Doug Casey on the Government Shutdown

Via Casey Research

Justin’s note: The U.S. government is shut down.

It has been for 28 days now – making it the longest government shutdown in U.S. history by a wide margin. And there’s no telling when it will come to an end.

So it shouldn’t come as a surprise that the media’s having a field day with this. But I can’t help but wonder if this is as big of a deal as people are making it out to be. So I got Doug Casey on the phone to see what he thinks…


Justin: Doug, the U.S. government shutdown is now 28 days old. Are you surprised it’s lasted this long?

Doug: I’m not surprised, but I’m definitely pleased. There have been a number of shutdowns in the past. Sixteen days under Obama. Twenty-one days under Bill Clinton. Five separate shutdowns on Jimmy Carter’s watch. This one, like its antecedents, is no more than a tempest in a toilet bowl – just a nuisance for a small segment of the population. A proper shutdown would include the IRS [laughs].

In this case, the shutdown is because Trump isn’t getting the $5.7 billion he wants for his wall. But this begs the question… should there even be a wall? My answer is “no,” for a number of both practical and philosophical reasons. Keeping illegal aliens out is a good idea. But it would happen naturally if just two things were done.

Point number one, get rid of the welfare benefits that draw the wrong kind of people. During the 19th century, and up to the 1930s, there were absolutely no welfare benefits for immigrants – or anybody else, for that matter. As a result, you attracted opportunity seekers.

Point number two, all U.S. property should be privately owned. Including streets, sidewalks, and parks. That way if they can’t support themselves, or make an arrangement with somebody who will, they would simply have no place to sleep.

No welfare?! No unowned property where vagrants can loiter?! It sounds heartless. But I have no doubt that people like Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez, New York’s Mayor DeBlasio, and thousands of other generous public servants would feed, clothe, and shelter them at their own expense.

But in today’s world, the public doesn’t want less government. They want much, much more. Polls show most Millennials favor socialism. So we can look forward to a paradise for the workers and peasants in the new future.

However I’m afraid nobody is looking at the important thing here.

Man Who Predicted 2008 Meltdown Surprises With New Prediction

Justin: And what would that be?

Doug: Some rather basic principles. Our topic is not why this shutdown occurred. It’s whether or not the shutdown is a good thing or a bad thing. To answer that question we have to decide to what extent the federal government is necessary. Everybody assumes that it’s always been there, and has always been the behemoth it now is. The average American not only confuses the government with the country – they’re actually two different things – but sees Washington, DC as a fixture in the cosmic firmament.

Let me make what some may feel is an outrageous statement: There’s nothing the government does that couldn’t and wouldn’t be done – vastly cheaper and better – by profit-seeking entrepreneurs. Further, a large part of what the government does is not just unnecessary, but destructive. And wouldn’t be done at all in a free market.

So, let’s look at a few departments that have been affected by this shutdown, and see how important they are to the conduct of life in the United States. Obviously this isn’t even scratching the surface. A proper discussion would take years. But it’s worth taking a few minutes here because the average American – forget about the average European – hasn’t even considered the concept.

My view is optimistic and hopeful. Basically, all the departments that have been shut down should actually be abolished wholesale. They serve no useful purpose. If they are useful, they should be privatized.

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NASA] is an excellent example of this. Right now, 95% of its employees have been furloughed.

And I’m all for NASA in principle, or at least what it does. I’m a big fan of space exploration. But even though NASA is full of competent, high-IQ people, it’s run like the post office, or a DMV, or the military. It’s degenerated into a typical cost-plus government bureaucracy.

SpaceX, Blue Origin, and many other companies are proving that the private sector can do anything that NASA does – faster, cheaper, and better. Why? Because they’re not constrained by politics. They necessarily have to operate in a sustainable, efficient, innovative way. Because they’re doing it for profit. Which means they’re trying to create capital, not consume it.

Apart from that, the U.S. government is manifestly bankrupt. Soon enough, it won’t even be able to pay the interest on its debt, forget about science projects. That’s going to happen over the next couple of decades. NASA will be left high and dry – last in line for whatever funds there are.

NASA, and similar government enterprises, should be privatized. Either taken public in an IPO, perhaps with most shares distributed to all U.S. citizens, and its employees. Or sold to some company with an interest in space. That would turn it from a cash consuming liability into an asset.

Trump Prediction Will Give You Goosebumps

Justin: What federal agencies would be better if taken over by the private sector?

Doug: The United States Department of Agriculture [USDA]. It has about 100,000 employees and spends about $140 billion a year. Those are amazing numbers, considering that only 1 to 2% of the U.S. population works in agriculture. Its useful functions – crop reporting, bio research and such – should be privatized. Of course all crop subsidies, price controls, planting limits, and the like should be abolished. They basically put farmers – especially politically well-connected ones – on welfare. And create distortions in the market.

The Department of Homeland Security should be abolished. In particular the Transportation Security Administration [TSA], one of their many divisions.

If airline security is necessary – if it actually makes sense to screen people before they get on planes – it should be the job of the airlines, not the government. Airlines shortsightedly offloaded the responsibility and cost of maintaining security to the taxpayer. But the costs should be reflected in the cost of flying. Air travelers who actually use this service – if that’s what it is – should pay for it. But it’s probably not necessary in today’s world of secured cabins.

What kind of middle-aged people – 60,000 of them – are willing to wear costumes and go through the dirty laundry of their fellow citizens, and interrogate them, for $15 an hour? It’s ridiculous and degrading theater.

Speaking of flying, the FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] should be privatized. In particular its critical Air Traffic Control division, which is always a generation or two behind in its technology. That’s not going to improve, because funding from a bankrupt government will be increasingly sparse.

Justin’s note: Tomorrow, we’ll share part 2 of our conversation, where Doug and I look at what the shutdown could mean for the National Park System as well as the Department of Defense.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal


-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
18 Comments
Donkey Balls
Donkey Balls
January 19, 2019 3:24 pm

“There’s nothing the government does that couldn’t and wouldn’t be done – vastly cheaper and better – by profit-seeking entrepreneurs.”

I don’t know about that. I’d be a bit worried about monopolies taking hold. I’d certainly be in favor of eliminating all public unionization though. I think that would be a great improvement. And make them find their own retirements same as the private sector.

starfcker
starfcker
  Donkey Balls
January 19, 2019 4:11 pm

Great post, WIP

Stucky
Stucky
  starfcker
January 19, 2019 4:32 pm

Hey … how about that Tesla announcement yesterday … laying off 3,400 people.

It’s always a good sign that when a company who can barely meet production quotas … then lays off thousands. Right?

I bet people should buy more Tesla stock. Right?

starfcker
starfcker
  Stucky
January 19, 2019 6:18 pm

Right. They announce quarterly results sometime in the next 10 days. Watch

Grog
Grog
  Donkey Balls
January 19, 2019 7:13 pm

The government isn’t a monopoly?

Donkey Balls
Donkey Balls
  Grog
January 19, 2019 8:15 pm

Yes, I agree but at least the government “could” keep a capitalist monopoly from charging $100 for using a highway.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  Donkey Balls
January 20, 2019 6:01 am

I doubt there would be many monopolies if the big companies couldn’t get what they want through government, making entry for new and smaller companies too hard. Level the playing field and get the government out of the way.

Stucky
Stucky
January 19, 2019 4:38 pm

Three pictures which prove that life goes on after a government shutdown … in fact, life gets BETTER!!

[imgcomment image[/img]
.
[imgcomment image[/img]
.
[img]https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRjNUfz2o6b66pmrBDbLni3Omscrn6jNIzujduPiUqlYexnwHwdvw[img]
.
.
[imgcomment image[/img]

Chubby Bubbles
Chubby Bubbles
  Stucky
January 19, 2019 7:51 pm

That’s her!! That’s Chubby Bubbles… 🙂

MarshRabbit
MarshRabbit
January 19, 2019 6:17 pm

“There’s nothing the government does that couldn’t and wouldn’t be done – vastly cheaper and better – by profit-seeking entrepreneurs”
Can you provide some examples where privatization of a government function was done “cheaper and better”? I know some examples where privatization failed rather dramatically.

starfcker
starfcker
  MarshRabbit
January 19, 2019 6:52 pm

Great post, MarshRabbit

no one
no one
  MarshRabbit
January 20, 2019 6:09 am

There was the whole “Reinventing Government” phase with all the public-private competition, which fueled the small business set asides for minorities. Holy Cow, that turned the government contracting business into a Sacred Cow. Yes, privatization became competition for government dollars, which is not true market competition, is it?

yahsure
yahsure
January 19, 2019 7:41 pm

As TBP has talked about, The Free Shit Army is vast. Democrats just talk up free shit and their army grows. the border, No anchor babies allowed and make work visas for seasonal workers is two ideas I have.

Thunderbird
Thunderbird
January 19, 2019 7:46 pm

There is no private sector to speak of. There are only corporations who consider themselves private. I disagree with everything Doug Casey is saying.

Going private means corporate control. Where is he coming from? He lives in a fantasy bubble that is not reality about our current situation in this country.

We need to bust up the giant corporations currently buying up everything on debt.

Free enterprise means no monopolies controlling everything. It means going back to customer service first over profits. It means a level playing field. It means no investors that have no sweat equity in the enterprise draining money from operations just because they want a certain level of return even at times when money needs to be used for replacing aging equipment and research & development.

Doug Casey is out to lunch. Sorry, my opinion of him and his self serving views.

starfcker
starfcker
  Thunderbird
January 19, 2019 8:11 pm

Great post, Thunderbird

Donkey Balls
Donkey Balls
  Thunderbird
January 19, 2019 8:17 pm

Yes, Thunderbird. Great comment.

That’s exactly the other side of things that people don’t always take into consideration. Corporations are as big a danger as governments, imo.

One day, you will have only 2 choices of employment. Either work for the government or a corporation.

overthecliff
overthecliff
  Donkey Balls
January 19, 2019 10:48 pm

They bought the government.

Chubby Bubbles
Chubby Bubbles
January 19, 2019 8:05 pm

I know one person affected by the shutdown: a friend who wanted grafting material from a public plant tissue bank maintained by (I think) the USDA. Now imagine if ALL plant material had to be provided by Monsanto!!

The Sobering Details Behind the Latest Seed Monopoly Chart

“By 2008, Monsanto’s patented genetics alone were planted on 80 percent of U.S. corn acres, 86 percent of cotton acres, and 92 percent of soybean acres. Today, these percentages are even higher.”

I think it was the Dep’t. of Ag. that used to be a huge source of seeds and gave seeds away for free to budding farmers wanting to “Go West, young man.” It behaved in an extremely socialist fashion, but in doing so supported millions of small-holders at the time (before it became the current, bloated, subsidy-cow). It supported serious research into the best strains and made that science available to agrarians. But most things that start out well end up getting corrupted by parasites and sociopaths.