Pope Francis and Libertarianism

no-pope-bergoglio  Don't Tread on Me

The purported pope of the Catholic Church recently attacked “libertarianism.”  As a number of theologians have ably shown, Jorge Bergoglio, a.k.a Pope Francis, cannot be a legitimate pope since he was neither ordained as a priest or consecrated as a bishop in the traditional Catholic rite of Holy Orders.  And, since he is not a bishop, he cannot be “bishop of Rome” – a prerequisite for being the head of the universal Church.

While “technically” he is not the pope, Bergoglio is a notorious heretic who has said a mind-boggling number of heresies, engaged in the most scandalous of actions, and has attempted to change doctrine and Church teaching.  He is not the pope since a heretic is necessarily outside the Church and, thus, cannot hold ecclesiastical office, especially that of supreme pontiff.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

If Bergoglio’s “invalidity” is not damnable enough, “Pope Francis” is a neo-Marxist who has repeatedly called for the redistribution of wealth, promoted mass migration, and has denigrated capitalism, accusing it of impoverishing the poor.

Naturally, with such a dossier, Bergoglio would be hostile to the concept of libertarianism.  And, as a skillful demagogue, he has deliberately mischaracterized the subject.

In a message to a meeting of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, Bergoglio harshly stated: “I cannot fail to speak of the grave risks associated with the invasion of the positions of libertarian individualism at high strata of culture and in school and university education.”*

If Bergoglio thinks that higher education is infected with “libertarian individualism,” he is more delusional than he has been given credit for!  Academia has long been a bastion of collectivist thought.  Libertarianism and, for that matter, conservative ideas have little voice in higher education.  Moreover, Western culture is dominated by the ideals of social democracy, a philosophy that is anathema to libertarianism and also to real Catholicism, not the kind that is preached by imposters such as “Pope Francis!”

It is probably deliberate that Bergoglio uses the word “invasion” in his description as he subtly mocks his audience.  The only invasion that has happened is not a takeover of academia by free-markets zealots, but by the millions of “asylum seekers” that have been thrust upon European soil which has been encouraged and orchestrated by the likes of multiculturalists such as Jorge Bergoglio.

“[T]he libertarian individual denies the value of the common good,” Bergoglio continues, “because on the one hand he supposes that the very idea of ‘common’ means the constriction of at least some individuals, and on the other hand that the notion of ‘good’ deprives freedom of its essence.”

Of course, to arch collectivists like “Pope Francis,” the common good always trumps individual rights.  While he does not explicitly say it, the “common good” means for the good of the state, and for those who place their own self interest or that of their family before the state’s interest, they are to be ostracized or worse.

Libertarianism to Bergoglio is an “antisocial radicalization of individualism” that “leads to the conclusion that everyone has the right to extend himself as far as his abilities allow him even at the cost of the exclusion and marginalization of the more vulnerable majority.”  By living “independently of others” a person can attain freedom.

Once again, as he had done throughout his “papacy” Bergoglio demonstrates that he is an economic ignoramus who does not grasp a basic tenet of social relationships.

Libertarians are proponents of the market economy and markets are the result of the division of labor, specialization, and exchange.  Society, in part, is the amalgamation of numerous markets and advanced societies are ones with a highly developed division of labor.  Overwhelming empirical evidence has shown that such societies are not only richer, but are more culturally advanced than self- sufficient societies (autarky) where individuals produce everything for themselves.

In such an order, an individual produces or provides services which he does best.  Since he does not produce everything himself, he, therefore, depends and needs to interact with others in exchange of goods he does not produce.  In the market economy, very few live “independently of others” as Bergoglio stupidly believes, but must rely and depend on their fellow man.  Even entrepreneurs, who Bergoglio implicitly condemns in the above passage, have to rely on consumers to patronize their products and services or they will quickly go out of business.

Bergoglio, of course, does not understand that there are many shades of libertarianism running a wide spectrum of social, political and economic thought.  If there is a common theme among libertarians, it is opposition to the modern state and the welfare/warfare system upon which it rests.  The modern state will not tolerate any competition for the minds, hearts, and souls of men.

Until the Second Vatican Council (1962-65), the Church recognized that the modern state was not only its enemy, but the enemy of mankind.  In this respect, the Church had common ground with the libertarian and conservative movements of the 20th century.

The Second Vatican Council and the “reforms” which came in its wake produced an environment that has led to the likes of cretins like Jorge Bergoglio who has not only repeatedly blasphemed the Divine Founder of the institution in which he supposedly heads, but regularly spews out all sorts of discredited neo-Marxist nonsense.

While “Pope Francis” condemns libertarianism, the solution to the financial, political, and many of the social problems which confront the Western world will only be solved by “libertarian means” – a gold/silver monetary standard, political decentralization/secession, de-militarization/non-intervention, free trade, and the application of private property rights to the migration crisis.

For the good of mankind, not only should Jorge Bergoglio be ignored as supreme Roman pontiff, but he should likewise be ignored when speaking on any and all public policy matters.

*Thomas D. Williams. “Pope Warns Against ‘Invasion’ of Libertarianism.”  Breitbart.  28 April 2017.  http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2017/04/28/pope-francis-warns-against-invasion-of-libertarianism/

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
21 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
May 22, 2017 9:33 am

The current Pope puts leftist political philosophy ahead of the teachings of Christ and the instructions he left us with to evangelize the world and all of its peoples.

Maybe through ignorance or maybe by design, either way that is what I see him doing.

jackson
jackson
  Anonymous
May 22, 2017 11:09 pm

Anonymous said:

“Maybe through ignorance or maybe by design…”

It’s by design. These people know what they’re doing!

I noticed, as of my post, no one here has addressed/commented on the topic of this piece: “The purported pope of the Catholic Church recently attacked “libertarianism.””

Any thoughts from the gallery???

BTW…

Q: What do the Zman and the so-called “Pope” have in common?

A: They are both statists/collectivists who would not hesitate to wield a gun against you in order to force compliance. One is simply “red”, the other is “blue.”

Got it?

xrugger
xrugger
May 22, 2017 9:39 am

This is a repost of a comment I made on a different thread on March 25th of this year. The subject was slightly different but I think it applies here as well.

I don’t know who exactly this guy is, but he is not the Pope. He is certainly an anti-pope. Some say he is the false prophet forerunner of the antichrist. I’m not sure if I buy into all that. He is certainly causing great uncertainty and anxiety among the faithful. Many of his quoted remarks are vague and seem to raise the possibility of doctrinal change in the Church. This is something no Pope can do. All that can result is schism and apostasy. Now, that leaves two possibilities: either Jorge is stupendously ignorant of what the very Church he “leads” is as a spiritual entity and he is leading millions astray simply because he is too stupid to see what he is doing. Or, he knows exactly what he is doing and has evil intent in doing it. My money is on the latter.
Bergoglio’s attitude towards the Muslim world is particularly disturbing. We are approaching a time-if we are not already there- when the continued existence of the Christian West and the civilization it built will be at risk. What is needed now is a Warrior-Pope who will rally what remains of Christendom against the rising Islamic tide. What we have is a damn cultural Marxist who literally kisses the feet of the Muslim barbarians who would gleefully slaughter the very people he is supposed to lead. Somebody needs to remind this “pope” that Christian charity does not include bending the knee to the Mohammedan or meekly presenting our necks to these Muslim animals.
The Catholic Church is being extremely poorly served by the hierarchy these days. Weak-kneed parish priests spew cultural Marxism from the pulpit. Bishops cannot, or will not, lead. Androgynous monstrosities keep pushing he feminist fantasy of a female “priesthood,” while truly feminine women shake their heads in wonder. Jorge Bergoglio blathers on while millions look for the exits.
The Church will survive. We are promised by Christ that the gates of hell will not prevail against it. The days of The Remnant Church, however, may be approaching. Accelerated by the ignorance and arrogance of the hierarchy, assaulted by heresy from without and faithlessness from within, the decline of the Church is evident. Those who remain faithful know that even though the Church Militant may suffer the corruption and struggle of this world, the Church Penitent and Church Triumphant are eternal. Jorge would do well to remember that.
I don’t know who this man is, but he is not the Pope

kokoda - the most deplorable
kokoda - the most deplorable
  xrugger
May 22, 2017 10:03 am

“My money is on the latter.”

Which is the typical case – Obama for example. There are a few ‘stupid’ ones – like Bush 2.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
May 22, 2017 10:24 am

I had not known that Bergoglio was not properly ordained or consecrated. Ann Barnhart already convinced me that he’s an antipope, since you can’t have two popes – it’s like, a rule. He’s bad news all the way around, even worse than the Kraut. They should have made Arinze pope instead of the Kraut. He’d have cracked some fucken heads – which, of course, is why the gay cardinals picked the chickenshit Kraut. As Archie Bunker explained about England: “the whole society is a kind of a fagdom.”

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
May 22, 2017 10:30 am

There’s almost no heresy from this antipope that can’t be undone with a quick and hilarious two minute video from this great teacher:

BL
BL
May 22, 2017 11:52 am

It’s a criminal enterprise. Why do Catholics keep sending them money?

bryan
bryan
May 22, 2017 9:47 pm

If the Pope would concern himself with just the pedophiles in his employ, he woudl be doing us all a favor

Mac Tírè
Mac Tírè
May 22, 2017 10:30 pm

Catholicism, the first Protestant denomination…

Vic
Vic
May 23, 2017 5:24 am

As to the pope, the early Christians did not have a “head” of the church. Each Bishop was equal to the other until Rome became more powerful and was able to assert itself above the other bishops.

Christianity is full of individualism. You individually accept Jesus and become a Christian. You individually live a Christian life, marry a Christian, raise your children as Christians. You always live as a Christian no matter what everybody else is doing and no matter what government says.

Capitalism is Christian. I advise reading Gary North on this subject. He wrote a multi-multi-volume book on this subject. It’s free on his website. He also has other books on this subject. If you read the Bible, you will see capitalism throughout. Yes, some early Christians decided, on their own, to try a collectivized lifestyle at the beginning, but that is not what Jesus preached. And when the Puritans came to America, they lived a collectivized lifestyle until they nearly starved to death. The hard workers stopped working hard when they realized the slackers were getting just as much food as they were. Now you know why there was a first “Thanksgiving,” because the Native Americans saved their bacon. The Puritan leaders finally let everyone have their own land to farm and to do whatever the landowner thought best individually, and they thrived.

After becoming a Christian, you individually (or with members of your church), give charitably, visit prisoners, help widows and orphans, just as the Bible teaches. It does not teach that the government does this for you by stealing the people’s money first. The Bible says YOU teach your children. You don’t leave it to the government.

A Christian is individually responsible to God and will be, on Judgment Day, standing before Him. Alone.

GilbertS
GilbertS
May 24, 2017 7:24 am

What proof is there he wasn’t ordained?