedom. Undocumented brings up a good question because it points to the pressure from without to conform. Rules and practices become traditions and traditions become a culture. But adherence to outside rules demanded by a culture lead to taboos, Sharia law, you can’t do things that are new, things never done before.
The early nationalist, Cain who cut out a field to plant crops, founded cities to counter the freedom of movement preferred by the globalist Abel, declaring that he would be avenged sevenfold if he were offended by the strange traditions of a foreigner like Abel who did not like farming and raised sheep instead.
Mario says that the history of the West is unified, there is no continental history apart from the new world. There are those that want to roll back time and separate the history of Indians, the natives of the Americas and the history of the Europeans. He says this is false.
Billy mentioned magic soil a few days ago and the idea planted in my brain was something akin to Lincoln’s address, he said the ground has been consecrated by the blood spilled by both Northerners and Southerners. The land once belonged to the Indians alone. The Europeans paid for their share with their blood.
Like the Eupropeans of old, immigrants in this day and age still die crossing the desert to buy a portion of the American dream for their progeny.
Without the shedding of blood, said the Great Spirit, there is no remission of sins.
Lots of fancy words, there, EC. Paul Ryan is on board with open borders, but as Milton Friedman said, you can have open borders or a wefare state, but not both. I might agree with your laissez-faire open borders Utopia, but only after we get rid of: public schools, SNAP, Obamacare, EMTALA, Section 8, SSDI, TANF, etc.
Very slick, Iska- trying to call me an open borders advocate. The question was about globalism, not immigration. Globalism, again from Llosa, is the cultural conquest of the entire world by the USA. We have exported our rap music, fast food chains, big box stores, sexual depravity and obsession with money. One of the tests we impose on a convert nation is the acceptance of gay marriage – where did that come from?
Mario didn’t apologize for the genocide perpetrated on the Indians, he glossed over it by saying that regardless of how we got here, we are here. He said that nationalism, a desire to revert to the past, leads to fascism and government control of the people.
He claims that the paradox of cultural assimilation of other cultures leads to a reaffirmation of that culture which becomes a sort of island in the stream. Whatever.
Anyway, he said there can never be a static culture, it is always transforming. When you try to freeze the culture, keep the USA in the 50’s, the people will rebel. They did that in the sexual revolution of the 60’s.
Old Stuck tried to define American culture once, he was flummoxed by the very nature of America’s kaleidoscopic transformations. That will keep happening to all of us as we stare agape and wide eyed like Hillary at all the new things happening in America.
Don’t think you would really be in favor of being a so called global citizen in a world that was “one”. One world that is, where you have no more rights than some native sitting on a African plain with absolutely no control over your life or future and living in a third world shithole. Guard the Constitution with your life, once lost it cannot be reclaimed. Open borders is code for the NWO and there is nothing connected with that but misery for you and your family.
Don’t care what she has to say-I’m just curious to see what’s under the dress. Those sweater monkeys look like they must be immense to require that weird suspension thing around her neck.