How The Donald Assassinated ‘America First’

Guest Post by David Stockman

Image result for How The Donald Assassinated 'America First' david stockman

By the twisted logic of Imperial Washington, you could say the Iranians were asking for it. After all, they had the nerve to locate their country right in the middle of 35 U.S. military bases!

Then again, your saner angels may ask: What in the hell is Washington doing with a massive military footprint in a region and in a string of backwater countries that have virtually no bearing on homeland security, safety and liberty?

Djibouti? Oman? Kyrgyzstan? Uzbekistan? Afghanistan? Bahrain? Kuwait? And, yes, Iraq and Iran?

In fact, Washington destroyed the former for no good reason and based on egregious Big Lies about Saddam’s nonexistent WMDs and sheltering of al-Qaeda. That turned Iraq into a failed state hell-hole, pulsating with sectarian frictions and anti-American grievances–even as the rump of Iraq centered in Baghdad fell under the control of Iran-friendly Shiite politicians and militias.

At the same time, Iran itself is zero threat to the American homeland. It’s tiny $350 billion GDP amounts to 6 days of US annual output and its $20 billion defense budget is equivalent to what the Pentagon wastes every 10 days.

Militarily, it has no blue water navy, an air force that could double as a cold war museum and a short and medium range missile force that is self-evidently dedicated to defense and deterrence in the region, not an attack on the USA way over on the yonder side of the deep blue seas.

Its 300 or so active aircraft, for example, include 175 US F-4, F-5, F-14 and sundry transports, helicopters and trainers purchased by the Shah during the 1970s and kept together since the revolution with bailing wire and bubble gum. It also fields 60 or so Soviet vintage MiG-29s and Sukhoi Su attack aircraft—plus a few dozen European and Chinese planes of mostly ancient design.

Likewise, even its most advanced medium range cruise missile (Soumar) can barely get to Rome, Italy, to say nothing of Rome, Georgia.

As is evident from the yellow, green, red and black circles on the map below, which circles outline each missile’s striking range, the overwhelming bulk of Iran’s missile force has a range of 500 miles or less. These missiles are capable of hitting targets in the immediate vicinity of the Persian Gulf, or roughly the same area which encompasses the 35 military bases designated by American flags in the graphic above.

Stated differently, Iran’s extremely modest military capacities are not remotely about an offensive threat to the American homeland. They are overwhelmingly about defending itself in its own neighborhood, where Washington has been intervening and occupying with massive firepower and hostile intent for decades.

Therein, of course, lies a hint. More than 13 years after Saddam’s last hurrah on a Baghdad gallows, the US still has upwards of 30,000 troops and contractors in the immediate vicinity of the Persian Gulf. But why?

It can’t be owing to ISIS. The Islamic State was never much more than a no count salient of dusty, woebegone towns and villages on the Upper Euphrates straddling Western Iraq and northeastern Syria, and was destined to collapse into its own barbaric madness anyway. As it has happened, it was essentially dispatched by the Russian air force, Assad’s military and the Shiite militia forces organized by the dead man himself, Major General Soleimani.

Likewise, it should be obvious by now that it’s not about the oil, either. At the moment the US is producing nearly 13 million barrels per day and is the world’s leading oil producer–well ahead of Saudi Arabia and Russia; and is now actually a net exporter of crude for the first time in three-quarters of a century.

Besides, the Fifth Fleet has never been the solution to oil security. The cure for high prices is high prices—as the great US shale oil and Canadian heavy oil booms so cogently demonstrate, among others.

And the route to global oil industry stability is peaceful commerce because virtually every regime–regardless of politics and ideology—needs all the oil revenue it can muster to fund its own rule and keep its population reasonably pacified.

Surely, there is no better case for the latter than that of Iran itself—with an economy burdened by decades of war, sanctions and mis-rule and an 80-million population that aspires to a western standard of living.

So left to its own devices, Tehran would produce 5 million barrels per day from its abundant reserves. That’s more than 10 times its present meager exports, which have nearly vanished owing to Washington’s vicious sanctions against any and all customers for its oil and potential investors in modernizing and expanding it production capacity. So if it’s not ISIS or oil, exactly why does Washington maintain the circle of 35 bases displayed in the graphic above and keep thousands of US troops and other personnel in harms’ way in the region?

Or more to the moment, why has the Donald been unable to bring the forces home as he has so often proclaimed to be his policy?

The answer, of course, is that the foreign policy apparatus of the US government is controlled by anti-Iran neocons and regime changers. We are still in Syria not to fight ISIS, which is gone, but to block Iran’s land route to its allies in Syria and Lebanon (Hezbollah); and we remain in Iraq solely to use it as a base for clandestine US and Israeli attacks on these Iranian allies and proxy forces.

These Washington instigated or conducted attacks on Iranian allies, in fact, are why there was growing pressure in the Iraqi government to demand that the US finally leave.

These pressures will now become overwhelming in light of this week’s US bombing of five PMF camps (Popular Mobilization Forces) which are Shiite militias that have been integrated into the Iraqi army and which are under the command of its prime minister. Thursday night’s assassination of its Deputy Commander along with Soleimani is only more kerosene on the fire.

To be sure, Iran’s choice of allies has nothing to do with America’s homeland security: None of the sovereign governments of Lebanon (where Hezbollah is the leading political party) or Syria or even Iraq (which is an ostensible US ally) have protested these confession (i.e. Shiite) based arrangements and the aid and benefits which flow from them.

That’s because the so-called evil Shiite crescent is a bogeyman invented by Bibi Netanyahu and is the excuse for his hysterical anti-Iranian foreign policy. The latter is not even designed to enhance Israel’s own security, but to vilify a “far enemy” that can keep his rightwing coalition glued together and himself in power.

Likewise, the US military-industrial complex’s greed and appetite for power and pelf is so voracious that it will embrace any and all missions anywhere on the planet—no matter how stupid or futile or immoral, as per the case of 19-years in Afghanistan—that keep the budgetary loot flowing.

Accordingly, the Washington apparatus conspires to keep the 35 mideast bases in place and to trigger actions like last night’s insane assassination of Iran’s foremost military leader in order to reify the threat and to periodically stoke tensions and counter-attacks that keep missions alive and the forces deployed.

Indeed, we are hard-pressed to imagine a more poignant case of the pot calling the kettle black than Washington’s claim that it had to retaliate owing to actual and expected Iranian “aggression”.

For crying out loud, Washington has been demonizing, ostracizing and economically attacking Iran for decades, and is now literally attempting to destroy its economy and society through its oil sanctions and its “maximum pressure” campaign that aims to bring the fate of Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi to its top leaders in Tehran. So do ya think a regime under a veritable existential threat might gravitate toward retaliation as an alternative to extinction?

And we need be clear about the matter of striking back in self-defense. Washington’s current sanctions campaign against Iran is so aggressive and brutal that it constitutes war by any other name.

When you surround a sovereign nation with an armada of land, sea and air-based high- tech lethality and then declare outright economic war on it with a barely-disguised aim of regime change, it must and will fight back however it can.

That’s why Secretary of State Pompeo’ statement justifying the Donald’s act of naked aggression is so hideous.

Washington is putting the entire nation of Iran at risk in the very place where God or evolution, as the case may be, formed the peninsula on which it resides; and it is doing so without any Iranian provocation against the security of the American homeland whatsoever.

But this neocon knucklehead has the gall to insist that when it comes to the actual anti-Iranian belligerents (i.e. U.S. forces) Washington has bivouacked where they have no business being at all, that not a hair on their head should come to harm.

That’s Imperial arrogance of a kind rarely seen in a world history which is littered with exactly that.

“I can’t talk too much about the nature of the threats. But the American people should know that the President’s decision to remove Soleimani from the battlefield saved American lives,” Pompeo told CNN.

The IRGC general had been “actively plotting” in the region to “take big action, as he described it, that would have put hundreds of lives at risk,” according to Pompeo.

Undoubtedly, things will now spiral out of control because the Iranian regime must and will retaliate for Soleimani’s death. Indeed, by vaporizing the latter, the Donald has now also vaporized any chance of actually implementing the “America First” policy upon which he ran, and which was the principal basis for his freakish elevation to the Oval Office.

The fact is, the only decent thing Obama did on the foreign policy front was the Iran Nuke Deal. Under the latter, Iran gave up a nuclear weapons capability it never had or wanted for the return of billions of escrowed dollars (which belong to Tehran in the first place), while putting itself in a straight-jacket of international inspections and controls that even Houdini could not have broken free from.

But the Donald wantonly shit-canned this arrangement, not because Iran violated either the letter or spirit of the deal, but because the neocons–led by his bubble-headed son- in-law and Bibi Netanyahu errand boy, Jared Kushner—-blatantly lied to him about its alleged defects.

Indeed, the resulting Washington pivot to the current “maximum pressure” aggression against Iran is fast becoming the Empire’s most demented and shameful hour—even as it crystalizes like rarely before the difference between homeland defense and imperial aggression.

Under the former, not one American serviceman, contractor or civilian official would be in harms’ way because the ring of hostile bases surrounding Iran would not exist nor would Washington be waging economic warfare on what would otherwise be a prosperous 5 million barrel per day oil trade with the world.

Only empires put their citizens needlessly in harms’ way and thereby trap their leaders into a cycle of violence which feeds upon itself.

The Donald is now yet another American president ensnared in the kind of tit-for-tat trap that is the modus operandi of Empire First.

David Stockman was Director of the Office of Management and Budget under President Ronald Reagan. After leaving the White House, Stockman had a 20-year career on Wall Street.

The above originally appeared at David Stockman’s Contra Corner.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
45 Comments
Solutions Are Obvious
Solutions Are Obvious
January 5, 2020 10:38 am

I thought Trump was the President – the chief executive of the nation and Commander In Chief of the military.

I’d like to know why, exactly, he can’t pull the plug on all these foreign bases and bring all the troops back to US soil where they might actually provide a defensive capability along the borders.

I’m under the impression that it is his say so alone that could stop all this shit as per his duties and capabilities under the Constitution, if that piece of paper still has any relevance these days.

What force keeps the waste, fraud and abuse going via the military that prevents the US from being a peaceful respectable nation?

credit
credit
  Solutions Are Obvious
January 5, 2020 11:26 am

you know what force. don’t be afraid to name it.

Solutions Are Obvious
Solutions Are Obvious
  credit
January 5, 2020 12:17 pm

Actually, I don’t know what force does this. I know what several forces are implied to be capable of this but that’s just bullshit.

If Trump said the magic words. “As Commander In Chief I’m ordering all US troops outside the United States to return to the United States within X days. Further, if anything suspicious happens to me as a result of this order, the American people should know that XXX, YYY, ZZZ etc are responsible.”, then the deed is done. By this time I’m certain he knows who to name as the likely culprits.

No assassination threat, no pressure from the Israeli lobby, no push from the MIC, etc could change that without setting the entire US on fire and that conflagration is in no one’s best interests inside the deep state as the entity known as the United States would cease to exist in any aftermath.

AC
AC
  Solutions Are Obvious
January 5, 2020 1:39 pm

The Iranians appear to know what force does this.

comment image

Solutions Are Obvious
Solutions Are Obvious
  AC
January 5, 2020 1:52 pm

That’s not force; that’s cooperation. Trump is controlled by the Zionists but that’s because he wants what they can provide and goes along. He still retains the authority to change the dynamic.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
  Solutions Are Obvious
January 5, 2020 1:51 pm

If he did that, he’d probably be assassinated within 48 hours by “the Iranians” (CIA), Pence the Retard would take over and things would continue on. That’s not to excuse Trump for his recent idiocy on Iran. It’s very possible that senate republicans threatened him with ouster if he didn’t go along with instigating war with Iran. So what? He should have outed their pressure campaign and if he got bottled from office, so be it. Trump may not realistically have had the ability to retrieve all Americans from the Middle East, but he didn’t have to assassinate the (by some accounts) most popular man in Iran.

Dan
Dan
  Solutions Are Obvious
January 5, 2020 11:36 am

Yet when it comes to starting wars, a Congressional power, no problem at all. Or imposing tariffs, also a Congressional power, no problem. Seems like you can take everything you learned in Civics class and burn it.

Steve
Steve
January 5, 2020 10:54 am

Too bad this article couldn’t be snuck into a rerun of the TV show FRIENDS. It would be about the only place where the majority of Americans might see or read it.

Solutions Are Obvious
Solutions Are Obvious
  Steve
January 5, 2020 12:35 pm

That wouldn’t work.

They’d mute the TV and use it as an opportunity to get more obesity ingredients from the kitchen.

I read recently that roughly 40% of the US population is obese and an additional 10% is overweight. So, half the folks in the country and thus half the folks in Virginia who proclaim to want to defend their 2nd Amendment rights would need a Walmart motorized shopping vehicle to snipe at the gun confiscation troops. Yeah, that’ll work.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
  Solutions Are Obvious
January 5, 2020 1:52 pm

The gun confiscation troops are fat, too.

Vote Harder
Vote Harder
January 5, 2020 11:17 am

Or more to the moment, why has the Donald been unable to bring the forces home as he has so often proclaimed to be his policy?

The answer, of course, is that the foreign policy apparatus of the US government is controlled by anti-Iran neocons and regime changers.

Trump is a smart man. I don’t see how his campaign foreign policy promise is being held hostage by the neocons. As SAO say’s he is Commander In Chief. There was another campaign promise, it was “draining the swamp”. This condition described by Stockman is the result of Trump not draining the swamp. So draining the swamp should be the starting point. Why has he been unable to do so? Trump is a smart man, he is capable of seeing this condition as described by Stockman and others, yet he acts like a hostage who is helpless or maybe some kind of Manchurian Candidate POTUS. If this is the case then it is proof that America has at some point has undergone a covert military coup and as a result is now a military dictatorship.

GAZ
GAZ
  Vote Harder
January 5, 2020 11:44 am

The military coup happened Nov. 22 1963. Dwight Eisenhower predicted the MIC takeover during his farewell speech.

Vote Harder
Vote Harder
  GAZ
January 5, 2020 11:47 am

Although ambiguously, It certainly does appear that way from his words.

chuck
chuck
  Vote Harder
January 5, 2020 12:46 pm

We never “underwent a coup” at some point. We were created and maintained in this fashion as a nation. Prying control away from the Deep State takes time. Calm the f+ck down. Just cause he couldn’t do what everyone wants in the first few years, everyone is having a hissy.
And quoting your other sockpuppet is bad form winnie.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  chuck
January 5, 2020 1:40 pm

So far, he hasn’t even taken one step.

piearesquared
piearesquared
  Vote Harder
January 5, 2020 1:27 pm

“Trump is a smart man … yet he acts like a hostage who is helpless.”

You got it. Trump is being held hostage by the Deep State / New World Order / Zionists. They own him either due to threats or blackmail. I don’t know if he ever intended to keep the promises he made when he was a candidate, but he certainly has no intention of keeping them now, which is why he is filling up the swamp instead of draining it, and has surrounded himself with every swamp creature imaginable. AG Barr is one of his Deep State handlers. He is just doing what he is told to do.

Dan
Dan
January 5, 2020 11:33 am

Absolutely spot on! Except for “The fact is, the only decent thing Obama did on the foreign policy front was the Iran Nuke Deal”. I would add to that normalizing relations with Cuba.

As a former Republican Congressman, Stockman’s voice is a tough one for conservatives to ignore.

starfcker
starfcker
  Dan
January 5, 2020 12:24 pm

“The fact is, the only decent thing Obama did on the foreign policy front was the Iran Nuke Deal” Is David not aware of all the aggression Iran has unleashed with that money? The guy over at Conservative Treehouse calls it the David Mamet principle. Liberals pretending not to know things lest facts get in the way of the nonsense they spout. “As a former Republican Congressman, Stockman’s voice is a tough one for conservatives to ignore.” I seriously doubt anybody believes Stockman has a conservative bone in his body at this point. Pure Wall Street libtard

Old Timer
Old Timer
January 5, 2020 11:43 am

“but because the neocons–led by his bubble-headed son- in-law and Bibi Netanyahu errand boy, Jared Kushner—-blatantly lied to him about its alleged defects.” And clueless Jr. had Cheney and Rumsfeld. Rinse repeat.

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
January 5, 2020 11:52 am

Really helps complete the picture of Zionist Trump: his appointing 666, attacking Syria, moving our Embassy, wearing the beanie at their Wall, dancing with Saudis etc. Houston, we have a problem: America was hijacked by Zionist and we need to get her off of the Eternal Infernal Zionist Way of Death and Destruction and back to Truth, Justice and the American Way. Please pray for Trump to have an Epiphany, to turn from the False god of Zion to the True God Jesus Christ and lead America back to The Path Jesus taught the World.

credit
credit
  robert h siddell jr
January 5, 2020 12:55 pm

too late. he says his grandson is going to be “the best Jew ever.”

Vote Harder
Vote Harder
January 5, 2020 12:20 pm

Likewise, it should be obvious by now that it’s not about the oil, either. At the moment the US is producing nearly 13 million barrels per day and is the world’s leading oil producer–well ahead of Saudi Arabia and Russia; and is now actually a net exporter of crude for the first time in three-quarters of a century.

I’m not so sure I agree with this one. Then why time after time has Trump made statements that those in the cross hairs he wants to invade for the taking of oil? If we have so much oil then why does he want to steal those countries oil? And the oil is no reason? That’s not according to Trump’s own words.

Trump’s Middle East Policy Is To Confiscate/Steal Oil, He Said So Himself: In hindsight, ‘We should have kept the oil in Iraq!’

In Syria too!

Trump Wants Deal With Exxon Or Other Company To Take Syrian Oil

John Bolton Says Ultimate Goal In Venezuela Is To Take Their Oil

Trump Boasts The US “Has Secured The Oil” In Syria

Take the oil first and due process later?
Assad say’s the US is stealing their oil and is taking them to court

Trump is wanting to steal Libyan oil

A book written by the former FBI directer has the following passage that reiterates the above agenda:

comment image

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Vote Harder
January 5, 2020 1:46 pm

Yes, and the US cannot be a “net oil exporter” when it produces something like 12/13Mbbl/day and uses something like 20Mbbl/day. However one wants to count it, that’s a “net” deficit of several million bbl/day.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  Vote Harder
January 5, 2020 2:15 pm

Its about power and control. And yes (Donkey) greed. Taking all the oil means that they can then control the countries like Russia and China that would otherwise purchase the oil. Same goes for taking over Venezuela someday. The more you have (and the more you can control because of it), the more you want ad infinitum.

Vote Harder
Vote Harder
  MrLiberty
January 5, 2020 3:34 pm

And the recent sanctions on Germany and Russia for the norstream pipeline to force US energy markets into Europe and Russia out.

Lebowski
Lebowski
  Vote Harder
January 6, 2020 4:16 am

Doubt that very much The US is in decline and others see that clearly

chuck
chuck
January 5, 2020 1:00 pm

Keep in mind this is David “Deep State” Stockman we’re discussing here.

mark
mark
January 5, 2020 1:19 pm

Hmmm…here is a related flashback from 7 months ago.

WHISTLEBLOWER EHO WARNED ABOUT FLASE FLAG ATTACKS TO JUSTIFY U.S. INVASION OF IRAN FOUND DEAD, YOU TUBE CHANNEL REMOVED

Whistleblower Who Warned About False Flag Attacks to Justify U.S. Invasion of Iran Found Dead, YouTube Channel Removed

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  mark
January 5, 2020 2:18 pm

To be fair, everyone with a clue has been saying that this would happen. THAT is how our government works (The Maine, the Lusitania, Pearl Harbor, the Gulf of Tonkin, 9-11, etc.). Not that his “two shots to the back of the head suicide” (just speculating, have no clue as to the details) wouldn’t be par for the course for the Clinton Crime Family or other globalist/Deep State players.

Jack Lovett
Jack Lovett
January 5, 2020 1:29 pm

Did Satanyahoo order his puppydog to commit the murder ? Or was his joo buddys wanting to keep the price of oil up, thereby keeping the casino proped up?

Anthony Aaron
Anthony Aaron
January 5, 2020 1:56 pm

As ex-PFC Wintergreen would say — ‘Too prolix’.

The author takes an awful lot of words to dance around the real source of all of the problems in the Middle East and the reason the United States has spent trillion$ of our dollar$ and thousands of our people’s lives: israel and the death-grip it has on United States legislators and on our domestic, foreign and military policies … for decades.

We DO need to get ALL of our troops and our materiel out of the Middle East — including the ‘trip wire’ United States Air Force base in israel that’s there solely to protect and further the war-mongering interests of israel.

We should close our embassy in israel and kick their counterparts out of the United States; we should deport all of their citizens — especially those ‘students’ and such who are engaged in constant espionage against US and who are here to disrupt the flow of information in OUR Sovereign Nation.

Enough already …

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
January 5, 2020 2:11 pm

100%

TC
TC
January 5, 2020 5:06 pm
TC
TC
January 5, 2020 5:08 pm
Jdog
Jdog
January 6, 2020 2:11 pm

Well said! Article well thought out!