Guest Post by Pat Buchanan
Three decades ago, as communications director in the White House, I set up an interview for Bill Rusher of National Review.
Among his first questions to President Reagan was to ask him to assess the political importance of Barry Goldwater. Said Reagan, “I guess you could call him the John the Baptist of our movement.”
I resisted the temptation to lean in and ask, “Sir, if Barry Goldwater is John the Baptist, who would that make you?”
What brings the moment back is Laura Ingraham’s new book: “Billionaire at the Barricades: The Populist Revolution from Reagan to Trump.” Thesis: Donald Trump is a conservative populist and direct descendant and rightful heir to Ronald Reagan.
Both men were outsiders, and neither a career politician. Raised Democratic, Reagan had been a Hollywood actor, union leader and voice of GE, before running for governor of California.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Trump is out of Queens, a builder-businessman in a Democratic city whose Republican credentials were suspect at best when he rode down that elevator at Trump Tower. Both took on the Republican establishment of their day, and humiliated it.
Among the signature issues of Trumpian populism is economic nationalism, a new trade policy designed to prosper Americans first.
Reagan preached free trade, but when Harley-Davidson was in danger of going under because of Japanese dumping of big bikes, he slammed a 50 percent tariff on Japanese motorcycles. Though a free trader by philosophy, Reagan was at heart an economic patriot.
He accepted an amnesty written by Congress for 3 million people in the country illegally, but Reagan also warned prophetically that a country that can’t control its borders isn’t really a country any more.
Reagan and Trump both embraced the Eisenhower doctrine of “peace through strength.” And, like Ike, both built up the military.
Both also believed in cutting tax rates to stimulate the economy and balance the federal budget through rising revenues rather than cutting programs like Medicare and Social Security.
Both believed in engaging with the superpower rival of the day — the Soviet Union in Reagan’s day, Russia and China in Trump’s time.
And both were regarded in this capital city with a cosmopolitan condescension bordering on contempt. “An amiable dunce” said a Great Society Democrat of Reagan.
The awesome victories Reagan rolled up, a 44-state landslide in 1980 and a 49-state landslide in 1984, induced some second thoughts among Beltway elites about whether they truly spoke for America. Trump’s sweep of the primaries and startling triumph in the Electoral College caused the same consternation.
However, as the Great Depression, New Deal and World War II represented a continental divide in history between what came before and what came after, so, too, did the end of the Cold War and the Reagan era.
As Ingraham writes, Trumpism is rooted as much in the populist-nationalist campaigns of the 1990s, and post-Cold War issues as economic patriotism, border security, immigration control and “America First,” as it is in the Reaganite issues of the 1980s.
Which bring us to the present, with our billionaire president, indeed, at the barricades.
The differences between Trump in his first year and Reagan in 1981 are stark. Reagan had won a landslide. The attempt on his life in April and the grace with which he conducted himself had earned him a place in the hearts of his countrymen. He not only showed spine in giving the air traffic controllers 48 hours to get back to work, and then discharging them when they defied him, he enacted the largest tax cut in U.S. history with the aid of boll weevil Democrats in the House.
Coming up on one year since his election, Trump is besieged by a hostile press and united Democratic Party. This city hates him. While his executive actions are impressive, his legislative accomplishments are not. His approval ratings have lingered in the mid-30s. He has lost half a dozen senior members of his original White House staff, clashed openly with his own Cabinet and is at war with GOP leaders on the Hill.
Moreover, we seem close to war with North Korea that would be no cakewalk. And the president appears determined to tear up the Obama nuclear deal with Iran that his own national security team believes is in the national interest.
Reagan was, as Trump claimed to be, an anti-interventionist. Reagan had no wish to be a war president. His dream was to rid the world of nuclear weapons. This does not sound like Trump in October 2017.
Steve Bannon may see the 25th Amendment, where a Cabinet majority may depose a president, as the great threat to Trump.
But it is far more likely that a major war would do for the Trump presidency and his place in history what it did for Presidents Wilson, Truman, LBJ and George W. Bush.
Pat, I don’t think that he’ll start the war. He will however finish it…..
The most likely war seriously affecting America I see as probable is a civil war if the leftists and Republican establishment succeeds in getting rid of Trump.
And it won’t be Trump that starts it, it will be the Leftist and Republicans who have removed all but the last box.
Fuuuuuuck Reagan. Nothing against the actual Reagan. But fuuuuck the people who always bring him up. The same establishment cucks (like George Will) who hated Reagan then now tout him because of his supposed presidentialness (presidentiality?). I remember how much the left hated Reagan back then, but it’s NOTHING like the rage harbored by the left now. We don’t have the luxury of being genteel these days. It’s a fucking knife fight. Besides, half of what he did looks idiotic now: he funded Muslim terrorists in Afghanistan to fight Russians. Screams of “Allahu Akbar” showed us that they were good, God-believing freedom fighters. Right. Fast-forward and they’re attacking us. Christ, Reagan’s been gone for thirty fucking years. Half of voters have no memory of him. Droning on and on about Reagan just makes the right look as ridiculous as if they were droning on about Harding. Ancient history.
Forgive me if I’m wrong, but didn’t Jimmy Carter start funding the Muslims through the Mujahideen, nicknamed Operation Cyclone?
The difference now is the left created status to speak out for their issues. Group think.
Trump’s silent majority will have to endure the loud mouth left at least to the next election.
No we don’t, we don’t have to remain silent and passive against them for any reason.
We can make them more intimidated by us than they can make us intimidated by them.
And we won’t need violent factions to do it the way they do.
Don’t think of it as silent and passive. Think of it as silent and resolved. Hear the rantings of Rosie O’Donnell and Michael Moore and smile. Watch the march of the genderqueers and stifle your laughter. See the left re-elect Trump and savor their uncomprehending horror.
I still won’t vote for him again if there’s no Wall.
A bill funding it is currently in Congress, better write your Congressthing to support and pass it since it has to be done by Congress as the President doesn’t have the power to do it on his own.
Trump will definitely sign it if Congress passes it and without the funding there really isn’t much that can be done.
Writing your Congressmen does nothing. The bank bailout should have told you that.
Both are lifetime actors playing to the new world order script.
on a lighter note
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKnQuHA0slg