Julian Assange: “Hillary Made The FBI Look Weak, And Now They’re Out For Payback”
by Tyler Durden
Nov 5, 2016 9:22 AM
In an extended, 25 minute interview with Australia’s John Pilger, posted now in its entirety on RT, Julian Assange said Hillary Clinton sparked an FBI backlash, which is now surfacing, when she stonewalled the Feds, who were trying to investigate her private server.
When asked by John Pilger about the significance of the FBI’s intervention in this last week of the US election campaign in the case against Hillary Clinton, Assange responds that “If you go to the history of the FBI, it has become effectively America’s political police. And the FBI demonstrated with taking down the former head of the CIA over classified information given to his mistress [that] almost no one was untouchable. The FBI is always trying to demonstrate that, “No one can resist us.” But Hillary Clinton very conspicuously resisted the FBI’s investigation. So, there is anger within the FBI because it made the FBI look weak.”
FBI director Comey threw the presidential race, which had threatened to become a Clinton procession last week, into chaos when he claimed that the agency had potentially obtained new information pertaining to Clinton’s use of a personal email server, set up shortly after she became Secretary of State in 2009, when they obtained the laptop of Anthony Weiner, the ex-husband of close Clinton aide Huma Abedin. Weiner was being investigated for an unrelated sexting offense.
Clinton has categorically denied mishandling classified information by using a vulnerable personal email address for State Department business. Fox News has alleged that the FBI has obtained new evidence from Weiner’s computer that shows that Clinton was “very likely hacked.”
When discussing the hacked Hillary emails, Assange, whose WikiLeaks website has over the last ten months released three sizable batches of emails, relating to Clinton herself, the Democratic National Committee, and her campaign manager John Podesta, said the FBI has cause to investigate Clinton. “There’s a thread that runs through all of these emails. There is quite a lot of “pay-to-play,” as they call it – taking… giving access in exchange for money for many individual states, individuals and corporations. Combined with the cover-up of Hillary Clinton’s emails while she was Secretary of State this has led to an environment where the pressure on the FBI [to investigate] increases,” Assange said.
Regardless of whether Clinton ever faces charges, Assange asserted that Clinton was beholden to corporate and political entities that have been hidden from the electorate during the race to the White House.
“She’s this centralizing cog, so that you’ve got a lot of different gears in operation from the big banks like Goldman Sachs, and major elements of Wall Street, and intelligence, and people in the State Department, and the Saudis, and so on. She’s is the, if you like, the centralizer that interconnects all these different cogs. She’s smooth central representation of all that, and all that is more or less what is in power now in the United States,” stated Assange, who said that the leaked emails presented a clear picture of this nexus of influences.
Assange also insisted that despite his image, projecting hope and change, President Barack Obama became “very close to banking interests” during his own initial White House campaign in 2008. “In fact, one of the most significant Podesta emails that we released was about how the Obama cabinet was formed – and half the [first] Obama cabinet was basically nominated by a representative from Citibank. It is quite amazing,” Assange said.
Assange also stated that as a result of too many vested “establishment interests”, Trump won’t be allowed to win.
Libya Is Hillary Clinton’s War
According to Assange, Clinton’s emails reveal a plan, hatched months before the West’s intervention in Libya in March 2011, to make it the signature conflict of her tenure as secretary of state, and a podium from which to realize her presidential dreams.
“Libya more than anyone else’s war was Hillary Clinton’s war. Barack Obama initially opposed it. Who was the person who was championing it? Hillary Clinton. That’s documented throughout her emails,” Assange said.
“There’s more than 1,700 emails out of the 33,000 of Hillary Clinton’s emails we published just about Libya. It’s not about that Libya has cheap oil. She perceived the removal of Gaddafi and the overthrow of the Libyan state something that she would use to run in the general election for president. So late 2011, there’s an internal document called the “Libya Tick Tock” that is produced for Hillary Clinton, and it’s all the… it’s a chronological description of how Hillary Clinton was the central figure in the destruction of the Libyan state.”
But the scheme not only failed on a personal level, after Clinton was largely blamed for allowing a jihadist ransacking of a US compound in Benghazi in 2012, but also continues to haunt the country, which remains in a state of civil war, and Europe.
“As a result, there [have been] around 40,000 deaths within Libya. Jihadists moved in, ISIS moved in. That led to the European refugee and migrant crisis, because not only did you have people fleeing Libya, people then fleeing Syria, destabilization of other African countries as a result of arms flows,” said Assange.
Should Hillary win on Tuesday, and should the neo-cons in Washington finally get their day in the sun with the “pacifist” Obama gone, as the WaPo recently reported, we – and many others – expect more “Hillary wars” in America’s future.
Anonymous
November 5, 2016 11:53 am
All Assange actually does is confirm what most of us already know or suspect but can’t prove.
I imagine those among the ignorant are those deliberately so and doubt his leaks and revelations will change many of them.
Old Guy
November 5, 2016 1:20 pm
Should be required viewing for all Americans who wish to cast a vote in the Presidential election.
I will qualify what I’m about to say by noting that I am not an elitist and in fact was a “working stiff”my entire life. Unfortunately in America, the vote of an individual with an IQ of 70 negates the vote of an individual with an IQ of 120. However I do take strong exception to Mr. Assange’s portrayal of Trump supporters as white trash as I am a Trump supporter and feel I rate a label no less than that of a white recyclable.
Thaisleeze
November 5, 2016 2:35 pm
Old Guy, I think JA is suggesting that is how DT is being presented by the elite in Europe. Might be wrong, its late here…..and I’m drunk and would just like to say that I love this site. Sweet dreams!
Julian Assange: “Hillary Made The FBI Look Weak, And Now They’re Out For Payback”
by Tyler Durden
Nov 5, 2016 9:22 AM
In an extended, 25 minute interview with Australia’s John Pilger, posted now in its entirety on RT, Julian Assange said Hillary Clinton sparked an FBI backlash, which is now surfacing, when she stonewalled the Feds, who were trying to investigate her private server.
When asked by John Pilger about the significance of the FBI’s intervention in this last week of the US election campaign in the case against Hillary Clinton, Assange responds that “If you go to the history of the FBI, it has become effectively America’s political police. And the FBI demonstrated with taking down the former head of the CIA over classified information given to his mistress [that] almost no one was untouchable. The FBI is always trying to demonstrate that, “No one can resist us.” But Hillary Clinton very conspicuously resisted the FBI’s investigation. So, there is anger within the FBI because it made the FBI look weak.”
FBI director Comey threw the presidential race, which had threatened to become a Clinton procession last week, into chaos when he claimed that the agency had potentially obtained new information pertaining to Clinton’s use of a personal email server, set up shortly after she became Secretary of State in 2009, when they obtained the laptop of Anthony Weiner, the ex-husband of close Clinton aide Huma Abedin. Weiner was being investigated for an unrelated sexting offense.
Clinton has categorically denied mishandling classified information by using a vulnerable personal email address for State Department business. Fox News has alleged that the FBI has obtained new evidence from Weiner’s computer that shows that Clinton was “very likely hacked.”
When discussing the hacked Hillary emails, Assange, whose WikiLeaks website has over the last ten months released three sizable batches of emails, relating to Clinton herself, the Democratic National Committee, and her campaign manager John Podesta, said the FBI has cause to investigate Clinton. “There’s a thread that runs through all of these emails. There is quite a lot of “pay-to-play,” as they call it – taking… giving access in exchange for money for many individual states, individuals and corporations. Combined with the cover-up of Hillary Clinton’s emails while she was Secretary of State this has led to an environment where the pressure on the FBI [to investigate] increases,” Assange said.
Regardless of whether Clinton ever faces charges, Assange asserted that Clinton was beholden to corporate and political entities that have been hidden from the electorate during the race to the White House.
“She’s this centralizing cog, so that you’ve got a lot of different gears in operation from the big banks like Goldman Sachs, and major elements of Wall Street, and intelligence, and people in the State Department, and the Saudis, and so on. She’s is the, if you like, the centralizer that interconnects all these different cogs. She’s smooth central representation of all that, and all that is more or less what is in power now in the United States,” stated Assange, who said that the leaked emails presented a clear picture of this nexus of influences.
Assange also insisted that despite his image, projecting hope and change, President Barack Obama became “very close to banking interests” during his own initial White House campaign in 2008. “In fact, one of the most significant Podesta emails that we released was about how the Obama cabinet was formed – and half the [first] Obama cabinet was basically nominated by a representative from Citibank. It is quite amazing,” Assange said.
Assange also stated that as a result of too many vested “establishment interests”, Trump won’t be allowed to win.
Libya Is Hillary Clinton’s War
According to Assange, Clinton’s emails reveal a plan, hatched months before the West’s intervention in Libya in March 2011, to make it the signature conflict of her tenure as secretary of state, and a podium from which to realize her presidential dreams.
“Libya more than anyone else’s war was Hillary Clinton’s war. Barack Obama initially opposed it. Who was the person who was championing it? Hillary Clinton. That’s documented throughout her emails,” Assange said.
“There’s more than 1,700 emails out of the 33,000 of Hillary Clinton’s emails we published just about Libya. It’s not about that Libya has cheap oil. She perceived the removal of Gaddafi and the overthrow of the Libyan state something that she would use to run in the general election for president. So late 2011, there’s an internal document called the “Libya Tick Tock” that is produced for Hillary Clinton, and it’s all the… it’s a chronological description of how Hillary Clinton was the central figure in the destruction of the Libyan state.”
But the scheme not only failed on a personal level, after Clinton was largely blamed for allowing a jihadist ransacking of a US compound in Benghazi in 2012, but also continues to haunt the country, which remains in a state of civil war, and Europe.
“As a result, there [have been] around 40,000 deaths within Libya. Jihadists moved in, ISIS moved in. That led to the European refugee and migrant crisis, because not only did you have people fleeing Libya, people then fleeing Syria, destabilization of other African countries as a result of arms flows,” said Assange.
Should Hillary win on Tuesday, and should the neo-cons in Washington finally get their day in the sun with the “pacifist” Obama gone, as the WaPo recently reported, we – and many others – expect more “Hillary wars” in America’s future.
All Assange actually does is confirm what most of us already know or suspect but can’t prove.
I imagine those among the ignorant are those deliberately so and doubt his leaks and revelations will change many of them.
Should be required viewing for all Americans who wish to cast a vote in the Presidential election.
I will qualify what I’m about to say by noting that I am not an elitist and in fact was a “working stiff”my entire life. Unfortunately in America, the vote of an individual with an IQ of 70 negates the vote of an individual with an IQ of 120. However I do take strong exception to Mr. Assange’s portrayal of Trump supporters as white trash as I am a Trump supporter and feel I rate a label no less than that of a white recyclable.
Old Guy, I think JA is suggesting that is how DT is being presented by the elite in Europe. Might be wrong, its late here…..and I’m drunk and would just like to say that I love this site. Sweet dreams!