Costs Must Be Weighed Against Benefits

Editor’s Note: Walter Williams passed away last Wednesday. You can read our tribute to him here.

Guest Post by Walter E. Williams

Costs Must Be Weighed Against Benefits

One of the first lessons in an economics class is every action has a cost. That is in stark contrast to lessons in the political arena where politicians virtually ignore cost and talk about benefits and free stuff. If we look only at the benefits of an action, policy, or program, then we will do anything because there is a benefit to any action, policy, or program.Think about one simple example. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that 36,096 Americans lost their lives in motor vehicle traffic crashes in 2019. Virtually all those lives could have been saved if we had a 5 mph speed limit.

The huge benefit of a 5 mph speed limit is that those 36,000-plus Americans would have been with us instead of lost in highway carnage. Fortunately, we look at the costs of having a 5 mph speed limit and rightly conclude that saving those 36,000-plus lives are not worth the costs and inconvenience. Most of us find it too callous, when talking about life, to explicitly weigh costs against benefits. We simply say that a 5 mph speed limit would be impractical.

What about the benefits and costs of dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic? Much of the medical profession and politicians say that lockdowns, social distancing, and mask-wearing are the solutions. CDC data on death rates show if one is under 35, the chances of dying from COVID-19 is much lower than that of being in a bicycle accident. Should we lock down bicycles?

Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, biostatistician, and epidemiologist, Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University and an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician and epidemiologist were the initiators of the Great Barrington Declaration. More than 50,000 scientists and doctors, as well as more than 682,000 ordinary people, have signed the Great Barrington Declaration opposing a second COVID-19 lockdown because they see it doing much more harm than good.

Efforts to keep very young from getting COVID-19, given most will not even realize they have it or will suffer only mild symptoms, may be counterproductive in that it delays the point where a country has herd immunity. According to the CDC, COVID-19 deaths in young people (from babies to college students) are almost nonexistent. The first age group to provide a substantial contribution to the death toll is 45-54 years, who contribute nearly 5 percent of all coronavirus deaths. More than 80 percent of deaths occur in people aged 65 and over. That increases to over 92 percent if the 55-64 age group is included.

Thus, only a tiny number of people under age 25 die of COVID-19. Yet, schools have been closed, and tens of millions of schoolchildren have been denied in-class instruction. Mandating that 5-year-olds wear masks during their school day is beyond nonsense. Virtual learning can serve as a substitute for in-class teaching but it has mixed results. Some parents can provide their children with the necessary tools, perhaps hire tutors, and take an active interest in what their children are doing online. Other parents will not have the interest, ability, or the time.

Here is a lockdown question for you. Government authorities permit groceries and pharmacies to remain open during lockdowns. They permitted stores likes Walmart, Costco, and Sam’s Club to remain open. However, these stores sell items that are also sold in stores that were locked down such as: Macy’s, J.C. Penney, J. Crew Group, Neiman Marcus, and Bed Bath & Beyond. The lack of equal treatment caused many employees to lose their jobs and many formerly financially healthy retailers have filed for bankruptcy.

As political satirist H. L. Mencken said, “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” By the way, the best time to scare people, be wrong, and persist in being wrong is when the costs of being wrong are borne by others.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
very old white guy
very old white guy
December 9, 2020 8:47 am

Yes, the last sentence says it all, they can be wrong and continue to be wrong as the costs are being borne by others. Nothing verifies that statement like the whu who flu actions.

The 47th Element
The 47th Element
  very old white guy
December 9, 2020 10:38 am

It’s very telling the corporations supplying the vaccine are being given legal exemptions in case their consumers are injured during a contrived emergency.
The big losers are the people who lost businesses and are unemployed from this fiasco. The economic fallout alone proves the return on investment (ROI) wasn’t worth it.

very old white guy
very old white guy
December 9, 2020 8:50 am

I have read Walter E, Williams for decades. he must have been a great teacher as he could simplify economics so that everyone short of a politician could understand what was being taught. He will be missed.

James
James
December 9, 2020 9:54 am

Nice, at least one final article by a great man,Mr. Williams,you and your thinking will be sorely missed.

Ban Hammer 🚫🔨
Ban Hammer 🚫🔨
December 9, 2020 10:29 am

IF this virus 🦠 is as deadly ☠️ as we’re being told-
Then we need to get serious here. Politicians must obey the mandates they put on the regular citizens also.

We, as a society need to decide on one extreme or the other and then execute to get to the back side and resume a modified normal.

Mass exposure, herd immunity. You live you live. You die you die.

-Or-

Full lockdown.
No exceptions. All grocery/ food by contactless delivery only for 90 days.
No travels, no weddings, no funerals, no gatherings beyond your 4 walls, $100k fine for non compliance etc.

This straddling the fence route gives the opportunity to make the ultra shitty, middle of the road situation go on for a long time and likely become the new normal.

That’s NOT acceptable to those who remember what freedom actually is / entails.
We’re bleeding 🩸 out here, small business is being actively euthanized.

Okay, hopping off the soapbox now.

We have zero control over anything beyond our personal space and situation, that’s been made abundantly clear.

Time to give conversing a rest and take whatever actions one deems necessary.

Best wishes to all.

The 47th Element
The 47th Element
  Ban Hammer 🚫🔨
December 9, 2020 10:47 am

One extreme or the other is never a good choice.
Government caused the consequences with their decision to declare a blanket public health emergency on everyone, and then covered up the consequences in order to justify a continued power grab. I find the timing of lockdowns do be politically suspicious and the continuous FUD infuriating.

Ban Hammer 🚫🔨
Ban Hammer 🚫🔨
  The 47th Element
December 9, 2020 11:12 am

Thoughtful comment, 47E.
There are as many ways to see this as there are thinking people.
Civil discussion can be a rarity.

The pendulum always swings to far both ways…
But, the middle of the road choice may only serve to keep us firmly divided and allow the situation to continue…

Not choosing IS a choice. Is the middle most beneficial? And for whom? Who really knows?

The timing, politicization and the boot on the neck of small businesses will likely require a choice to be made.

Any decision made will likely seem extreme to the half that disagree.

So it goes…