Guest Post by Tom Luongo
Nigel Farage has thrown down the gauntlet to Boris Johnson over the election strategy. Johnson has refused.
Of course he did. Farage made an offer Johnson couldn’t accept, ditch the Withdrawal Treaty he just negotiated with the EU and truly campaign on a far harder Brexit than Johnson has ever advocated for.
If he doesn’t do that face Farage’s Brexit Party standing candidates in more than 500 seats and potentially split the Leave vote.
Mike Shedlock thinks Farage’s deal is “Preposterous.” Mike is wrong. It is the only offer Farage could offer the Tories and stay in any way relevant in a time of electoral chaos and party fluidity.
It is the kind of ‘big ask’ that his friend Donald Trump would make. It may be an opening bid in a complex negotiation that ends with them making a pact towards the end of the campaign.
Frankly that only happens if the polls shift considerably from where they are.
Politics is not a game for the timid or the weak. If Farage is to be a big player in British politics he needs to act like he is a big player in British politics.
And that means sticking to his core message, a real Brexit where the U.K. regains sovereignty over itself in a timely manner. 2022 is not timely for the U.K.
It is, however, timely for the EU, given the realities of its continent-wide political uprisings against its rule.
Farage is smartly not just saying that Brexit is his party’s raison d’etre, he’s using Brexit as the means to change the post-Brexit political environment, something the Tories are absolutely dead set against.
Farage has positioned the Brexit Party on a “Change Politics for Good” platform that proposes sweeping changes to the system from proportional representation to a written constitution and reforming the House of Lords.
This is, as Monty Python would say, something completely different.
The statement itself cuts to what’s fundamentally wrong. It’s aspirational and tells the voters they still have the real power after three years of parliamentary shenanigans designed to marginalize them while being insufferably condescending.
We’ll find out in the next couple of weeks as to whether Farage et.al. can make the case to British voters that these changes go hand in hand with Brexit. Are these people not only tired of the endless Brexit wrangling but now truly awake to the depth of the betrayal of their political representatives?
If they are then Boris Johnson will have a real problem come December 12th.
Because that is a platform, beyond Brexit, that cuts across all party lines.
The Tories are rallying around their common message now that they have an election. There are serious misgivings within in the party on Johnson’s deal and the strategy. But fear of losing Brexit has motivated the strongest Brexiteers to cave to what Mike rightly points out has been the political reality.
But that was before the election was secured.
Hard core Leavers like Marc Francois and Steven Baker, prominent members of the ERG — European Research Group — are on board with the deal and have called out Farage as lying about it.
But, arguing that these guys being on board with Boris’ treaty means it’s a good deal is simply appeal to authority while missing the much larger point.
The Tories are the main mechanism by which the British Deep State and political elite maintain control over not only British policy, but also that of the U.S. and much of Europe. Don’t for a second think that these ERG guys are any less compromised in the end than the outright Remainers like Ken Clarke, Dominik Grieve or Philip Hammond.
They will always put party before country in the end. Most of them proved it during Theresa May’s multiple rounds of blackmail last spring by eventually voting for that deal because, ultimately, they are spineless.
Fear of losing Brexit is what motivates them. Fear of Farage upsetting the apple cart in Westminster is also very real.
Farage may be overstating the threats within the political declaration to the U.K.’s bargaining position during Free Trade Agreement talks, but he also knows the EU side of the ledger far better than any of the newly-promoted back-benchers in the ERG.
So, if I’m going to resort to appealing to an authority on the subject I’m going with the guy who put the world in this situation in the first place, Nigel Farage.
That said, however, Farage’s strategy is a risky one. There’s no doubt about that. With the most recently published polls putting Johnson at his peak of popularity and the Brexit Party languishing around 10% Farage has a lot of ground to gain in six weeks.
There are real worries that Farage’s support in the Labour heartland of the Midlands and the Northeast isn’t as strong as he thinks it is. But, given how fundamentally split the Remain vote is between the Liberal Democrats and Labour, I don’t see how Farage hurts Johnson unless Farage’s numbers rise.
And Johnson will absolutely try to duck any head-to-head meetings between them just like Theresa May did.
But you don’t change things by being timid. Farage doesn’t win loyalty by going up to Boris Johnson, bowl in hand, and asking for another ladle of gruel. You act like the big dog and you challenge the alpha who, to this point, doesn’t even know what he signed the U.K. up for.
I maintain that Johnson is a fake Leaver and none of his behavior has contravened that, including duping the ERG into backing a now unnecessary Withdrawal Treaty which served its purpose to get a general election to get rid of a rotten Parliament.
Johnson and the ERG know this, and yet, they will persist in putting party first, betraying Northern Ireland, keeping the U.K. as close to the failing EU as possible and all the while calling it Brexit.
Given those circumstances would you expect Nigel Farage to offer Boris Johnson anything more?
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
There is not going to be a Brexit. There will be the simulation of one, and attorneys will make a lot of money arguing abut it, but the last word in British policy and, fundamentally, law, will come from Brussels, not London.
Just like investigating and impeaching Trump, this whole Brexit thing has been a scam, a smoke generator covering up the facts, and preventing British voters from seeing what is really going on.
Watch the Pound. It has just about served it’s purpose, and the powers-that-be (like LaGarde) want to retire it to scrip status in Britain. That will come around when the gloves finally come off in Brexit. It might be a couple of years, but it is coming.
Not sure what will happen to the EU. If the EU economy fails, meaning stagnation, with inflation and high unemployment, which seems to be the crop from the seeds which are being planted, then the EU will want to hold onto the UK to keep itself afloat and as a place to exile political agitators and malcontents.
Sounds like where Trump is on draining the swamp.
It might be a couple of years [three years into it now], but it is coming.
He’ll get to it when the last American soldier is out of Syria.
I think it’s long overtime for a written constitution. The UK has a legal system based on accumulated governmental acts, court findings or case law and traditions extending back too the time of the Magna Carta and incorporating Roman common law practice.
That doesn’t mean that a constitution ends legal interpretation, and in fact probably just the opposite, but a written constitution would enable the populace, or the voting public to have some input into the system.
The Brexit vote, apparently being an advisory rather than authoritarian vote, has developed into a monstrosity.
Either have an election which settles an issue, or don’t have the election at all.
The parliamentary elections do have some very good qualities, immediate transfer of government rather than going through a period between elections and inauguration as in the American system which opens up the government to various “Lame Duck” measures, or last minute acts by governments after they have been turned out in an election but before the elected officials have taken office, which ends up with legislative abominations.
You’re dreaming!
Haven’t you heard that the US constitution is just a piece of paper? Why would a British version be any different?
A written constitution is no guarantee against tyranny as is unfolding year after year in the USA. Clauses like the Commerce Clause are tortured until they give in to whatever the political class wants.The entire ‘law’ is a giant swindle to allow the powers that shouldn’t be to fleece the citizenry at every turn.
After 9/11, the Patriot act, the NDAA, FISA courts, etc are all unconstitutional as are all Federal Gun laws that daily infringe on the citizenry’s rights.
Sorry, but putting ink to paper is a waste of time.
Proportional representation isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. The Party decides who will sit in the legislative chamber, not the people. The politicians you want are the so-called loose cannons who are prepared to speak up and tell the party leaders how stupid their ideas are. Under proprtional representation, those are the last people on the list to be appointed.
A written constitution as also “not as advertised”. While there may be some benefits, the courts end up deciding what law is, despite what the legislative chamber debate may have been. The problem the UK has, on top of parties having become more dogmatic, is that Orders in Council, like Executive Orders in the US, bypass the legislature. What is happening today is the closest thing to a backbench revolt, in the past 60 years. The difference is that in a real backbench revolt, the MPs actually say what the majority of their constituents want. In this case, it appears to be more of a personal view rather than a constituent view. A return to the days of actually representing constituents, rather than towing the party line, would go a long way to fixing the problem.
As for the House of Lords, it has been under attack for more than 100 years. Recall that the original Lords were large land owners. They weren’t going anywhere. In order to preserve their estates for generations to come, they took a long term view on legislation and its effects. Their power has been eroded to the point that they cannot outright reject legislation. Further people like Tony Blair “reformed” (deformed?) the Lords by removing hereditary title,and replacing them with people like “Lord Cashpoint” – the people who buy political parties. How’s that worked out Nigel?
Remember how they were pumping him along with Trump 2-3 years back.
Back when he said he was done with politics.
Same network of Cambridge Analytica type scum.
Because a written Constitution solves all of your problems….LOL.