Authored by Whitney Webb via UnlimitedHangout.com,
A group of “bipartisan” neoconservative Republicans and establishment Democrats have been “simulating” multiple catastrophic scenarios for the 2020 election, including a simulation where a clear victory by the incumbent provokes “unprecedented” measures, which the Biden campaign could take to foil a new Trump inauguration.
A group of Democratic Party insiders and former Obama and Clinton era officials as well as a cadre of “Never Trump” neoconservative Republicans have spent the past few months conducting simulations and “war games” regarding different 2020 election “doomsday” scenarios.
Per several media reports on the group, called the Transition Integrity Project (TIP), they justify these exercises as specifically preparing for a scenario where President Trump loses the 2020 election and refuses to leave office, potentially resulting in a constitutional crisis. However, according to TIP’s own documents, even their simulations involving a “clear win” for Trump in the upcoming election resulted in a constitutional crisis, as they predicted that the Biden campaign would make bold moves aimed at securing the presidency, regardless of the election result.
This is particularly troubling given that TIP has considerable ties to the Obama administration, where Biden served as Vice President, as well as several groups that are adamantly pro-Biden in addition to the Biden campaign itself. Indeed, the fact that a group of openly pro-Biden Washington insiders and former government officials have gamed out scenarios for possible election outcomes and their aftermath, all of which either ended with Biden becoming president or a constitutional crisis, suggest that powerful forces influencing the Biden campaign are pushing the former Vice President to refuse to concede the election even if he loses.
This, of course, gravely undercuts the TIP’s claim to be ensuring “integrity” in the presidential transition process and instead suggests that the group is openly planning on how to ensure that Trump leaves office regardless of the result or to manufacture the very constitutional crisis they claim to be preventing through their simulations.
Such concerns are only magnified by the recent claims made by the 2016 Democratic presidential candidate and former Secretary of State under Obama, Hillary Clinton, that Biden “should not concede under any circumstances.”
“I think this is going to drag out, and eventually I do believe he will win if we don’t give an inch, and if we are as focused and relentless as the other side is,” Clinton continued during an interview with Showtime a little over a week ago. The results of the TIP’s simulations notably echo Clinton’s claims that Biden will “eventually” win if the process to determine the election outcome is “dragged out.”
The Uniparty’s “war games”
Members of the TIP met in June to conduct four “war games” that simulated “a dark 11 weeks between Election Day and Inauguration Day” in which “Trump and his Republican allies used every apparatus of government — the Postal Service, state lawmakers, the Justice Department, federal agents, and the military — to hold onto power, and Democrats took to the courts and the streets to try to stop it,” according to a report from The Boston Globe. However, one of those simulations, which examined what would transpire between Election Day and Inauguration Day in the event of a “clear Trump win,” shows that the TIP simulated not only how Republicans could use every option at their disposal to “hold onto power”, but also how Democrats could do so if the 2020 election result is not in their favor.
While some, mostly right-leaning media outlets, such as this article from The National Pulse, did note that the TIP’s simulations involved the Biden campaign refusing to concede, the actual document from TIP on the exercises revealed the specific moves the Biden campaign would take following a “clear win” for the Trump campaign. Unsurprisingly, these moves would greatly exacerbate current political tensions in the United States, an end result that the TIP claims they were created to avoid, gravely undercutting the official justification for their simulations as well as the group’s official reason for existing.
In the TIP’s “clear Trump win” scenario (see page 17), Joe Biden – played in the war game by John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign manager and chief of staff to former President Bill Clinton – retracted his election night concession and subsequently convinced “three states with Democratic governors – North Carolina, Wisconsin and Michigan – to ask for recounts.” Then, the governors of Wisconsin and Michigan “sent separate slates of electors to counter those sent by the state legislature” to the Electoral College, which Trump had won, in an attempt to undermine, if not prevent, that win.
Next, “the Biden campaign encouraged Western states, particularly California but also Oregon and Washington, and collectively known as “Cascadia,” to secede from the Union unless Congressional Republicans agreed to a set of structural reforms. (emphasis added)” Subsequently, “with advice from [former] President Obama,” the Biden campaign laid out those “reforms” as the following:
- Give statehood to Washington, DC and Puerto Rico
- Divide California into five states “to more accurately represent its population in the Senate”
- Require Supreme Court justices to retire at 70
- Eliminate the Electoral College
In other words, these “structural reforms” involve the creation of what essentially amounts to having the U.S. by composed 56 states, with the new states set to ensure a perpetual majority for Democrats, as only Democrat-majority areas (DC, Puerto Rico and California) are given statehood. Notably, in other scenarios where Biden won the Electoral College, Democrats did not support its elimination.
Also notable is the fact that, in this simulation, the TIP blamed the Trump campaign for the Democrats’ decision to take the “provocative, unprecedented actions” laid out above, asserting that Trump’s campaign had “created the conditions to force the Biden campaign” into taking these actions by doing things like giving “an interview to The Intercept in which he [Trump] stated that he would have lost the election if Bernie Sanders had been nominated” instead of Biden as the Democratic presidential candidate.
The TIP also claimed that the Trump campaign would seek to paint these “provocative, unpredecented actions” as “the Democrats attempting to orchestrate an illegal coup,” despite the fact that that is essentially what those actions entail. Indeed, in other simulations where the Trump campaign behaved along these lines, the TIP’s rhetoric about this category of extreme actions is decidedly different.
Yet, the simulated actions of the Biden campaign in this scenario did not end there, as the Biden campaign subsequently “provoked a breakdown in the joint session of Congress [on January 6th] by getting the House of Representatives to agree to award the presidency to Biden,” adding that this was “based on the alternative pro-Biden submissions sent by pro-Biden governors.” The Republican party obviously did not consent, noting that Trump had won the election through his Electoral College victory. The “clear Trump win” election simulation ended with no president-elect being inaugurated on January 20, with the TIP noting “it was unclear what the military would do in this situation.”
Of course, some TIP members, including its co-founder Rosa Brooks – a former advisor to the Obama era Pentagon and currently a fellow at the “New America” think tank, have their preference for “what the military would do in this situation.” For instance, Brooks, writing less than 2 weeks after Trump’s inauguration in 2017, argued in Foreign Policythat “a military coup, or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders” was one of four possibilities for removing Trump from office prior to the 2020 election.
Full TIP document below:
Who is behind the TIP?
The TIP was created in late 2019, allegedly “out of concern that the Trump Administration may seek to manipulate, ignore, undermine or disrupt the 2020 presidential election and transition process.” It was co-founded by Rosa Brooks and Nils Gilman and its current director is Zoe Hudson. Brooks, as previously mentioned, was an advisor to the Pentagon and the Hillary Clinton-led State Department during the Obama administration. She was also previously the general counsel to the President of the Open Society Institute, part of the Open Society Foundations (OSF), a controversial organization funded by billionaire George Soros. Zoe Hudson, who is TIP’s director, is also a former top figure at OSF, serving assenior policy analyst and liaison between the foundations and the U.S. government for 11 years.
OSF ties to the TIP are a red flag for a number of reasons, namely due to the fact that OSF and other Soros-funded organizations played a critical role in fomenting so-called “color revolutions” to overthrow non-aligned governments, particularly during the Obama administration. Examples of OSF’s ties to these manufactured “revolutions” include Ukraine in 2014 and the “Arab Spring,” which began in 2011 and saw several governments in the Middle East and North Africa that were troublesome to Western interests conveniently removed from power.
Subsequent leaked emails revealed the cozy ties between Soros and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, including one email where Soros directed Clinton’s policy with respect to unrest in Albania, telling her that “two things need to be done urgently,” which were to “bring the full weight of the international community to bear on Prime Minister Berisha” and “appoint a senior European official as mediator.” Both “urgent” tasks were subsequently performed by Clinton, presumably at Soros’ behest.
In addition to her ties to the Obama administration and OSF, Brooks is currently a scholar at West Point’s Modern War Institute, where she focuses on “the relationship between the military and domestic policing” and also Georgetown’s Innovative Policing Program. She is a currently a key player in the documented OSF-led push to “capitalize” off of legitimate calls for police reform to justify the creation of a federalized police force under the guise of defunding and/or eliminating local police departments. Brooks’ interest in the “blurring line” between military and police is notable given her past advocacy of a military coup to remove Trump from office and the TIP’s subsequent conclusion that the military “may” have to step in if Trump manages to win the 2020 election, per the group’s “war games” described above.
Brooks is also a senior fellow at the think tank New America. New America’s mission statement notes that the organization is focused on “honestly confronting the challenges caused by rapid technological and social change, and seizing the opportunities those changes create.” It is largely funded by Silicon Valley billionaires, including Bill Gates (Microsoft), Eric Schmidt (Google), Reid Hoffman (LinkedIn), Jeffrey Skoll and Pierre Omidyar (eBay). In addition, it has received millions directly from the U.S. State Department to research “ranking digital rights.” Notably, of these funders, Reid Hoffman was caught “meddling” in the most recent Democratic primary to undercut Bernie Sanders’ candidacy during the Iowa caucus and while others, such as Eric Schmidt and Pierre Omidyar, are known for their cozy ties to the Clinton family and even ties to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign.
The Never Trumpers
Aside from Brooks, the other co-founder of TIP is Nils Gilman, the current Vice President of Programs at the Berggruen Institute and, prior to that, worked for Salesforce, a major tech company and government contractor. Gilman is particularly focused on artificial intelligence and transhumanism, recently telling the New York Times that his work at the Berggruen Institute is focused on “building [a] transnational networks of philosophers + technologists + policy-makers + artists who are thinking about how A.I. and gene-editing are transfiguring what it means to be human.” Nicholas Berggruen, for whom the Berggruen Institute is named, is part of the billionaire-led faction, alongside Blackstone’s Steve Schwarzman and Eric Schmidt, who seek to develop A.I. and the so-called “Fourth Industrial Revolution” in conjunction with the political leaders and economic elite of China.
They are critics and rivals of those in the “nationalist” camp with respect to A.I. and China, who instead prefer to aggressively “leapfrog” China’s A.I. capabilities in order to maintain U.S. global hegemony as opposed to a “new order” promoted by Berggreun, Schmidt, Schwarzman and Henry Kissinger, another key member of the “cooperation” faction. The battle over the U.S.’ future A.I. policy with respect to China appears to be a major yet widely overlooked reason for some of the antipathy towards Trump by those in the “cooperation” faction, including those who employ TIP’s founders, given Trump’s tendency to, at least publicly, support “America First” policies and increased tensions with China. In contrast, the Biden family is invested in Chinese A.I. companies, suggesting that Biden would be more willing to pursue the interests of the “cooperation” faction than Trump.
While the identities of the TIP’s founders and current director have been made public, the full member list of the TIP has not. However, the TIP’s “sister” organization, called The National Task Force on Election Crises (NTFEC), does have a public membership list and several of its members are also known to be part of the TIP. Some of these overlapping members include Michael Chertoff, former head of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Michael Steele, former chairman of the RNC and Lawrence Wilkerson, chief of staff to former Secretary of State, Colin Powell. Chertoff, Steele and Wilkerson, though Republicans, are part of the so-called “Never Trump” Republican faction, as are the TIP’s other known Republican members. Thus, while the “bipartisan” nature of TIP may be accurate in terms of party affiliation, all of known TIP’s members – regardless of party – are united in their opposition to another term for the current president.
Other known members of the TIP include David Frum (the Atlantic), William Kristol (Project for a New American Century, The Bulwark), Max Boot (the Washington Post), Donna Brazile (ex-DNC), John Podesta (former campaign manager – Clinton 2016), Chuck Hagel (former Secretary of Defense), Reed Galen (co-founder of the Lincoln Project) and Norm Ornstein (American Enterprise Institute).
Of their known members, the most outspoken is Lawrence Wilkerson, who has fashioned himself the group’s “unofficial” spokesperson, having done the majority of media interviews promoting the group and its “war games.” In an interview in late June with journalist Paul Jay, Wilkerson notes that the TIP lacks transparency and that, aside from their “war games,” their other activities are largely confidential.
He specifically stated that:
“There is some confidentiality about what we agreed to, and what we’ve put out publicly, and who’s responsible for that, and other aspects of our doing that. The Transition Integrity Project is to this point very, very close, whole, and confidential.”
In that same interview, Wilkerson also noted that the current “combination of events” involving the recent unrest in several U.S. cities, the coronavirus crisis, the national debate over the future of policing, the economic recession and the 2020 election was the foundation for a revolution in the U.S. He told Jay that:
“I want to say this is how things like 1917 and Russia, like 1979 and Tehran, and like 1789 in France. This is how these sorts of things get started. So we’ve got to be very careful about how we deal with these things. And that worries me because we don’t have a very careful individual in the White House.”
Pre-planned chaos – who benefits?
While it certainly is possible that, in the event of a clear Biden win, President Trump could refuse to leave the White House or take other actions that would challenge the faith of many Americans in the national election system. However, while the TIP claims to be specifically concerned about this eventuality and about “safe guarding” democracy without favoring either candidate, that is clearly not the case, as their simulation of a clear Trump win shows that extreme, “undemocratic” behavior, in their view, is permissible if it prevents another four years of Trump. Yet, this clear double standard reveals that an influential group of “bipartisan” insiders are intent on creating a “constitutional crisis” if Trump wins and are planning for such a crisis regardless of the 2020 election’s results.
Well before the TIP or any of their affiliated groups emerged to conduct these doomsday election simulations, other groups were similarly engaged in “war games” that predicted complete chaos in the U.S. on election day as well as the imposition of martial law in the U.S. following the emergence of unprecedented unrest and disarray in the country.
Several of these I detailed in a series earlier this year, which mainly focused on the “Operation Blackout” simulationsconducted by the U.S.-Israeli company, Cybereason. That company has considerable ties to the U.S. and Israeli intelligence and its largest investor is Softbank. Notably, Softbank is named by the Eric Schmidt-led National Security Commission on AI (NSCAI) as forming the “backbone” of a global framework of A.I.-driven companies favored by the “cooperation” faction as a means of enacting the “Fourth Industrial Revolution” in cooperation with China’s economic and political elite.
In addition to Cybereason, several mainstream media reports and a series of suspect “predictions” from U.S. intelligence and other federal agencies released last year had seeded the narrative that the 2020 election would not only fail spectacularly, but that U.S. democracy “would never recover.” Now, with the TIP’s simulations added to the mix and the advent of the previously predicted chaos throughout the country with the 2020 election just two months away, it is clear that the November 3rd election will not only be a complete disaster, but a pre-planned one.
The question then becomes, who benefits from complete chaos on and following the 2020 election? As the TIP suggested in several of their simulations, the post-election role of the military in terms of domestic policing, incidentally the exact expertise of the TIP’s co-founder Rosa Brooks, looms large, as most of the aforementioned doomsday election simulations ended with the imposition of martial law or the military “stepping in” to resolve order and oversee the transition.
The domestic framework for imposing martial law in the U.S., via “continuity of government” protocols, was activated earlier this year under the guise of the coronavirus crisis and it remains in effect. Now, a series of groups deeply tied to the Washington establishment and domestic and foreign intelligence agencies have predicted the exact ways in which to engineer a failed election and manipulate its aftermath.
Who would stand to benefit the most from the imposition of martial law in the United States? I would argue that one need look no further than the battle within Washington power factions over the future of AI, which has been deemed of critical importance to national security by the public sector, the private sector and prominent think tanks. The Schmidt-led NSCAI and other bodies determining the country’s AI policy plan to implement a series of policies that will be deeply resisted by most Americans – from the elimination of individual car ownership to the elimination of cash as well as the imposition of an Orwellian surveillance system, among other things.
All of these agendas have advanced under the guise of combatting coronavirus, but their advance can only continue to use that justification for so long. For groups like the NSCAI, Americans must welcome these AI-driven advances or else, even if it means Americans face losing their jobs or their civil liberties. Otherwise, these groups and their billionaire backers argue, the U.S. will be “left out” and “left behind” when it comes time to set the new global standards for AI technology, as the U.S. will then be left in the dust by China’s growing AI industry, which is fed by its own implementation of these technologies.
By keeping Americans angry and distracted by the partisan divide through pre-planned election chaos, a “New America” waits in the wings – one that is coming regardless of what happens on election day. That is, of course, unless Americans quickly wake up to the ruse…
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
I believe that it was Captain John Parker at Lexington who said words to the effect that, “If you want a war then let it begin here”. (Paraphrased)
If this is their plan I don’t see how it can be avoided.
A manufactured Constitutional crisis would fracture the military. I don’t know about other branches of service, but the USMC is overwhelmingly conservative and patriotic. THIS would absolutely lead to CWII, with no doubt in my mind. However, something that I believe is wholly possible is to create a limited “political” Constitutional crisis whereby the Electoral College is eliminated. Make no mistake, the elimination of the Electoral College would absolutely and fundamentally change the US, leading to the eventual breakup of the states.
Just Sayin’
I would say the military people who would side with the Democrats are already known. They can’t keep their mouths shut with their need to identify their “wokeness” with the other traitors.
Agreed. I’d be willing to bet that only “career” officers, whom are overwhelmingly of the ‘ring-knocker’ clan would fall into this category. They’d probably get some support initially just though a “maintain order” type of command, but this would likely fall apart relatively quickly when the truth becomes apparent to lower grade officers and senior NCO’s.
Just Sayin’
Many will claim they have the china virus and cannot be on duty. Since its such a plausible excuse……
Any military you see in the coming chaos will not be the friend of the right or patriotic that is for sure. They will probably be of color with a grudge looking for payback. Many in the military are recent citizens and obtained citizenship via their time in the military. They are not acclimated, assimilated nor patriotic to this country. (Mostly).
The people behind this coup are certainly evil, but not stupid. They know that power comes at the barrel of a gun. Sadly, most of our current military members would likely act to suppress their fellow citizens. Most, if not all, of the officer corps are products of the left-wing colleges and universities or the now-‘woke’ service academies. The rank-and-file are largely the product of public schools- taught since early childhood to follow directions and accept a narrative as the truth. They’re almost completely lacking in critical-thinking skills, and thus could be expected to behave as amoral, homicidal drones. Those not so-inclined have probably been surreptitiously identified and will be conveniently transferred to remote locations where they can be easily controlled and wouldn’t factor into any martial-law conditions. There are, however, a few downsides to the bad guys plan… First, our current military is extremely overconfident. They, however, would not be acting against some tin-pot dictator in a third-world shit-hole where the only opposition is a few guys with rifles driving around in old pick-up trucks. Furthermore, they wouldn’t be operating in the wide-open vistas of the middle east where they’ve been for the last 30+ years. Also, they may not be able prosecute a war by driving around the way they’ve been doing in the recent conflicts. Domestically, they would be facing an enemy that knows the terrain and available cover, is amply armed, and many of whom do have experience prosecuting battle on foot from tours in Vietnam.
It would be a toss-up with huge casualties on both sides.
I wish I could share your enthusiasm for the military. I live about 2 miles from Cherry Point Marine Corp Air Station. I have never seen a more obedient populace than my community. 95% are wearing masks, some in their vehicles. This is certainly what some would call a patriotic town, but Food Lion grocery store told an employee he couldn’t wear a mask with an American flag. (After negative publicity they reversed their stand.)
All military members take an oath to uphold the Constitution. Most have never read it. They have been indoctrinated in the same schools as the rest of us attended. They are incapable of understanding or believing what the government is capable of doing.
Of course there are a handful of Marines who value our freedom. Most value their paycheck more.
As evidence that the elimination of the Electoral College would absolutely and fundamentally change the US, I give you California. When the Earl Warren supreme court declared by county representation in the state senate “unconstitutional” (it was in fact a Republican form a government, as mandated for the states by the Constitution) it removed the check on the electoral power of the cities, where all the liberals live.
They consequently voted the most generous welfare in the nation, and attracted every bum and lowlife in the nation to California, where they reliably vote Democrat.
TIP…transition integrity, that’s rich. Should be TTC…Treasonous Treacherous Co#&suckers. All I can say is stock up on Beans, Bullets, and a Bible. Things are going to get real, real soon.
You forgot silver
True…however bullets are more likely to become the coin of the realm.
I don’t live in your country, and while I respect your attitude, the Bible will prove to be of no use in my opinion. With all due respect, I consider it nonsense in the 21st century context. Ethics, morality, top flight. Metaphyscs? Nah.
One must never forget the foundation of this country. That book is front and center.
I like how these people have put their names on all of these documents, or have been recorded via video, to outline their treasonous activities. People have better face the facts that a civil war will break out right after election day, and the people who need to be dragged out screaming into the streets to meet a quick, messy, and ignoble end have been self identified. Lawyers and the courts will have very little power to control this, as many have already been declared “enemy combantants” based on their current existence still on this planet.
From the looks of things that civil war is already happening in some areas anyway
….and the people responsible for fomenting this are still walking around unimpeded and without fear.
As always, they do what they do and they stick it to US the way they do — because they know that they can get away with it …
If law enforcement disappears or is identified as enemy combatants in an area there won’t be this group ignoring crime by Antifa/BLM and grabbing up normal citizens for self defense. There will not be any witnesses to call the police because you fought back against attackers. Instead of simply shooting at the guys with the firebombs etc. which might cause plenty of them to go home, I would imagine any standing there after that are on the menu. If THEY lose the protections of the authorities, every thing they have been doing will be done to them plus a lot of stuff they haven’t been able to do. They will not like it.
“bold moves aimed at securing the presidency, regardless of the election result.”
This of course is known as a “coup d’etat”.
We oldsters recall being taught about “voting” in the USSR where only one candidate was on the ballot. Americans have also had such a system, where both candidates represent the same Uniparty. Self rule cannot be allowed under any circumstances, as such a system would not tolerate wudespread looting.
Uncle Joe Stalin was right when he said that he didn’t care about the vote — all he cared about was who counted the ballots.
Think some of these people who put out their names on these documents or on talk shows and such are forced (maybe willingly) to do this. The message is given, with the true authors are hidden behind the useful idiots.
This country is full of communist. Communism is nothing but humanism, therefore satanic.
Would not count on any police force or military help, just look at what body writes the check at the end of the month.
I’ll be surprised if we have an election. I wasn’t surprised by the covid lockdown, I was surprised by the speed at which it was accepted. I wouldn’t be surprised if a late october election moratorium was accepted by both sides of the uniparty pending a UN “Supervised” election could be held.
I think there’ll be an election, it will be a complete farce, and it’ll be the last election we will have until we reach the light at the end of the tunnel. Otherwise, I concur. Especially with respect to how rapidly people accepted the lockdowns.
Well…all this information, clearly spelled out in the “gaming”
exercises, and the corporate military support for the street fighting…
tells us it’s over for the USA.
They will starve us out, and if that isn’t quick enough to satisfy the PTB,
they will simply spray us with a neurotoxin and we drop in our tracks.
While much better examples of inhumanity may exist, I know about this one
because my Dad. Eisenhower ordered all fighting age men into an open air
fenced compound without food or clothing for winter. My Dad was there, near
the fence when GIs drove by calling for interpreters, and Dad hollered out, and
was saved. He operated in the black market for the GIs, eg, food for cameras.
jewelry, and anything of value. Anyone not chosen obviously succumbed
to starvation and exposure. My Mom was “working” for the German equivalent
of the Red Cross. She also knew how to speak English, and was chosen to run the
household for an American Colonel to interpret. Three peasants did the outdoor work.
My parents were in their late teens. I have a picture on the kitchen wall of Mom in
a smart uniform, (maid style) with the bosses dog Geisha, a boxer size large.
They met later, and here I am in the USA.
War is hell squared, please do not wish for it. Civilians can not do anything to
stop the military from squashing them. Forget about any armed insurrection
as it is futile. Further, beyond some few %, Americans are fat, stupid, lazy,
and uneducated. There are smarties out there for sure, but not enough to
forestall military or strong police action.
Suzanna.
“Well…all this information, clearly spelled out in the “gaming”
exercises, and the corporate military support for the street fighting…
tells us it’s over for the USA.
They will starve us out, and if that isn’t quick enough to satisfy the PTB,
they will simply spray us with a neurotoxin and we drop in our tracks.”
I agree completely and have said that very thing many times in the past to much “Macho” derision. My motto has always been that we must resist smarter not harder. We continue to allow them to dictate our terms of defending against them. It has been impossible to get anyone to even consider discussing plans on how to resist and what to replace this mess with.
I’m afraid Montefrio is right. “If now there is insufficient anger, well, it’s done and I’m tremendously sad that the will to fight for it has disappeared.
We non-partisan outsiders are also preparing for chaos, regardless of who wins the election.
These fools have completely forgotten the Us Militia, every citizen and how they would react. Many may feel it would be an appropriate time to act. First they would eliminate the marxist rioting, then burn city halls and govt buildings even in red states to make a point.
Next, conceivably, targeted individuals they felt were treasonous. Next, a stand off of militia vs military with many in the military not showing up or maybe showing up as militia. Some taking out frustrations on corporations they felt were treasonous/marxist supporting.
Lastly, guerrilla warfare, down to the white collar worker fomenting disruption at companies, factories, shipping etc. like losing paperwork or just putting sand in the gears of operations.
Farmers refusing to farm.
People refusing to pay tax as there would be no representation for the tax paid.
Certain occupations like the legal field, banking, investments will be looked upon with disdain and their business or even homes targeted. Maybe even them.
Locally? Even known neighbors supportive of marxism or the left could be “fired” in the sense of homes burned. I spare no critical thought of hypothetical outcomes or actions as to outcomes when these people foment this level of corruption and the potential blowback. There will be blowback and I am unsure if they are including this from a citizen level. They are only an echo chamber and think only the left, their constituents, will riot. I think they are mistaken.
Everyone on the right may do their own type of rioting. Housewives to grannies in their own way. Sanding the gears if you will. It would be hard to detect and lay blame much less find whodunit.
Then their would be the real nefarious shit also. By the 3% if you will. They wont be stupid I feel and march openly. They could be a real terror. Unseen. Unknown.
I feel this is all plausible because people are much more angry on the right than they understand.
I don’t live in your country, although I remain attached to it, having been born and raised in it and loved it. If now there is insufficient anger, well, it’s done and I’m tremendously sad that the will to fight for it has disappeared.
I fully expect that on day #1, Southern California will lose it’s water supply. Was it Nixon that said, “When you have them by the balls, their hearts and minds will follow?”
No one should laugh at the military. That said, what is in your local Guard Armory? Do they have grenades? .30 and .50 caliber machine guns? Armored vehicles and tracks? All wheel drive semi tractors and 6×6? Ours has SAM batteries. Forget any kind of air attacks here. Recoiless Rifles, 90mm and 106mm? Mortars, maybe a 105mm howitzer or two? I see a parking lot full of uparmored Hummers with gun tubs. We’ll have a good bit of serious stuff drop in our laps if need be.
As far as air assets, Anybody who has ever flown to flyover country airports, places like Iowa have squadrons of Air Guard fighters, helos of all kinds etc.
In short, patriots will have lots of hardware but that demonstrates what a God awful situation it would be.
Gen. Milley said this week the military has “no role” in US elections. This was prompted by a paper or papers published by some shithead Colonels calling for military intervention against Orange Man Bad. Those are exactly the kind of folks to put in the jackpot if the “enemies domestic” commit treason.
I just spent the last couple of hours traveling down this article’s associated rabbit hole(s), and I think we Americans, are in a lot more trouble than I had envisioned. When and where did the meme, “Trump won’t leave office (ever)” develop? And how is it possible that three public groups have emerged since 2016 to game the possible outcomes? Is this the #TRUMPWONTLEAVEGATE conspiracy that we are going to be fed until the election, terrorist attack, war, … .? Wilkerson’s interview with Paul Jay spoke in terms that this meme is a foregone conclusion. Indeed that it has already been baked into the National Election Transition Cake! And, Wilkerson’s assertion that John Bolton is a “saner version of Trump” is just unbelievable.
Anyone else out there look at the article’s supporting documents have a viewpoint? I’m a bit frazzled sorting this out.
Joe
This whole narrative is a set-up; when they try to steal the election via mail-in ballots and get caught red-handed – and they will – Trump will refuse to vacate, as he should, IMO. Biden can’t fill a gymnasium but Trump fills arenas and crowds outside. That is, the ONLY way Biden wins is outright theft and everybody knows it. This is the talking points for the media and brainwashed socialists so they have plenty of time to “rehearse”. That is, they are going to try to do what they do (win by fraud), and paint Trump as the bad guy for not cooperating with the treason.
Either way, we do not escape November without blood. If Trump wins, they continue to burn everything down. If Biden “wins” . . . I doubt he makes it to be sworn in.
And i agree that “Trumpwontleave” is a fiction, programming, at best. Because he might just leave without a word . . . after releasing ALL the documents and dirty secrets that the satanists have gone to elaborate lengths – fake pandemic, anybody? – to keep hidden.
This has all been planned. “But everybody has a plan ’til the get punched in the mouth.”
But there could be another angle: when it becomes obvious that they can’t manufacture enough votes to steal it, they’ll just pop the grid and it’s every man for himself.
So, yeah, I agree . . . most people have no point of reference for the trouble we are in.
Joe, the only media digging into this on a daily basis are Steve Bannon’s “Warroom Pandemic” podcast with the middle hour on TV on Newsmax at 10 pm CST. Also an allied publication, The “National Pulse.” Bannon covers China very closely and has detailed how much China is involved with all of this. Most of us remember how bought off by China the Clintons were. The Biden’s and many Dems are owned by China as well as many RINOs and neocons.
China so owns the MSM that I bet most of us did not know India and China are now escalated to a shooting war on the Tibet/India border and that China had one of their new fighters splashed in a dogfight over the Taiwan Straits by the Taiwanese this past week. Vietnam and Japan have entered into a mutual defense pact against China. We are sitting on a global powder keg.
Surprise Soros is funding political and civil unrest to completely destroy our Republic from within . Surprise the Democratic Party is fully involved in assuring that the plan succeeds as is a faction of the Republican Party . Hillary & Obama are dancing a war dance over it in full support .
Note all key players are supported by the likes of Willam Ayers and Bernadine Dorn and all are students of Saul Alynsky rules for radicals .
It should be obvious to all that our government is torn apart internally and the enforcement to control riots and attacks will only come out in full force against those of us who will not run and take an armed stance ready and willing to go hot (deadly force) when needed to defend ourselves and property !
Remember Kyle Rittenhouse !
Remember who was fleeing an angry mob , remember who is in jail for having to use deadly force to survive and the miscreants he shot . Fucking police should have bought him a steak dinner for cleaning the street
Corruption isn’t part of the system; it is the system.
Trump is on the way out.
Even the gay, fake white nationalists are making a mockery of this.
JUST DON’T MENTION BANKERS.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=2hbAb8S8MIo&feature=emb_logo&ab_channel=BrendonO%27Connell
hopefully trump will round these bastards up between the time the polls close & the winner is announced–
there should be enough intel to indict many of these traitors 4 some type of infraction,which might keep them from making trouble between election night & inauguration day–
Lmao, that was funny!
Bwahahahaha!
Trump would be more than a little late to that effort.
Before the election would work even though the MSM would decry it loudly and of course, inaccurately. I saw AG Barr come close to losing it with asshat Wolf Blitzer the other day telling him that he and the rest of the MSM carrying water for this steal the election group and the group members were playing with fire.