Fuel Riots – The Paris Preview

Guest Post by Eric Peters

They’re rioting in France over the government’s imposition of artificial fuel scarcity.

There’s no actual shortage; the country – the world – is swimming in fuel, courtesy of new discoveries and new extraction techniques.

Parisians just can’t afford to buy it because of French President Emmanuel Macron’s “hydrocarbon tax” regime – specifically designed to make fuel unaffordable, as a compensatory measure to correct for its abundance and the low prices that would otherwise be the case.

As here.

Adjusted for inflation, the cost of gasoline is less in real terms than it was in 1965. And a huge chunk of the cost today is taxes – about 50 cents per gallon. Take that away and gas would only cost about $2 per gallon.

Diesel fuel – despite the add-on costs of having to refine it to the nth degree in order to achieve compliance with federal Ultra Low Sulfur fatwas – is also very affordable, about $2.60 per gallon.

This, of course, is a big problem for the getting-people-out-of-their-cars agenda. Of which Macron (the Beto O’ Rourke of the French) is a leading avatar.

Which agenda had pinned its hopes on the perception of naturally rising fuel prices (also artificially created, via the withholding of oil) as the nudge they needed to get people to give up their cars voluntarily.

But the Peak Oil that’s been promised – threatened – for more than half a century never peaked.

Worse – from the standpoint of those who want to get-us-out-of-cars  – is that the opposite has happened. More oil has been found. Oceans of the stuff. So much oil has been discovered that despite a more than doubling of worldwide demand, supply has increased even faster.

This has eliminated the excuse for all the government-imposed austerity measures of the past 50 years – everything from the “Drive 55” water torture we endured from the mid-1970s until the mid-1990s to the Corporate Average Fuel Economy fatwas that are literally destroying the car industry.

And the disappearance of that excuse is an obsidian dagger pointed at the heart of the Electric Car Agenda, which is really an anti-car, anti-mobility agenda. The object is to get people out of their cars. To get them under control. EVs are just the shuck-and-jive used to gull the modern-day version of Lenin’s useful idiots.

Bottom line: If fuel is plentiful then there is no reason for “alternatives” to it.

At least, no reason for most people to freely give up their affordable, quick-to-refuel and long-ranged non-electric cars in favor of expensive, takes-forever-to-recharge and range-gimped EVs.

And this is the reason for the hysteria we’re witnessing – from governments like Macron’s as well as ours – attended by the courtier press, which sings the “climate change” chorus at top volume, to drown out the problem of cheap, abundant fuel.

And for Macron’s “hydrocarbon tax.”

It has caused the price per liter of diesel fuel in France to swell by almost 25 percent over by the past year, to about $7 per gallon as of late November. This is a very big deal in France because more than half the passenger cars on the road are diesel-powered.

They became so popular because of artificially rising gas prices. The French government, like other European governments, has been imposing haltingly regressive taxes on gas for decades.

A diesel-powered car goes farther on a liter of fuel than an equivalent gas-burning car.  Buying a diesel-powered car was thus an end run around government-manufactured unleaded regular austerity.

Now, it’s diesel that’s in the crosshairs – precisely because it is abundant, efficient and affordable.

And it’s not just the fuel, either.

The French government has issued decrees forbidding diesel-powered cars made in 2005 or before from entering Paris and will progressively increase these bans until diesel-powered cars are outlawed altogether.

This, of course, renders those cars – several hundred thousand of them – useless to their owners, who will not be compensated for the regulatory taking. Instead, they will be nudged to become parasitical upon their fellow Frenchmen, by partaking of subsidies for  . . . electric cars.

Until, of course, those become the object of future bans. Which, rest assured, they will be. Remember: The real issue is mobility. Limiting, controlling and denying it – to average people.

Never, of course, to the elites. Macron will have all the diesel and gas he likes. Paid for by those who can no longer afford it themselves.

And there’s more.

All IC powered cars (diesel and gas) will be prohibited from operating in the French capital beginning in 2030 and a ban on their sale in the whole country goes into effect in 2040. Similar measures are either in process or already on the books in other European countries, including the UK and Germany.

And this is why there is such unglued hysteria – displayed by the car companies and the government – for electric cars here, too.

Major automakers headquartered in Europe such as Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Volvo, Renault, VW/Audi, Jaguar/Land Rover and Alfa have had their businesses shut down by regulatory edict.

They will go electric – or they will not go at all.

And because of that, so will we.

Even if Uncle doesn’t impose no-driving/no IC fatwas and/or confiscatory fuel taxes, the rip-tide effect of what is going on right now in Europe will almost certainly drag us along.

Consider: Half of the world’s major car companies have “committed” – that is, been forced to accept – an all-electric future because of what is going on in Europe. They aren’t going to continue investing R&D money into the development of a separate line of non-electric cars, even if they are still allowed to sell them here. So they will sell electric cars here and – having embraced the tar baby – push for mandates that they be sold and for subsidies to help sell them.

GM and Ford will do so also – have already committed publicly to the same agenda. In part because they can’t afford to not sell cars in Europe, which are huge markets for them both.

China, too.

It’s not personal – just business. Like Michael Corleone said.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
20 Comments
Ruso Paisa
Ruso Paisa
November 27, 2018 1:04 pm

Bring on the electric/ natural gas powered cars. Here in South America (Colombia) there are no restrictions on sulfur limits. As a result, the valley in Medellin where I live is a pollution nightmare. Two days after my maid cleans the house I can run my fingers across the floor/ counter top and they will be black. And I’m not a negro in case you were wondering. Eyes and throat are constantly irritated as well. For this reason I’ll be relocating to the countryside pronto.

Max in the Middle of NoWhere
Max in the Middle of NoWhere
  Ruso Paisa
November 27, 2018 1:50 pm

Senor Ruso Paisa,

Por Favor, can you provide more information about Columbia.

I am considering relocation to South America, and am considering Columbia in particular. I want to relocate to a rural region, an altiplano area where I can build a adobe house, make a garden, raise some chickens, and plant a small orchard for a cash income. Is that possible? Are the locals likely to accept a foreigner who has come to work and integrate? Is it necessary to join the Catholic Church?

Ruso Paisa
Ruso Paisa
  Max in the Middle of NoWhere
November 27, 2018 2:57 pm

If you are looking for something rural you will still want to be inside of a well guarded community. The prices are fairly expensive if you want to live in a decent area. If you decide to buy a plot somewhere without that you are exposing yourself to major risks. Think kidnapping and extortion. FYI, the police have a dedicated number just for kidnappings just to give you an idea. The country is full of friendly, kind, hard-working people. However, there are a lot of bad hombres as well. The average monthly wage is only between $300-500. If you are still undeterred let me know.

Max in the Middle of NoWhere
Max in the Middle of NoWhere
  Ruso Paisa
November 27, 2018 11:26 pm

If I decide to settle in rural Columbia, I will find a town of 2,000 to 3,500 people with agricultural land nearby, where I can buy a plot of 10 to 40 acres . The idea is to live in a fortified town with enough adult males to form a militia, organized to protect the town from roving bands of thugs. I will walk out to my small farm each day with a pair of dangerous dogs, and a pair of large pistols in shoulder holsters. I realize that firearm permits are difficult to obtain in parts of South America, but a yearly gift to the police retirement fund can work miracles. In Mexico, a gift to the policia is called mordita-the bite.

For many centuries, people in parts of Europe lived together for mutual protection in fortified villages that were surrounded by cultivated farms. The first Spanish settlers in northern New Mexico (now part of US) did the same. I read that “Indian” tribes in the southeast USA had the same arrangement when European explorers first arrived.

Individuals or even families who live in remote farmhouses have a death wish. They do not have enough people there to protect themselves from a roving gang. See what happens in South Africa. A large gang will attack at night. Even if the farmer has big dogs,the farm family and their dogs are not enough to defend against the large gang of hombres muy malo. Torture first, rape of the women, then death. After seeing your family raped and tortured, death will be a welcome friend.

In the USA at the present time, remote farmsteads are only robbed when the farmer and his family are gone to a city to purchase supplies or equipment. Later, after the coming collapse, the gangs will kill the farm family after forcing them to tell where valuables are hidden. Many more gangs will exist and they will be more vicious.

Most people here in the US are living in a dream world, not realizing how bad conditions can be after a collapse of civilized society. Very few people are aware of sudden collapses of civilized conditions have already occurred in local areas in the US or in entire countries elsewhere in the world. I have read about the descent into savagery in The Ukraine in the early 1930’s and Argentina after the collapse there in 2001. Those who have seen how crazy people can become have told me that 80% of our population will die from starvation and violence if we have a nationwide disaster. The electrical power grid, the financial system, or the food delivery system can fail very easily.

I think people in South America are much more able to deal with bad times than people in North America. People who have been through bad times can survive more bad times. People in the US have had soft lives for too long. They will not react well to trouble.

In 2014, about 4 years ago, I bought a house in a small town in the middle of the US. At that time, the Obama government seemed to be trying to get the Ebola plague started in the US. I assumed that they would use an Ebola epidemic here as a reason to declare martial law and restrict travel inside the US. So, I panicked and moved to the first place I found that seemed good. I just wanted to be away from any large groups of people.

The small town I live is reasonably safe and remote from large cities, I have room for a huge garden and can buy more ground, but I see several problems for the near future. Firstly, the town is too small. There are not enough people to make a defense force for the town. In addition, since our little world is mostly free of crime, the people here want to ignore the evil and violence that can come here from the outside world. Secondly, the water supply to the town is not secure enough. Thirdly, there are not enough trees to provide firewood, if the supply of natural gas is interrupted or the electrical grid does not deliver electricity for more than a very short time.

I realize that I can find a bigger town in a more remote part of the US, with a reliable water supply, and large forests for firewood. The problem is that I am convinced that we will have a very violent, very bloody Civil War in the US, sometime very soon. Every place in the US will be touched by the Civil War, even if some remote places will experience less destruction and less bloodshed. I need to decide if I stay and play my part in the Civil War, or go somewhere else.

Ruso Paisa
Ruso Paisa
  Max in the Middle of NoWhere
November 27, 2018 3:04 pm

Forget trying to make a living selling anything from the garden. Most foreigners work online and get paid in dollars or euros. That or making significant investments in real estate and living off of the rental income

Max in the Middle of NoWhere
Max in the Middle of NoWhere
  Ruso Paisa
November 27, 2018 11:44 pm

If I move to Columbia or some other South American country, my garden, chickens, and rabbits will be near my house in town to make food for my family, myself, and local friends. The orchard will be on the small remote farm and hopefully be used to make money. Tree crops like nuts, apples, etc., can be carried to the cities and sold there. Unfortunately, trees started from seeds don’t start bearing fruit for six or seven years.

If the US has a Civil War or random violence from a collapse of fragile supply systems, any income obtained remotely from the US will disappear. At that point, any emigrant from the US to a South American country must hope the local people value his work and contribution to the community.

ursel doran
ursel doran
November 27, 2018 1:23 pm

Global warming debunked to global COOLING for one reason. Sun cycles, the source of all energy.
Gosh who could have possibly have seen this rational logical bit of science?

Global Cooling is Real – Major Temperature Low 2046?

Aquapura
Aquapura
November 27, 2018 1:52 pm

There are so many errors in this article I’ don’t know where to begin. Sure, global oil production has increased in recent years due to advanced recovery techniques. Nobody has found a new super-major oil field like the Ghawar in KSA. In fact all the major fields around the globe are in decline. We can’t trust the data out of OPEC but we have good reliable data on places like the North Sea and Alaska’s Prudhoe Bay – two of the most recent major discoveries which are both in heavy decline. So we make it up on fracking, which is fine except for those wells have very steep decline rates. It’s an adreniline shot for global production that won’t last long. We’ve got deep sea wells which are great but the masthead of this very website shows how that can go. Stated simply, oil will not “run out” but it will get hard and harder to find as it already has and that will get reflected in the price eventually.

Secondly, diesel fuel is not “better” than gasoline. It has more BTU’s per gallon so of course a vehicle can go further on one gallon. You’re comparing apples and oranges with diesel and gasoline. That being said, it does pollute more and if Eric doesn’t give a crap about air pollution there are parts of the world he can visit to see what that looks like.

As for fuel taxes, France can do as they wish. As a nation France has basically zero oil production of their own. So for something they import +99% of prudent policy would be to tax that such that people are motivated to use an alternative, maybe one that is locally produced. France has a world class electrical grid powered on nuclear energy. Say what you will about that but it powers some decent rail networks and could power electric cars. Having been to France several times the last thing needed in Paris is the dream world of Mr. Peters where everyone drives Dodge Chargers running on liquid fuel.

Iwasntbornwithenufmiddlefingers
Iwasntbornwithenufmiddlefingers
  Aquapura
November 27, 2018 5:00 pm

Parts of the world he can visit if he wants to see air pollution

Because its isolated in pockets based on geography where land and water formations cause temperature inversions and smog. Not a world wide phenomena.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
November 27, 2018 3:14 pm

They refer to the protests as “anti-government.” If only. The French are not that mature in their understanding and neither is most of the world…sadly. What they are are protests against THIS government. Once their tyrant du jour is in power, and wielding the sword in support of THEIR causes, blind obedience and worship will return.

TC
TC
November 27, 2018 3:35 pm

Funny – the French don’t seem to care about hordes of 3rd world invaders taking over their country but don’t you fucking dare charge too much for diesel.

AB
AB
November 27, 2018 3:41 pm

Petrol has always been 4 times higher than in the States, due to taxes. Driving is discouraged, and considering the available public transportation and the fact the infrastructure was developed prior to the invention of the automobile, not such an inconvenience. Pathways between villages are generally the route of least resistance, etc.

I would like to know from just where do these globalist idiots think electricity is generated? It’s a zero sum gain going electric. Diesel is the way to go, but the globalists are intent on wiping that out, expect for their own use, of course.

Overthecliff
Overthecliff
November 27, 2018 5:34 pm

The frogs voted for it. Now they are going to get it good.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  Overthecliff
November 27, 2018 8:21 pm

No, the majority of people who bothered to vote, voted for it. The rest are simply going to suffer the end result. Please don’t lump them all together. NO society is 100% in support of what their government is doing…not even ours.

Thunderbird
Thunderbird
November 27, 2018 9:56 pm

Hydrogen is the future fuel source. The coming revolution in France will be like the last one. The status quo is breaking down. So is the false narrative we have to listen to every day.

Steve
Steve
  Thunderbird
November 28, 2018 10:07 am

The expense of manufacturing hydrogen is more expensive that using oil. The net is a negative number. Sorry to bum you out.

Robert (QSLV)
Robert (QSLV)
  Steve
November 28, 2018 11:21 am

Water+Solar=Hydrogen The Hopewell Project

steve
steve
  Steve
November 29, 2018 12:35 am

like I said: hydrogen is net-negative and NOT a realistic option. Sorry to bum you out.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/04/hydrogen_the_netnegative_energy_option.html

Boat Guy
Boat Guy
November 27, 2018 10:12 pm

It’s all about restricting people and their freedom to come and go independently . Alcohol in the fuel in the states is just another scatter brain government plain developed by social engineers . What do you expect from a French Socialist that married a women old enough to be his mother

wdg
wdg
November 28, 2018 10:31 am

This the UN’s Agenda 21, Agenda 2030 and Global Neighborhoods satanic doctrine of slavery and control now being applied in France by Macron who is an agent of the Rothschild Criminal Banking Syndicate. Watch: Agenda 21 in Less Than 5 Minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=govL-fUAwMA
or
Agenda 21….You are dead….