Right to Print Arms

Guest Post by John Stossel

Right to Print Arms

Are you very afraid? 3D-printed guns are coming.

“Virtually undetectable!” shrieked CNN.

“This changes the safety of Americans forever!” shrieked MSNBC.

Does it?

Six years ago, a company called Defense Distributed posted blueprints for 3D-printed guns on the web. The Obama State Department said that violated the Arms Control Act because allowing foreigners to see them is equivalent to exporting a missile launcher, and that’s illegal.

Defense Distributed withdrew the blueprints. Gun control advocates were relieved.

“We have enough guns in this country already,” Massachusetts legislator David Linsky tells me in my new video about 3D-printed guns.

But this debate is about free speech, too.

“You can’t ban lawful U.S. citizens from sharing information with other lawful U.S. citizens,” says Defense Distributed’s lawyer, Josh Blackman.

“After the Oklahoma City bombing, Congress asked the Department of Justice, ‘Can we make a law that bans putting bomb-making instruction on the internet?’ The DOJ said, ‘No, you can’t ban putting files on the internet.'”

Not even files showing how to make a nuclear weapon?

“Nuclear bomb’s … different because it’s classified information,” he said. Courts have upheld restrictions on publishing classified information.

But the web is filled with unclassified information about how to make all sorts of deadly things.

“Should ‘The Anarchist Cookbook’ be banned”? I asked Linsky. It contains deadly recipes.

“There’s no reason to ban books,” he replied. “The genie is out of the bottle a long, long time ago on ‘The Anarchist Cookbook.’ But this is a very different thing whereby all you have to do is download a file, press a button and a printer gives you a gun.”

It’s actually not that easy.

U.S. Senator Ed Markey, D-Mass., made it sound as if anyone could make a 3D gun. “Bad people can go to Instagram and get an insta-gun!”

But that’s silly, like so much of what Markey says.

“It’s actually a very complicated process,” explains Blackman. You need technological expertise and very specific materials. “It might take a full day of printing. You have to treat the plastic with chemicals so that they’re strong enough. Even then, odds are, the gun’s pretty crappy.”

True. When my TV show tried one, it wouldn’t fire.

But the technology will improve.

It’s said that 3D guns will be “a windfall for terrorists.”

“Terrorists have access to far more dangerous weapons,” responds Blackman. “The notion that ISIS is … making these stupid little plastic guns that can fire one shot at a time strains credulity.”

But can’t plastic guns sneak past airport security?

“Bullets are made out of metal,” notes Blackman. “Plastic and rubber bullets are not very effective.”

America has a long tradition of people making their own guns, often for good reasons.

“If we had a ban on home manufacture of weapons during the time of the American Revolution, we would probably still be under the King’s rule,” cracked Blackman.

“It was a very different society,” argues Linsky. “Now we have AR-15s.”

Blackman had an answer for that: “Rights were enshrined in the Constitution for permanence … They’re there for the long haul.”

Although Defense Distributed withdrew its blueprints, it continues to fight for the right to publish them online.

Seems kind of like a pointless fight to me, because in the short time before Defense Distributed withdrew its post, hundreds of other websites had copied it. They still host the blueprints.

Linsky hadn’t realized that. When I showed some to him, he said, “I understand that some people might think that the genie is out of the bottle, but let’s put as much of that genie back into the bottle as we possibly can.”

But we can’t put the genies back. Today, once information is out, it’s out there forever. No government can pull it back.

Nevertheless, gun control advocates and the childish media will demand that “something be done!”

CNN warned, “Tomorrow morning, the sun will be shining, the birds will be singing and anyone will be able to legally download instructions to 3D-print their own fully functional plastic gun!”

I liked Blackman’s response:

“That happened. The world’s the same,” he said. “People are just fear-mongering.”

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
18 Comments
Steve
Steve
April 17, 2019 11:20 am

Black scary guns keep me awake at night………………….. Polishing them

James
James
  Steve
April 17, 2019 11:59 am

Steve ,give em a camo paint job relevant to your natural surroundings and you will find you sleep just fine!

The net is loaded(pun intended)with firearm building plans and books on how to do it out for years,genie is out of the bottle and running free!

Do not forget the TM 31-210 that a astute poster pointed out here awhile back during this frenzy.

Iwasntbornwithenufmiddlefingers
Iwasntbornwithenufmiddlefingers
April 17, 2019 11:43 am

Find something with an antena. Cut so .22 bullet drops in and stops. Tape on rubberband and some manner of handle. Tape nail to rubberband. Pull nail. Release to fire. Bang. Been making zip guns since i was 8 that work better than this plastic pos. Or i could be lying.

AC
AC
April 17, 2019 12:00 pm
James
James
  AC
April 17, 2019 12:19 pm

Nice drop AC.I would say those with machine access was a nice set of plans and program to build your own .50,was on WRSA last week,will dig it up if any interested.

James
James
  AC
April 17, 2019 3:25 pm

Why yes it is thank you.I would have done it meself but am on a island with limited net connection,helping out a family member here.I saw this and thought a nice plan/layout and will certainly when have decent connection download meself,and memory stick ect.

AC
AC
  James
April 17, 2019 4:22 pm

I don’t think that design would make a great long range rifle, it looks like it would have fairly complex harmonics to deal with. I’d want a free floating barrel, and a few other things.

But if you need to hit something really hard, something that isn’t too small, say within 1000 yards or so, it would probably do the job just fine.

James
James
  AC
April 17, 2019 4:49 pm

AC,am happy to hit with a .308 @ 300 yards,would like to work on that and get better and find a spot to reach out further.My dad had a hilly 600 acres in southern VT.and at best with woods/hills/and safe back drop we could find was 800 yards.I will say me dad died unfortunately and was never able to even start on further distance.

I will say much to me surprise was able to hit with a unfamiliar handgun 65-70% of the time a 12×16 target(inches,not feet!) 100 yards recently,really made me realize with work/practice could do even better.

Steve
Steve
  James
April 17, 2019 7:11 pm

LOOK at the ballistics of the 6.5 creedmore. Much better ballistics than the .308

James
James
  Steve
April 18, 2019 7:33 am

Steve,have looked at that on some sites,but,at moment the problem is not the .308,the problem is the man shooting it,working on that!

starfcker
starfcker
April 17, 2019 1:28 pm

“But this debate is about free speech, too.” The more Stossel writes, the less respect I have for him. Completely divorced from common sense of any sort. He wouldn’t have a right of any sort if big strong men didn’t enforce them for him.

NoThanksIJustAte
NoThanksIJustAte
April 17, 2019 3:15 pm

Yeah that’s cute but I was thinking of printing myself a little something that packs somewhat more of a punch. Something that will put me more on par with the local SWAT team when they foolishly knock on my door to try take my guns away.

comment image

James
James
  NoThanksIJustAte
April 17, 2019 3:26 pm

No,while no plan for your launcher the TM31-210 might help you out.

Iwasntbornwithenufmiddlefingers
Iwasntbornwithenufmiddlefingers
April 17, 2019 5:46 pm

Gonna 3d print me a three story tall trebouchet

Per/Norway
Per/Norway
April 17, 2019 6:57 pm

i prefer this homemade shotgun over a piece of plastic that may or may not fire..

bob
bob
April 18, 2019 8:02 am

Printable guns notwithstanding, fedgov still wins the arms race vs. the American people by a wide margin. Yes. Be afraid. Be very afraid. Of fedgov.

James
James
  bob
April 18, 2019 11:11 am

bob,in straight out fire power perhaps,assuming all forces work with govt. oppression of citizens,in itself a wild card.The average folks can do a lot better then a firearm,just throw monkeys wrenches in the works regarding electricity/transport/comms ect.