Guest Post by The Zman
It is hard to know, but most likely the conspiracy theory is one of the oldest parts of human society. In fact, the popularity of conspiracy theories is probably a good measure of social trust. Low-trust societies, like you find in the Middle East, tend to be shot through with conspiracy theories. High trust societies in Northwest Europe tend to have less of it, but even they are prone to bouts of conspiracy mongering. The Great Fear that swept through rural France is a good example.
In modern times, the conspiracy theory has been formalized. The assassination of John Kennedy is probably when this formalization process began. For example, a conspiracy theory needs a series of hard to accept coincidences. In the case of Kennedy, we have the amazing marksmanship of the shooter and then his unlikely assassination at the hands of a Jewish gangster, while he was in police custody. The Jack Ruby part is what made the whole thing perfect for the conspiracy theorists.
The first step in a conspiracy theory is that the obvious answer or the official answer must be eliminated as a lie or implausible. In the case of the Kennedy assassination, the start of the conspiracy dynamic was the dismissal of Oswald as the lone actor. It is a variation on the old Sherlock Holmes line. Once you eliminate the parsimonious explanation, then the more complex and convoluted explanations become more plausible. That opens the door to endless speculation.
We see this with the QAnon cult on-line. All of it starts with the assumption that the obvious answer is wrong. For example, it is plainly obvious that Bill Barr is covering up the FBI spying scandal. He’s had years to do what should have taken a few months. Instead of accepting that rather obvious and plausible explanation, the QAnon people reject it and instead weave wildly complex theories about how half of Washington is about to be charged with crimes.
Another aspect of the formal conspiracy theory is the liberal use of the associative property to connect unrelated events. Person A knows Person B and Person B once had lunch at the same place as Person C. If any of these three people can be tied to the event in question, then it is assumed the other two are connected. The weakest associations are enough to assume a conspiracy. The associative property is an essential element of the modern conspiracy theory.
In the case of Kennedy, for example, organized crime is a popular player, because Jack Ruby was a minor criminal. His tenuous association with organized crime opens the door for linking any number of underworld characters with the assassination. It also opens the door for all sorts of theories about the Kennedy administration’s connections to organized crime. The associative property then ties communism, organized crime and the Cuba situation to the assassination.
Probably the most overlooked aspect of the formal conspiracy theory is the personalizing of complex events. The conspiracy theorist assumes there is a small group of people behind the events in question. These super-intelligent, shadowy figures pull the strings from the shadows. Even when a government agency is at the core of the conspiracy, it is really a core of individuals within that core that is secretly manipulating the organization.
This turns up with the spying scandal. The reality is, the Washington-based intel community is horribly corrupt. The spying and subsequent cover-up is a product of a culture of corruption in these institutions. For the conspiracy theorist, that does not work, so they focus on a few “shot callers.” Of course, it was not just mere partisan zeal that led them to spy on Trump people. They are part of some shadowy organization that is secretly doing all sorts of bad things.
Probably the most important part of the modern conspiracy theory is that it must flatter the person obsessed with it. For the conspiracy buff, the thrill is in feeling that they have figured it all out. Those super-intelligent people working in the shadows were not smart enough to outwit the conspiracy hunter. Everyone else falls for the official story, but the conspiracy theorist knows the real truth. Paradoxically, the conspiracy theory makes the world a much simpler and safer place for them.
The best example right now is the Left’s obsession with white supremacy. They cannot accept that their vision of Utopia is not very popular. That’s the first step in a conspiracy theory, the rejection of the most plausible reason. That allows them to spin wild tales of secret Nazis and spectral supremacists. Rather than confront reality, which is frightening and disconcerting, they have created a series of conspiracy theories to explain why the world is not as they imagine it.
This is why conspiracy theories are a useful metric to gauge social trust. When order begins to break down, people naturally look for reasons. That opens the door to speculation and then conspiracy theories. This, in turn, erodes social trust, which is the foundation upon which every ruling class rests. As that foundation falters, the ruling class looks for reasons. Since blaming themselves is always off the table, they naturally begin to speculate, which opens the door to conspiracy theories.
America is now ruled by conspiracy theorists. That is clear in the debate surrounding the first Trump-Biden debate show. The Left is obsessing over white supremacists and the old Gavin McInnes fan club, the Proud Boys. They have any number of conspiracies involving those things, but now they are cooking up conspiracies as to why Trump did not properly denounce them. It must mean something! For the people in charge, it is conspiracy theories all the way down.
None of this is to say there are no conspiracies. The FBI spying scandal, for example, is a good example of a conspiracy. It was corrupt and self-important mediocrities playing at spymaster. In a functioning society, they would be in jail now and that would be the end of it. In a conspiratorial state, they remain free as one side conspires to defeat the white supremacy conspiracy, while the other conspires to cover it all up. The QAnon people strap on their aluminum foil hats to sort it all out.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Anyone who has read the Book of Mormon knows all this and more.
“Secret Combinations” was 1800s-speak for conspiratorial rule.
Political corruption didn’t kill the Kennedys or bring down the twin towers and complaining about “the left” this and “the left” that is just cuck blather.
I tend to define a conspiracy theory as, anything that rejects the official narrative.
Kennedy is a good example of how this works. The official narrative is implausible.
So what really happened?
That’s an error. Just because someone else is wrong, doesn’t mean I have the correct answer. More to the point, it’s extremely common to find people claiming to know things that are unknown and unknowable. When challenged, they always pull the, so what’s your explanation.
If god didn’t create the universe, who did?
But this jumps forward a few steps, and this is where most “crazy talk” comes in. That is, if it’s completely impossible that Kennedy didn’t die as unto the official narrative, then the official narrative must be correct.
But, it could always have been aliens. That’s possible.
And so, the other side frames the matter as aliens, versus extremely implausible marksmanship.
But that’s not right. It’s aliens, plus CIA agents, plus other agents, plus Magneto, etc., versus implausible marksmanship.
Just like, we can’t disprove the catholic god. We can, however, demonstrate that the catholic god is no more probable than Shiva, or any other god. That, in fact, for every god, there exists an equal and opposite god. Which breaks Pascal’s wager, because there could exist a god who hates imbeciles and condemns anyone who believes in god without evidence to hell, while welcoming only atheists to heaven.
On that note, atheism and conspiracy theory is the same basic idea. Just because lots of people believe something, just because people threaten you for not believing it, doesn’t make it plausible. Only evidence can do that. The proper conspiracy theorist is unflinching in the face of threats and insults, bending only to evidence, remaining humble enough not to assume knowledge he doesn’t have, while being skeptical enough to reject the specious boasts of those who know no more than he does.
From here we get to a second issue when dealing with official narratives. That is, not only is the government incompetent as a judge of truth, it’s also uninterested. Governments understand that, in an environment where the public at large will accept the official narrative even if no evidence is given, evidence can only ever be a bad thing. The result is, universal coverup and lies.
That is, regarding 9/11, NIST, didn’t actually investigate, at all. Which brings us to the actual meaning of investigate. That is, an investigation entails three aspects. To collect data. To propose explanations for the data. To cull implausible explanations.
NIST, instead, merely proposed explanations. The explanations were implausible, breaking the laws of physics, and even the laws of math, but, the US government understood that it didn’t matter, that the NIST explanation didn’t require evidence, or even proper math, to convince the vast majority of Americans.
In short, what NIST released, was not an investigation, but propaganda.
This same dynamic can also be seen in the MH17 investigation.
Since the propagandists know they can pin the blame on Russia even without any evidence, they know evidence can only hurt them. Even if an honest investigation did confirm their propaganda, most people, almost everyone, already believes it, so it’s superfluous. Conversely, if it contradicts the propaganda, it’s heretical. Thus, the correct answer in this sort of situation, is to quickly bury the evidence while conducting a show investigation for the sole purpose of fleshing out the narrative. To make it look like government narrative is produced by scientists rather than propagandists.
We all knew exactly what the MH17 investigation would say. In fact, everyone admitted that they knew exactly what the MH17 investigation would say. This is obviously impossible for a real investigation.
And so, it’s not just MH17 or 9/11. It’s easy to predict the results of nearly every investigation into any propaganda worthy event. Whether it’s Iranian nukes, Syrian chemicals, masks, whatever, the so called investigations never refute the propaganda.
If a government wants my trust, it should occasionally admit to being wrong. Because, honest people, will make mistakes. Only liars can be right about everything. But, rather than an appearance of honesty, government prefers the mystique of impeccability.
A conspiracy theorist doesn’t have to be way smarter than the general public to see things they can’t. Atheism doesn’t demand genius. It just demands intellectual rigor. Conversely, propagandists aren’t trying to create iron clad narratives. Even if their story is filled with plot holes, as long as it’s at least as believable as the catholic church, they can get most people to pretend it’s true.
That was pretty good.
Expand on it just a bit and it’s a great stand alone piece.
At least use proper grammar: God, Catholic Church. As far as atheism demanding intellectual rigor… Possibly as in a straight jacket, but not in the sense of truth ensconced in the firmament of reason.
And “to define a conspiracy theory as, anything that rejects the official narrative” is to agree with the spin masters purpose of the phrase. Of course anything not officially endorsed is labeled as such, and with prejudice. The more I think about this the more I think I have been duped into believing it was serious….
If conspiracy is defined as two or more people making secret plans, then conspiracy theories are speculations about the people who are surmised to be making the secret plans and inferences specifically concerning the secret plans.
And here’s the problem with speculations on secret plans and those who make them: The conjectures are hard to prove and difficult to debunk. But that doesn’t make them theories. And it doesn’t mean they’re not true either.