Speeding is Good for You

Guest Post by Eric Peters

Speeding, like exercise, is good for you. It is lack of motion in both cases that ends up causing problems.

This is no joke.

First of all, “speeding” does not mean driving excessively fast. That is the shibboleth, the cliche, the tired and formulaic claptrap used to justify the roadside ritual of mulcting drivers almost at will – because nearly every driver “speeds” at least a little bit every time he goes for a drive. That is to say, he drives in excess of the posted speed limit – which is always set to ensure exactly that.

Fish in a barrel. 

It’s odd that this fact – obvious to all – largely goes by without any raising of hands, if not pitchforks.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

Think of other laws that have turned more than half of the population into technical criminals or at least scofflaws. The 18th Amendment is an obvious example. From 1920-1933, it was illegal to drink alcohol in any amount in any state. That was the law. But most of the country ignored this prohibition for the obvious reason that it was ridiculous and outrageous.

They became outlaws, but of a commendable sort. The Bad Guys became the Good Guys – and the reverse, too. Those enforcing Prohibition were generally regarded as dicks.

Just as speed cops (and drug cops, another rant) are today.

In the 1920s, there were speakeasies; today, we flash our lights at other cars to warn the drivers of a speed trap down the road. No one warns a burglar that the house he’s casing has a security system. Why is Smokey and the Bandit one of the highest-grossing films ever made?

Think about this.

Having a drink no more corresponds to drunkenness than “speeding” amounts to driving excessively fast. Which is why everyone instinctively flouts speed laws and – as with flouting Prohibition – feels no moral shame for having done so.

This incidentally is particularly the case with regard to cops.

Who, just like the Prohibition-era “prohees” – the government goons who were sent out to “bust” underground saloons – are the most likely to offend against these absurd statutes because they are more aware than most ordinary people how absurd they are and of course, they have the freedom to flout them with impunity.

They know that “speeding” doesn’t kill nearly as effectively as being asleep at the wheel – which is exactly what obeying speed limits fosters.

It is boring to drive the speed limit. You might as well take an Ambien. The results are the same – and entirely predictable.

Especially in any car built during the past 30 years. Because speed limits are not merely under-posted, they are anachronisms. Unlike almost everything else around us, which has been on a fast-forward track since the dawn of the computer era, speed limits are totems of another time.

We are supposed to be grateful for the fact that the 55 MPH highway maximum got repealed and most highway speed limits are now 70-75 MPH. But that is what they were back in the 1960s – when Ich bin ein Berliner and the typical car rode on a suspension not much advanced over farm machinery, with four-wheel drum brakes (no ABS) and bias-ply tires and no computers controlling anything.

1970 speed limit

There was no Lane Keep Assist, no Automatic Emergency Braking. The steering was overboosted and sloppy. It required paying attention to keep the car on the road.

Which people did, because there wasn’t much choice. This made driving not boring because driving required one to mind what was going on – particularly at speed. You were occupied by the task. People were better drivers in those days because one had to be.

More than 50 years down the road, speed limits on the highways are back to what they were circa 1969 and most limits on secondary roads are lower.

Ostensibly, this is for “safety.”

In fact, it erodes it.

Driving too slow is dangerous. 

A bored driver’s attention wanders; he begins to space out. Or decides to send a text – or check email. Why not? The car – at this point – almost drives itself. At circa 1969 or less speeds, a modern car is as under-challenged as Stephen Hawking would be if you asked him to figure what two-plus-two equals.

The ridiculousness of the situation is that extreme.

Cars have evolved, speed limits have remained static – or regressed. It is like seeing a guy walking down the streets dressed like John Travolta in Saturday Night Fever. Platform shoes, tight lycra pants, shirt open, chest wig, gold medallions.

But at least our time-travel Disco Dude won’t get hassled by cops.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
unit472
unit472
August 16, 2017 12:37 pm

I’d prefer ‘reckless driving’ being the catch all offense but it is hard to define. Obviously 70 mph is not too fast on an empty divided highway with limited access but it quite lethal in other situations- even on that same stretch of road.

Then there is the issue of not all cars or drivers are equal. Your car might go from zero to 60 in 4 seconds but that is no reason to do it. Other drivers shouldn’t have to be on the look out for speed demons out to boost their ego by showing off a car they simply bought

Anonymous
Anonymous
  unit472
August 16, 2017 2:48 pm
Anon
Anon
  unit472
August 16, 2017 6:03 pm

Enforcing reckless driving would of course require cops intelligent enough to use good judgement. As most on TBP know, today’s street cop is just above the IQ of the average monkey. These governments don’t want intelligent cops, as intelligent cops may actually question pulling people over for revenue collection and putting their lives in danger through traffic stops to enrich city coffers. Better to have idiot cops with radar guns stating the speed, then have low speed limits. No thinking required, no judgement call – speed is 45, radar gun says 49 – ticket. Duh ok boss….
The intelligent thing would be to look at the engineered safe speed of the highway / road in question and set that limit appropriately based on modern car design. Of course, that would also cut deep in to the continuing royalties (speeding ticket revenue) of the local municipal and state governments because most likely the speed limit would be more naturally followed by the citizen, as it would “just feel right” to do that speed. That has about as much chance of happening as the Government deciding that personal privacy is superior to constant surveillance, and peace in the world is preferable to constant, never ending wars, sound money, you know, logical stuff like that.

james the deplorable wanderer
james the deplorable wanderer
August 16, 2017 4:53 pm

Also keep in mind that highways are engineered facilities – they do have a maximum safe speed. Typically, that speed is for good conditions – dry pavement, daylight, normal winds, etc. It also is considered so for the average driver – if you have bad / slow reflexes, drug or alcohol impairment, or other medical conditions you may not be safe at the posted speeds – or maybe even shouldn’t be driving.
However, tires are better than they were back in the 1970s, and so are suspensions, brakes, etc. Perhaps we should look at a nationwide revisit of the posted highway speeds, using modern equipment and current road conditions instead of history.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  james the deplorable wanderer
August 16, 2017 5:23 pm

No matter the speed, you can only have so much differential between the fastest and slowest moving traffic before it becomes dangerous.

Keep in mind that there will always be slow moving vehicles such as trucks on any road and that has to be allowed for in determining the maximum allowed speed.

Macumazahn
Macumazahn
  Anonymous
August 18, 2017 5:26 am

When I’m “speeding” I’m thinking more in terms of rates of closure than of actual velocity.