The Right to Bodily Integrity: Nobody Wins and We All Lose in the COVID-19 Showdown

Guest Post by John W. Whitehead

“We’ve reached the point where state actors can penetrate rectums and vaginas, where judges can order forced catheterizations, and where police and medical personnel can perform scans, enemas and colonoscopies without the suspect’s consent. And these procedures aren’t to nab kingpins or cartels, but people who at worst are hiding an amount of drugs that can fit into a body cavity. In most of these cases, they were suspected only of possession or ingestion. Many of them were innocent… But these tactics aren’t about getting drugs off the street… These tactics are instead about degrading and humiliating a class of people that politicians and law enforcement have deemed the enemy.”—Radley Balko, The Washington Post

Freedom is never free.

There is always a price—always a sacrifice—that must be made in order to safeguard one’s freedoms.

Where that transaction becomes more complicated is when one has to balance the rights of the individual with the needs of the community.

Philosophers such as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau envisioned the social contract between the individual and a nation’s rulers as a means of finding that balance. Invariably, however, those in power grow greedy, and what was intended to be a symbiotic relationship with both sides benefitting inevitably turns into a parasitic one, with a clear winner and a clear loser.

We have seen this vicious cycle play out over and over again throughout the nation’s history.

Just look at this COVID-19 pandemic: the whole sorry mess has been so overtly politicized, propagandized, and used to expand the government’s powers (and Corporate America’s bank balance) that it’s difficult at times to distinguish between what may be legitimate health concerns and government power grabs.

After all, the government has a history of shamelessly exploiting national emergencies for its own nefarious purposes. Terrorist attacks, mass shootings, civil unrest, economic instability, pandemics, natural disasters: the government has been taking advantage of such crises for years now in order to gain greater power over an unsuspecting and largely gullible populace.

This COVID-19 pandemic is no different.

Yet be warned: we will all lose if this pandemic becomes a showdown between COVID-19 vaccine mandates and the right to bodily integrity.

It doesn’t matter what your trigger issue is—whether it’s vaccines, abortion, crime, religion, immigration, terrorism or some other overtly politicized touchstone used by politicians as a rallying cry for votes—we should all be concerned when governments and businesses (i.e., the Corporate State) join forces to compel individuals to sacrifice their right to bodily integrity (which goes hand in hand with the right to conscience and religious freedom) on the altar of so-called safety and national security.

That’s exactly what’s unfolding right now, with public and private employers using the threat of termination to force employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19.

Unfortunately, legal protections in this area are limited.

While the Americans with Disabilities Act protects those who can prove they have medical conditions that make receiving a vaccination dangerous, employees must be able to prove they have a sensitivity to vaccines.

Beyond that, employees with a religious objection to the vaccine mandate can try to request an exemption, but even those who succeed in gaining an exemption to a vaccine mandate may have to submit to routine COVID testing and mask requirements, especially if their job involves contact with other individuals.

Under the First Amendment and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, individuals have a right of conscience and/or religious freedom to ask that their sincere religious beliefs against receiving vaccinations be accommodated. To this end, The Rutherford Institute has issued guidance and an in-depth fact sheet and model letter for those seeking a religious exemption to a COVID-19 vaccine mandate in the workplace. The Rutherford Institute’s policy paper, “Know Your Rights: How To Request a Religious Accommodation for COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates in the Workplace,” goes into the details of how and why and in which forums one can request such accommodation, but there is no win-win scenario.

As with all power plays of this kind, the ramifications of empowering the government and its corporate partners to force individuals to choose between individual liberty and economic survival during a so-called state of “emergency” can lead to terrifying results.

At a minimum, it’s a slippery slope that justifies all manner of violations in the name of national security, the interest of the state and the so-called greater good.

If the government—be it the President, Congress, the courts or any federal, state or local agent or agency—can willfully disregard the rights of any particular person or group of persons, then that person becomes less than a citizen, less than human, less than deserving of respect, dignity, civility and bodily integrity. He or she becomes an “it,” a faceless number that can be tallied and tracked, a quantifiable mass of cells that can be discarded without conscience, an expendable cost that can be written off without a second thought, or an animal that can be bought, sold, branded, chained, caged, bred, neutered and euthanized at will.

That’s exactly where we find ourselves now: caught in the crosshairs of a showdown between the rights of the individual and the so-called “emergency” state.

All of those freedoms we cherish—the ones enshrined in the Constitution, the ones that affirm our right to free speech and assembly, due process, privacy, bodily integrity, the right to not have police seize our property without a warrant, or search and detain us without probable cause—amount to nothing when the government and its agents are allowed to disregard those prohibitions on government overreach at will.

This is the grim reality of life in the American police state.

Our so-called rights have been reduced to technicalities in the face of the government’s ongoing power grabs.

Yet those who founded this country believed that what we conceive of as our rights were given to us by God—we are created equal, according to the nation’s founding document, the Declaration of Independence—and that government cannot create nor can it extinguish our God-given rights. To do so would be to anoint the government with god-like powers and elevate it above the citizenry.

And that, in a nutshell, is what happens when government officials are allowed to determine who is deserving of constitutional rights and who should be stripped of those rights for whatever reason may be justified by the courts and the legislatures.

In this way, concerns about COVID-19 mandates and bodily integrity are part of a much larger debate over the ongoing power struggle between the citizenry and the government over our property “interest” in our bodies. For instance, who should get to decide how “we the people” care for our bodies? Are we masters over our most private of domains, our bodies? Or are we merely serfs who must answer to an overlord that gets the final say over whether and how we live or die?

This debate over bodily integrity covers broad territory, ranging from abortion and euthanasia to forced blood draws, biometric surveillance and basic healthcare.

Forced vaccinations are just the tip of the iceberg.

Forced vaccinations, forced cavity searches, forced colonoscopies, forced blood draws, forced breath-alcohol tests, forced DNA extractions, forced eye scans, forced inclusion in biometric databases: these are just a few ways in which Americans continue to be reminded that we have no control over what happens to our bodies during an encounter with government officials.

Consider the case of Mitchell vs. Wisconsin in which the U.S. Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision found nothing wrong when police officers read an unconscious man his rights and then proceeded to forcibly and warrantlessly draw his blood while he was still unconscious in order to determine if he could be charged with a DUI.

To sanction this forced blood draw, the cops and the courts hitched their wagon to state “implied consent” laws (all of the states have them), which suggest that merely driving on a state-owned road implies that a person has consented to police sobriety tests, breathalyzers and blood draws.

More than half of the states (29 states) allow police to do warrantless, forced blood draws on unconscious individuals whom they suspect of driving while intoxicated.

Seven state appeals courts have declared these warrantless blood draws when carried out on unconscious suspects are unconstitutional. Courts in seven other states have found that implied consent laws run afoul of the Fourth Amendment. And yet seven other states (including Wisconsin) have ruled that implied consent laws provide police with a free pass when it comes to the Fourth Amendment and forced blood draws.

Read the writing on the wall, and you’ll see how little remains of our right to bodily integrity in the face of the government’s steady assaults on the Fourth Amendment.

Our freedoms—especially the Fourth Amendment—continue to be strangulated by a prevailing view among government bureaucrats that they have the right to search, seize, strip, scan, spy on, probe, pat down, taser, and arrest any individual at any time and for the slightest provocation.

Worse, on a daily basis, Americans are being made to relinquish the most intimate details of who we are—our biological makeup, our genetic blueprints, and our biometrics (facial characteristics and structure, fingerprints, iris scans, etc.)—in order to clear the nearly insurmountable hurdle that increasingly defines life in the United States: we are now guilty until proven innocent.

Such is life in America today that individuals are being threatened with arrest and carted off to jail for the least hint of noncompliance, homes are being raided by militarized SWAT teams under the slightest pretext, property is being seized on the slightest hint of suspicious activity, and roadside police stops have devolved into government-sanctioned exercises in humiliation and degradation with a complete disregard for privacy and human dignity.

While forced searches—of one’s person and property—may span a broad spectrum of methods and scenarios, the common denominator remains the same: a complete disregard for the dignity and rights of the citizenry.

Unfortunately, the indignities being heaped upon us by the architects and agents of the American police state—whether or not we’ve done anything wrong—are just a foretaste of what is to come.

The government doesn’t need to tie you to a gurney and forcibly take your blood or strip you naked by the side of the road in order to render you helpless. As this showdown over COVID-19 vaccine mandates makes clear, the government has other methods—less subtle perhaps but equally devastating—of stripping you of your independence, robbing you of your dignity, and undermining your rights.

With every court ruling that allows the government to operate above the rule of law, every piece of legislation that limits our freedoms, and every act of government wrongdoing that goes unpunished, we’re slowly being conditioned to a society in which we have little real control over our bodies or our lives.

You may not realize it yet, but you are not free.

If you believe otherwise, it is only because you have made no real attempt to exercise your freedoms.

Had you attempted to exercise your freedoms before now by questioning a police officer’s authority, challenging an unjust tax or fine, protesting the government’s endless wars, defending your right to privacy against the intrusion of surveillance cameras, or any other effort that challenges the government’s power grabs and the generally lopsided status quo, you would have already learned the hard way that the American Police State has no appetite for freedom and it does not tolerate resistance.

This is called authoritarianism, a.k.a. totalitarianism, a.k.a. oppression.

As Glenn Greenwald notes for the Guardian:

Oppression is designed to compel obedience and submission to authority. Those who voluntarily put themselves in that state – by believing that their institutions of authority are just and good and should be followed rather than subverted – render oppression redundant, unnecessary. Of course people who think and behave this way encounter no oppression. That’s their reward for good, submissive behavior. They are left alone by institutions of power because they comport with the desired behavior of complacency and obedience without further compulsion. But the fact that good, obedient citizens do not themselves perceive oppression does not mean that oppression does not exist.

Get ready to stand your ground or run for your life.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, our government “of the people, by the people and for the people” has been transformed into a greedy pack of wolves that is on the hunt.

“We the people” are the prey.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
24 Comments
Evil nab
Evil nab
August 19, 2021 6:55 pm

Excellent article.

It saddens me that we have gotten to this point. More so that what has been tolerated up to this point suggests that no matter what indignities and oppression come next, they too will be accepted as meekly as the last.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Evil nab
August 19, 2021 9:41 pm

I wish it weren’t so.

falconflight
falconflight
August 19, 2021 7:05 pm

Well, what we have here is a failure to communicate conviction. We have a very lopsided vote on the diagnosis (And in this article by Whitehead) in my earlier post at another article:

falconflight
I wonder how many here believe that the jab is an engineered weapon to cause large scale death. I guess that I’m still a bit naïve.

yes – up vote
no – down vote
88-6

But, when faced with even voting on resisting democide, costing perhaps hundreds of millions of lives, the conviction is obvious:

falconflight
If you all are correct (And I pray you are not), then everyone with an ounce of morality will have a sacred duty like never imagined to strike out in the most demonstrative manner imaginable, yes? Put me down as a yes, there would be no alternative because otherwise I wouldn’t be worthy of living.

yes – up vote
no – down vote
6-0

Maybe this only signifies fear of AP/Flash or maybe…or another gov’t Provocateur (Me?) turning in your vote in the affirmative to the State…which also proves the point about even theoretical conviction. Quinn or anyone else are welcome to send an anonymous tip to the FBI on my declaration of resistance to an actual democide/genocide scenario.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  falconflight
August 19, 2021 8:09 pm

If we were a threat to “Them” we would be up to our ears in charges of possession of drugs and white sheets. Collectively we are an asset to them because we act as a relief valve.
We have no rights save those we can attain through force or persuasion. Rights are a myth just like the myth that they need a tip from a concerned neighbor.

comment image

falconflight
falconflight
  Anonymous
August 19, 2021 8:33 pm

We aren’t actually conspiring (Thought also will soon be a criminal act), so mocking and cementing public opinion against dissenters is enough. jmo

Quiet Mike
Quiet Mike
  Anonymous
August 19, 2021 9:40 pm

Goldhat: “Badges? We ain’t got no badges. We don’t need no badges. I don’t have to show you any stinkin’ badges!”

pyrrhuis
pyrrhuis
  falconflight
August 19, 2021 9:24 pm

It’s a scam cooked up with US money in a foreign lab to make huge profits for Pharma and give our idiot politicians dictatorial powers…And to enable all that, they banned highly effective treatments, as you all know…Draw your own conclusions…

Old School Counselor
Old School Counselor
  pyrrhuis
August 20, 2021 7:24 am

More likely something happened and it turned into an opportunity.

another Doug
another Doug
August 19, 2021 7:24 pm

There is no pandemic. The illness present is treatable. The “vaccine” for it is poison. Any questions?

GNL
GNL
August 19, 2021 7:40 pm

Yes, ultimately, this is about freedom.

Quiet Mike
Quiet Mike
August 19, 2021 9:29 pm

I still stay in touch w/ a guy I went through Parris Island with. We graduated in Dec. ’69. He sent me an email today as a matter of fact. I enjoy what he has to say and I figure he feels the same or we wouldn’t keep corresponding. I’m speaking solely for myself here but I imagine there are more than a few old buzzards like me that if and when “the stack” shows up at our front door, we ain’t gonna go quietly into that gentle night.

Svarga Loka
Svarga Loka
August 19, 2021 9:36 pm

I had to undergo a genital exam to rule out syphilis as a condition to get a green card. It can be ruled out by blood test, too, but I think they did it for added humiliation. Welcome to the land of the free!

falconflight
falconflight
August 19, 2021 9:47 pm
Cleveland
Cleveland
August 19, 2021 9:59 pm
Sir Willie Wallace
Sir Willie Wallace
  Cleveland
August 20, 2021 7:54 am

I’m holding out for Zeta.

falconflight
falconflight
August 19, 2021 10:21 pm

Four police in Oz jackbooting a guy for sitting outside. Three of the four are female cops. Unbelievable. We will indeed get the tyranny we accept.

https://www.smh.com.au/national/police-commissioner-says-officers-wrongly-issuing-tickets-won-t-be-held-to-account-20210819-p58k76.html

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
August 20, 2021 2:19 am

If there were a smart Republican, they could sponsor a bill to mandate vaccination for all SNAP (Food Stamps) recipients. Not because I’d like to see a vaccine mandate for anyone, but because I’d like to see Keith Ellison and AOC and Rashida Tlaib denounce it.

Ned Kelly
Ned Kelly
August 20, 2021 3:36 am

Hey – you americans have 800 million or so guns so why are YOU being trampled on?
We need ours back – how about a few shipping containers full eh?

Meanwhile in France:

Maybe it’ll take starvation for the human race to rebel…

Sir Willie Wallace
Sir Willie Wallace
  Ned Kelly
August 20, 2021 7:59 am

They’ll break into stores at night to begin with, then distribution centers, then farms and Macron’s shack.

Old School Counselor
Old School Counselor
August 20, 2021 7:18 am

The social contract can be valid in a high trust society in which most people have a shared sense of reality and culture. The United States is a low trust society, thus the only contract possible between the governors and the governors guards and the governed is force. The problem is not freedom. The problem is mutuality.

Our people need to stop talking about freedom and start building mutuality. The Left has mutuality, which is why their Covid rituals and symbols are so effective. They are bonding together against us with those rituals and symbols. We need shared identity and our own rituals and symbols.

Do you see why the Left is destroying our symbols? We cannot fight as a cohesive force without our shared identity.

Svarga Loka
Svarga Loka
  Old School Counselor
August 20, 2021 11:17 am

Awesome comment. I believe, when the time is right, leader(s) will emerge and a cohesive force will be summoned. Slow at first, then with a bang.

The shared symbol could be long hair HSF-style. Just need a symbol for the women, like a Tshirt that says “Fuck Fauci”.

Sir Willie Wallace
Sir Willie Wallace
August 20, 2021 7:51 am

Whoa, whoa! It’s early days for those of us still alive out here. And the fight is coming!

i forget
i forget
August 20, 2021 4:22 pm

The requirement of integrity, moral character – the prerogatives – precedes ability, let alone desire, to respect rights. What a pole vaulter needs be, before s/he can pole vault, is a pole vaulter. People are born, all along the spectrum, not made. And the oughtism spectrum that should, but can’t, is wide.

People who join gangs (cartels, monopolies, governments, etc), sometimes referred to as “made” guys/gals, are security seekers, sinecure seekers, & only rarely do those have integrity, or know/understand/respect the prerogatives.

But even those few that had integrity lost it – devil’s due – when they joined up. There are no friendlies in the mafia.

The “authority” of fraud, & force, that “erases” rights in dehumanized others is a story ~ narrative ~ that subhumans tell themselves, & their prey, their hosts (many of whom are subhuman, too).

96:4. The ubermenschen:untermushen spectrum is all equal before the law (as opposed the legality that calls itself the law). The prerogatives are the law that sorts ‘em out whether that’s “let,” or not.

Security sought at all costs is full of red insecurity seeds. Like spike proteins.

“It is not mere coincidence that almost all prominent Socialists & Communists were of middle-class descent. The basic problem of middle-class life is security – in the national as well as in the personal sense.263 The two classes which have the greatest inner affinities & likeness, the working class & the middle class, both live in the cities & the vast majorities of *both* classes are employees & not free men. There is a difference in income which is nevertheless not so startling as one is wont to believe. The middle classes are forced to spend relatively large sums for the sake of appearances (clothes, furniture, higher rents for “better neighborhood”), which makes it often more difficult for the white-collar class to save & to enjoy *personal* luxuries (as, for instance, holidays, good food, etc.). It is merely the haute bourgeoisie & the small enterpriser who belong sociologically (or rather typologically) to a different “class” or “group.”

But if we compare the worker & the petty bourgeois we must say that the former has many bourgeois & the latter many “proletarian” traits. Of all salaried professions the officials & army men have the greatest security & there has always been in Europe a curious trend in all bourgeois groups for careers in the bureaucracy. He who had the greatest security wasmthe most admired of all. The worker shares this admiration in all bourgeois civilizations & thus he is not immune against the terrible, bourgeois promise of bolshevism: *”Ye shall all be state employees! Ye shall all get insurance & pensions!”*264

264 Bolshevism actually promises to make *everybody* a state employee & thus to assure the maximum of social security. That tendancy was always strong in the European bourgeoisie. Even Herbert Spencer complained about it in his essay “The Coming Slavery.” Yet he made the mistake of considering this craving for government jobs as a desire for an increased dignity. Primarily it was something else – the nostalgia for security; the added dignity of a state priesthood was of secondary value. Spencer writes: “And in Russia where that universality of State-regulation which characterizes the militant type of society has been carried furthest, we see this ambition pushed to its extreme. Says Mr. Wallace, quoting a passage from a play: ‘All men, even shopkeepers & cobblers, aim at becoming officers, & the man who has passed his whole life without official rank seems to be not a human being.’”

To be financially secure, to wear the uniform & to have a safe position; this bourgeois idea of the West grew on eastern soil in tropical richness & splendor. A similar evolution could be observed in Hungary where the *biztos kis allas* (the secure little position) is valued by the bourgeoisie beyond anything else. Count Keyserling in his *Europe* overrates the aristocratic essence of *modern* East Central Europe considerably.” ~ The Menace of the Herd, Kuehnelt-Leddihn