More Green to be “Green”

Guest Post by Eric Peters

The Green New Deal isn’t just an attack on driving. It’s also an attack on mowing – and growing.

On everything that gets done using equipment powered by internal combustion – which results in the production of carbon dioxide, the bogeyman of our time.

This includes lawn mowers – and hay balers.

There are electric versions of the former but not of the latter. And electric lawn mowers – like electric cars  – only go so far and then take an awfully long time before they can go anywhere again. Longer, actually, than EVs – which can be “fast” charged in about 30-45 minutes . . . if you have access to a 240 volt charger.

But electric lawn mowers (and trimmers) charge up the old-fashioned way, on standard 120 volt household current – like portable drills.

Which takes hours.

You could run an extension cord and avoid losing charge – and so, having to recharge. But what if you have to mow more than a quarter-acre or so? That’s going to take a long extension cord.

The Green New Deal is as much an assault on rural living – and farming – as it is on driving, the cost of which will go up by 30-50 percent if people are forced to buy only electric cars and the much-promised (but yet to be delivered) “breakthrough” in battery technology that will supposedly reduce the cost of electric cars by 30-50 percent and so make EVs cost-equivalent with non-electric cars doesn’t happen.

It certainly hasn’t happened yet.

As a point of comparison, the least expensive EV on the market is the Nissan Leaf, which stickers for just under $30,000.

By $10

Its base price is $29,990 – which sounds better than $30,000. Which is about twice the cost of a Nissan Versa Note, the automaker’s otherwise similar economy hatchback.

That’s for a Leaf with a best-case range of 150 miles.

Italicized because EV range is much more variable than the range of IC cars – because everything that’s powered in an EV – including power accessories such as the AC and heater – is powered by the battery pack and so draws down the battery pack’s charge.

Also, batteries are greatly affected by extremes of heat and cold – as EV owner n the Midwest discovered last winter during a cold snap. The advertised range of their EVs plummeted by as much as 40 percent just from the cold. You’d have to have a leaking gas tank to have a similar problem with a non-electric car.

The EV range problem wouldn’t be such a big problem were it not for the EV recharge problem – which imposes a time cost on the EV owner, even if a “fast” charger is available.

Nissan offers a Leaf with more range – 226 miles – for several thousand more ($36,650). This version of the Leaf goes about half as far as any current non-electric economy car (most can go 400 miles or more on a tank) and costs about $20,000 more than the price of a non-electric economy car such as the Versa Note ($15,650).

Will similar costs be imposed on outdoor power equipment – and farm equipment – in the name of the Green New Deal?

if so, eating is also going to get a lot more expensive. Unless, of course, an exemption is given to heavy farm equipment as well as to the heavy trucks that deliver the food.

Cows, too.

These emit a lot of carbon dioxide – and there’s no way to reduce their “emissions” without reducing the number of them. This will mean either fewer steaks – or much more expensive steaks.

Maybe, like electric cars, steaks will be something for the rich only.

That’s how future – our present – was portrayed back in the 1973 dystopian film, Soylent Green. A steak was as much a luxury as a private car – or a private apartment. The cattle – who ended up being processed into Soylent crackers – lived a life of austerity.

Green New Deal proponents don’t mention any of this, of course – for the obvious reason that most people aren’t going to knowingly vote themselves into poverty – much less starvation.

Instead, they imagine a utopian future of electrified everything that costs them nothing -either in money or time – to solve a problem that’s as hyped as the solutions to it.

There’s got to be some kind of way out of here . . . said the joker to the thief.

But maybe not.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
TN Patriot
TN Patriot
October 10, 2019 11:10 am

It is easy to vote yourself into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Anonymous
Anonymous
October 10, 2019 11:38 am

Let me fix one line: “if you have access to a 240 volt charger.” This Should read: “if you have access to a COAL FIRED 240 volt charger.”

WayfaringStrang3r
WayfaringStrang3r
October 10, 2019 12:13 pm

As far as I have been able to find, the GND makes no mention of putting limits on all the bazillion devices that keep people addicted and connected to mind altering bullshit like Twitter. The first iPhone came out mid-2007, we’re now on the 11th generation, in 12 years. That will continue unabated apparently even though E-waste and the turnover in all kinds of computing devices is thru the roof. Toxic dumps of e-waste in Africa etc are massive and killing, sickening the black and brown people who survive by crawling all over them for salvage. But be sure to get that Alexa and Echo and all the smart appliances. because how else can you be spied on.
Also no GND mention of planned obsolescence of all types – those shitty front load Whirlpool washers that stank up your clothes and then the counterbalance thing flew like a torpedo thru your wall as soon as the warranty was up. Industry can keep intentionally churning out garbage products at will. Sane people realize that product quality has never been lower, requiring rapid re-purchase of major appliances. That can keep going.
And, hmm, why do clothes get that weird smell so fast? Because they’re made of petroleum products. We’re wearing plastic. Synthetic fibers don’t make the best fabrics, but they make the cheapest, maximizing profit. Many aren’t supposed to come in contact with the chemical in fabric softeners because it makes that sour weird smell. But, more planned obsolescence.
Rebuilding a house to be “green” when you take into consideration all the manufacturing of the materials and the carbon-generation from the construction processes, takes 20-30 years to break even. Until then you haven’t actually reaped any positives from the carbon-damage you have caused by “improving things”. So before rebuilding could even begin to reduce carbon it has to make it a lot, lot worse. Common sense maintenance of existing buildings and infrastructure is far more responsible but again, bad for wealthy donors profit margins.
The GND seems to emphasize above all else, various means to reduce the mobility and autonomy of the lower classes, while also increasing their density, and making it more profitable to feed them.
The elites however will continue on in their lifestyles. All they have to do is write a check, donate to a Carbon-offset fund. Which encourages/educates other people, the small people, to do with less so (she really says this) the rich don’t have to.
https://theblondeabroad.com/why-im-pledging-to-become-a-carbon-neutral-flyer/
Leo DiCrapio and Prince Harry and this blonde bitch have zero intentions of changing their habits AT ALL. They’ll just write checks to SJW Orgs. who will make sure that YOU change. The rich can pollute like pigs as long as they write carbon-offset checks. Like back in the good old days, when the wealthy paid off the church to get absolution for their sins with every intention of keeping on sinning. Exactly like that.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  WayfaringStrang3r
October 10, 2019 8:30 pm

Al Gore takes the scam a step further, as he owns the company he is paying the carbon offset to. From one pocket to another and viola, I still have the money.

RiNS
RiNS
October 10, 2019 3:24 pm