Capt. Sullenberger on the FAA and Boeing: ‘Our credibility as leaders in aviation is being damaged’

Guest Post by Sully Sullenberger

For most of the history of powered flight, the United States has been a world leader in aviation.

This nation’s aviation regulatory body, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), has long been the gold standard of safety regulation in global aviation, often a template for other nations to follow in technical and safety matters.

Boeing BA, +0.42% has long been the world’s preeminent airplane maker.

But now, our credibility as leaders in aviation is being damaged. Boeing and the FAA have been found wanting in this ugly saga that began years ago but has come home to roost with two terrible fatal crashes, with no survivors, in less than five months, on a new airplane type, the Boeing 737 Max 8, something that is unprecedented in modern aviation history.

‘For too many years, the FAA has not been provided budgets sufficient to ensure appropriate oversight of a rapidly growing global aviation industry.’

For too many years, the FAA has not been provided budgets sufficient to ensure appropriate oversight of a rapidly growing global aviation industry. Staffing has not been adequate for FAA employees to oversee much of the critically important work of validating and approving aircraft certification. Instead, much of the work has been outsourced by designating aircraft manufacturer employees to do the work on behalf of the FAA. This, of course, has created inherent conflicts of interest, when employees working for the company whose products must be certified to meet safety standards are the ones doing much of the work of certifying them. There simply are not nearly enough FAA employees to do this important work in-house.

To make matters worse, there is too cozy a relationship between the industry and the regulators. And in too many cases, FAA employees who rightly called for stricter compliance with safety standards and more rigorous design choices have been overruled by FAA management, often under corporate or political pressure.

Let me be clear, without effective leadership and support from political leaders in the administration, the FAA does not have sufficient independence to be able to do its job, which is to keep air travelers and crews safe. Oversight must mean accountability, or it means nothing.

‘Boeing, in developing the 737 Max 8, obviously felt intense competitive pressure to get the new aircraft to market as quickly as possible.’

Boeing, in developing the 737 Max 8, obviously felt intense competitive pressure to get the new aircraft to market as quickly as possible. When flight testing revealed an issue with meeting the certification standards, they developed a fix, Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), but did not tell airline pilots about it. In mitigating one risk, they seem to have created another, greater risk.

After the crash of Lion Air 610 last October, it was apparent that this new risk needed to be effectively addressed. It has been reported that Boeing pushed back in discussions with the FAA about the extent of changes that would be required, and after the second crash, of Ethiopian 302, the Boeing CEO reached out to the U.S. President to try to keep the 737 Max 8 from being grounded in the U.S. The new fix still has not been fielded, nearly five months after Lion Air. It almost certainly could have been done sooner, and should have been.

Boeing  has focused on trying to protect its product and defend its stance, but the best way, indeed the only way, to really protect one’s brand or product is to protect the people who use it. We must not forget that the basis of business, what makes business possible, is trust.

Estimates are that Boeing likely will face additional costs of several billion dollars because of these recent crashes and the decisions made several years ago that led up to them. This case is a validation of something that I have long understood, that there is a strong business case for quality and safety, that it is always better and cheaper to do it right instead of doing it wrong and trying to repair the damage after the fact, and when lives are lost, there is no way to repair the damage.

And in this ultra-cost-competitive global aviation industry, when it comes to costs, nothing is more costly than an accident. Nothing.

Capt. “Sully” Sullenberger is a safety expert, author and speaker on leadership and culture. He is also a retired airline pilot who, on Jan. 15, 2009, safely landed US Airways Flight 1549 on the Hudson River in New York when both engines lost power when they were struck by a flock of birds. All 155 people on board survived.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
26 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
March 20, 2019 8:57 am

“the FAA has not been provided budgets sufficient”

I stopped reading right there.

Morongobill
Morongobill
  Anonymous
March 20, 2019 9:47 am

Your loss.

anonsortof
anonsortof
  Morongobill
March 20, 2019 11:08 am

I guess it’s my loss, too. “This agency needs more money” is a non-starter. Call me when someone writes about privatizing something.

Dutchman
Dutchman
  Anonymous
March 20, 2019 1:37 pm

Couple poor design + H1-B engineers + 3rd world pilots = disaster.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  Dutchman
March 20, 2019 6:03 pm

Everyone keeps mentioning the pilots, but if EVERY other plane handles things “this way,” and that includes every other version of the 737, but the Max does things “this other way,” then that is a serious safety issue. It is especially dangerous if one is talking about he way onboard AI is handling matters (completely hidden from the crew). Sorry, 3rd world pilots who fly everyday, lots of different planes, etc. are just as competent as any other pilot. Expecting a 1st, 2nd, or 3rd world pilot to have to do things completely differently on THIS version of the 737 is the insane part of this issue.

None Ya Biz
None Ya Biz
  Anonymous
March 22, 2019 12:34 pm

I as well!

Articles of Confederation
Articles of Confederation
March 20, 2019 9:02 am

Very very sad. Transnational corporations and the U.S. Government are rapidly losing public confidence and trust. Thus, they push to tighten the screws on the populace. Why do we never learn?

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  Articles of Confederation
March 20, 2019 6:05 pm

The absolute BEST THING that could happen to our world, would be for everyone to lose confidence in their governments and these transnational corporations. THEY are both the only REAL problems we face, and blind faith in them is how we got here.

Articles of Confederation
Articles of Confederation
  MrLiberty
March 20, 2019 8:28 pm

Oh I agree wholeheartedly. The very fact they exist is the problem. We wouldn’t be here today if humans were humble enough to learn from history. The fallout is going to be tremendous though.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  Articles of Confederation
March 20, 2019 9:03 pm

The fallout is going to be horrible one way or the other. The sooner it happens, and the more everyone walks into it with their eyes wide open, with the proper culprits identified, the better it will be. If everyone enters the fray looking to the same criminals to “fix things” that broke them in the first place, the misery and suffering will surely last a lot longer and be far worse.

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 20, 2019 9:11 am

This plane is a frankenstien project, the 737 is a 30 year old design, and to be “competitive” Boeing decided to slap on some new fuel efficient engines. That is not a bad idea. The problem is that these engines were not designed to fly with the frame. They are too big, to fit like the old engines, so they had to make cost benefit analysis (sounds familiar?) and decided to use them anyway.

This is just another example of a ford pinto with the gas tank right behind the bumper, and any numerous stories we have heard about the auto industry, where people die because of managers getting involved in the design process.
only now it is happening in the airline industry.

for anyone too young to remember the pinto, when it was hit in the rear, the tank ruptured resulting in fire and loss of life, and the investigation revealed that there is a formula used to figure out if a recall is required, (also mention in fight club movie)

“Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don’t do one”

Basically, stay away from the 737 Max, it is the ford pinto of planes.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
March 21, 2019 1:39 am

Interesting you mention the Pinto; Tesla’s factory in Fremont, CA was originally built by Ford and the Pinto was assembled there (when the production line was actually running).

CCRider
CCRider
March 20, 2019 9:29 am

“what makes business possible, is trust.” In a government run by globalists? Sully you must still be waterlogged.

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 20, 2019 9:35 am

My copy of the Constitution doesn’t discuss the FAA’s role in guaranteeing airworthiness.

Morongobill
Morongobill
  Anonymous
March 20, 2019 9:49 am

As a Supreme Court justice once said, the constitution means what we say it means. Deal with it.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  Anonymous
March 20, 2019 6:06 pm

Some idiots would say that the “necessary and proper clause” or the “general welfare” clauses somehow do. But then they are the ones who have helped us get this far down the rabbit hole.

Unintentional
Unintentional
March 20, 2019 9:54 am

Just another example of how shit happens. Slowly at first and then suddenly.

GoneWest
GoneWest
March 20, 2019 10:56 am

it is always better and cheaper to do it right instead of doing it wrong and trying to repair the damage after the fact

Except when you are an executive of the corporation, derive a large part of your compensation from the increase in the stock price, and you can exit with your earnings/stealings before the shit hits the fan from your decisions. Hell, you can probably leave after the SHTF and still keep your earnings/stealings.

The only effective prevention of this behavior is to start locking up the execs for their bad decisions.

I’m not holding my breath for that to happen.

Articles of Confederation
Articles of Confederation
  GoneWest
March 20, 2019 2:39 pm

It boils down to Rand’s description of moochers and looters. This is a classic example. The People can’t match brute force with the looters, and they can’t match the moochers’ access to the looters.

The only winning move is not to play the game.

TC
TC
March 20, 2019 11:22 am

In recent years Boeing has accelerated their outsourcing as well as embraced diversity and the greater globohomo agenda. That probably has nothing to do with this problem though.

NtroP
NtroP
March 20, 2019 2:33 pm

In a just world, Boeing’s stock price would be decimated, and a whole slew of executives and managers would be in the dock for 300 counts of murder, or at best manslaughter.
Here in Rome 2.0, there will be a perfunctory, meaningless “investigation’, after which nothing will happen, life goes on business as usual, and they are still Masters of the Universe/Big swinging dicks of the MIC.
That’s just the way it is…

Articles of Confederation
Articles of Confederation
  NtroP
March 20, 2019 2:41 pm

Until it ends with the Vandals at the gates. I imagine Southerners will get over the initial shock and pain quick enough.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  NtroP
March 20, 2019 6:10 pm

With all of the ETFs, and other “bundling” of stocks to “diversify exposure,” Boeing will never truly be hurt as nobody will sell because all the other transportation stocks in the “sector” are doing great while Boeing suffers. So nobody sells and the price remains high. Just another consequence of forcing millions into risky stocks because banks no longer need to pay decent interest or attract savers in order to have money to lend. End the Fed!!!!

Trapped in Portlandia
Trapped in Portlandia
March 20, 2019 4:23 pm

Giving more money to the FAA or any government agency will not solve the problem. Industry and the government are in bed together protecting each other.

The only solution is two fold. First let the lawsuits fly and make Boeing pay dearly for the lives they took. If they go bankrupt it will be a fine lesson for other corporations who value their stock price over their customers lives.

Second, and most importantly, throw the CEO and other top executives in prison where they can bed down with Bubba, or a Catholic priest, and learn the true nature of brotherly love.

Only bankrupting the corporations and making the top executives pay with their freedom and lives will solve these problems. More regs and more government will do nothing.

Alternatively, we can put the 100 top Boeing executives in a new 737 Max outfitted just like the two that crashed, and let the plane fly with an African pilot with only 200 flight hours. That approach will work even better.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
March 20, 2019 6:00 pm

Just to be clear on another agency that is supposed to be there “for our safety.” The FDA does ABSOLUTELY NO independent testing of any drugs, medical devices, etc. but relies ONLY on the data generated in-house or by paid consultants of these companies. Yes, they evaluate all the “paperwork” supposedly to make sure that all the “t’s” are crossed, etc. and that all required protocols were properly followed by the clinical trial conductors, etc. but nothing in their own labs, their own clinics, etc.

And were there REAL liability, including CRIMINAL LIABILITY for the deaths associated with fraud, lack of appropriate safety testing, etc. this would truly not matter.

Now contrast that with UL, TUV, CSA, ETL, electrical safety certification agencies (all private except for CSA, the Canadian Standards Agency). They all perform in-house electrical safety testing, conduct on-site audits of parts, paperwork, and quality systems at the production facilities of manufacturer’s bearing their safety marks.

Of COURSE a fully private, competitive, free market in safety for ALL products, could and SHOULD exist. Those same pilots, engineers, and safety experts that now exist within the framework of the FAA, FDA, and others, would flourish under a private system that actually cared more about keeping their customers happy and their reputations sound.