Guest Post by Freed Radical
In the deep past, when you and I were learning arithmetic in government indoctrination centers (public schools), we used the equal sign, ‘=’. Little did we understand the dark implications of such a symbol, embodying white supremacy, slavery, racism and, even lynching and pickup truck dragging. Fortunately, today the woke have taught us the truth of ‘=’, and how it is used as a tool of oppression every bit as wicked as US government slavers on horseback whipping fleeing Haitians.
Also in those times, the word ‘consensus’ was rarely used, only applying to the mystical predictions of committees of economists, which we all ignored. We have learned however, through the enlightenment of modern progressive liberalism, that consensus is a term rich in meaning and able to move our society in a positive direction. Today, every upward movement you can name is associated with the consensus of educated professionals, scientists, medical doctors, and leaders of the cause. Consensus is power, and power is, well, power.
To grasp a concept and use it effectively, we have to attach language, symbology, and context. Where would red be without apple, where would ho be without rap, and where would stupid be without the milk crate challenge? To further ground and grow the concept of consensus in our society, I propose a new glyph, a new mathematical operator if you will, the consensus sign. This new symbol replaces the outdated and racist equal sign with something more in tune with modern thinking, in ways I will now illustrate.
First, the form of the consensus sign. We need a symbol that is easily written by young hands, easy to typeset, and easy to recognize. I propose the following:
This symbol may look similar to the oppressive equal sign, but it has many advanced qualities. First of all, it has a curved appearance like the inclusive LGBTQ multi-color rainbow. Second, it is fun to draw. What kid has not used his/her/they/them box of multicultural crayons to draw a rainbow, imagining the day of equity and fairness for all peoples of color and various sexual persuasions and genders. (It’s easy if you try.) Third, the symbol is flexible, such that anyone drawing the consensus sign like this:
will not be ostracized or bullied, but rather will be celebrated for their diversity. There is no such thing as a sloppy human being, just as there is no illegal human being.
The consensus sign is applied much like the now taboo equal sign:
1+1 4
Here we see the consensus is that one plus one is four, which is of course totally valid, depending on the situation and level of systemic oppression in play. (Consult any Congressional appropriations bill for more examples.)
However, the consensus sign applies in many other non-mathematical contexts, such as these popular instances (pronounce the sign “by consensus is”, or “by consensus are”):
global warming true
a fetus not alive
vaccination preventing infection
old people not worth keeping alive
infinite spending and debt good
government dependency ultimate freedom
9/11 our fault
war waged by Republicans bad
war waged by Democrats good
news media our friend
See? This is a powerful tool to convey critical concepts to the masses.
The consensus sign also will create hope and change. With every new problem humanity encounters, the consensus sign will be out front, leading societal evolution. For example, as domestic terrorism increases in the US,
interning domestic terrorists good for America
That consensus is in our near future. The current consensus is this:
white people bad
This consensus is even approved by a consensus of white people, with only a few racists in the south opposing.
Consensus is also independent of outmoded concepts like truth. Consensus forms its own truth:
focusing on truth racism
This is also a powerful tool in shaping our society.
Some consensus seems contradictory:
conservative consensus no consensus at all
But when we consider that there can only be valid progressive consensus, then it all makes sense. Conservative consensus is actually conspiracy to commit domestic terrorism.
How do we reach consensus? Consensus sometimes comes about when people happen to agree on a topic and course of action. But most often consensus is simply bought, as with the CARES Act sending 100 billion dollars to hospitals, purchasing their consensus on the pandemic. The absolutists would call this bribery, but the consensus is that
paid consensus not bribery
and so it must be, because of consensus.
Consensus is also intentionally promoted and grown by the best and brightest among us, using our allies in the fight for one world government, the new media. The consensus sign not only expresses existing consensus, but our I have a dream of a consensus we envision for a better world, also promoted by media. The previously referenced song, Imagine, is packed with forward looking consensus, from one of our brightest, and is only now coming to fruition:
religion harmful and unnecessary
God nonexistent
heaven and hell figments of deranged minds
having no countries world peace
owning nothing beneficial for everybody
As consensus forms, people see the right way forward, and move in that direction. For the others:
those not for us haters
With consensus, the only constant is change. If the current consensus ever becomes obsolete, new consensus must be formed:
old consensus discarded and forgotten
This can be accomplished at light speed in today’s Internet connected world. Since absolutes are oppressive and racist, absolutes such as truth, consensus can easily compensate for changing conditions in the world without the inconvenience of thought or logic.
Some may ask, consensus of whom? What people are involved? The consensus responds
consensus of whom something you don’t need to know
which is the beauty of consensus for those working together to run other peoples’ lives. After all, consensus is not about consensus, but power, and, well, power is about power.
Consensus is a useful tool of subversion against our enemies, if you have not gathered that by now. Planting several opposing consensuses in our opponents’ camp guarantees perpetual strife and infighting, keeping them out of our way. This is particularly effectively among conservative intellectual groups and is the tool of choice against religious types, none more than people of the cloth. Multi-sided consensus on artificial, meaningless, unprovable and useless theories (even if correct) has kept Christians fighting amongst themselves for two thousand years. It matters not how outrageous is the premise, the conflicts endure through the centuries, and Internet videos have given these arguments eternal life. Not to give away the game, but here are just a few.
the rapture long past
the rapture never happening
the rapture scheduled for future time X
Jews God’s chosen people
Jews tools of the devil
my theology the only theology that is correct
Nimrod the father of the lizard people
The flexibility of consensus can be seen today in the pandemic response. The initial consensus that masks do not protect against viruses was quickly changed to require one mask per person. Then the consensus adapted to require two masks. Then it grew to require vaccinations, and now booster shots. In Australia, the consensus supports detaining the sick and infected in hotels, and jailing vaccine and lockdown resisters.
Now a person might look at those specific actions and be offended or shocked. That’s the wrong way to look at things. Since there are no absolutes, the consensus view is by definition the right view, and whatever happens in support of the consensus is by definition the right thing to do. This simplifies the decision making process considerably, relieving those in charge from any restrictions of stale morality.
There are people who do resist the progressive flow of consensus.
consensus resisters obstacles to progress
These people impede the entirety of society, worldwide, and must be eliminated.
consensus resisters to be eliminated
In spite of our best efforts, these resisters persist in living free. They persist in building free community. They persist in demanding and exercising their rights, rights which of course by their very nature oppress people of color.
exercising rights oppressive to people of color
They even attempt to drag people of color away into freedom. Thus,
people of color being free bad for consensus
and this must be stopped at all costs. The biggest danger to consensus is an individual who champions absolute truth, freedom, and independent thought. The consensus is that
independent people slated for death
and with there being no moral restrictions in a consensus based society, this is not a problem, except that (by their consensus, not ours)
armed people fighting back
We’re still working on that one, to develop an acceptable consensus.
I hope you will embrace the consensus sign and further move our society toward the sparkling nirvana that awaits. Spread this new tool of language and change on social media, and to all your consensus approved cultural diversities.
Next week, I’ll be presenting the brand new collective societal suicide sign. Don’t miss it!
That is such a logical presentation of why consensus might come to mean equity or worse it is frightening.
There are some terrible assaults on common-sensical words and viewpoints.
How can a symbol used commonly in most studies of arithmetic, i.e., the equal (=) sign, be considered racist? What madness is this, Lear?
= denotes an absolute answer and we know that answers can be different for different people and errbody know dat maff be rayciss!!!!
You have to learn to trust the science.
“… artificial, meaningless, unprovable and useless theories (even if correct)… It matters not how outrageous is the premise”
So why try to find anything correct in all that middle-eastern nonsense?
I prefer the second rendition of the consensus sign. It takes a broad view from the left side and narrows it down to the consensus side.
https://imgflip.com/i/5oup3y
I just stick with ” ≠ “.
Because inequality is my creed.
Freed Radical:
Have you ever seen the film The Miracle Season?
A seriously inspirational story about Caroline Line’s legacy, the core message showcased the Full of Life attributes of Caroline Line.
Caroline Line was not a bitter person; she experienced tremendous love. Caroline Line was both fiercely competitive and genuinely All Sunshine!
Regardless of an individual’s roots, there are only a handful of ways to experience Full of Life attributes. Bitterness was void in her legacy.
The Bitter, Perverse, Ruthless World mocks that All Sunshine that she and others have radiated.
A consensus worthy of a legacy to uphold to those such as Caroline Line and her All Sunshine wisdom is greatly appreciated.
They can’t conceal or hide the insane global level of outright stealing without getting rid of the “=” sign. It’s the one indispensable requirement for an audit.
Brilliant. Conventional wisdom is not the same and in a mad world is often at odds with common sense.