6 reasons Trump’s erratic, destructive policies could tank the markets

 

Trump’s protectionist, interventionist leanings could hurt U.S., and global economies, Roubini warns

Reuters
Donald Trump’s inconsistent, erratic, and destructive policies will take their toll on domestic and global economic growth in the long run.

NEW YORK (Project Syndicate) — When Donald Trump was elected president of the United States, stock markets rallied impressively. Investors were initially giddy about Trump’s promises of fiscal stimulus; deregulation of energy, health care, and financial services; and steep cuts in corporate, personal, estate, and capital-gains taxes.

But will the reality of Trumponomics sustain a continued rise in equity prices?

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

It is little wonder that corporations and investors have been happy. This traditional Republican embrace of trickle-down supply-side economics will mostly favor corporations and wealthy individuals, while doing almost nothing to create jobs or raise blue-collar workers’ incomes.

According to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, almost half of the benefits from Trump’s proposed tax cuts would go to the top 1% of income earners.

Yet the corporate sector’s animal spirits may soon give way to primal fear: the market rally is already running out of steam, and Trump’s honeymoon with investors might be coming to an end. There are several reasons for this.For starters, the anticipation of fiscal stimulus may have pushed stock prices DJIA, -0.02%   up, but it also led to higher long-term interest rates TMUBMUSD10Y, -1.04%  , which hurts capital spending and interest-sensitive sectors such as real estate.

Meanwhile, the strengthening dollar DXY, -0.35%  will destroy more of the jobs typically held by Trump’s blue-collar base. The president may have “saved” 1,000 jobs in Indiana by bullying and cajoling the air-conditioner manufacturer Carrier; but the U.S. dollar’s appreciation since the election could destroy almost 400,000 manufacturing jobs over time.

Moreover, Trump’s fiscal-stimulus package might end up being much larger than the market’s current pricing suggests.

As Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush showed, Republicans can rarely resist the temptation to cut corporate, income, and other taxes, even when they have no way to make up for the lost revenue and no desire to cut spending. If this happens again under Trump, fiscal deficits will push up interest rates and the dollar even further, and hurt the economy in the long term.

A second reason for investors to curb their enthusiasm is the specter of inflation. With the U.S. economy already close to full employment, Trump’s fiscal stimulus will fuel inflation more than it does growth. Inflation will then force even Janet Yellen’s dovish Federal Reserve to hike up interest rates sooner and faster than it otherwise would have done, which will drive up long-term interest rates and the value of the dollar still more.

Third, this undesirable policy mix of excessively loose fiscal policy and tight monetary policy will tighten financial conditions, hurting blue-collar workers’ incomes and employment prospects. An already protectionist Trump administration will then have to pursue additional protectionist measures to maintain these workers’ support, thereby further hampering economic growth and diminishing corporate profits.

If Trump takes his protectionism too far, he will undoubtedly spark trade wars.

America’s trading partners will have little choice but to respond to U.S. import restrictions by imposing their own tariffs on U.S. exports. The ensuing tit-for-tat will hinder global economic growth, and damage economies and markets everywhere. It is worth remembering how America’s 1930 Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act triggered global trade wars that exacerbated the Great Depression.

Fourth, Trump’s actions suggest that his administration’s economic interventionism will go beyond traditional protectionism. Trump has already shown his willingness to target firms’ foreign operations with the threat of import levies, public accusations of price gouging, and immigration restrictions (which make it harder to attract talent).

The Nobel laureate economist Edmund S. Phelps has described Trump’s direct interference in the corporate sector as reminiscent of corporatist Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. Indeed, if former President Barack Obama had treated the corporate sector in the way that Trump has, he would have been smeared as a communist; but for some reason when Trump does it, corporate America puts its tail between its legs.

Fifth, Trump is questioning U.S. alliances, cozying up to American rivals such as Russia, and antagonizing important global powers such as China. His erratic foreign policies are spooking world leaders, multinational corporations, and global markets generally.

Finally, Trump may pursue damage-control methods that only make matters worse. For example, he and his advisers have already made verbal pronouncements intended to weaken the dollar. But talk is cheap, and open-mouth operations have only a temporary effect on the currency.

This means that Trump might take a more radical and heterodox approach. During the campaign, he bashed the Fed for being too dovish, and creating a “false economy.” And yet he may now be tempted to appoint new members to the Fed Board who are even more dovish, and less independent, than Yellen, in order to boost credit to the private sector.

If that fails, Trump could unilaterally intervene to weaken the dollar, or impose capital controls to limit dollar-strengthening capital inflows. Markets are already becoming wary; full-blown panic is likely if protectionism and reckless, politicized monetary policy precipitate trade, currency, and capital-control wars.

To be sure, expectations of stimulus, lower taxes, and deregulation could still boost the economy and the market’s performance in the short term. But, as the vacillation in financial markets since Trump’s inauguration indicates, the president’s inconsistent, erratic, and destructive policies will take their toll on domestic and global economic growth in the long run.

This article has been published with the permission of Project SyndicateThe End of Trump’s Market Honeymoon.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
February 2, 2017 11:29 am

“Dr Doom” doesn’t have a particularly impressive track record, no better than many others who have predicted differently.

That said, the current DOW P/E is 20.8 which is at too high a level, IMO, and has a good possibility of correcting by several points.

But, then, my opinion is not to be taken as seriously as those who actually know far more about the market than I do so don’t weigh it into your own position in any influential degree.

Tommy
Tommy
February 2, 2017 11:31 am

It’s going down anyway Roubini, at least we’ll go down swingin’. If Roubini and the rest of the geniuses were even batting .250 I’d be concerned, I haven’t checked – any chance he’s selling a news and investment subscription?

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
February 2, 2017 11:37 am

I stopped reading at “Nouriel Roubini”

Troy Ounce
Troy Ounce
  hardscrabble farmer
February 2, 2017 1:57 pm

The globalists lost! Hahaaaaahhhaaa

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
February 2, 2017 11:40 am

Nouriel Roubini, the renowned economist known as Dr Doom, told FTfm the consequences of Greece leaving the euro would be “catastrophic” for the global economy.

2015

Still waiting, Doc.

Trapped in Portlandia
Trapped in Portlandia
February 2, 2017 11:40 am

The economy was running on fumes when Trump was elected. We all know it was heading down. You simply can’t accumulate $20T in debt and expect everything to continue being hunky-dory.

With that being said, I’d much rather have Trump in charge when the ships goes down then Obama, Hillary, Bernie, etc.

kokoda the deplorable
kokoda the deplorable
February 2, 2017 11:52 am

If the markets tank, who will feel the brunt of that event?

It won’t be the poor or most of the remaining middle class; it will be the Banksters, Hedge Funds, Investment Funds (like Fidelity), and other Buy and Hold ‘muppets’.

I don’t care if the markets tank, except I hope that they do tank big time – that will then be a generational buying opportunity.

MuckAbout
MuckAbout
  kokoda the deplorable
February 2, 2017 12:27 pm

@kokoda the deplorable: A generational buying opportunity”? You are talking like there is no $240,000,000,000,000.00 overhang of debt, derivative counterparty debt and almost $20 trillion of national debt.

Before your “generational buying opportunity” a majority of that debt must be liquidated and we must slog through a second Greatest Depression (far worse than 29-37) in order to wipe out the malinvestments and grifters who have eaten out economy from the inside out since 1913, 1971, etc……

[imgcomment image[/img]

Ag
Ag
February 2, 2017 12:10 pm

This is a steaming pile of horse shit from dr. doom.

“Trump this and Trump that”, Nouriel is just a shill from the globalist camp (project syndicate is another mouth piece for the Rothschilds, just like the Economist).

They want to watch the US empire get destroyed by over extension, debt, etc, just like their previous British empire.

The more people say the market is going to tank, the more likely it is that the markets will not tank.

It is when they start saying “you need to play a long game”
or “there is still a lot of value in this sector”
or “the future is in xyz”
or anything positive, that is when you should start running for the exits.

Unexpandable
Unexpandable
February 2, 2017 12:26 pm

Of course. Don’t blame the bankers or the Fed or address the fundamental problem or the policies that got us to where we are today.

If the author was honest, the headline would have read:

“Trump Inherits Overinflated Financial Balloon Filled with Hot Air from Blind Bankers:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVF4XI2AXrY

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
February 2, 2017 12:59 pm

Crazy, wild question.

Who is this alleged debt owed to?

Unpayable
Unpayable
  hardscrabble farmer
February 2, 2017 3:19 pm

Victims of Social Security lies, rich fat guys and Asian slant-eyes. Did I miss any?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Unpayable
February 2, 2017 5:47 pm

most people with a retirement account or pension based in the market, which is most of them.

phoolish
phoolish
February 2, 2017 1:12 pm

What a tool.

I don’t see erratic. Erratic is being reported by the purveyers of fake news, but what happening his clearly the unfolding of a plan.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
February 2, 2017 2:35 pm

I have more cash than equities. Been on the sidelines for way too long. I hope Trump tanks the living shit out of the market. Hurry up and tank, baby.

Angus
Angus
February 2, 2017 4:13 pm

Doesn’t the author teach Obamanocis 101 at Havard?

Perseus Against Liberals
Perseus Against Liberals
February 2, 2017 4:28 pm

I think Mr Roubini does not realize, Trump’s is here to make a total RESET. That is to either default on the debt or to press the big red DELETE button on Fed Reserve computer. Two options are available to him to get US out of the 100 years old mess, create a War or a little chaos on financial realms followed by a reset…the later will be the best choice which means no casualty or very little…

Bob
Bob
February 2, 2017 6:13 pm

Tank = correction. Gloom, not doom. Partly sunny. Life goes on…

The world as we know it is likely to continue, albeit with major disruptions and course corrections underway, continuing and recurring.

The US and Canada will be living in interesting times, for sure. The Chinese and Indians seem cursed to wallow in their own filth, fighting over air, water and food and boundaries. The Russians, Europeans and Japanese will be dying off in droves and becoming smaller parts of the world as a result. Africa seems simply hopeless, and a risk for incubating serious pandemics. The Middle East will continue living in 630 AD. Latin America, including Mexico, is likely to just become a more fractured version of Latin America.

So in this multilateral world we seem to be heading into, things are likely to get more and more multilateral for an extended period of time. The pendulum seems due to swing back in the other direction, from nation-building and Pax Americana to many forms of dissolution a la the Soviet Union…

America first? Which part?