Self-Assessment

Guest Post by The Zman

On Monday of this week, I had a conversation with a client about the normal stuff we talk about on a regular basis. Of course, the panic was a topic, as every business is figuring out what they need to do to keep the doors open in the panic. This person is generally sober minded and skeptical about most things. He is one of those guys, who can get wound up over little things, but those little things are stupid things. Otherwise, he is not the sort to mindlessly join the herd in the latest fads.

Anyway, I just assumed he was as skeptical as I was about the panic, so I said something along the lines of this being madness. To my surprise, I got a lot of push-back about how this is super serious. He did the old “my wife knows a doctor at some hospital and she said 70% of people will get this.” It is the Ferris Bueller gambit, in which a mythological expert several steps removed from the person, is the most reliable source of information on the planet about the subject.

Of course, I made the mistake I often point out in politics and that is I countered his claim with actual facts that anyone can look up. I pointed out that there are eight billion people on the planet. I told him more people have died from suicide in China than from this plague and China is the epicenter. My client listened, but it was quite clear he was on the side of strangers he reads on-line. Those people are much more convincing to him, because of something called abductive reasoning.

Abductive reasoning is where you start with an observation or set of observations and then you find the simplest and most likely, or what feels like the most likely, explanation for the observations. Greg Johnson talked about this in his review of Ben Novak’s Hitler & Abductive Logic. In this case, my client sees the panic and the outlandish actions of government officials and thinks, “What could be causing this?” The best answer, the one that is the simplest, is that the virus is the Plague of Justinian.

Later in the week, I had an e-mail exchange with someone, who is most certainly on this side of the great divide. The e-mail was about the cancellation of this year’s American Renaissance and other dissident events due to the panic. I once again assumed he was on the sober minded side of this issue, so I freely called it a panic. What I got was the old line about “If we can save just one life.” In this case, he thought staying home for a couple of weeks was a perfectly reasonable measure.

The mistake I was making here was in not talking to someone where they are rather than where I would like them to be. That is, this person is a non-technical person working in a non-essential part of the economy. He will get paid to stay home for two weeks, so this is a nice unexpected vacation. He also has kids, so he feels he has to be extra cautious, as people literally count on him for their existence. He’s never going to respond to facts and reason on this issue. He’s being justifiably selfish.

Both of these examples are useful in thinking about politics. The whole point of politics is to persuade people. Being right is a nice side benefit, if you are into that sort of thing, but it is rarely an essential element. People, even smart people, respond to emotional appeals and moral appeals before appeals to reason. Critically, only left-wing lunatics put politics ahead of their personal safety or the well-being of their family. “For the children” is a cliché because it was highly effective.

In this case, after the panic has subsided and we are evaluating the wreckage, most of the people who supported these measures will be right there with extreme solutions to remedy the fallout. The curve flatteners will be demanding a New Deal to restore the economy and boost the stock market. Many may even howl about the foolishness of destroying the global economy to save a few extra people this year. People are funny that way. They forgive and forget their errors first.

It will be tempting to remind these people that they were warned about the trade-offs, but supported the panic anyway. In six months, a lot of curve flatteners are going to be complaining about the downstream consequences to this. Just as facts and reason are of no use in this panic, they will be of no use in the aftermath. It is a lesson dissident need to take from this current crisis and put to use in the next. Like animals, people must be led, exploiting their naturally tendencies, not their reason.

That’s the hard part of politics for the sorts of people that naturally find themselves on this side of the great divide. The bigots and anti-Semites, of course, end up over here because they have nowhere else to go, but most people are led here, because this is where the facts led them. It is the rejection of emotional appeals and herd thinking that opened their eyes to alternative explanations for observable reality. It’s asking a lot to then resort to emotional appeals in order to do politics.

That said, it is not impossible. Midweek I had a chat with another client and this subject naturally came up. This person is a self-actualizing beautiful person. Having been bitten twice earlier, I was prepared this time. I mentioned that I was worried that about how the lock-down would keep the tens of millions of diabetics from getting their insulin. This person then told me their mother was on insulin. We chatted a bit about how shutting down the economy would stop all sorts of essential items.

I could tell his sense of well-being shifted on a dime. He went from being comfortable with the lock-down to suddenly being worried it would cause him real harm. The number of insulin users is less ten million. The number is less than half that, but we all know someone that takes the needle. We can feel that without thinking about it. The ten million number is meaningless. What resonates is the one, the one person we know, who is dependent upon insulin to remain on this side of the grass.

Ultimately, this is the age-old lesson of politics. Politicians are trained to personalize issues as best they can, because that resonates with people. The town hall debate is really just a form of the AA meeting. The politician is the counselor, leading the participant in telling their story. The politician provides affirmation and encourages the groups to share in that affirmation. This is the ideal environment for the relatable sociopath, which is why democracy loves the town hall style debate.

For dissidents, there will be loads of open doors in the coming months, as the public comes to terms with what has been wrought. Suddenly, there are going to be a whole lot of people looking for the simplest and most likely explanation for what they see happening around them. The normal political construct is not going to be enough to explain it. That means there is an opportunity to provide a personal and reasonable sounding answer that emotionally connects with them.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
TC
TC
March 20, 2020 3:08 pm

I’d be more interested in reading how Zman contracted it, what steps he took to inform those he had been in contact with and what steps he’s taking to protect those around him (I assume he’s not talking to these people in person) etc.

subwo
subwo
  TC
March 21, 2020 2:16 am

He didn’t catch it. That opening statement in his earlier piece was in italics and was some Hollywood type.

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 20, 2020 3:59 pm

“That means there is an opportunity to provide a personal and reasonable sounding answer that emotionally connects with them.”
They still won’t accept it.
Explain to them how the USG is on par with the Soviet Union or Nazi’s and they would beat your ass for being unpatriotic.
Most people can’t wake up, there not smart enough or too busy with life in general with no time to consider observable reality.

Unonymous
Unonymous
March 20, 2020 4:32 pm

If persuasion were a balloon, it rises on the helium of communicated personal benefits. Customers, clients, constituents, and even friends and family are greedy. But in ways they believe to be good

ssgconway
ssgconway
March 20, 2020 5:39 pm

The Romans lived through the first true pandemics because they had the first true, long-lasting multi-continent empire, with good roads to help the spread. Harper’s The Fate of Rome, published a couple of years ago, describes not just how the Romans had no real idea what caused pandemics, but that the marginalized Christians, who actually helped the sick whilst others abandoned them, gained lots of cred, while the Empire survived much longer than perhaps it should have. ‘There is a lot of ruin in a great nation,’ and we may be saved by precisely that.
On the flip side, the eastern Roman, or Byzantine Empire should not have survived the repeated blows struck from the Plague of Justinian through the coming of Islam. Haldon’s The Empire That Would Not Die offers a take on why they survived: One culture (Greek), one Faith (Orthodoxy), one heritage (Roman), one legal system (Roman, as codified by Justinian), and a strong central government able to organize society’s resources to help the center (Constantinople) survive and to serve as a basis for restoration. I’ll add one more: Sound money. They didn’t devalue their money as a quick fix for budget problems. How many of those do we have? How many did we have in 1960?

mike
mike
March 20, 2020 6:41 pm

That Greg Johnson review is pretty poor, and makes one wonder if the book is just as weak.
I mean one shoddy example (“cooperation of New York bankers and Russian Bolsheviks”) to substantiate the book title?

And what about things that obviously break the “abductive” frame,
such as his famous line:
“The great masses of the people will more easily fall victim to a big lie than a small one. For they all use small lies every day, but cannot imagine someone would distort the truth so infamously.”

So looks more like a goal-seeked book to me (A/K/A First decide on the wanted outcome, then search for facts supporting it),
as far as I can tell based on the limited info available.

SeeBee
SeeBee
March 20, 2020 9:37 pm

Pussy footing around gets very tiresome. Why do the awakened always seem to have to kowtow to the woke.

None Ya Biz
None Ya Biz
March 21, 2020 12:06 pm

Stopped reading at the anti-Semite line. Sheesh!

Hardscrabble Farmer
Hardscrabble Farmer
March 21, 2020 8:12 pm

“The bigots and anti-Semites, of course, end up over here because they have nowhere else to go, but most people are led here, because this is where the facts led them.”

Interesting qualification.