Witness the real time red pilling of an establishment physician. Youtube personality and Covid vaccine proponent, Dr. John Campbell goes over the Pfizer document dump.
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Real Time Red Pill
When will the trials start is what I want to know…
I know… why not appoint a panel of politicals to get to the bottom of things and afterwards they can convene a judicial panel to examine the politicals findings and determine whether charges can be brought against any alleged criminal activity is say ten tears or so…
I wonder if durham will have some time to chase this all down or if he’ll still be busy with the investigation he’s currently been running for….
This is the result of living in a bubble. Doctors have a large capacity of memory/recall. But this does not make them smart as they believe if one colleague says something they agree because they are part of that club. I recall a group of doctors sitting at their desks in an ER gleaming at their recent investments and self back slapping of Elizabeth Holme’s Theranos. I looked at them and asked, “You understand they are under investigation for widespread fraud & activities that have resulted in the deaths of misdiagnosed cancer patients?” They continued on with their elite dribble but I’m sure by now they lost 10s of thousands.
A Netflix documentary “A Good American” about metadata collecting of US citizens that was allowed and funded after 9/11. One retired worker that I pictured working at the NSA complex that spent her whole time driving back & forth to her Silver Springs home, drinking Earl Grey tea while retired, stated, “I knew there were bad people in the world, but I never thought there would be bad people in the NSA.” Just clueless, absolutely clueless in their little world that they think the world revolves around them.
But at least this doctor has the ability to look himself in the mirror. It’s unfortunate it happens after so many have been injured and killed while still more to come.
Posting a link on farcebook of this will get it labeled “False information” which if you read their explanation is actually saying it is “misleading”, not actually false. Their saying it is false is what is false. Their argument is the dead people and people who had serious side effects shortly after getting the shot were not proven to have suffered because of the shots, it could have been co-incidence is not the same as saying that makes these side effect claims false. It doesn’t. Calling the jabs “safe” is what is false because they were not proven safe with so many unknown cause health issues occurring just after the jabs. All Campbell is saying is common sense caution and a reasonable questioning judgement was not observed considering the data being used to declare mRNA safe. All Campbell did was review the documents and say in his judgement they are most worrisome. I cannot find anything false about that.
This guy is so far behind the 8-ball…his pool table must be 10 miles long. Took him this much time to come around?
I knew early on in 2020 from reading the automatic earth website this virus was just a nasty flu, and the vaccine was bad mo-jo.
agree, would add CYA public “mea culpa, don’t hang me”. Not buying it.
It is interesting that the video remains on YouTube. Perhaps because he is so cautious in his analysis and while asking questions so people can come to their own conclusions.
In the video, he cites the Pfizer document as acknowledging 42,086 case reports for adverse events and 1,223 deaths during the 3 months from 12-1-2020 through 2-28-2021.
Then, he references the following “Adverse Events” (AEs) from the Pfizer document:
– 51,335 general disorders
– 25,957 nervous system disorders
– 17,283 musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
– 14,096 gastrointestinal disorders
– 8,476 skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
– 8,848 respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
– 4,610 infections and infestations
Additionally, he cites the Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) that comprise the final 8 pages of the appendix in the 38-page document – and this AESI in particular:
– 1,403 cardiovascular (or 3.3% of the total adverse events dataset)
Obviously, the adverse events add up to more than 42,086 case reports so I am wondering why the discrepancy?
Perhaps case reports are different than AEs and AESIs?
Or, on page 8 of the original PDF (this hyperlink actually downloads the PDF so only click if you wish to download), there is a colored bar-graph that lists “system organ classes” and identified according to “nonserious” and “serious”.
But even then, the numbers don’t appear to match the 42,086 case reports.
Can anyone reading this explain the discrepancy between case reports, AEs, and AESIs?
Because I would want to know before forwarding this video onto any intelligent Covidians (yes, they exist).
Otherwise, I would just use the actual document and stress the 8-page appendix of adverse events and the 1,223 deaths. In response, I’m sure the Covidians would claim these as acceptable in light of millions of doses administered. To which I would ask them these questions: Then why did it take a judge to release the information? Why the secrecy? What else might they be hiding?
In rereading the document, I will attempt to answer my own question: It appears the 42K+ case reports tied to the vaccine contain 158,893 events that “may be due to an underlying disease or some other factor(s) such as past medical history or concomitant medication” (page 6/38 of the document)
How many people were in the trial?
This is data from their trials, is it not?
That particular info appears to be redacted, but the two FDA officials that were referenced the video, in their August 2021 statements, claimed the vaccines were “safe and effective” for “millions” of people.
Yet the Pfizer vaccine was cleared for release in the U.S. in mid-December 2020 and the documents covered Dec 1, 2020 thru Feb 28, 2021.
So, how many people Pfizer-vaxxed in that time for this trial? It appears we’re not allowed to know. Probably for our own good, of course.
I have been following this doctor for about a year. Never been on board with his unbending adherence to gubmit vaccine policy but did find his take somewhat palatable compared to some other I have seen. He was never hyperbolic when discussing it.
Anyways I watched this last week, whenever it came out, and was quite fascinated by the way he changed tact during his “talk”. You could see the switcheroo as the cognitive dissonance brought on as the information he was revealing washed over him.
I do find it hard to give him a pass on what he did these past two years. He should have been asking serious questions about vaccine safety and effectiveness long before now. It shouldn’t need this document dump to do the right thing. I mean, he is a smart guy, way smarter than me, so there really isn’t be any excuse to feign surprise now at the situation he finds himself in.
And it is still the early innings in the document releases. Fact is the good Doctor is going to be swallowing a whole more red pills in the coming months… sucks to be him.
I was thinking the same thing. While he has always been more cautious than others, he has been carrying the line that the vaccines are safe and effective when there were always so many unknowns about long term safety.
As soon as anyone tells me a pharmaceutical is ‘safe’ my bullshit detector goes off.
Under the right circumstances and in the wrong body none of them are ‘safe’. They have varying degrees of risk associated with them (some much lower than others) but none of them are *without risk*.
The media and the government pushed this stuff on the general public like a dealer pushes crack on a junkie. That was all I needed to hear.
“The media and the government pushed this stuff on the general public like a dealer pushes crack on a junkie. That was all I needed to hear.”
That was the #1 reason for me as well.
Either the red pill wore off, or he was force-fed several blue pills to get him back in line. Four days later, “18 million excess deaths” and not one mention of the vax. Only reasons given: covid deaths under-reported; results of lockdown measures, violence, alcohol/ drug abuse, inability or reluctance to access healthcare (3:45). Any increase in future cancer deaths from the last one (12:50).