WASHINGTON, D.C.—After being sworn in as a Supreme Court justice, Amy Coney Barrett immediately issued a decree that all women are to wear red handmaid’s outfits for the rest of their lives.
“Execute papal order 66,” she said, her eyes glowing red. “Implement the theocratic state.”
Barrett sent out squads of soldiers to round up women and make sure they wear the garment at all times. All women are now required to bear at least seventeen babies. Attendance at Catholic Mass is also mandatory. Those who violate the order will be executed, “no exceptions,” said Barrett.
“She can’t do this! This is unconstitutional!” screamed Rachel Maddow as enforcement squads kicked in the doors at MSNBC’s studios and grabbed her for reconditioning as a subservient handmaid. “I warned you! I WARNED ALL OF YOU!”
The whole country turning into a Christofascist state seems to be a negative to many, but the nation is quite a bit more peaceful now.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
“She can’t do this! This is unconstitutional!” screamed Rachel Maddow”
She’s going to fail on the 17 babies thing too. No volunteer Papas.
Hunter’d do it.
As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.
Isaiah 3:12
It is remarkable how thoroughly feminism has tainted people’s understanding of the Natural Order. Another woman elevated to a place where she can wreak maximum havoc, yay.
And Catholics.
Guess the pope is happy.
I believe we are about to see the rise of the Thomas Court. Justice Thomas has long decried the wrongfully decided cases that have perverted the Constitution and I think he will lead the 4 other originalists in returning the Constitution to its previous status as a protector of freedom from government intrusion. We will know when he starts becoming more assertive. The Chief will be welcome to join them, if he so pleases, or he can continue to hang out with the 3 liberals.
The court would improve if your prediction came to pass, but I’ll believe it when I see it.
Man, I hate to say it, but you’re going to be disappointed. Barrett is going to prove to be just another liberal turncoat jurist like Kavanaugh, Gorsuch and Roberts. How do we know she’s liberal? Because she made it on the court.
I’m going to wait until after Re-Election Day before I start asking women “where’s your bonnet, bitch?”
My Aunt, who is 85 years old and through hard work became a fairly wealthy individual, and who has 2 grown children, actually thinks ACB is going to just decree Roe v. Wade unconstitutional. And repeal Obama Care.
Folks, if you actually paid attention in High School (and not modern HS either, I’m talking pre-2000 HS), or if you have a passing familiarity with School House Rock, then you might realize THAT’S NOT HOW THE SUPREME COURT WORKS.
Laws are made by legislators on the state and federal level. Not by the Supreme court or any other court.
https://www.thoughtco.com/how-do-cases-reach-supreme-court-4113827
ACB explained pretty well how this works, although going into too much detail at the hearings was pointless as the Dem Senators didn’t really want an explanation, they only wanted to trap her into “pre-ruling” on a case she did not hear yet, that much was obvious.
We already know ACB is a Catholic. We already know she has several biological children. We already know she holds her faith dear.
What we want is someone who can put aside his/her personal feelings and opinions and rule on the Constitutionality of a law. That’s it.
I’m guessing ACB is against abortion PERSONALLY. I myself feel abortion is over used and taken far too lightly in this country. But that’s my personal opinion and one I do not feel I can force on another person.
With that said, I do not believe the Federal Government, via my taxes, should support abortion. Because that would be taking my personal choice to not support it, and tacitly supporting others who do. I liken it very much to union dues. It has already been ruled that unions cannot force their members to pay dues. Dues are often used to support political causes or candidates that the individual members do not support.
Will the make up of the Supreme Court change the Federal standing of Roe v. Wade? We have to look at possible versus probable. Anything is possible. Not everything is probable.
Which brings me to another, separate outcome that overturning Roe V. Wade may have. One that many people don’t yet realize.
Roe turned on the 14th amendment, and IMPLIED privacy, as no where is “privacy” specifically mentioned. However, life is very much mentioned.
Anyone who sees where the current vaccine push from Creepy Uncle Gates, et al…can see that overturning Roe leaves the door wide open, Federally speaking, to allow the Government to do anything to anyone.
An untested, rushed vaccine is the epitome of potential risk to life, as well as the pursuit of it. Vaccines, even those deemed “safe” have caused permanent brain damage, physical disability, and death. I would say being dead will certainly curtail your right to happiness and the pursuit of it. Or being confined to a wheel chair or in a semi-vegetative state.
While I am not “anti vax” per se, certainly in the case of things like the Polio vaccine or small pox, what we have now is a slew of vaccines that are pushed on us for things like HPV (Gardasil), yearly flu, chicken pox, and shingles.
If Roe is overturned, then rest assured we have no recourse anywhere to resist the Covid-1984 vaccine that will almost certainly be mandated everywhere. For a virus with an extremely high survival rate and has only killed (supposedly) 224,905 people as of today. With the majority being over 70 years of age. And having co-morbidities.
If the slogan “my body, my choice” holds true for abortion, then certainly it holds true to refuse an untested, unproven, rushed vaccine for a sickness that you have a 97+ chance of fully recovering from and 99+ chance if you are young.
Who will your aunt vote for president?