Trump’s new budget is a debt bomb waiting to explode

Guest Post by Judge Andrew Nepolitano

Imagine you open the faucet of your kitchen sink expecting water and instead out comes cash. Now imagine that it comes out at the rate of $1 million a minute. You call your plumber, who thinks you’re crazy. To get you off the phone, he opines that it is your sink and therefore must be your money. So you spend it wildly. Then you realize that the money wasn’t yours and you owe it back.

Now imagine that this happens every minute of every day for the next three years. At the end of the three years, you owe back more than $6 trillion. So you borrow $6 trillion to pay back the $6 trillion you owe.

Is this unending spigot of cash reality or fantasy?

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

I am not speaking of Amazon or Google or Exxon Mobil or Apple. They deliver products that appeal to consumers and investors. They deal in copious amounts of money because they sell what hundreds of millions of people want to purchase and they do it so efficiently that hundreds of thousands want to invest in them. If they fail to persuade consumers to purchase their products and investors to purchase their financial instruments, they will go out of business.

My analogy about all that cash in your kitchen sink that just keeps coming is not about voluntary commercial transactions, which you are free to accept or reject. It is about the government’s spending what it doesn’t have, the consequences of which you are not free to reject.

Government produces no products that consumers are willing to pay for voluntarily, and it doesn’t sell shares of stock in its assets. It doesn’t generate wealth; it seizes it. And when it can no longer politically get away with seizing, it borrows. It borrows a great deal of money — money that it rolls over, by borrowing trillions to pay back trillions to prior lenders, and thus its debt never goes away.

Last week, after eight years of publicly complaining that then-President Barack Obama was borrowing more than $1 trillion a year to fund the government — borrowing that the Republicans silently consented to — congressional Republicans, now in control of Congress and with a friend in the Oval Office, voted to spend and hence borrow between $5 trillion and $6 trillion more than tax revenue will produce in the next three years; that’s a few trillion more than they complained about in the Obama years.

That’s borrowing $1 million a minute.

Obviously, no business or household or bank can survive very long by borrowing from Peter to pay Paul. Yet the federal government, no matter which party controls Congress or the presidency, engages in staggering borrowing — borrowing that will cripple future generations by forcing them to pay for goods and services that were consumed before they were born.

The government has often borrowed to meet critical emergency needs, typically during wartime. Indeed, the country was born in debt when Alexander Hamilton, the father of big government, offered the idea that the new federal government created by the Constitution could purchase the fidelity of the states by assuming their Revolutionary War debts.

But those debts were paid back using inflation, gold and tax dollars, and the country enjoyed sporadic periods of nearly debt-free government. Then three unhappy events coincided about 100 years ago: Woodrow Wilson — the father of modern-day big government — was elected president, and he brought us into the useless battle over national borders among old European royalty called the Great War, and he financed American participation in that first world war using the new printing presses owned by the new Federal Reserve System.

The $30 billion President Wilson borrowed from the Federal Reserve and others has been rolled over and over and has never been repaid. The federal government still owes the $30 billion principal, and for that it has paid more than $15 billion in interest. Who in his right mind would pay 50 percent interest on a 100-year-old debt? Only the government.

Wilson’s $30 billion debt 100 years ago has ballooned to $20.6 trillion today. At the end of President Donald Trump’s present term — because of the Republican budget signed into law last week — the government’s debt will be about $27 trillion.

That amount is a debt bomb waiting to explode. Here’s why. Every year, the federal government collects about $2.5 trillion in revenue and spends it all. It borrows another $1.5 trillion to $2 trillion and spends it all. To avoid paying back any of the $27 trillion it will owe, the federal government will need to spend about $1 trillion a year in interest payments.

That $1 trillion is 40 percent of the revenue collected by the federal government; that’s 40 cents on every dollar in tax revenue going to interest on old debts — interest payments that are legally unavoidable by taxpayers and voters.

Will the taxpaying public tolerate this much longer? What would happen if taxpayers stopped paying taxes because 40 percent of what they’ve been paying has produced nothing for them? Would investors stop lending money to the government because of fear that the government could not pay them back? The Constitution requires the government to pay its debts. Would the government’s creditors acquire control of the government’s fiscal policy in order to pay themselves back? The government’s biggest creditor is one of its biggest menaces — the government of China.

Borrowing money at $1 million a minute is digging a hole out of which we will never peacefully climb. President Obama’s and President Trump’s own military and intelligence chiefs have argued that the national debt — not the Russians or the Islamic State group or the North Koreans — is the greatest threat to freedom and security that we face today.

Why are Congress and President Trump not listening?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
Rob
Rob
February 17, 2018 4:59 pm

The bigger problem is that once spending for a specific project or entitlement occurs it is never taken away. Its like politicians do not have the backbone to say no. Read the book “When Money Dies.” The history of Germany forced to repay GB and France after WWI when Germany was dead broke. Along came a guy named Hitler. My excel spreadsheet tells me the USA debt bomb explodes somewhere around 2025. This is what it will look like from the ground….the trucks will stop rolling and your local supermarket will not be able to keep the shelves stocked. All hell breaks lose as you and your neighbor fight over the last can of pork and beans.

Brian
Brian
February 17, 2018 5:08 pm

Funny thing is, Congress can create all the money it wants. Yet it defers that power to the federal reserve and then charges us income tax for their dereliction of duty. All the while the Fed makes a nice 6% dividend on Congresses inability to carry out it’s duty. PLUS all the interest they make as well. What a racket!

John Cray
John Cray
  Brian
February 17, 2018 7:52 pm

Remember the US Federal Reserve is privately owned by a consortium of banks. Think about that.

Brian
Brian
  John Cray
February 17, 2018 9:54 pm

Given license by this case to assist the government in the collection and distribution of revenue.

Something IMO they have overstepped by a few light years.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCulloch_v._Maryland

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
February 17, 2018 5:28 pm

Prior to Q I rarely paid much attention to this kind of article because it represents the status quo, same as it ever was.

Since Q, two things Trump is doing have me perplexed. One is the massive budget spending and looming calls for MOAR. Through Q’s posts I suspect that much like making the Beaners pay for the wall as Trump is fond of saying, the budget will ultimately be paid for in full and then some by way of that Executive order he signed. I think we are going to use those confiscated assets to pay off the debt and rebuild our country and then transition to a value based, sovereign monetary system of some kind. Using the wealth of the bad actors to destroy what they built would be the ultimate FUCK YOU to the elites.

The build up of the military is more perplexing. Trump is a believer in the Constitution. He has stated that he wants to give our government back to the people. The ramifications of what Q is discussing indicate that the world will work more as allies on a level playing field of mutual respect and commerce. Trump has said as much himself. Most of the current discord among nations stems from the evil that the deep state elite rulers of the world intentionally stir up to enrich themselves and control the world through manipulation and fear. With them out of the way there would seemingly be no need for a massive military anywhere. I have not yet heard of a plausible theory for the military build up in a world freed from elite domination. The Constitution certainly doesn’t support large standing armies. Perhaps the goal is to technically modernize our military to the max instead of increasing force size, pay for it with seized assets then scale it back.

At the end of the day I think the ultimate goal is to shine the light of truth on the lies, give the republic back to the people and then allow the people to do what they will with it. There are no guarantees. The People abdicated their responsibilities in the past. I’m hoping the horrors of what is about to be revealed will prevent that in the future but as I am fond of saying humans are far too shortsighted. We only think in terms of our own life spans rarely planning for anything longer than that. Our elite rulers on the other hand do exactly the opposite.

That’s muh hope anyway.

kokoda the Deplorable Raccoon and I-LUV-CO2
kokoda the Deplorable Raccoon and I-LUV-CO2
  IndenturedServant
February 17, 2018 7:43 pm

IS….the wealth theft of all the convicted rich in America would not dent the current 20 Tril debt.20 Trillion

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant

You are forgetting the Rothschild, Soros and Rockefeller fortunes including ALL of the companies, think tanks, foundations and trusts (which in turn own TONS of primo real estate) they own. Like Q says, expand your thinking. 🙂

BB
BB
February 17, 2018 6:30 pm

Indent Service ,you have become an eternal optimist and I’m not sure I like it.I liked you better when you were a hard core doomsday boy.
Rob ,some economist are saying 2024 – 2025 is when the shit will hit the Fan.This give guys like me a few more years to get our houses in order if you know what I mean.
We could just refuse to pay any of this imaginary debt back. Couldn’t we ?

Wip
Wip
  BB
February 17, 2018 7:10 pm

I think that’s the reason for the military buildup….avoiding repayment.

Mark
Mark
  Wip
February 17, 2018 9:50 pm

Wip,

Me too.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Wip
February 18, 2018 9:10 am

There is no reason that repayment would ever need to be avoided.

Congress just issues as much money as is necessary to pay it and as much as the want to spend every time they want to spend it through the Treasury and the problem is solved, there are even provisions in the Federal Reserve Act to allow a buy back of it this way.

Congress would do a much better job of controlling our money supply than the Fed does.