From Canada, With Love

Guest Post by Eric Peters

One thing inevitably follows the next – if the first thing is tolerated.

When the Supreme Court, America’s unelected legislative body, created an exception (several, actually) to the Fourth Amendment’s clear and definite prohibition of searches without having first established probable cause and without a specific warrant, the Fourth Amendment became a functional nullity – the equivalent of a plastic water jug shot through with holes.

One of those exceptions created out of thin air by the Supremes is the one which empowers armed government workers to randomly stop motorists who’ve given no reason to suspect them of having broken any laws – in order to force them to prove they haven’t broken any.

And (hopefully, from the viewpoint of the government) to find some they have.

This exception to what had been the Fourth – and Fifth – Amendment’s protections created Checkpoint America.

Which didn’t used to exist.

Millennials won’t remember that better, vanished time, but anyone older than 40 today can remember it.

Americans were once free to travel unmolested by the state’s armed goons unless the state’s armed goons could give a reason for molesting them, specifically.

Not arbitrarily and randomly.

Which is to say, unreasonably.

Public saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaafety is given as the justification for the trampling of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments’ clear prohibitions of this checkpoint business.

“Someone” among the herd of randomly stopped cars might be “drunk” – or some other illegal thing, it is argued. One could of course just as easily turn this around and argue that any of the armed government workers performing the random stop/search might have just raped a child.

Or perhaps his pockets are stuffed with money stolen from  . . . “someone.”

Perhaps they all should be compelled to disprove the allegation upon demand – for the sake of public saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaafety?

Never mind. Logic being as defunct as the Fourth and Fifth Amendments.

In place of the guarantees the people were once promised, written in the plainest, clearest language imaginable – The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized – it is now “lawful” to randomly stop people, without warrant or probable cause, subject them to searches (eyeballing the interior of your car is a search) and require them to prove their innocence of such crimes as having consumed legal alcohol in whatever arbitrarily forbidden quantity or of having partaken of arbitrarily illegal “drugs” in any quantity.

Re-read that part about “shall not be violated.” No exceptions are listed – except those based on “probable cause” and very particularly describing what is to be searched for and seized – as opposed to a random fishing expedition, as we’ve all grown accustomed to tolerating.

That outrage ordained and accepted, the next and worse will inevitably follow.

It already has, in Canada – where the badged and armed ones have been empowered to demand that people prove to their satisfaction they aren’t  “drunk” or “high” even if they aren’t driving.

Even if they are at home.

Canadian cops can now bang on people’s doors and demand they submit to a breath test “within two hours” of driving – and if alcohol is found in their system at that time, it’s an arrestable offense.

Even if the drinking occurred after the driving stopped.

You drive home, park the car, grab a beer or three and sit down on the sofa to relax after a long day. Unbeknownst to you, “someone” called to report you swerved or cut them off on your way home – but perhaps all you did was pass them or “speed.” This enrages some people – who can now do more than flash their brights and honk their horns in impotent fury.

An AGW is dispatched to your house, there is a knock on the door. . .

Canadians are  subject, in other words, to being SWATTED on the basis of an allegation of a violation of DUI laws . . . hours after they stopped actually driving.

Your neighbor – the one you argued about over grass clippings or maybe a barking dog – only has to pick up the phone.

One call does it all.

Hut! Hut! Hut!

Canadians actually driving are also subject to mandatory breath tests at any time, without any need for “reasonable suspicion” that they may have been drinking.

The entire country has become, in effect, a gigantic checkpoint, open 24/7.

And refusing to collaborate in one’s own prosecution by submitting to a breath test – whether at home or in one’s car – is now itself a criminal offense.

The “noncompliant” victim is subject to immediate manacling and, upon conviction, can be sent to prison as well as fined thousands of dollars on that basis alone. Even if no trace of alcohol is subsequently discovered in the victim’s system. At least one elderly woman with breathing difficulties was cuffed and stuffed – and punished – for not taking the test, in spite of subsequent testing that established she had zero alcohol in her system.

And it’s not just breath they’re testing, either.

The law (C46) empowers armed government workers to “demand” – the exact word used in the legislation – that drivers “.. provide a sample of a bodily substance for analysis by drug screening equipment ”

In other words, the AGW banging on your door in the middle of the night may have a syringe.

Imagine being jumped, cuffed and held down while armed government workers (indemnified against any civil liability) extract blood from you  . . . in your own living room.

Yes, it’s come to that.

And it will be coming here, too.

Bank on it.

If forcibly stopping motorists at random checkpoints and demanding they prove to the satisfaction of a roadside AGW that they are not “drunk” (as well as other things) isn’t a violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, then on what basis would one argue that stopping them anywhere and demanding exactly the same thing is a violation?

It will of course be argued that the Canadians haven’t got a Bill of Rights – but then, neither do we.

Not anymore.

The ugly fact is that forced blood draws are already being performed here – with judicial sanction. 

And it is already effectively a criminal offense to decline to self-incriminate by the side of the road.

Refusal to take a breath test on demand in this country will result in arrest, suspension of driving privileges (how did it become a state-granted privilege to drive?) as well as the seizure of one’s vehicle.

All without the necessity of having convicted you of anything.

Americans have become used to the idea of sentence first, verdict after – per the Red Queen, from Alice in Wonderland. And it is going to get much worse. Ironically, because of the decriminalization of marijuana – ostensibly a step toward less Hut! Hut! Hutting! that will lead to more  – and worse – of it. Because THC – the active intoxicant in pot – cannot be detected by Breath tests and can remain in one’s blood for days and weeks (and longer) after the intoxicating effect has dissipated.

Thus it will be argued that it is necessary for public saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaafety to randomly check blood for the presence of THC – and anyone who has smoked pot at any time within the past days/weeks/months will be vulnerable to a Hut! Hut! Hutting! for as long as traces remain in his system.

It is equally likely they will soon begin mandatory DNA swabbing as well. Why not? How could anyone object – given established law and precedent?

“Someone” might be an on-the-loose felon, for instance.

Can’t be too saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaafe!

We are without doubt through the looking glass.

Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
23 Comments
Dutchman
Dutchman
February 8, 2019 2:32 pm

Off topic – For the last week in Minnesota we have had very cold weather -27 for two days. Those electric cars didn’t do so well. Also we’ve had rain / freezing rain / snow / black ice. I’d like to see on of those self driving vehicles try and drive on these roads.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Dutchman
February 8, 2019 4:28 pm

Who is the hell would want to keep living in a place like that? It’s too damned cold, the road salt eats up cars and trucks very quickly, and it’s a Democrat state turned into what Donald Trump calls a third world shit hole by their importation of Somalis. What do they do for the desert riffraff to keep them wanting to live there?

Dutchman
Dutchman
  Anonymous
February 8, 2019 10:19 pm

Well I’m from ‘near’ Philly. The weather is OK – since we don’t have many Niggers. BUT – they imported the ‘New Niggers’ – Somalis. I guess I’m just Fucked.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Dutchman
February 8, 2019 10:28 pm

Hey at least everyone can tell who the desert shit is and it takes only one quick look. They kinda stand out, don’t they?

TampaRed
TampaRed
  Dutchman
February 8, 2019 4:41 pm

dutch,
you’re just jealous because elon unfriended you–

Bob P
Bob P
February 8, 2019 2:34 pm

As we say in Canada, “Shit.”

Pequiste
Pequiste
  Bob P
February 8, 2019 8:21 pm

Au Québec: merde!

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
February 8, 2019 2:36 pm

Can’t argue with a word he wrote.

Cricket
Cricket
February 8, 2019 2:40 pm

Trudeau is heavily influenced by Muslim groups and some suspect this law is part their plans to slowly introduce sharia law up here or, maybe the new law is so Trudeau can fulfil his dreams of making Canada into a basic dictatorship.

The law should not stand when tested in the courts, but someone with enough money will have to drive the case through the courts. Meanwhile us little people have to worry about the local cops stopping us when we return empties for recycling.
https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/mandel-cop-pulls-over-senior-for-returning-too-many-empty-beer-bottles

As soon as I heard cops were doing this, I stopped returning my empties and just put them the recycle bin or trash. And see, just like that I got nudged to change my behaviour rather than challenge authority. It’s so Canadian. SMH 🙁

Anonym
Anonym
  Cricket
February 8, 2019 3:31 pm

That reminds me of something similar, was fishing with my buddy, and we were putting the empty beer cans in the back of my truck, it was brand new, no cap or covering on the bed.

we hear some dirt bike s wiz past us, with super loud pipe, and think nothing of it.

when it was dark, and we’re ready to leave, we get pulled over by a state trooper. I asked why he pulled us over:
“we had a report of a loud vehicle”
I told him this was a brand new truck, you can hear it is not loud.
“well, while I was investigating, I noticed you had some empties in your truck, so I waited for you”

long story- passed the DUI cause cops are stooopid, and the old breathalyzers were easy to cheat on, just plug the straw with your tougue and blow around it. he even held his had in front of the device to ensure I was blowing. hardy har.

Bottom line – Cops are assholes in general, and dicks specifically, unless they have tits, in which case they are just bitches with badges. They are not here to help.

what ever they tell you, just think the opposite, as that is there intention. and tell them NOTHING>>>

Last speeding ticket I got, the cop asked “is everything ok?” and I replied “just having a bad day” and when I get the ticket, it says on the bottom of it
“defendant states he was having a bad day”

I completely enjoy getting one over on the coppers, it is one of the better feelings in life.

Has TBP done a post on “how I got away from the coppers” with stories in comments?

Donkey Balls
Donkey Balls
  Anonym
February 8, 2019 5:30 pm

Sorry, I don’t get your 2 cop stories. I don’t think your breathalyzer trick is true and, how exactly did you get anything over on the cop by telling him you were having a bad day?

TampaRed
TampaRed
  Donkey Balls
February 8, 2019 6:05 pm

db,
i don’t know about the breathalyzer,though it sounds plausible,but the writing comments on the ticket is true & a bunch of bs–if it is not germane it should not be on there–
late june,2017,my mom & sister were in the car & someone pulled out of a parking lot in front of them while they were trucking along –the other guy was charged–
mom was a bit dazed & the deputy put on the accident report that she was confused–nearly a year later,early june,2018, she gets a letter from the state dmv telling her that her license is being suspended unless she can get a doctor to attest that she is fine,which is a problem because she is starting to have some memory problems even though they have not affected her driving–we’re still fighting w/the state over it–
my sister was the passenger & is a terrible driver who has had many accidents–she also has a big mouth and while talking casually to the deputy said that she’s had so many wrecks she can’t remember them all,probably 15-20–guess what went onto the accident report?

Old Shoe
Old Shoe
February 8, 2019 3:15 pm

We’re all hosed, eh? There are no judges. Just government employees that wear black robes at work.

Ned
Ned
February 8, 2019 3:47 pm

You were born free, got fucked out of half of it, and you wave a flag celebrating it.

Martel's Hammer
Martel's Hammer
February 8, 2019 4:09 pm

Last time I checked the US Constitution does not apply in Canada…..we have had at least two conflicts to establish that the USA is not Canada! Canada while a lovely place is full of tyranny and less freedom than the USA….guns, speech etc.

Ned
Ned
  Martel's Hammer
February 8, 2019 4:13 pm

Unfortunately the U.S. constitution no longer applies in the USA either. It has been abolished under Color Of Law.

Ned
Ned
February 8, 2019 4:20 pm

Meanwhile in the U.S. of Bullshit “A”;

Sheriffs’ Union Boss Says Officers Have No Reason To Do Their Job If They Can’t Score Forfeiture Cash On The Side
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20190206/18374741545/sheriffs-union-boss-says-officers-have-no-reason-to-do-their-job-if-they-cant-score-forfeiture-cash-side.shtml

yahsure
yahsure
February 8, 2019 4:34 pm

Plenty of fun videos about those border patrol checkpoints miles away from the border. WTF!

TampaRed
TampaRed
February 8, 2019 5:50 pm

agree w/everything peters wrote–
just b4 my daughter graduated preschool,so she would have been almost 5,i had her in the truck w/me about dusk-
i live in an area that has had a bad drug problem & back then they would saturate the neighborhood every tuesday w/deputies looking to pull you over 4 the slightest reason–
a guy lit me up just as i was turning onto my property–when he came up to my window i asked why he stopped me and he pointed at my daughter & said “…it looked like she was not buckled in.”
she was properly buckled in but he still looked around inside & then ran my license–
after he was finished i never said a single bad word to my daughter even though i was furious–
my daughter went to a pre school run by the city zoo and they had gotten the cops to come out a week or so b4 this happened,letting the kids switch on the lights/siren,sit in the helicopter ,etc.,just building goodwill w/the kids,which i have no problem with–
a week or so later when i was picking her up one afternoon, one of the moms,who had a cop in her family, was getting ready to unload on me–“why do you dislike police & why are you saying bad things about them in front of your daughter?”huh?
turned out my daughter was telling the other preschoolers that the police were bad because they told fibs about her–when i told the mom what happened & that my kid said that on her own,all she could do was shake her head & walk away–
funny thing is,my daughter does not remember the incident but to this day she is not a fan of cops or govt,all w/o my input,at least the cop part–

Anonymous
Anonymous
February 8, 2019 6:03 pm

Here at their checkpoints, they get you for not having “proof of insurance” in your possession … NOTE … Not for Being Uninsured, but for not being able to prove it them instantaneously. Meanwhile, more than 30% of the drivers in the state have no insurance yet they can’t seem to find these … so many expired tags driving around and they never stop these. Why? Because those people have no money!

TampaRed
TampaRed
  Anonymous
February 8, 2019 7:32 pm

a dirty little secret ,anon,is that they get very few dui s at these check points,but they do get people for things like you said,no proof of insurance,bulbs out,etc.–
once you get in line,don’t try to turn around,it’s like blood in the water for them & it’s legal 4 them to go get you for trying to elude them–

Boat Guy
Boat Guy
February 8, 2019 6:44 pm

I never did get this DUI checkpoint nonsense , unless they wear swastika arm bands . As for drinking out side of your home it is generally done in a state licensed facility or business so how much does the state allow their licensed agents to sell for consumption on premises to one individual 1 drink 2 or 10 ?
The State of Maryland claims your ability to make any decision is impaired after one drink . So a state licensed facility sells you more than one drink but you are to be held accountable and responsible after the state licensed business allows you to continue to drink after one drink . But your ability to decide to drink more than one is already established by the state as impaired . Therefore all businesses must only sell you one drink or else they are contributory to your intoxication .
Maryland is contributory state if 90% of an accident is your fault 10% is someone else’s therefore it’s a no fault issue .
Good luck explaining that one when your shitfaced !
I’m home for the night , it’s bourbon time LOL

Pequiste
Pequiste
February 8, 2019 8:27 pm

“The law (C46) empowers armed government workers to “demand” – the exact word used in the legislation – that drivers “.. provide a sample of a bodily substance for analysis by drug screening equipment ”

Political statement and bodily substance in one package: profer for the constabulary a stool sample.