Major University Study Finds “Fire Did Not Bring Down Tower 7 On 9/11”

Authored by Matt Agorist via The Free Thought Project,

On September 11, 2001, at 5:20 p.m., World Trade Center Building 7 suddenly collapsed into its own footprint, falling at free fall speed for 2.5 seconds of its seven-second complete destruction. WTC 7 was not hit by a plane. After it collapsed, Americans were told that office fires caused a unique — never before seen — complete architectural failure leading to the building collapsing into its own footprint at the rate of gravity.

Despite calls for the evidence to be preserved, New York City officials had the building’s debris removed and destroyed in the ensuing weeks and months, preventing a proper forensic investigation from ever taking place. Seven years later, federal investigators concluded that WTC 7 was the first steel-framed high-rise ever to have collapsed solely as a result of normal office fires.

Naturally, skeptics have been questioning the official story for some time and after moving from the realm of conspiracy theory into the realm of science, an extensive university study has found that the official story of fire causing the collapse is simply not true.

This week, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth announced their partnership with the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) in releasing a draft report of an in depth four-year study on what actually brought down WTC 7. According to the press release, the release of the draft report begins a two-month period during which the public is invited to submit comments. The final report will be published later this year.

According to the study’s authors:

The UAF research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have occurred on September 11, 2001. First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred. Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Third, we simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.

After conducting comprehensive modeling and studying countless scenarios, the study’s authors, J. Leroy Hulsey, Ph.D., P.E., S.E., UAF, Zhili Quan, Ph.D., Bridge Engineer South Carolina Department of Transportation, and Feng Xiao, Ph.D., Associate Professor Nanjing University of Science and Technology Department of Civil Engineering, concluded the following:

Fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.

The results of this study cannot be dismissed. It completely destroys the narrative that has been shoved down the throats of Americans for nearly two decades. What’s more, this study backs up thousands of other researchers, scientists, and engineers who have been pointing this out for years.

In fact, as TFTP reported in July, history was made in regard to 9/11 as New York area fire commissioners called for a new investigation into the tragic events that unfolded that day. The resolution called for a new investigation due to the “overwhelming evidence” that “pre-planted explosives . . . caused the destruction of the three World Trade Center buildings.”

On July 24, 2019, the Franklin Square and Munson Fire District, which oversees a volunteer fire department serving a hamlet of 30,000 residents just outside of Queens, New York, became the first legislative body in the country to officially support a new investigation into the events of 9/11, according to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

The resolution calling for a new investigation was drafted by Commissioner Christopher Gioia and it was immediately and unanimously approved by the five commissioners.

“We’re a tight-knit community and we never forget our fallen brothers and sisters. You better believe that when the entire fire service of New York State is on board, we will be an unstoppable force,” said Commissioner Christopher Gioia, adding, “We were the first fire district to pass this resolution. We won’t be the last.”

According to the report:

The impact of 9/11 on the community extends well beyond the victims and their grieving families. On September 12, 2001, the Franklin Square Fire Department was called in to assist with the massive rescue and recovery effort that was just getting underway. Countless members of the department, including Gioia and Commissioner Philip Malloy (then rank-and-file firefighters), spent weeks on the pile searching in vain for civilians and fellow responders who might still be alive. Today, Malloy is one of thousands suffering chronic health effects.

The department also lost one of its own in Thomas J. Hetzel, affectionately referred to as “Tommy” by the commissioners. Hetzel was a full-time member of the New York Fire Department in addition to serving as a volunteer firefighter in Franklin Square. A touching memorial to Hetzel was on display during the meeting, and Hetzel’s widow, parents, and sister were all in attendance.

“The Hetzel and Evans families were very appreciative of the proceedings,” Gioia commented the day after the meeting. “They know it’s an uphill struggle. But at least they have hope, which is something they haven’t had in a long time.”

The importance of this resolution — especially coming from a legislative body of fire fighters — is immense. The impact of first responders calling for a new investigation over the use of explosives is massive. The naysayers who call those who question the official narrative “kooks” will have a hard time going after fire commissioners.

This move and the study above are yet another blow to the highly questionable and hole-filled official narrative. As TFTP reported earlier this year, in another major move from the great folks over at the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and 9/11 victim family members Robert McIlvaine and Barbara Krukowski-Rastelli, a joint federal lawsuit has been filed to assess any evidence the FBI may have known about that contributed to the destruction of the towers on 9/11 which they may have kept from Congress.

The complaint cites the failure of the FBI and its 9/11 Review Commission to assess key 9/11-related evidence that the FBI can be shown to have had, or been aware of, regarding:

  1. the use of pre-placed explosives to destroy World Trade Center Buildings, 1, 2, and 7;
  2. the arrest and investigation of the “High Fivers” observed photographing and celebrating the attacks on the World Trade Center on 9/11;
  3. terrorist financing related the reported Saudi support for the 9/11 hijackers;
  4. recovered plane parts, including serial numbers from all three crash locations;
  5. video from cameras mounted inside and outside the Pentagon; and
  6. cell phone communications from passengers aboard airplanes.

According to the press release on Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, this is evidence relevant to the 9/11 Review Commission’s and the FBI’s compliance with the mandate from Congress, which should have been assessed by the FBI and the 9/11 Review Commission and reported to Congress. The complaint also cites the destruction by the FBI of evidence related to the “High Fivers.” Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth has joined in bringing the counts that involve the evidence of the World Trade Center’s explosive demolition and evidence related to the “High Fivers,” while the other plaintiffs are party to all counts.

Also, as TFTP previously reported, a monumental step forward in the relentless pursuit of 9/11 truth took place last December when a United States Attorney agreed to comply with federal law requiring submission to a Special Grand Jury of evidence that explosives were used to bring down the World Trade Centers. Then, in March, the group behind the submission, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, announced the filing of a “petition supplement” naming persons who may have information related to the use of said explosives.

According to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the 33-page document contains 15 different categories of persons who may have information material to the investigation, including contractors and security companies that had access to the WTC Towers before 9/11, persons and entities who benefited financially from the WTC demolitions, and persons arrested after being observed celebrating the WTC attacks.

names-redacted version of the petition supplement, which was filed with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York on February 14, 2019, has been made available to the public. The un-redacted version filed with the U.S. Attorney today will remain undisclosed in the interest of maintaining the secrecy, security, and integrity of the grand jury proceeding.

As TFTP reported in December, for the first time since 9/11 the federal government is taking steps to hear evidence that explosives may have been used to destroy the world trade centers.

The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry successfully submitted a petition to the federal government demanding that the U.S. Attorney present to a Special Grand Jury extensive evidence of yet-to-be-prosecuted federal crimes relating to the destruction of three World Trade Center Towers on 9/11 (WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7).

After waiting months for the reply, the U.S. Attorney responded in a letter, noting that they will comply with the law.

“We have received and reviewed The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc.’s submissions of April 10 and July 30, 2018. We will comply with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3332 as they relate to your submissions,” U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman stated.

According to the petition, dozens of exhibits were presented as evidence that explosives were used to destroy all three world trade centers.

The Lawyers’ Committee’s April 10th 52-page original Petition was accompanied by 57 exhibits and presented extensive evidence that explosives were used to destroy three WTC Towers on 9/11.That evidence included independent scientific laboratory analysis of WTC dust samples showing the presence of high-tech explosives and/or incendiaries; numerous first-hand reports by First Responders of seeing and hearing explosions at the World Trade Center on 9/11; expert analysis of seismic evidence that explosions occurred at the WTC towers on 9/11 both prior to the airplane impacts and prior to the building collapses; and expert analysis and testimony by architects, engineers, and scientists concluding that the rapid onset symmetrical near-free-fall acceleration collapse of these three WTC high rise buildings on 9/11 exhibited the key characteristics of controlled demolition. The July 30th Amended Petition included the same evidence but also addressed several additional federal crimes beyond the federal bombing crime addressed in the original Petition.

The Lawyers’ Committee concluded in the petitions that explosive and incendiary devices that had been preplaced at the WTC were detonated causing the complete collapse of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7 on 9/11, and the resulting tragic loss of life, and that “the evidence permits no other conclusion — as a matter of science, as a matter of logic, and as a matter of law.”

“This Petition Supplement is intended to assist the Special Grand Jury by providing a roadmap for a meaningful investigation into the yet-to-be-prosecuted 9/11 WTC crimesthat the Lawyers’ Committee has reported and documented in our Petitions,” Attorney David Meiswinkle, President of the Lawyers’ Committee’s Board of Directors, said.

Finally, after nearly two decades of ridicule, dismissal, and outright intolerance of information contrary to the “official story” of what happened on 9/11, the public may finally learn the truth of what happened and who was behind it.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
37 Comments
Bob P
Bob P
September 6, 2019 7:06 am

As the great majority who frequent TBP know, the evidence for controlled demolition of all three towers is incontestable. Still, most people refuse to believe it. In my experience they dismiss it because they think it would be impossible to hide something of this magnitude for this long.
How do you hide it? First, immediately cart away all the physical evidence and destroy it, which is what they did. Second, bribe or threaten scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology to produce a fraudulent report riddled with scientific errors and ignoring the actual cause, designate it the final word on the matter, then deny all Freedom of Information requests to share their computer models.
Next, place people in on the crime at the head of the commission to investigate 9/11 that the government was forced to set up by families of 9/11 victims. One 9/11 Commission Co-chair said the commission was set up to fail. Another commissioner resigned because he said the commission had been deliberately compromised by the President, who had soviet minders overlooking everything and warned the commission not to probe too deeply. Six of the ten commissioners stated that the government lied about the official story.
But the most important way to hide the truth is to control the media. Have Dan Rather repeat the lies again and again, I mean the official story invented by the government. ‘Bin Laden did it. Bin Laden did it. Bin Laden did it.’ In that way the lies take on the aura of irrefutable truth, especially when the majority of the audience is brain dead. ‘Bin Laden did it. Get him!’ Omit any evidence that would undermine the official account and ridicule anyone who thinks different. ‘We all saw the big jet fly into the building; that’s clearly what brought it down. Don’t embarrass yourself with these foolish conspiracy theories. People will think you’re nuts.’ Worked like a charm.
How? When you hit a person over the head with a truth that powerful, it’s so distressing as to be disorienting. It means the people in charge are thoroughly evil. What a profound betrayal of trust! What an outrage! What hope can we have for the future if this is all true? People don’t want to believe it. That’s how they got away with it.

ordo ab chao
ordo ab chao
  Bob P
September 6, 2019 7:34 am

Mighty fine comment, Bob P !

In Oct. of 97 my dad was ‘given’ 3-6 months due to a diagnosis of inoperable cancer (he never smoked/drank/nothing)
In Aug. of 98, I was sitting with him at his house when the news came on about the embassy bombing in Kenya, and the ‘Dan Rather’ of the day reporting on the suspect-showing bin Laden’s picture.

Dad says: “that SOB is gonna be trouble, boy……he’s one of ours”

A few years later, I realized how right he was. Z. Brzezinski and the mujahideen in Afghanistan in 79(?)

annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum <<<<—-working on this plan.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1998_United_States_embassy_bombings

Not Payola
Not Payola
  Bob P
September 6, 2019 8:11 am

It is always that way.

Vote Harder
Vote Harder
  Bob P
September 6, 2019 8:59 am

Then you also have to realize the fact that just 8 years before there was an attempt to bring down the WTC with explosives, an admitted inside job. The FBI paid Emad Salem 1 million dollars to build and plant the bomb but Emad was too smart for them. He secretly tape recorded them during the process of the FBI’s attempt at manufacturing terrorism and thus blew the FBI’s cover.

So the question for the “9/11 was an inside job” deniers is, if the US government could attempt such a thing before 9/11, why is it so hard for them to believe that they could attempt and successfully do it on 9-11-01? And what about all those other declassified US documents where admitted false flag attacks and attempts were made, like Operation Northwoods?

RS
RS
  Bob P
September 6, 2019 11:27 am

Just research Larry Silverstein’s insurance scam–he took out a $1 BILLION policy the year before, IIRC, on the 2 towers. One of the Bush Brothers was on the NYC harbor security commission (or maybe even the head of it).

Silverstein mad the Freudian slip “we had to pull it” comment.

Dutchman
Dutchman
September 6, 2019 7:48 am

You going to believe a study by guys named: Leroy, Zhili, and Feng?

Neuday
Neuday
  Dutchman
September 6, 2019 8:06 am

Moreso than jews.

NtroP
NtroP
  Dutchman
September 6, 2019 9:20 am

Dutch,
I was just happy to see the white guy Leroy there with the Chinamen!
Ph.D. = piled higher and deeper

TC
TC
September 6, 2019 9:04 am

Nothing will come of this. Football season is just getting under way.

Vote Harder
Vote Harder
September 6, 2019 9:04 am

Here is a recent study that shows nukes brought down the twin towers.

The material here is overwhelming, hours of lectures and dozens of detailed slides. This is not an easy read. It is another piece of irrevocable proof regarding 9/11 and the use of nuclear weapons and, on its own, worth much more than just scanning or flipping through.

https://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/09/01/breathtaking-solving-nuclear-9-11-the-pommer-report/

credit
credit
September 6, 2019 9:20 am

those ‘High-fivers” who observed and celebrated this destruction are commonly known as the Dancing Israelis. let’s not do more covering up with euphemism.

Montefrío
Montefrío
  credit
September 6, 2019 4:06 pm

Better known as the “dancing Schlomos”.

anonymousse
anonymousse
September 6, 2019 9:32 am

9/11 was the 4th major coup to happen in the US.

1787 – Constitutional convention (foundations of GovCo. “of the rich, by the rich, for the rich”)
1861 – US Civil War (GovCo dominance affirmed, states rights eliminated, individual rights eroded)
1963 – Kennedy assassination (GovCo dominance by the MIC confirmed, individual rights further eroded)
2001 – 9/11 attacks (MIC dominance reconfirmed and beginning of the end of individual rights in the US)

RS
RS
  anonymousse
September 6, 2019 11:33 am

You left out the current Russiagate coup.

Martel's Hammer
Martel's Hammer
September 6, 2019 10:38 am

And if you believe an airliner hit the Pentagon I have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn…..

Lots of good people died at the hands of their own government that day…..

Don'tbuyBS
Don'tbuyBS
September 6, 2019 10:51 am

Major university? Alaska Fairbanks ..nah.

Stucky
Stucky
September 6, 2019 11:12 am

Y-A-W-N.

No one gives a flying fuck.

How do I know this? Because a 9-11 conspiracy thread on TBP used to generate 200+ comments with ease. Tempers raged. People left. Shit was flung. Enemies made.

Now? 30 measly comments … and even fewer on the other thread posted today.

RS
RS
  Stucky
September 6, 2019 11:34 am

Back to sleep for you, Rumpelstiltskin (aka Stucky).

DRUD
DRUD
September 6, 2019 11:48 am

This is interesting…not because the of what the report showed, but that it comes from an Accredited University and that it is gaining some attention and momentum on the alternative media sites. If the attention grows enough, it could get to point where the MSM would HAVE to report on it..but they definitely CANNOT report on it in any way shape or form. Such would undercut their remaining few shards of credibility with even the most gullible and expose the Deep State in an profound way that could not be ignored.

Interesting.

RS
RS
September 6, 2019 12:00 pm

Read “Where did the towers go?” book by Dr. Judy Wood.

Overthecliff
Overthecliff
September 6, 2019 1:12 pm

I have zero confidence in any university study not backed up by common sense.

Overthecliff
Overthecliff
  Overthecliff
September 6, 2019 1:14 pm

It is enough to make me believe #7 was brought down by a sharknado.

flash
flash
September 6, 2019 1:13 pm

I think it safe to say, when presented with two narratives, one can rightly assume that the one issued by the government and propagated by the Main Stream Media to be more often than not, false.

Vote Harder
Vote Harder
September 6, 2019 1:53 pm

Ex-CIA analyst: Putin warned Bush about impending attack two days before 9/11

The revelation by the former CIA operative appears to be yet another proof that Washington has been repeatedly warned about the attacks that ultimately happened on September 11, 2001.

Anonymous
Anonymous
September 6, 2019 3:00 pm

All three buildings were controlled demolition. No doubt about it, and apparent from day one about 20 seconds after the buildings fell.
Anyone who seen the buildings fall and deny this is a complete idiot. Seems we have plenty of them… idiots that is….

Guest
Guest
September 6, 2019 3:03 pm

This is not news. Rudy Guiliani had a ‘gaffe’ once on FOX where he said, essentially, that a decision was made to demolish the building with controlled explosives. He then lamented that he never understood why they didn’t tell the public.