THIS DAY IN HISTORY – O.J. Simpson acquitted – 1995

Via History.com

At the end of a sensational trial, former football star O.J. Simpson is acquitted of the brutal 1994 double murder of his estranged wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ronald Goldman. In the epic 252-day trial, Simpson’s “dream team” of lawyers employed creative and controversial methods to convince jurors that Simpson’s guilt had not been proved “beyond a reasonable doubt,” thus surmounting what the prosecution called a “mountain of evidence” implicating him as the murderer.

Orenthal James Simpson–a Heisman Trophy winner, star running back with the Buffalo Bills, and popular television personality–married Nicole Brown in 1985. He reportedly regularly abused his wife and in 1989 pleaded no contest to a charge of spousal battery. In 1992, she left him and filed for divorce. On the night of June 12, 1994, Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were stabbed and slashed to death in the front yard of Mrs. Simpson’s condominium in Brentwood, Los Angeles. By June 17, police had gathered enough evidence to charge O.J. Simpson with the murders.

Simpson had no alibi for the time frame of the murders. Some 40 minutes after the murders were committed, a limousine driver sent to take Simpson to the airport saw a man in dark clothing hurrying up the drive of his Rockingham estate. A few minutes later, Simpson spoke to the driver though the gate phone and let him in. During the previous 25 minutes, the driver had repeatedly called the house and received no answer.

A single leather glove found outside Simpson’s home matched a glove found at the crime scene. In preliminary DNA tests, blood found on the glove was shown to have come from Simpson and the two victims. After his arrest, further DNA tests would confirm this finding. Simpson had a wound on his hand, and his blood was a DNA match to drops found at the Brentwood crime scene. Nicole Brown Simpson’s blood was discovered on a pair of socks found at the Rockingham estate. Simpson had recently purchased a “Stiletto” knife of the type the coroner believed was used by the killer. Shoe prints in the blood at Brentwood matched Simpson’s shoe size and later were shown to match a type of shoe he had owned. Neither the knife nor shoes were found by police.

On June 17, a warrant was put out for Simpson’s arrest, but he refused to surrender. Just before 7 p.m., police located him in a white Ford Bronco being driven by his friend, former teammate Al Cowlings. Cowlings refused to pull over and told police over his cellular phone that Simpson was suicidal and had a gun to his head. Police agreed not to stop the vehicle by force, and a low-speed chase ensued. Los Angeles news helicopters learned of the event unfolding on their freeways, and live television coverage began. As millions watched, the Bronco was escorted across Los Angeles by a phalanx of police cars. Just before 8 p.m., the dramatic journey ended when Cowlings pulled into the Rockingham estate. After an hour of tense negotiation, Simpson emerged from the vehicle and surrendered. In the vehicle was found a travel bag containing, among other things, Simpson’s passport, a disguise kit consisting of a fake moustache and beard, and a revolver. Three days later, Simpson appeared before a judge and pleaded not guilty.

Simpson’s subsequent criminal trial was a sensational media event of unprecedented proportions. It was the longest trial ever held in California, and courtroom television cameras captured the carnival-like atmosphere of the proceedings. The prosecution’s mountain of evidence was systemically called into doubt by Simpson’s team of expensive attorneys, who made the dramatic case that their client was framed by unscrupulous and racist police officers. Citing the questionable character of detective Mark Fuhrman and alleged blunders in the police investigation, defense lawyers painted Simpson as yet another African American victim of the white judicial system. The jurors’ reasonable doubt grew when the defense spent weeks attacking the damning DNA evidence, arguing in overly technical terms that delays and other anomalies in the gathering of evidence called the findings into question. Critics of the trial accused Judge Lance Ito of losing control of his courtroom.

In polls, a majority of African Americans believed Simpson to be innocent of the crime, while white America was confident of his guilt. However, the jury–made up of nine African Americans, two whites, and one Hispanic–was not so divided; they took just four hours of deliberation to reach the verdict of not guilty on both murder charges. On October 3, 1995, an estimated 140 million Americans listened in on radio or watched on television as the verdict was delivered.

In February 1997, Simpson was found liable for several charges related to the murders in a civil trial and was forced to award $33.5 million in compensatory and punitive damages to the victims’ families. However, with few assets remaining after his long and costly legal battle, he has avoided paying the damages.

In 2007, Simpson ran into legal problems once again when he was arrested for breaking into a Las Vegas hotel room and taking sports memorabilia, which he claimed had been stolen from him, at gunpoint. On October 3, 2008, he was found guilty of 12 charges related to the incident, including armed robbery and kidnapping, and sentenced to 33 years in prison.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Iska Waran
Iska Waran
October 3, 2018 7:47 am

The juxtaposition of Kavanaugh being on the cusp of losing a SCOTUS position over an evidence-free accusation and Simpson having been acquitted despite a mountain of evidence is mind-blowing. Then they talk about “white privilege”.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  Iska Waran
October 4, 2018 2:12 am

The problem is the majority of that evidence was circumstantial. Too many get convicted on circumstantial evidence.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
October 3, 2018 11:51 am

“If he’s black and full of shit….you must acquit.”

MarshRabbit
MarshRabbit
October 3, 2018 1:09 pm

Detective Mark Furman took the 5th three times. After that, the prosecution was dead in the water. The LA cops blew this case when they tried to frame a guilty man.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  MarshRabbit
October 4, 2018 2:22 am

I think they convinced themselves that O.J. was the murderer, and the easiest solution, and wanted a quick conviction. As I said before, I think his son did the murder. The son had mental issues. There’s a good video online that outlines this. I think O.J. stumbled onto the crime scene and knew his son did it but was prepared to take the blame.
By the way, you cannot trust California DNA evidence. Remember the scandals of fake DNA confirmations not long ago in the papers. These cops wanted a fast conviction to a high-profile case, no matter who got convicted. And since he had a domestic violence past, O.J. fit the bill for them. Doesn’t mean he actually did it. Domestic violence doesn’t always lead to murder. But mental illness can and does.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  MarshRabbit
October 4, 2018 2:26 am

By the way, that video was telling as far as my argument that O.J. didn’t do it.
We’ve all seen past articles and videos of police planting evidence and falsifying evidence. And I include DNA evidence in that argument.
They wanted a quick conviction, and if they had to lie, cheat or steal, they would have done it, because the higher-ups were pressing them.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
October 3, 2018 7:19 pm

Being a resident of the greater LA area, and having already witnessed the savage dindoo uprising that accompanied the Rodney King verdict, I took the day off, just in case. My drive home would take me through some darker areas, and the last thing I wanted was to be the next Reginald Denny.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
October 4, 2018 2:10 am

I still say O.J.’s “chef” son did it. He owned chef’s knives for his job and was pissed off at his mother right before the murder. He expected her at the restaurant he worked at earlier in the evening and she didn’t show up, so he was pissed. Not to mention, he had mental issues. I think O.J. was willing to take the rap for him, but he had good attorneys that got him off.
Everyone will ask why he was running in the Bronco. I think his plan was to leave to either bring suspicion on himself or to claim he wasn’t there, and hoping the crime would be unsolvable, which is basically what it came down to after his trial and he was acquitted.