Because We Said So

Guest Post by Eric Peters

When a bright child questions a parent who hasn’t got a good answer, the parent often will sometimes say, because I said so!

Government works on the same principle.

It says A and B are the law – that we must not do something – because of this rationale. But when we – its children, as it considers us – notice and ask why C is allowed or even required, despite it being contrary to the same rationale given for A and B, we are told – in essence – because I said so!

Examples abound but the latest is an exemption from federal saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaafety requirements for cars without drivers just granted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

The Nuro R2  – named, obviously, to summon warm associations with the cute little R2 D2 robot from Star Wars – will not have to conform to FMVSS crashworthiness standards that apply to other cars.

Well, to cars that still have drivers.

FMVSS is ukase code for Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards – there’s that word again! – which among other things decree the crashworthiness of new cars with someone behind the wheel. How they impact things.

This includes people.

Driverless cars like the Nuro R2 are to be exempted from such tomfoolery, even though it’s a fact that they are quite capable of crashing into things.

And people.

Because driverless cars aren’t infallible.

They have demonstrated this. Repeatedly.

But NHTSA considers the R2 an acceptable risk – to our safety – because it has a maximum speed of “only” 25 miles-per-hour. Walk into traffic moving 25 MPH and see how saaaaaaaaaaaaaafe it is to be hit by a vehicle traveling “only” 25 MPH.

If, of course, you survive the experience.

Since the R2 doesn’t have a driver to see things in its path such as other cars – and people – it is up to sensors and cameras and programming to apply the brakes and not run into them.

It’s inevitable that the R2 won’t see someone, eventually. Perhaps you.

Maybe your kid.

Our safety – at the mercy of technology which has established its fallibility.

Including its greater susceptibility to being stumped by rain and fog and snow and ice, its programming stymied – because its sensors cannot see.

Oh well.

Where to send the hospital bill?

Meanwhile, we’re not allowed to temporarily turn off defective air bags that have established their lethality until such time as it can be arranged to have the murderous things replaced. As you read this sentence, there are tens of thousands of cars being driven around with air bags prone to disintegrate upon deployment, shredding the driver’s face with high-velocity shrapnel.

The law requires the owners of these cars to continue driving around with these time-bombs inches away from their faces; or rather, the law – NHTSA – will not issue a stay of execution by permitting the owners to have a dealer turn them off until they can be replaced (so many cars are affected that it will take years to replace all the known-defective air bags)..

Even though NHTSA knows that the cars equipped with these dashboard Claymores are extremely not saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaafe.

Oh well.

What would NHTSA’s reaction be if it were discovered that Toyota or Honda or Chevrolet had been selling cars that didn’t meet the federal 5 MPH bumper-impact requirement?

It’d be volcanic.

So why are driverless cars exempted?

It is because NHTSA wants to facilitate the process of getting drivers out of cars. There is no other sane explanation for the serial kid-glove treatment of dangerous driverless cars, including (most notoriously) Tesla electric cars that drive a great deal faster then 25 MPH – without a driver.

Or rather, with drivers who have turned over driving to the car – and then gone to sleep behind the wheel.

Tesla advertises this capability as a selling point – and NHTSA doesn’t so much as belch. Other car companies are champing at the bit to do the same and many already offer partial self-driving capability – encouraging the driver not to.

Multiple deaths have already occurred – and more inevitably to follow.

No recall. No requirement that “Autopilot” be disabled – even temporarily.

But if you don’t wear a seatbelt, you risk the unfriendly attentions of armed government workers, who rarely “buckle up” themselves. These AGWs will literally threaten your life for – at the very worst – putting your own saaaaaaaaaaaafety slightly at risk.

Driverless cars that put other people’s saaaaaaaaaaaafety at risk?

That’s just fine.

Because we said so!

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
20 Comments
gman
gman
February 12, 2020 1:22 pm

“Where to send the hospital bill?”

by the time all this is implemented, a bigger question will be, “is there still a hospital?”

F4 Pilot
F4 Pilot
  gman
February 12, 2020 10:02 pm

In that case we can hire Xi’s construction crew to build us a hospital pronto.

M G
M G
  F4 Pilot
February 12, 2020 10:22 pm

Good one!

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
February 12, 2020 1:49 pm

Everyone knows it is the primary job of the government to keep us safe from ourselves. We are obviously too stupid to watch our for our own best interests.

Conform or you will face the AGW’s.

gman
gman
  TN Patriot
February 12, 2020 1:57 pm

“the primary job of the government to keep us safe from ourselves”

would you accept that government has a role in keeping us safe from each other?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  gman
February 12, 2020 2:05 pm

the primary job of government is to defend itself from the citizens

gman
gman
  Anonymous
February 12, 2020 2:22 pm

no, it’s not. government is just a tool, how it gets used depends on whether the citizens do their job of keeping control of it or not.

gman
gman
  gman
February 12, 2020 8:43 pm

(to the downvoters) looks like someone doesn’t want to take responsibility.

the far left and far right are so similar. the left expects government to give it something without their having worked for it, and the right expects government to be something without their having worked for it. both are freeloaders.

The Wonder of it All
The Wonder of it All
  gman
February 12, 2020 10:03 pm

Gee, too much time on your hands?

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  gman
February 12, 2020 3:05 pm

Not the feds. At the local level, it is much more acceptable, or it used to be before they became militarized.

BTW my first statement was totally sarcasm.

TampaRed
TampaRed
  TN Patriot
February 12, 2020 2:22 pm

“Conform or you will face the AGW’s.”
amen mr patriot–
tis much better both 4 you & society that an agw shoots you as you’re resisting accepting a ticket 4 not wearing a seatbelt than to allow citizens to decide what level of risk is acceptable to live with–
besides,if there were no mandatory seatbelt laws,agw s would not have the right to stop you 4 any reason to check you out under the guise of …”it looked like your daughter wasn’t buckled in”,as was said to me once when i was cutting thru a bad area as a neighborhood enforcement action was occurring–
even after it was obvious that i was legal it didn’t stop the deputy from running my license/registration & looking around my truck to see if there were any containers of alcohol or drugs–imo,if a bogus incident occurs a person should not be able to be charged 4 anything else that they’re doing–
the people who support mandatory seatbelt laws are useful idiots 4 big govt.–the laws are really there to give govt. more control–imo it’s stupid not to wear a seatbelt but the direct consequences only affect you,nobody else–
the only positive about it is that it made my daughter very skeptical of authority b/c “…that policeman didn’t tell the truth about me.”
the wisdom of a 5 yo–

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  TampaRed
February 12, 2020 3:07 pm

Tampa Red – It always boils down to control, doesn’t it?

gman
gman
  TN Patriot
February 12, 2020 4:30 pm

control of the vehicle, yes.

GoneWest
GoneWest
  TampaRed
February 12, 2020 4:20 pm

Much like helmet laws for motorcycles. You are an absolute dolt not to wear one. But is anyone going to be hurt besides you if you choose not to and get hurt?

Should insurance be able to deny payment for your injuries if you’re not wearing one? Absolutely! They (and I mean the company and all the other insured folks who pay into the insurance pool) should not have to pay for your stupidity. Don’t like it – don’t drive a motorcycle.

This same principle should be applied everywhere. There is no need for the government to make these laws. Not to mention the fact that the US Fed Gov’t does not have the authority – besides the guns and jails – to make these laws. But that’s for another time…

gman
gman
  TampaRed
February 12, 2020 4:25 pm

“an agw shoots you as you’re resisting accepting a ticket 4 not wearing a seatbelt”

if you’re getting shot over a seat belt ticket then you have bigger problems than seatbelts, tickets, cops, or government.

“than to allow citizens to decide what level of risk is acceptable to live with”

watching all the traffic accidents found on youtube, it’s clear that lots of people suffer the consequences of not only their own mistakes but also the mistakes of other people. watch the cl0se-ups, you can see drivers being thrown around trying to regain control. not wearing a seatbelt means you’re more likely to lose control of your vehicle and injure or kill someone else, and THEY aren’t going to be interested in your notion of “responsibility”, THEY’re only going to be interested in preventing injury to themselves in the first place.

SeeBee
SeeBee
February 12, 2020 8:37 pm

You can never be too protected.

Over Protective Mommy = State. Incapacitated kid = you

gman
gman
  SeeBee
February 12, 2020 8:44 pm

“You can never be too protected.”

we’re nowhere near that. and everybody knows it.

(great scene though)

SeeBee
SeeBee
  gman
February 12, 2020 8:50 pm

comment image
We’re close.

Morongobill
Morongobill
  SeeBee
February 13, 2020 10:12 am

Let’s see. Mcdonalds served coffee very close to the boiling point back then. Anyone who goes through a drivethru knows they hand it out to you with the server holding it by the lid. Mcd’s lids aren’t known for being tight, especially when this happened. Sounds like a situation that guaranteed injuries.

SMRT
SMRT
February 13, 2020 12:42 am

Eric is against mandatory vehicle insurance, so there will be no place to send the bill, so why ask? He also believes that the government should not be in position to make saaaaaaafty measures mandatory, so he should like this idea that the government is staying out of this right. So what is it? It’s everything that he should want. This should be seen as a step in the right direction for him. But he’s a Libertarian, so this hypocrisy of his makes sense. And the OM has to take some credit for this too. Eric backs the OM, while Eric can still call himself a Libertarian holding the NAP up as proof. It’s complicated. Let him explain it to you.